Indymac Bancorp, Inc.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number: 1-8972
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other
jurisdiction of incorporation)
888 East Walnut
Street, Pasadena, California
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
95-3983415
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
91101-7211
(Zip Code)
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(800) 669-2300
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 Par
Value
(including related preferred stock purchase rights)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
WIRES Units
(Trust Preferred Securities and Warrants)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
[None.]
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K þ.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer” in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
Based on the closing price for shares of Common Stock as of
June 30, 2006, the aggregate market value of Common Stock
held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately
$3,119,794,294. For the purposes of the foregoing calculation
only, in addition to affiliated companies, all directors and
executive officers of the registrant have been deemed affiliates.
As of February 16, 2007, 72,329,748 shares of IndyMac
Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock, $.01 par value per share, were
outstanding.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting —
Part III
INDYMAC
BANCORP, INC.
2006
ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
1
INDYMAC
BANCORP, INC.
2006
ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Items 1.
and 7.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Forward-Looking Statements
|
|
|
4
|
|
Item 1. Business
|
|
|
4
|
|
Business Model
|
|
|
5
|
|
Segments
|
|
|
6
|
|
Mortgage Banking
|
|
|
6
|
|
Production Divisions
|
|
|
7
|
|
Loan Servicing
|
|
|
8
|
|
Thrift.
|
|
|
9
|
|
Portfolio Divisions
|
|
|
9
|
|
Regulation and Supervision
|
|
|
10
|
|
General
|
|
|
10
|
|
Regulation of Indymac Bank
|
|
|
10
|
|
General
|
|
|
10
|
|
Qualified Thrift Lender Test
|
|
|
10
|
|
Regulatory Capital Requirements
|
|
|
11
|
|
Insurance of Deposit Accounts
|
|
|
11
|
|
Capital Distribution Regulations
|
|
|
12
|
|
Community Reinvestment Act and the
Fair Lending Laws
|
|
|
12
|
|
Privacy Protection
|
|
|
12
|
|
Income Tax Considerations
|
|
|
12
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
12
|
|
Competition
|
|
|
12
|
|
Website Access to United States
Securities and Exchange Commission Filings
|
|
|
13
|
|
Item 7. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
|
|
20
|
|
Overview
|
|
|
20
|
|
Summary of Business Segment Results
|
|
|
21
|
|
Detail Channel Segment Results
|
|
|
24
|
|
Product Profitability Analysis
|
|
|
29
|
|
Loan Production
|
|
|
37
|
|
Loan Sales
|
|
|
40
|
|
Mortgage Servicing and Other
Retained Assets
|
|
|
43
|
|
Mortgage Servicing and Mortgage
Servicing Rights
|
|
|
43
|
|
Other Retained Assets
|
|
|
45
|
|
Valuation of MSRs, Interest-Only,
Prepayment Penalty, and Residual Securities
|
|
|
49
|
|
Hedging Interest Rate Risk on
Servicing-Related Assets
|
|
|
50
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities and
Loans Held for Investment
|
|
|
50
|
|
SFR Mortgage Loans Held for
Investment
|
|
|
51
|
|
Consumer Construction Division
|
|
|
53
|
|
Home Equity Division
|
|
|
54
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Homebuilder Division
|
|
|
55
|
|
Warehouse Lending Division
|
|
|
56
|
|
Net Interest Margin
|
|
|
57
|
|
Interest Rate Sensitivity
|
|
|
59
|
|
Credit Risk and Reserves
|
|
|
60
|
|
Secondary Market Reserve
|
|
|
64
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
65
|
|
Future Outlook
|
|
|
65
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
66
|
|
Overview
|
|
|
66
|
|
Principal Sources of Cash
|
|
|
66
|
|
Loan Sales and Securitizations
|
|
|
66
|
|
Advances from Federal Home
Loan Bank
|
|
|
66
|
|
Deposits/Retail Bank
|
|
|
67
|
|
Trust Preferred Securities
and Warrants
|
|
|
68
|
|
Other Borrowings, Excluding
Subordinated Debentures Underlying Trust Preferred
Securities
|
|
|
68
|
|
Direct Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
70
|
|
Capital Raising and Deployment
Strategies
|
|
|
70
|
|
Principal Uses of Cash
|
|
|
70
|
|
Regulatory Capital Requirements
|
|
|
70
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
|
|
|
70
|
|
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
71
|
|
Risk Factors That May Affect
Future Results
|
|
|
72
|
|
Risks Related to Our Business
Generally
|
|
|
72
|
|
Risks Related to Our Interest Rate
Hedging Strategies
|
|
|
74
|
|
Risks Related to Our Valuation of
Assets
|
|
|
76
|
|
Risks Related to Our Assumption of
Credit Risk
|
|
|
77
|
|
Risks Related to Our Liquidity
|
|
|
79
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies and
Judgments
|
|
|
80
|
|
AAA-Rated Interest-Only Securities
|
|
|
80
|
|
Mortgage Servicing Rights
|
|
|
81
|
|
Non-Investment Grade Securities
and Residuals
|
|
|
82
|
|
General
|
|
|
82
|
|
Loss Estimates
|
|
|
83
|
|
Prepayment Speeds
|
|
|
83
|
|
Discount Rates
|
|
|
83
|
|
Derivatives and Other Hedging
Instruments
|
|
|
83
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
84
|
|
Secondary Market Reserve
|
|
|
85
|
|
Sensitivity Analysis
|
|
|
85
|
|
3
PART I
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained in this
Form 10-K
may be deemed to be forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the federal securities laws. The words
“anticipate,” “believe,”
“estimate,” “expect,” “project,”
“plan,” “forecast,” “intend,”
“goal,” “target,” and similar expressions
identify forward-looking statements that are inherently subject
to risks and uncertainties, many of which cannot be predicted or
quantified. Actual results and the timing of certain events
could differ materially from those projected in or contemplated
by the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors,
including, the effect of economic and market conditions
including industry volumes and margins; the level and volatility
of interest rates; the Company’s hedging strategies, hedge
effectiveness and asset and liability management; the accuracy
of subjective estimates used in determining the fair value of
financial assets of Indymac; the credit risks with respect to
our loans and other financial assets; the actions undertaken by
both current and potential new competitors; the availability
of funds from Indymac’s lenders and from loan sales and
securitizations to fund mortgage loan originations and portfolio
investments; the execution of Indymac’s growth plans and
ability to gain market share in a significant market transition;
the impact of disruptions triggered by natural disasters;
the impact of current, pending or future legislation,
regulations or litigation; and other risk factors
described in the reports that Indymac files with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, including this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
its Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
and its reports on
Form 8-K.
While all of the above items are important, the highlighted
items represent those that, in management’s view, merit
increased focus given current conditions.
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. is the holding company for IndyMac Bank,
F.S.B., a $29 billion hybrid thrift/mortgage bank,
headquartered in Pasadena, California (“Indymac Bank”
or “Bank”). Indymac Bank originates mortgages in all
50 states of the U.S. and is the largest savings and loan
headquartered in Los Angeles County, California, the seventh
largest nationwide, based on assets according to American
Banker, the ninth largest residential mortgage originator
according to the National Mortgage News based on third quarter
2006 mortgage origination volume, and the eleventh largest
mortgage servicer according to National Mortgage News as of
September 30, 2006. Indymac Bank, operating as a hybrid
thrift/mortgage banker, provides cost-efficient financing for
the acquisition, development, and improvement of single-family
homes. Indymac also provides financing secured by single-family
homes and other banking products to facilitate consumers’
personal financial goals. We facilitate the acquisition,
development, and improvement of single-family homes through our
e-MITS(R)
(Electronic Mortgage Information and Transaction System)
platform that automates underwriting, risk-based pricing and
rate locking on a nationwide basis via the Internet at the point
of sale. Indymac Bank offers highly competitive mortgage
products and services that are tailored to meet the needs of
both consumers and mortgage professionals.
Indymac (then known as Countrywide Mortgage Investments, Inc.)
was founded as a passive mortgage real estate investment trust
(“REIT”) in 1985 and transitioned its business model
to become an active, operating mortgage lender in 1993. In
response to the global liquidity crisis in the fourth quarter of
1998 in which many non-regulated financial institutions,
mortgage lenders and mortgage REITs were adversely impacted or
did not survive, we determined that it would be advantageous to
become a depository institution. The depository structure
provides significant advantages in the form of diversified
financing sources, the retention of capital to support growth,
and a strong platform for the origination of mortgages.
Effective January 1, 2000, we terminated our status as a
REIT and converted to a fully taxable entity, and, on
July 1, 2000, we acquired SGV Bancorp, Inc.
(“SGVB”), which then was the parent of First Federal
Savings and Loan Association of San Gabriel Valley, a
federal savings association. We contributed substantially all of
our assets and operations to the subsidiary savings association,
which we renamed Indymac Bank.
We entered the reverse mortgage industry through the acquisition
of 93.75% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Financial
Freedom Holdings, Inc. (“Financial Freedom”), the
leading provider of reverse mortgages in the United States of
America, and the related assets from Lehman Brothers Bank,
F.S.B. and its affiliates on July 16, 2004. The remaining
shares of the common stock of Financial Freedom, constituting
6.25% of the outstanding shares of common stock, were held by
its chief executive officer, James Mahoney, after the
4
acquisition. The acquisition was consummated as part of our
strategy to increase market share by offering niche mortgage
products and servicing a broad customer base. On July 3,
2006, the Company purchased from James Mahoney the remaining
6.25% interest in Financial Freedom for $40 million.
Financial Freedom now operates as a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Indymac Bank.
References to “Indymac Bancorp” or the “Parent
Company” refer to the parent company alone, while
references to “Indymac,” the “Company,” or
“we” refer to the parent company and its consolidated
subsidiaries. References to “Indymac Bank” or the
“Bank” refer to our subsidiary IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.
and its consolidated subsidiaries.
BUSINESS
MODEL
Indymac’s hybrid thrift/mortgage banking business model is
the basis for our corporate structure. Our model provides a
strong framework for growth over the long-term and the
flexibility to operate efficiently in varying interest-rate
environments. Our businesses are aligned into two primary
operating segments, the mortgage banking and the thrift
segments. Mortgage banking involves the originating and trading
of mortgage loans and related assets, and the servicing of these
loans. The revenues from mortgage banking consist primarily of
gains on sale of the loans; interest income earned while the
loans are held for sale; and the servicing fees. The thrift side
of our business invests in single-family residential mortgage
assets including mortgage-backed securities (“MBSs”)
which we hold on our balance sheet. Revenues consist primarily
of spread income, which represents the difference between the
interest earned on the loans and the cost of funds.
As a result of the quick asset turn times associated with
mortgage banking, it is less capital-intensive than thrift
investing and offers higher returns on invested capital.
However, mortgage banking is cyclical: origination volumes are
closely correlated to interest rates, rising when rates fall and
falling when rates rise.
Thrift investing requires more capital than mortgage banking,
resulting in lower returns on invested capital. However, the
returns tend to be more stable and less cyclical than those from
mortgage banking, and they generally improve as returns on
mortgage banking decline. As interest rates rise, there is
little incentive for borrowers to refinance, so portfolio runoff
(i.e., reduction) is reduced.
Our hybrid business model allows us to take advantage of both
the higher returns on invested equity offered by mortgage
banking, and the earnings stability offered by a traditional
savings and loan institution. The common denominator of the
Company’s business is providing consumers with
single-family residential mortgages through relationships with
each segment’s core customers via the channels in which we
operate. Prudent allocation of capital between our mortgage
banking and thrift segments, depending on the interest rate
environment, market conditions and expected return on equity,
serves to stabilize earnings through the mortgage cycles. With
our hybrid model, we can take advantage of opportunities to fund
and sell loans, but we also prudently build a portfolio of
high-quality investment loans and mortgage-backed securities, as
well as a substantial servicing portfolio to provide more
consistent income throughout the interest rate cycle. By
deploying capital in the area that offers the best returns, we
are able to stabilize earnings through a variety of economic and
interest rate cycles.
Indymac’s long-term strategy focuses on gaining a larger
share of the mortgage origination market without compromising
profitability goals. During 2006, we successfully executed our
strategy and reached a record level of mortgage production of
$90.0 billion and increased our market share by 78% to
3.58% while the market volume declined. According to the
National Mortgage News, by the third quarter of 2006, we were
the ninth largest originator of mortgage loans in the United
States of America. We will continue to leverage our
mortgage-banking infrastructure, increase our marketing and
sales efforts, and expand our geographic presence in an effort
to gain additional market share in the future.
In the fourth quarter of 2006, we saw a fairly dramatic decrease
in the return on equity (“ROE”) in our thrift segment,
mostly caused by net interest margin erosion in our whole loan
and MBS portfolios. As such, it does not make economic sense for
us to grow these portfolios to the extent that we had previously
planned. While we will continue to maintain some level of
investments in our whole loan and MBS portfolios, going forward
the growth of these portfolios will be based on the extent to
which (1) their ROEs exceed our cost of both core and
risk-based capital or (2) they are needed to support our
core mortgage banking investments in mortgage servicing rights
and residual and non-investment grade securities, if their ROEs
are below our cost of capital. These changes in our business
model and strategy represent fine-tuning more than a major
strategic shift.
5
SEGMENTS
Indymac is structured to achieve synergies among its operations
and to enhance customer service, operating through its two main
segments, the mortgage banking and the thrift segments. The
common denominator of the Company’s business is providing
consumers with single-family residential mortgages through
relationships with each segment’s core customers via the
channel in which each operates.
For further information on the revenues earned and expenses
incurred by each of our segments, refer to
“Note 3 — Segment Reporting” included
in the Company’s consolidated financial statements
incorporated herein.
MORTGAGE
BANKING
The mortgage banking segment’s core activities are loan
production, loan sales, and the performance of our servicing
functions. Loan production is achieved by delivering a suite of
mortgage products, predominantly prime credit quality, to our
customers using a technology-based approach across multiple
channels on a nationwide basis supported by 16 strategically
distributed regional mortgage centers. Our broad product line
includes adjustable-rate mortgages (“ARMs”),
intermediate term fixed-rate loans, pay option ARMs offering
borrowers multiple payment options, fixed-rate mortgages, both
conforming and non-conforming,
construction-to-permanent
loans, subprime mortgages, home equity lines of credits
(“HELOCs”) and reverse mortgages.
Our largest production channel, mortgage professionals group,
originates or purchases mortgage loans through its relationships
with mortgage brokers, mortgage bankers, and financial
institutions. We also offer mortgages and reverse mortgages to
consumers through channels such as direct mail, Internet leads,
online advertising, affinity relationships, real estate
professionals, including realtors, and through our Southern
California retail banking branches.
When we have accumulated a sufficient volume of loans with
similar characteristics, generally $100 million to
$1.5 billion in principal amount, we sell the loans in the
secondary market. The length of time between when we originate
or purchase a mortgage loan and when we sell or securitize the
mortgage loan generally ranges from 10 to 90 days,
depending on factors such as loan volume by product type and
market fluctuations in the prices of MBS. On average during
2006, we sold loans within 50 days of purchase or
origination, down from 52 days in 2005.
We sell the majority of the mortgage loans that we originate or
purchase (88% in 2006). The loans are usually sold on a
non-recourse basis, but we do make certain representations and
warranties concerning the loans. We generally retain the
servicing rights with respect to loans sold to the government
sponsored enterprises (“GSEs”), primarily Federal
National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company (“Freddie Mac”).
The credit losses on these loans are absorbed by the GSEs. We
pay guarantee fees to the GSEs to compensate them for their
assumption of credit risk.
We also sell loans through private-label securitizations. Loans
sold through private-label securitizations consist primarily of
non-conforming loans and subprime loans. The securitization
process involves the sale of the loans to one of our
wholly-owned bankruptcy remote special purpose entities, which
then sells the loans to a separate, transaction-specific
securitization trust in exchange for cash and certain trust
interests that we retain. The securitization trust issues and
sells undivided interests to third-party investors that entitle
the investors to specified cash flows generated from the
securitized loans. These undivided interests are usually
represented by certificates with varying interest rates and are
secured by the payments on the loans acquired by the trust, and
commonly include senior and subordinated classes. The senior
class securities are usually rated “AAA” by at least
two of the major independent rating agencies and have priority
over the subordinated classes in the receipt of payments. We
have no obligation to provide funding support (other than
temporary servicing advances) to either the third-party
investors or securitization trusts. Neither the third-party
investors nor the securitization trusts have recourse to our
assets or us, and neither have the ability to require us to
repurchase their securities. We do make certain representations
and warranties concerning the loans, such as lien status or
mortgage insurance coverage, and if we are found to have
breached a representation or warranty, we could be required to
repurchase the loan from the securitization trust. We do not
guarantee any securities issued by the securitization trusts.
The securitization trusts represent “qualified special
purpose entities,” which meet the legal isolation criteria
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140,
“Accounting for Transfer and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”
(“SFAS 140”), and are therefore not consolidated
for financial reporting purposes. We also sell loans on
6
a whole-loan basis to institutional investors with servicing on
such loans either retained by us or released to the
institutional investors.
In addition to the cash we receive from the sale of MBS, we
typically retain certain interests in the securitization trust
as payment for the loans. These retained interests may include
mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”), AAA-rated
interest-only securities, AAA-rated senior securities, AAA-rated
principal-only securities, subordinated classes of securities,
residual securities, securities associated with prepayment
charges on the underlying mortgage loans, cash reserve funds, or
an overcollateralization account. Other than AAA-rated
interest-only and principal-only securities, the AAA-rated
senior securities, the securities associated with prepayment
charges on the underlying mortgage loans, and the MSRs, these
retained interests are subordinated and serve as credit
enhancement for the more senior securities issued by the
securitization trust. We are entitled to receive payment on most
of these retained interests only after the third party investors
are repaid their investment plus interest and there is excess
cash in the securitization trust. Our ability to obtain
repayment of our residual interests depends solely on the
performance of the underlying mortgage loans. Material adverse
changes in performance of the loans, including actual credit
losses and prepayment speeds differing from our assumptions, may
have a significant adverse effect on the value of these retained
interests.
We usually retain the servicing rights for the securitized
mortgage loans, as discussed in the description of servicing
operations below under the caption “Loan Servicing.”
As a servicer, we are entitled to receive a servicing fee equal
to a specified percentage of the outstanding principal balance
of each loan. This servicing fee is calculated and payable on a
monthly basis. We may also be entitled to receive additional
servicing compensation, such as late payment fees or prepayment
charges. Our servicing fees have priority in payment over each
class of securities issued by the securitization trusts.
Refer to “Note 14 — Transfers and Servicing
of Financial Assets” in the accompanying notes to
consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Production
Divisions
Mortgage
Professionals Group
Our largest production channel, mortgage professionals group,
was responsible for 86% of our total mortgage production during
2006. This group is responsible for the production of mortgage
loans through relationships with mortgage brokers, mortgage
bankers, financial institutions, capital market participants
across the country, and homebuilders via three channels:
wholesale, correspondent, and conduit. Mortgage loans could be
either funded by us (wholesale) or obtained as closed loans on a
flow basis (correspondent) or in bulk purchases (conduit). When
originating or purchasing mortgage loans, we generally acquire
the rights to “service” the mortgage loans (as
described below). When we sell the loans, we may either retain
the related servicing rights and service the loans through our
Home Loan Servicing division or sell those rights. See
“Loan Servicing” below.
This division targets customers based on their loan production
volume, product mix and projected revenue to us. The sales force
is responsible for maintaining and increasing loan production
from these customers by marketing our strengths, which include a
“one stop shop” for all products, competitive pricing
and response time efficiencies in the loan purchase process
through our
e-MITS
underwriting process and high customer service standards.
During 2006, to continue our emphasis on increasing production
capacity and geographic penetration to build market share, the
division opened three new regional centers. With these three new
centers, the division currently has 16 regional centers. Looking
ahead, we plan to add several new regional offices in the coming
years as a way of increasing geographic penetration to gain
market share in target markets, improving customer service, and
improving operational efficiencies.
The retail lending group, a division of the mortgage
professionals group, will open storefront mortgage offices in
areas supported by regional operating centers. These offices
will offer mortgage services through the retail channel,
anchored by a proven local producing leader. The choice of areas
in which to open retail mortgage offices will be determined
based upon several factors, such as the availability of local
talent and the demographic characteristics of the area. We plan
to open 15 to 20 retail mortgage offices in 2007.
In February 2007, the Company entered into a definitive
agreement to purchase assets of the retail mortgage banking
platform of New York Mortgage Company, LLC (“NYMC”), a
wholly owned taxable REIT subsidiary of
7
New York Mortgage Trust, Inc. As part of the transaction, the
Company will hire a majority of NYMC’s employees, including
approximately 200 retail loan officers and a strong retail
branch management team. This acquisition is part of our strategy
to build our retail platform. See “Note 27 —
Subsequent Events” in the accompanying notes to
consolidated financial statements for further discussion on the
acquisition.
Consumer
Direct
This channel markets mortgage products directly to existing and
new consumers nationwide through direct mail, Internet lead
aggregator, outbound telesales, online advertising, and referral
programs, as well as our Southern California retail banking
branches.
Through our call center operations and our Southern California
retail banking branch network, loan consultants counsel
consumers on the loan application process and make lending
decisions using our
e-MITS
technology. Loans are processed and funded by our operations
group within our regional call centers.
Financial
Freedom
Through the acquisition of Financial Freedom, we have become the
leading provider of reverse mortgages in the United States. This
group is responsible for the generation and servicing of
predominantly reverse mortgage products with senior customers
via the affinity business unit to institutional relationships,
traditional wholesale mortgage relationship sales force and a
retail loan officer sales force. Reverse mortgages allow
homeowners age 62 and older to convert home equity into
cash to supplement their retirement income. The equity may be
withdrawn in a lump sum, as annuity-style monthly payments, as a
credit line, or any combination thereof. Reverse mortgages
offered by us feature: no recourse to the borrower, no repayment
during the borrower’s occupancy of the home, and a
repayment amount that cannot exceed the value of the home (after
costs of sale). With the increased familiarity that senior
homeowners and their financial advisors have with this product,
the reverse mortgage market is expected to continue to grow.
Comparing 2006 to 2005, our reverse mortgage volume increased
71% to $5.0 billion in 2006 from $2.9 billion in 2005.
However, the competition is expected to intensify in this
market. As a result, margin for this product will be negatively
impacted.
Loan
Servicing
MSRs
and Other Retained Assets
This division manages the assets the Company retains in
conjunction with its mortgage loan sales. The assets held
include the following asset classes: (i) mortgage servicing
rights (“MSRs”), interest-only strips, prepayment
penalty securities and residual securities;
(ii) derivatives and securities held as hedges of such
assets, including forward rate agreements swaps, options,
futures, principal-only securities, agency debentures and
U.S. Treasury bonds; (iii) loans acquired through
clean-up
calls or originated through the Company’s customer
retention programs; and (iv) investment and non-investment
grade securities. The Company hedges the MSRs to protect the
economic value of the MSRs.
At December 31, 2006, primarily through our Home Loan
Servicing operation in Kalamazoo, Michigan, we serviced
$148.0 billion of mortgage loans, of which
$139.8 billion was serviced for others, an increase of 65%
from $84.5 billion serviced for others in 2005. The growth
in our portfolio of loans serviced for others was attributable
to our record production and sale volumes in 2006. The servicing
portfolio includes servicing for prime and subprime loans,
HELOCs, reverse mortgages, manufactured housing loans and home
improvement loans.
Servicing of mortgage loans includes: collecting loan payments;
responding to customers’ inquiries; accounting for
principal and interest; holding custodial (impound) funds for
payment of property taxes and insurance; counseling delinquent
mortgagors; modifying and refinancing loans; supervising
foreclosures and liquidation of foreclosed property; performing
required tax reporting; and performing other loan administration
functions necessary to protect investors’ interests and
comply with applicable laws and regulations. Servicing
operations also include remitting loan payments, less servicing
fees, to trustees and, in some cases, advancing delinquent
borrower payments to investors, subject to a right of
reimbursement.
8
THRIFT
The strategy of our thrift segment has been to leverage and
scale infrastructure with prudent mortgage related asset growth
to stabilize and diversify company-wide earnings, targeting a
return on equity ranging from 15% to 20%. Through leveraging our
capital and our FDIC-insured financial institution, the thrift
segment principally invests in single-family residential
(“SFR”) mortgage loans (predominantly prime ARMs,
including intermediate term fixed-rate loans), construction
financing for single-family residences or lots provided directly
to individual consumers, builder construction financing
facilities for larger residential subdivision loans, HELOCs,
mortgage-backed securities, and warehouse lines of credit, which
provides short- term revolving warehouse lending facilities to
small-to-medium
size mortgage bankers and brokers to finance mortgage loans from
the closing of the loans until they are sold. The thrift segment
also occasionally engages in loan sales with servicing retained,
principally of HELOCs and lot loans, as part of our balance
sheet management efforts and our efforts to optimize returns on
equity. The primary sources of revenue for the thrift segment
are net interest income on loans and securities, and to a lesser
extent, the gain on sale of HELOCs and lot loans.
In the fourth quarter of 2006, we saw a fairly dramatic decrease
in the ROE in our thrift segment, mostly caused by net interest
margin erosion in our whole loan and MBS portfolios. As such, it
does not make economic sense for us to grow these portfolios to
the extent that we had previously planned. While we will
continue to maintain some level of investments in our whole loan
and MBS portfolios, going forward the growth of these portfolios
will be based on the extent to which (1) their ROEs exceed
our cost of both core and risk-based capital or (2) they
are needed to support our core mortgage banking investments in
mortgage servicing rights and residual and non-investment grade
securities, if their ROEs are below our cost of capital. These
changes in our business model and strategy represent fine-tuning
more than a major strategic shift. The new reality of narrowing
net interest margins actually favors Indymac from a competitive
standpoint in that, unlike many other depository institutions,
we already have a relatively high, market-based cost of funds
and have learned, through trading assets and loans in the
secondary market, how to earn strong overall ROEs despite that
fact.
Portfolio
Divisions
Mortgage
Backed Securities (“MBS”)
MBS includes predominantly AAA-rated agency and private label
MBS.
Prime
SFR Mortgage Loans
Single-family residential mortgage loans held for investment are
generally originated or acquired through our mortgage banking
production divisions and transferred to the thrift divisions.
Held for investment loans may also be acquired from third party
sellers. Such loans are typically prime loans as the majority of
the subprime loans originated are securitized in private
transactions or sold to GSEs. The thrift divisions invest in
loans for which they can earn an acceptable return on equity. We
are currently investing primarily in ARMs in order to minimize
interest rate risk, and to a lesser extent, loan products which
we believe the market does not properly price. We may also
retain a portion of the loans acquired through our exercise of
clean-up
calls as these loans are generally high quality, seasoned loans
that generate an above-market yield.
Home
Equity Division
Our home equity division specializes in providing HELOC and
closed-end second mortgages nationwide through Indymac’s
wholesale and retail channels. With a
state-of-the-art
web-based decision engine, utilizing a streamlined application
process and competitive pricing, this division provides
homeowners the ability to easily tap the excess equity in their
homes for a variety of uses. With the HELOC product, homeowners
have convenient access to their funds using the Indymac Visa
Equity Card or equity checks.
Consumer
Construction and Lot Loans
Our consumer construction and lot loans division provides
construction financing for individual consumers who want to
build a new primary residence or second home. Through our
streamlined
e-MITS
online application process, the division offers a single-close
construction-to-permanent
loan that provides borrowers with the funds to build a primary
residence or vacation home. This product typically provides
financing for a construction term of 6 to 12 months and
automatically converts to a permanent mortgage loan at the end
of construction. The end result is a
9
product that represents a hybrid activity between our portfolio
lending and mortgage banking activities. The Company earns net
interest income on these loans during the construction phase.
When the home is completed, the loan automatically converts to a
permanent mortgage loan without any additional cost or closing
documents, which is typically sold in the secondary market or
acquired by the SFR mortgage loan portfolio. This division also
provides financing to builders who are building single-family
residences without a guaranteed sale at inception of project, or
on a speculative basis. Approximately 68% of new commitments are
generated through mortgage broker customers of the Mortgage Bank
and the remaining 32% of new commitments are retail originations.
Builder
Financing
Our homebuilder division provides land acquisition, development
and construction financing to homebuilders for residential
construction. Builder construction loans are typically
adjustable-rate loans, indexed to the prime interest rate with
terms ranging from 12 to 24 months. The Company earns net
interest income on these loans. The homebuilder division has
central operations in Pasadena, California with 17 satellite
sales offices in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida,
Illinois, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Oregon, Tennessee,
Texas, and Washington, D.C. Our typical customer is a middle
size, professional homebuilder who builds between 200 and 2,000
homes per year. We do a limited amount of business with large
private and public homebuilders, and have a small homebuilder
program dedicated to homebuilders building five to 25 unit
projects, and who typically build five to 100 homes per year.
Warehouse
Lending
Our warehouse lending group offers short-term lines of credit to
approved correspondent sellers nationwide. The group functions
as a financial intermediary for lenders, providing them with the
financial capacity to fund loans and hold them on the balance
sheet until they are sold to approved investors.
REGULATION AND
SUPERVISION
GENERAL
As a savings and loan holding company, Indymac Bancorp is
subject to regulation by the Office of Thrift Supervision
(“OTS”) under the savings and loan holding company
provisions of the Federal Home Owners’ Loan Act
(“HOLA”). As a federally chartered and insured savings
and loan association, Indymac Bank is subject to regulation,
supervision and periodic examination by the OTS, which is the
primary federal regulator of savings associations, and the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), in its
role as federal deposit insurer. The primary purpose of
regulatory examination and supervision is to protect depositors,
financial institutions and the financial system as a whole
rather than the shareholders of financial institutions or their
holding companies. The following summary is not intended to be a
complete description of the applicable laws and regulations or
their effects on us, and it is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the particular statutory and regulatory provisions
described.
REGULATION OF
INDYMAC BANK
General
Both Indymac Bank and the Company are required to file periodic
reports with the OTS concerning our activities and financial
condition. The OTS has substantial enforcement authority with
respect to savings associations, including authority to bring
enforcement actions against a savings association and any of its
“institution-affiliated parties,” which term includes
directors, officers, employees, controlling shareholders, agents
and other persons who participate in the conduct of the affairs
of the institution. The FDIC has “backup” enforcement
authority over us and has the power to terminate a savings
association’s FDIC deposit insurance. In addition, we are
subject to regulations of the Federal Reserve Board relating to
equal credit opportunity, electronic fund transfers, collection
of checks, truth in lending, truth in savings, and availability
of funds for deposit customers.
Qualified
Thrift Lender Test
Like all savings and loan holding company subsidiaries, Indymac
Bank is required to meet a qualified thrift lender
(“QTL”) test to avoid certain restrictions on our
operations, including the activities restrictions applicable to
10
multiple savings and loan holding companies, restrictions on our
ability to branch interstate and Indymac Bancorp’s
mandatory registration as a bank holding company under the Bank
Holding Company Act of 1956. A savings association satisfies the
QTL test if: (i) on a monthly average basis, for at least
nine months out of each twelve month period, at least 65% of a
specified asset base of the savings association consists of
loans to small businesses, credit card loans, educational loans,
or certain assets related to domestic residential real estate,
including residential mortgage loans and mortgage securities; or
(ii) at least 60% of the savings association’s total
assets consist of cash, U.S. government or government
agency debt or equity securities, fixed assets, or loans secured
by deposits, real property used for residential, educational,
church, welfare, or health purposes, or real property in certain
urban renewal areas. Indymac Bank is currently, and expects to
remain, in compliance with QTL standards.
Regulatory
Capital Requirements
OTS capital regulations require savings associations to satisfy
three sets of capital requirements: tangible capital,
Tier 1 (leverage) capital, and risk-based capital. In
general, an association’s tangible capital, which must be
at least 1.5% of adjusted total assets, is the sum of common
shareholders’ equity adjusted for the effects of other
comprehensive income (“OCI”), less goodwill and other
disallowed assets. An association’s ratio of Tier 1
capital to adjusted total assets (the “core capital”
or “leverage” ratio) must be at least 3% for strong
associations that are not anticipating or experiencing
significant growth and have well-diversified risks, including no
undue interest rate risk exposure, excellent asset quality, high
liquidity, and good earnings, and 4% for others. Higher capital
ratios may be required if warranted by the particular
circumstances, risk profile, or growth rate of a given
association. Under the risk-based capital requirement, a savings
association must have Tier 1 (core) capital equal to at
least 4% of adjusted total assets and total capital (core
capital plus supplementary capital) equal to at least 8% of
risk-weighted assets. Tier 1 capital must represent at
least 50% of total capital and consists of core capital
elements, which include common shareholders’ equity,
qualifying noncumulative, nonredeemable perpetual preferred
stock, and minority interests in the equity accounts of
consolidated subsidiaries, but exclude goodwill and certain
other intangible assets. Supplementary capital mainly consists
of qualifying subordinated debt, preferred stock that does not
meet Tier 1 capital requirements, and portions of allowance
for loan losses.
The above capital requirements are viewed as minimum standards
by the OTS. The OTS regulations also specify minimum
requirements for a savings association to be considered a
“well-capitalized institution” as defined in the
“prompt corrective action” regulation described below.
A “well-capitalized” savings association must have a
total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater, a Tier 1
risk-based capital ratio of 6% or greater and a leverage ratio
of 5% or greater. Indymac Bank currently meets, and expects to
continue to meet, all of the requirements of a
“well-capitalized institution.”
The OTS regulations include prompt corrective action provisions
that require certain remedial actions and authorize certain
other discretionary actions to be taken by the OTS against a
savings association that falls within specified categories of
capital deficiency. The relevant regulations establish five
categories of capital classification for this purpose, ranging
from “well-capitalized” or “adequately
capitalized” through “undercapitalized,”
“significantly undercapitalized” and “critically
undercapitalized.” In general, the prompt corrective action
regulations prohibit an OTS-regulated institution from declaring
any dividends, making any other capital distributions, or paying
a management fee to a controlling person, such as its parent
holding company, if, following the distribution or payment, the
institution would be within any of the three undercapitalized
categories.
Insurance
of Deposit Accounts
Deposits of the Bank are presently insured by the Savings
Association Insurance Fund (“SAIF”), which is
administered by the FDIC, up to $100,000 per depositor. The
FDIC has established a risk-based system for setting deposit
insurance assessments. Under the risk-based assessment system, a
savings association’s insurance assessments vary according
to the level of capital the institution holds and the degree to
which it is the subject of supervisory concern. Assessment rates
currently range between five and 43 cents per $100 in
deposits. Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC
upon a finding that the savings association has engaged in
unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound
condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable
law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC or
the OTS. All insured depository institutions, including the
Bank, are required to pay an additional assessment, currently
1.22 cents per $100 in deposits, in order to retire
Financial Corporation bonds that were issued between 1987 and
1989.
11
Capital
Distribution Regulations
OTS regulations limit “capital distributions” by
savings associations, which include, among other things,
dividends and payments for stock repurchases. Refer to
“Note 23 — Regulatory Requirements” in
the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements for
further discussion.
Community
Reinvestment Act and the Fair Lending Laws
Savings associations are examined under the Community
Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) and related regulations of
the OTS on the extent of their efforts to help meet the credit
needs of their communities, including low and moderate-income
neighborhoods. In addition, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and
the Fair Housing Act, together known as the “Fair Lending
Laws,” prohibit lenders from discriminating in their
lending practices on the basis of characteristics specified in
those statutes. Enforcement of these regulations has been an
important focus of federal regulatory authorities and of
community groups in recent years. A failure by Indymac Bank to
comply with the provisions of the CRA could, at a minimum,
result in adverse action on branch and certain other corporate
applications, and regulatory restrictions on our activities, and
failure to comply with the Fair Lending Laws could result in
enforcement actions by the OTS, as well as other federal
regulatory agencies and the Department of Justice. Indymac Bank
received an overall “Satisfactory” rating during our
most recent CRA evaluation.
Privacy
Protection
The OTS has adopted privacy protection regulations which require
each savings association to adopt procedures to protect
consumers’ and customers’ “nonpublic personal
information.” It is Indymac Bank’s policy not to share
customers’ information with any unaffiliated third parties,
except as expressly permitted by law, or to allow third party
companies to provide marketing services on our behalf, or under
joint marketing agreements between us and other unaffiliated
financial institutions. In addition to federal laws and
regulations, we are required to comply with any privacy
requirements prescribed by California and other states in which
we do business that afford consumers with protections greater
than those provided under federal law.
INCOME
TAX CONSIDERATIONS
We report our income on a calendar year basis using the
liability method of accounting. We are subject to federal income
taxation under existing provisions of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended, in generally the same manner as other
corporations. We are also subject to state taxes in the areas in
which we conduct business.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2006, we had 8,630 full-time
equivalent employees (“FTE”), including 633 FTE
off-shore as part of our Global Resources program. We believe
that we have generally good relations with our employees.
COMPETITION
We face significant competition in acquiring and selling loans.
In our mortgage banking operations, we compete with other
mortgage bankers, GSEs, established third party lending
programs, investment banking firms, banks, savings and loan
associations, and other lenders and entities purchasing mortgage
assets. With regard to MBS issued through our mortgage banking
operations, we face competition from other investment
opportunities available to prospective investors. We estimate
our market share of the U.S. mortgage market to be
approximately 3.58% based on the full year 2006 mortgage
production. A number of our competitors have significantly
larger market share and financial resources. We seek to compete
with financial institutions and mortgage companies through an
emphasis on quality of service, diversified products and maximum
use of technology.
The GSEs have made and we believe will continue to make
significant technological and economic advances to broaden their
customer bases. When the GSEs contract or expand, there are both
positive and negative impacts on our mortgage banking lending
operations. As GSEs expand, additional liquidity is brought to
the market, and loan products can be resold more quickly.
Conversely, expanding GSEs increase competition for loans, which
may reduce profit margins on loan sales. We seek to address
these competitive pressures by making a strong effort to
maximize our use of technology, by diversifying into other
residential mortgage products that are less affected by GSEs,
and by operating in a more cost-effective manner than our
competitors.
12
WEBSITE
ACCESS TO UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FILINGS
All reports filed electronically by us with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including Annual Reports
on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
and current event reports on
Form 8-K,
as well as any amendments to those reports, are made accessible
as soon as reasonably practicable after filing with the SEC at
no cost on our website at www.IndymacBank.com. These
filings are also accessible on the SEC’s website at
www.sec.gov.
We have a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is applicable
to all of our employees and officers, including the principal
executive officer, the principal financial officer and the
principal accounting officer. In addition, Indymac has a
Director Code of Ethics that sets forth the policy and standards
concerning ethical conduct for directors of Indymac. We also
adopted formal corporate governance standards in January 2002,
which the Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of
Directors reviews annually to ensure they incorporate recent
corporate governance developments and generally meet the
corporate governance needs of Indymac. You may obtain copies of
each of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the Director
Code of Ethics, and the Board of Directors’ Guidelines for
Corporate Governance Issues by accessing the “Corporate
Governance” subsection of the “Investors” section
of www.IndymacBank.com, or free of charge by writing to
our Corporate Secretary at IndyMac Bancorp, Inc., 888 East
Walnut Street, Pasadena, California 91101. Indymac intends to
post amendments to or waivers of the Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics (to the extent applicable to Indymac’s principal
executive officer, principal financial officer or principal
accounting officer) and of the Director Code of Ethics at the
website location referenced above.
KEY
OPERATING RISKS
Like all businesses, we assume a certain amount of risk in order
to earn returns on our capital. For further information on these
and other key operating risks, see “Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations — Risk Factors.”
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
13
Our significant leased properties are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
Principal Lease
|
|
Purpose
|
|
Location
|
|
Square Feet
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Corporate
Headquarters/Administration
|
|
Pasadena, California
|
|
|
173,000
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Corporate Headquarters/
Administration*
|
|
Pasadena, California
|
|
|
179,000
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Corporate IT
|
|
Tempe, Arizona
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Home Loan Servicing —
Customer Service and Loan Administration
|
|
Kalamazoo, Michigan
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Home Loan Servicing —
Master Servicing and Investor Reporting
|
|
Pasadena, California
|
|
|
36,000
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Web & Direct Mail
Headquarters; Mortgage Bank Operations; Financial Freedom
Headquarters, Legal/Administration
|
|
Irvine, California
|
|
|
138,000
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center,
Consumer Direct Operations and Sales
|
|
Kansas City, Missouri
|
|
|
53,000
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Overland Park, Kansas**
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
Ontario, California
|
|
|
41,500
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
San Ramon, California
|
|
|
46,500
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
Atlanta (Norcross), Georgia
|
|
|
67,500
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
Scottsdale, Arizona
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
|
|
2009-2011
|
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
Marlton, New Jersey
|
|
|
62,000
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
East Norriton, Pennsylvania
|
|
|
39,000
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
Columbia, South Carolina
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
Dallas (Irving), Texas
|
|
|
41,000
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
Seattle (Bellevue), Washington
|
|
|
31,000
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Sacramento (Rancho Cordova),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
California
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
Tampa, Florida
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
|
|
2007-2013
|
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
Chicago (Schaumburg), Illinois
|
|
|
62,000
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Regional Mortgage Banking Center
|
|
Boston (Braintree), Massachusetts
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Eastern Operations
Center — Financial Freedom
|
|
Atlanta, Georgia
|
|
|
44,000
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Western Operations
Center — Financial Freedom
|
|
Sacramento (Roseville), California
|
|
|
39,000
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Loan Servicing, Accounting and
Finance — Financial Freedom
|
|
San Francisco, California
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Consumer Bank Retail Operations
|
|
24 locations in Southern California
|
|
|
86,000
|
|
|
|
2008-2013
|
|
Other Sales Offices and Locations
|
|
58 locations in various states
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
2007-2010
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
5,203 square feet relates to a Consumer Bank Retail
Operation |
|
** |
|
to be extended to 2009 |
In addition to the above leased office space, we own the
property (consisting of four buildings) that houses our mortgage
banking headquarters, located in Pasadena, California, totaling
approximately 265,000 square feet. We also own a building
in La Mirada, California of approximately
16,500 square feet, which houses our information technology
data center. We own an additional four retail banking
properties, containing an aggregate of approximately
56,000 square feet, located in Southern California.
14
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
In the ordinary course of business, the Company and its
subsidiaries are defendants in or parties to a number of legal
actions. Certain of such actions involve alleged violations of
employment laws, unfair trade practices, consumer protection
laws, including claims relating to the Company’s sales,
loan origination and collection efforts, and other federal and
state banking laws. Management believes, based on current
knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that these legal
actions, individually and in the aggregate, and the losses, if
any, resulting from the likely final outcome thereof, will not
have a material adverse effect on the Company and its
subsidiaries’ financial position, but may have a material
impact on the results of operations of particular periods. Refer
to “Note 21 — Commitments and
Contingencies” in the accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements for further discussion.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of shareholders during the
quarter ended December 31, 2006.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR INDYMAC BANCORP, INC.’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCK
HOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES
|
STOCK
INFORMATION
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock is traded on the New
York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol
“NDE.” The following table sets forth the high and low
sales prices (as reported by Bloomberg Financial Service) for
shares of IndyMac Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock for the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
43.24
|
|
|
|
37.71
|
|
|
|
39.15
|
|
|
|
32.83
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
50.50
|
|
|
|
40.44
|
|
|
|
43.44
|
|
|
|
33.04
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
47.24
|
|
|
|
37.15
|
|
|
|
46.25
|
|
|
|
37.40
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
48.14
|
|
|
|
40.35
|
|
|
|
40.50
|
|
|
|
34.40
|
|
ISSUANCE
OF COMMON STOCK
On June 8, 2004, we issued 3,200,000 shares of common
stock at a market price of $31.75 through a public offering. On
July 12, 2004, we issued an additional 130,000 shares
of common stock at a market price of $31.75 upon the exercise of
the underwriters’ over-allotment option. The cash proceeds
of $96.25 million from the initial closing, net of
expenses, were recorded as equity during the second quarter of
2004. The cash proceeds from the exercise of the over-allotment
option, net of expenses, of $3.9 million were recorded as
equity during the third quarter of 2004. Certain of the proceeds
were used to finance the acquisition of Financial Freedom and
the remaining proceeds have been used for general corporate
purposes, including, but not limited to, continued asset growth
for Indymac Bank.
The Company has a direct stock purchase plan which offers
investors the ability to purchase shares of our common stock
directly over the Internet. Investors interested in investing
over $10,000 can also participate in the waiver program
administered by Mellon Investor Services LLC. For the year ended
December 31, 2006, we issued 3,532,360 shares of
common stock at an average market price of $42.04 through this
plan.
SHARE
REPURCHASE ACTIVITIES
There was no share repurchase activity during the three months
ended December 31, 2006. Our Board of Directors previously
approved a $500 million share repurchase program. Since its
inception in 1999, we have repurchased a total of
28.0 million shares through this program. As of
December 31, 2006 the maximum approximate dollar value of
shares that may be purchased under the program was
$63.6 million. In January 2007, we obtained an
authorization from the Board of Directors to repurchase an
additional $236.4 million of common stock for a total
current authorization of up to $300 million.
15
As of February 16, 2007, 72,329,748 shares of IndyMac
Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock were held by approximately
1,797 shareholders of record.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
Indymac’s goal is to maintain a dividend payout ratio in
line with other financial institution payout ratios, which range
from 30% to 50% of earnings per share. For 2006, Indymac’s
dividend payout ratio was 39%.
Cash dividends declared were as follows during 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
|
per
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Ratio(1)
|
|
|
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter 2006
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
Second Quarter 2006
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
Third Quarter 2006
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
Fourth Quarter 2006
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter 2005
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
Second Quarter 2005
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
Third Quarter 2005
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Fourth Quarter 2005
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dividend payout ratio for the first, second, third, and fourth
quarters of 2005 was calculated using the dividend declared
divided by retrospectively adjusted diluted earnings per share
of $0.98, $1.24, $1.16, and $1.06, respectively. |
In 2006 and 2005, we funded the payment of dividends primarily
from the dividend from Indymac Bank and cash on hand at the
Company. The future principal source of funds for the dividend
payments is anticipated to be the dividends we will receive from
Indymac Bank. The payment of dividends by Indymac Bank is
subject to regulatory requirements and review. See the
“Capital Distribution Regulations” section on
page 12 for further information. There is no assurance that
the Bank will be able to pay dividends to the holding company in
the future.
EQUITY
COMPENSATION PLANS INFORMATION
The equity compensation plans information required by this
Item 5 is hereby incorporated by reference to Indymac
Bancorp’s definitive proxy statement, to be filed pursuant
to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of our
2006 fiscal year.
16
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005(2)
|
|
|
2004(2, 3, 4)
|
|
|
2003(2, 4)
|
|
|
2002(2, 4)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Selected Balance Sheet
Information (at December 31)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
$
|
356
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
Securities (trading and available
for sale)
|
|
|
5,443
|
|
|
|
4,102
|
|
|
|
3,689
|
|
|
|
1,838
|
|
|
|
2,339
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
9,468
|
|
|
|
6,024
|
|
|
|
4,446
|
|
|
|
2,573
|
|
|
|
2,228
|
|
Loans held for investment
|
|
|
10,177
|
|
|
|
8,278
|
|
|
|
6,750
|
|
|
|
7,449
|
|
|
|
3,962
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
1,822
|
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,105
|
|
|
|
1,566
|
|
|
|
997
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
29,495
|
|
|
|
21,452
|
|
|
|
16,826
|
|
|
|
13,240
|
|
|
|
9,574
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
10,898
|
|
|
|
7,672
|
|
|
|
5,743
|
|
|
|
4,351
|
|
|
|
3,141
|
|
Advances from Federal Home
Loan Bank
|
|
|
10,413
|
|
|
|
6,953
|
|
|
|
6,162
|
|
|
|
4,935
|
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
4,637
|
|
|
|
4,367
|
|
|
|
3,162
|
|
|
|
2,622
|
|
|
|
2,609
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,519
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
27,467
|
|
|
|
19,909
|
|
|
|
15,545
|
|
|
|
12,209
|
|
|
|
8,713
|
|
Shareholders’
equity
|
|
|
2,028
|
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
862
|
|
Income Statement(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income before
provision for loan losses
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
Service fee income (expense)
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
Gain (loss) on mortgage-backed
securities, net
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
Fee and other income
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
Basic earnings per share(5)
|
|
|
5.07
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
|
|
3.41
|
|
|
|
2.92
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
Diluted earnings per share(6)
|
|
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
4.43
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
2.88
|
|
|
|
2.27
|
|
Other Operating Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage production
|
|
$
|
89,951
|
|
|
$
|
60,774
|
|
|
$
|
37,902
|
|
|
$
|
29,236
|
|
|
$
|
20,276
|
|
Total loan production(7)
|
|
|
91,698
|
|
|
|
62,714
|
|
|
|
39,048
|
|
|
|
30,036
|
|
|
|
20,882
|
|
Mortgage industry share(8)
|
|
|
3.58
|
%
|
|
|
2.01
|
%
|
|
|
1.37
|
%
|
|
|
0.77
|
%
|
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
Pipeline of mortgage loans in
process(9)
|
|
|
11,821
|
|
|
|
10,488
|
|
|
|
6,689
|
|
|
|
4,116
|
|
|
|
4,723
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
|
79,049
|
|
|
|
52,297
|
|
|
|
31,036
|
|
|
|
23,176
|
|
|
|
16,825
|
|
Loans sold/mortgage loans produced
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
|
|
82
|
%
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
Mortgage loans serviced for others
(as of year end)(10)
|
|
|
139,817
|
|
|
|
84,495
|
|
|
|
50,219
|
|
|
|
30,774
|
|
|
|
28,376
|
|
Total mortgage loans serviced (as
of year end)
|
|
|
147,994
|
|
|
|
90,721
|
|
|
|
56,038
|
|
|
|
37,066
|
|
|
|
29,138
|
|
Average full-time equivalent
employees
|
|
|
7,935
|
|
|
|
6,240
|
|
|
|
4,715
|
|
|
|
3,882
|
|
|
|
2,938
|
|
Other Per Share Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Dividends payout ratio(11)
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
Book value per share at
December 31
|
|
|
27.78
|
|
|
|
24.02
|
|
|
|
20.65
|
|
|
|
18.17
|
|
|
|
15.72
|
|
Closing price per share at
December 31
|
|
|
45.16
|
|
|
|
39.02
|
|
|
|
34.45
|
|
|
|
29.79
|
|
|
|
18.49
|
|
Average Common Shares (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
67,701
|
|
|
|
62,760
|
|
|
|
59,513
|
|
|
|
55,247
|
|
|
|
58,028
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
71,118
|
|
|
|
66,115
|
|
|
|
62,010
|
|
|
|
55,989
|
|
|
|
58,302
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005(2)
|
|
|
2004(2, 3, 4)
|
|
|
2003(2, 4)
|
|
|
2002(2, 4)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average equity
(“ROE”)
|
|
|
19.09
|
%
|
|
|
21.23
|
%
|
|
|
17.38
|
%
|
|
|
17.02
|
%
|
|
|
15.17
|
%
|
Return on average assets
(“ROA”)
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
|
|
1.20
|
%
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
|
|
1.66
|
%
|
Net interest income to pretax
income after minority interest
|
|
|
94.82
|
%
|
|
|
87.55
|
%
|
|
|
120.65
|
%
|
|
|
116.10
|
%
|
|
|
97.41
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
2.02
|
%
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
|
|
2.61
|
%
|
|
|
2.91
|
%
|
|
|
2.89
|
%
|
Net interest margin, thrift(12)
|
|
|
1.93
|
%
|
|
|
2.10
|
%
|
|
|
2.05
|
%
|
|
|
1.78
|
%
|
|
|
2.00
|
%
|
Mortgage banking revenue
(“MBR”) margin on loans sold(13)
|
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
|
|
1.80
|
%
|
|
|
2.21
|
%
|
|
|
2.30
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio(14)
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
Operating expenses to loan
production
|
|
|
0.86
|
%
|
|
|
0.99
|
%
|
|
|
1.24
|
%
|
|
|
1.27
|
%
|
|
|
1.54
|
%
|
Balance Sheet and Asset Quality
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
26,028
|
|
|
$
|
19,645
|
|
|
$
|
15,521
|
|
|
$
|
10,675
|
|
|
$
|
7,230
|
|
Average equity
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
|
1,381
|
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
Debt to equity ratio(15)
|
|
|
13.5:1
|
|
|
|
12.9:1
|
|
|
|
12.1:1
|
|
|
|
11.8:1
|
|
|
|
10.1:1
|
|
Core capital ratio(16)
|
|
|
7.39
|
%
|
|
|
8.21
|
%
|
|
|
7.66
|
%
|
|
|
7.56
|
%
|
|
|
8.70
|
%
|
Risk-based capital ratio(16)
|
|
|
11.72
|
%
|
|
|
12.20
|
%
|
|
|
12.02
|
%
|
|
|
12.29
|
%
|
|
|
14.03
|
%
|
Non-performing assets to total
assets
|
|
|
0.63
|
%
|
|
|
0.34
|
%
|
|
|
0.73
|
%
|
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
|
|
1.05
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to total
loans held for investment
|
|
|
0.61
|
%
|
|
|
0.67
|
%
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
|
|
1.28
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to
non-performing loans held for investment
|
|
|
57.51
|
%
|
|
|
127.10
|
%
|
|
|
107.67
|
%
|
|
|
140.04
|
%
|
|
|
95.76
|
%
|
Loan Loss Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to net
charge-offs
|
|
|
4.9
|
x
|
|
|
7.2
|
x
|
|
|
6.7
|
x
|
|
|
3.0
|
x
|
|
|
2.2x
|
|
Provision for loan losses to net
charge-offs
|
|
|
156.50
|
%
|
|
|
129.57
|
%
|
|
|
103.10
|
%
|
|
|
110.57
|
%
|
|
|
69.95
|
%
|
Net charge-offs to average
non-performing loans held for investment
|
|
|
16.82
|
%
|
|
|
16.65
|
%
|
|
|
18.28
|
%
|
|
|
39.33
|
%
|
|
|
36.70
|
%
|
Net charge-offs to average loans
held for investment
|
|
|
0.14
|
%
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
0.34
|
%
|
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The items under the balance sheet and income statement sections
are rounded individually and therefore may not necessarily add
up to the total due to such rounding. |
|
(2) |
|
2002-2005
data has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the stock
option expenses under Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), Share Based
Payment (“SFAS 123(R)”). Refer to
“Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies” in the accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements for further discussion. |
|
(3) |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2004, the data is presented
on a pro forma basis excluding the effect of change in
accounting principle for rate lock commitments under Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 105, “Application of
Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments”
(“SAB 105”), effective April 1, 2004,
and for the impact of the purchase accounting adjustments for
Financial Freedom. The SAB 105 impact for the year ended
December 31, 2004 was $59.5 million. Additionally, the
impact of the purchase accounting adjustment for Financial
Freedom totaled $7.9 million before-tax. The pro forma
results are provided so that investors can evaluate our results
on a |
18
|
|
|
|
|
comparable basis. A full reconciliation between the pro forma
and GAAP amounts, with the relevant performance ratios, is as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
GAAP
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
$
|
364
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
2.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
$
|
3.27
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
13.89
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.38
|
%
|
ROA
|
|
|
0.96
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The Company previously classified the initial deferral of the
incremental direct origination costs net of the fees collected
on the loans as a net reduction in operating expenses. However,
during 2005, we revised the presentation to reflect the deferral
of the total fees collected as a reduction of fee and other
income and the deferral of the incremental direct origination
costs as a reduction of operating expenses. All prior periods
were revised to conform to the current presentation. This
revision had no impact on reported earnings or the balance sheet
in 2005 or in any prior period. Certain performance ratios based
on net revenues or operating expenses were revised accordingly. |
|
(5) |
|
Net earnings divided by weighted average basic shares
outstanding for the year. |
|
(6) |
|
Net earnings divided by weighted average dilutive shares
outstanding for the year. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes newly originated commitments on construction loans. |
|
(8) |
|
Our market share is calculated based on our total loan
production, both purchased (correspondent and conduit) and
originated (retail and wholesale), in all channels (the
numerator) divided by the Mortgage Bankers Association
(“MBA”) February 12, 2007 Mortgage Finance
Long-Term Forecast estimate of the overall mortgage market (the
denominator). As we review industry publications such as
National Mortgage News, we have confirmed that our calculation
is consistent with its methodologies for reporting market share
of Indymac and our mortgage banking peers. It is important to
note that these industry calculations cause purchased mortgages
to be counted more than once, i.e., first when they are
originated and again by the purchasers (through correspondent
and conduit channels) of the mortgages. Therefore, our market
share calculation may not be mathematically precise, but it is
consistent with industry calculations, which provide investors
with a good view of our relative standing compared to the other
top mortgage lending peers. |
|
(9) |
|
The amount includes $1.9 billion, $1.3 billion and
$0.4 billion of non-specific rate locks on bulk purchases
in our conduit channel at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. |
|
(10) |
|
Represents the unpaid principal balance on loans sold with
servicing retained by Indymac. |
|
(11) |
|
Dividends declared per common share as a percentage of diluted
earnings per share. |
|
(12) |
|
Net interest margin, thrift represents the combined margin from
thrift, elimination and other, and corporate overhead. |
|
(13) |
|
Mortgage banking revenue margin is calculated using the sum of
consolidated gain on sale of loans and the net interest income
earned on loans held for sale by our mortgage banking production
divisions divided by total loans sold. |
|
(14) |
|
Defined as operating expenses divided by net interest income and
other income. |
|
(15) |
|
Debt includes deposits. |
|
(16) |
|
Ratio is for Indymac Bank and excludes unencumbered cash at the
Parent Company available for investment in Indymac Bank.
Risk-based capital ratio is calculated based on the regulatory
standard risk weighting adjusted for the additional risk
weightings for subprime loans. |
19
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, and the
notes thereto and the other information incorporated by
reference herein.
OVERVIEW
Indymac is a leading hybrid thrift/mortgage banking company. We
offer a wide range of home mortgage products to a broad customer
base using a technology-based approach. Indymac is structured to
achieve synergies among its operations and to enhance customer
service. The Company conducts business substantially through
IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. via two primary operating segments, the
mortgage banking and the thrift segments. On the mortgage
banking side, we generate earnings largely by originating,
securitizing and selling loans and securities at a profit and by
servicing loans for others. On the thrift side, we generate core
spread income from our investment portfolio of prime SFR
mortgages, home equity loans, consumer and builder construction
loans and mortgage-backed securities. The combination of
mortgage banking and thrift investing has proven to be a
powerful business model for Indymac, and, given our strong
execution in the past, we have been able to outperform our peers
and produce both strong and relatively stable returns on our
shareholders’ equity.
2006 was a challenging year in the mortgage banking industry.
This was the third year since the industry peaked, and industry
loan volumes of $2.5 trillion were 34% below 2003’s
historic high level and 17% lower than in 2005. Mortgage banking
revenue margins declined further after sharp declines in 2005,
and net interest margins continued to compress, as the yield
curve inverted with the average spread between the
10-year
Treasury yield and the
1-month
LIBOR declining from 89 basis points in 2005 to negative
31 basis points in 2006. To cap it off, the housing
industry slowed down significantly, increasing loan
delinquencies and non-performing assets and driving up credit
costs for all mortgage lenders.
Yet, despite these challenges, Indymac again reached new
performance heights in 2006, achieving:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Record mortgage loan production of $90 billion, a 48%
increase over 2005;
|
|
|
•
|
Record mortgage market share of 3.58%, a 78% gain over the 2.01%
share we had in 2005;
|
|
|
•
|
Record net revenues of $1.3 billion, a 22% increase over
2005;
|
|
|
•
|
Record
earnings-per-share
of $4.82, a 9% gain;
|
|
|
•
|
Record growth in total assets, which increased by
$8 billion, or 37%, to $29.5 billion;
|
|
|
•
|
Record growth in our portfolio of loans served for others, which
increased by $55 billion, or 65%, to 140 billion;
|
|
|
•
|
Strong return on equity of 19%, slightly lower than last
year’s 21% level.
|
Net revenues of $1.3 billion for 2006 reflect an increase
of 22% over 2005. Key drivers of this growth included the
following:
1) Growth in average interest earning assets of 32% from
$19.6 billion in 2005 to $26.0 billion in 2006,
leading to an increase in net interest income of 24% to
$526.7 million. The increase is primarily driven by the
growth in production, increased retention of securities and
loans in our held for investment portfolio, offset by the sale
of loans. Net interest margin declined from 2.16% to 2.02%
during a period of inverted yield curve. Factors contributing to
this decline included higher cost of funds and hedging cost,
higher premium amortization and increased non-performing loans.
This decline somewhat mitigated the positive impact from the
growth in average interest earning assets.
2) Growth in mortgage production of 48% in 2006 over 2005
to a record high of $90.0 billion, led to a 51% increase in
loans sold to $79.0 billion. Our market share increased
from 2.01% in 2005 to 3.58% in 2006. Leading this growth were
our Financial Freedom and conduit channels with increases in
production of 71% and 90%, respectively. This volume growth
mitigated a decline in the MBR margin on loans sold, resulting
from a decline in higher margin pay option ARM volume and a
higher mix of lower margin conduit and correspondent channel
volume. The MBR margin on loans sold was 1.06% in 2006, down
from 1.36% in 2005.
20
3) Provision for loan loss increased from
$10.0 million for 2005 to $20.0 million for 2006
mainly due to an increase in our non-performing assets as
delinquencies worsened. The allowance for loan losses currently
represents 4.9 times net charge-offs, down from 7.2 times at
December 31, 2005 as net charge-offs for 2006 increased
4 basis points to 0.14% of average loans held for
investment.
4) Service fee income of $101.3 million in 2006 grew
129% over 2005 driven by the increase in the principal balance
of loans serviced for others combined with solid hedging
performance and slowing prepayments attributable to higher
mortgage rates.
Operating expenses of $789.0 million reflected an increase
of 28%, consistent with the growth in our operations and
infrastructure investments in order to execute on our strategy
to increase production and revenue. During 2006, we opened three
new regional centers, which increased our total regional centers
to 16 at December 31, 2006. In addition, average FTE
increased 27% from 6,240 to 7,935 during the year supporting
this growth.
The effective tax rate on earnings for the year ended
December 31, 2006 decreased to 39.1% from the 39.5% for the
year ended December 31, 2005. The decline was due to a
lower blended state tax rate as the Company further expanded
geographically into states with lower tax rates. The effect of
the decline on the net deferred tax liability further reduced
the effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2006
to 38.3%.
SUMMARY
OF BUSINESS SEGMENT RESULTS
Our mortgage banking segment consists of the following divisions:
|
|
|
Mortgage Professionals
Group
|
|
This group is responsible for the
production of mortgage loans through relationships with mortgage
brokers, mortgage bankers, financial institutions and
homebuilders. Mortgage loans are either funded by us (wholesale
division) or obtained as closed loans on a flow basis (wholesale
and correspondent divisions) or through bulk purchases (conduit
division).
|
Consumer Direct
|
|
This division offers consumers
mortgage lending through our Southern California retail banking
branches, direct mail, internet lead aggregators, outbound
telesales, online advertising, and referral programs.
|
Financial Freedom
|
|
This group is responsible for the
generation of predominantly reverse mortgage products with
senior customers (age 62 or older). This group also
services all reverse mortgage loans originated.
|
MSRs and Other Retained
Assets
|
|
This division manages the assets
the Company retains in conjunction with its mortgage loan sales.
The assets held include the following asset classes:(i) mortgage
servicing rights (“MSRs”), interest-only strips,
prepayment penalty securities and residual securities;
(ii) derivatives and securities held as hedges of such
assets, including forward rate agreements, swaps, options,
futures, principal-only securities, agency debentures and
U.S. Treasury bonds; (iii) loans acquired through
clean-up
calls or originated through the Company’s customer
retention programs; and (iv) investment and non-investment
grade securities. Further, the division continues to service all
loans sold with servicing retained, loans held on the balance
sheet pending sale and mortgage loans held for investment and
undertakes solicitation and loan production activities related
to retention of customers in the servicing portfolio unless
prohibited by the servicing agreement.
|
21
The thrift segment includes the following divisions:
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed Securities
(“MBS”)
|
|
Assets include predominantly
AAA-rated agency and private label MBS.
|
Prime SFR Mortgage
Loans
|
|
Assets include all single-family
residential mortgage loans held for investment other than
discontinued products.
|
Home Equity Division
|
|
This division specializes in
providing HELOC and closed-end second mortgages nationwide
through Indymac’s wholesale and retail channels.
|
Consumer Construction
Division
|
|
This division provides
construction-to-permanent
and lot loan financing to individuals who are in the process of
building their own homes. This channel leverages our
relationship sales force in the mortgage professional channel to
produce these products in addition to programs offered directly
to consumers.
|
Homebuilder Division
|
|
This division offers land
acquisition, development and construction financing to
homebuilders for residential construction.
|
Warehouse Lending
Division
|
|
This division offers short-term
lines of credit to approved correspondent sellers nationwide.
The group functions as a financial intermediary for lenders,
providing them with the financial capacity to fund loans and
hold them on balance sheet until they are sold to approved
investors.
|
Discontinued Products
|
|
Home improvement and manufactured
housing loans.
|
The tables below summarize the
year-over-year
performance of Indymac’s divisions. Detailed operating
results for each division are provided on pages 24 to 27:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSRs and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Banking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
Divisions
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Overhead(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Thrift
|
|
|
& Other
|
|
|
Results
|
|
|
Overhead
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net Income 2006
|
|
$
|
289,675
|
|
|
$
|
91,246
|
|
|
$
|
(34,189
|
)
|
|
$
|
346,732
|
|
|
$
|
137,721
|
|
|
$
|
(34,346
|
)
|
|
$
|
450,107
|
|
|
$
|
(107,178
|
)
|
|
$
|
342,929
|
|
Net Income 2005
|
|
|
268,085
|
|
|
|
43,913
|
|
|
|
(28,061
|
)
|
|
|
283,937
|
|
|
|
134,938
|
|
|
|
(32,214
|
)
|
|
|
386,661
|
|
|
|
(93,533
|
)
|
|
|
293,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
21,590
|
|
|
|
47,333
|
|
|
|
(6,128
|
)
|
|
|
62,795
|
|
|
|
2,783
|
|
|
|
(2,132
|
)
|
|
|
63,446
|
|
|
|
(13,645
|
)
|
|
|
49,801
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
108
|
%
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Average Capital 2006
|
|
$
|
552,835
|
|
|
$
|
370,451
|
|
|
$
|
12,848
|
|
|
$
|
936,134
|
|
|
$
|
675,467
|
|
|
$
|
2,108
|
|
|
$
|
1,613,709
|
|
|
$
|
182,551
|
|
|
$
|
1,796,260
|
|
Average Capital 2005
|
|
|
364,125
|
|
|
|
193,959
|
|
|
|
10,291
|
|
|
|
568,375
|
|
|
|
524,791
|
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
|
|
1,094,630
|
|
|
|
286,237
|
|
|
|
1,380,867
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
(36
|
)%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
ROE 2006
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
ROE 2005
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
% Change
|
|
|
(29
|
)%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)%
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included production division overhead and servicing overhead of
$24.1 million and $10.1 million, respectively, for the
year ended December 31, 2006. For the year ended
December 31, 2005, the production division overhead and
servicing overhead were $18.5 million and
$9.6 million, respectively. |
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking Production Divisions
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Professionals Group
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
|
Correspondent
|
|
|
Conduit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
Freedom
|
|
|
Divisions
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net Income 2006
|
|
$
|
154,087
|
|
|
$
|
18,773
|
|
|
$
|
61,935
|
|
|
$
|
234,795
|
|
|
$
|
682
|
|
|
$
|
54,198
|
|
|
$
|
289,675
|
|
Net Income 2005
|
|
|
191,576
|
|
|
|
27,111
|
|
|
|
25,090
|
|
|
|
243,777
|
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
|
|
24,833
|
|
|
|
268,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
(37,489
|
)
|
|
|
(8,338
|
)
|
|
|
36,845
|
|
|
|
(8,982
|
)
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
29,365
|
|
|
|
21,590
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(31
|
)%
|
|
|
147
|
%
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
230
|
%
|
|
|
118
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Average Capital 2006
|
|
$
|
211,459
|
|
|
$
|
51,870
|
|
|
$
|
182,133
|
|
|
$
|
445,462
|
|
|
$
|
10,943
|
|
|
$
|
96,430
|
|
|
$
|
552,835
|
|
Average Capital 2005
|
|
|
153,298
|
|
|
|
27,551
|
|
|
|
103,534
|
|
|
|
284,383
|
|
|
|
15,981
|
|
|
|
63,761
|
|
|
|
364,125
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
|
(32
|
)%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
ROE 2006
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
ROE 2005
|
|
|
125
|
%
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
% Change
|
|
|
(42
|
)%
|
|
|
(63
|
)%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
(39
|
)%
|
|
|
290
|
%
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
|
(29
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thrift
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-
|
|
|
Prime SFR
|
|
|
Home
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backed
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Homebuilder
|
|
|
Warehouse
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Lending
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
Total Thrift
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net Income 2006
|
|
$
|
18,099
|
|
|
$
|
41,170
|
|
|
$
|
23,521
|
|
|
$
|
27,467
|
|
|
$
|
26,775
|
|
|
$
|
556
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
137,721
|
|
Net Income 2005
|
|
|
18,122
|
|
|
|
46,124
|
|
|
|
22,454
|
|
|
|
29,452
|
|
|
|
20,133
|
|
|
|
(1,138
|
)
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
134,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(4,954
|
)
|
|
|
1,067
|
|
|
|
(1,985
|
)
|
|
|
6,642
|
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
2,783
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
149
|
%
|
|
|
164
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Average Capital 2006
|
|
$
|
58,135
|
|
|
$
|
227,937
|
|
|
$
|
148,033
|
|
|
$
|
123,273
|
|
|
$
|
104,123
|
|
|
$
|
10,382
|
|
|
$
|
3,584
|
|
|
$
|
675,467
|
|
Average Capital 2005
|
|
|
40,342
|
|
|
|
202,883
|
|
|
|
95,907
|
|
|
|
101,060
|
|
|
|
78,051
|
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
4,376
|
|
|
|
524,791
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
ROE 2006
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
ROE 2005
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
(52
|
)%
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
% Change
|
|
|
(31
|
)%
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
|
(32
|
)%
|
|
|
(24
|
)%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
178
|
%
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
Total capital deployed in our operating business segments
increased 47% to $1.6 billion in 2006 and earned a 28%
return on equity before the impact of corporate overhead. Net of
corporate overhead and including the excess undeployed capital,
Indymac’s average capital of $1.8 billion earned a 19%
return on equity for 2006.
We deployed 31% of our capital, or $552.8 million, into our
Mortgage Production Divisions in 2006, an increase of 52% over
2005. Mortgage production earnings grew 8%; however the return
on equity declined from 74% to 52% reflecting the narrower
mortgage banking revenue margins. The wholesale and
correspondent divisions reported stronger production
year-over-year,
but a reduction in net income as margins were lower in these two
business lines
year-over-year.
Our conduit division had a strong year with earnings growth of
147% mainly attributable to growth in production of 90%, while
return on equity increased to 34% from 24%. Our reverse mortgage
division continued to demonstrate strong returns with earnings
and production growth of 118% and 71%, respectively. In
addition, return on equity increased from 39% in 2005 to 56% in
2006. The strong returns in this business are reflective of the
strong growth in demographics for the seniors market and the
growing popularity of the reverse mortgage product. In light of
the intensifying competition in the reverse mortgage market, the
division will focus on improving its efficiency and thus
improving its costs to originate. We expect the division to
continue to grow in the future and expect it to maintain its
industry leadership position in the reverse mortgage market.
We deployed 21% of our capital, or $370.5 million, into the
MSRs and Other Retained Assets division, up from 14% one year
ago, while return on equity at 25% remained flat. We target our
pricing and hedging strategies to earn expected ROE of 18% to
23% for this segment. Given the volatility in this segment,
returns in a quarter may substantially exceed or fall below the
targeted level.
We deployed 38% of our capital, or $675.5 million, to the
Thrift segment, a 29% increase over last year. Thrift’s
return on equity declined from 26% to 20% over the same period.
Net interest margin declined from 1.95% to 1.75% during a period
of inverted yield curve. Factors contributing to the decline
included higher cost of funds and hedging cost, higher premium
amortization and increased non-performing loans. As a result,
net interest income increased by only 12% in spite of the 25%
increase in average interest earning assets. Additionally,
provision for loan losses and write-downs on residual securities
increased substantially due to worsening credit quality of our
portfolio and the collateral supporting the residual securities.
23
DETAIL
CHANNEL SEGMENT RESULTS
The following tables summarize the Company’s financial
results for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 by
its two primary segments via each of its operating divisions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSRs and
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
Other Retained
|
|
|
Banking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
Divisions
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Overhead(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Thrift
|
|
|
& Other(2)
|
|
|
Results
|
|
|
Overhead
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
170,786
|
|
|
$
|
60,497
|
|
|
$
|
562
|
|
|
$
|
231,845
|
|
|
$
|
259,052
|
|
|
$
|
44,561
|
|
|
$
|
535,458
|
|
|
$
|
(8,737
|
)
|
|
$
|
526,721
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(19,993
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(19,993
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(19,993
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
637,966
|
|
|
|
31,477
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
669,443
|
|
|
|
66,634
|
|
|
|
(68,023
|
)
|
|
|
668,054
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
668,054
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
21,141
|
|
|
|
84,071
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
105,212
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
(4,361
|
)
|
|
|
101,317
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
101,317
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
22,014
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
22,014
|
|
|
|
(12,725
|
)
|
|
|
11,193
|
|
|
|
20,482
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
20,482
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
|
|
3,295
|
|
|
|
12,205
|
|
|
|
37,361
|
|
|
|
(1,664
|
)
|
|
|
47,902
|
|
|
|
2,220
|
|
|
|
50,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
831,788
|
|
|
|
205,074
|
|
|
|
3,857
|
|
|
|
1,040,719
|
|
|
|
330,795
|
|
|
|
(18,294
|
)
|
|
|
1,353,220
|
|
|
|
(6,517
|
)
|
|
|
1,346,703
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
594,041
|
|
|
|
63,312
|
|
|
|
59,997
|
|
|
|
717,350
|
|
|
|
121,621
|
|
|
|
49,009
|
|
|
|
887,980
|
|
|
|
169,473
|
|
|
|
1,057,453
|
|
Deferred expense under FAS 91
|
|
|
(238,979
|
)
|
|
|
(8,068
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(247,047
|
)
|
|
|
(16,970
|
)
|
|
|
(2,229
|
)
|
|
|
(266,246
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(266,246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
476,726
|
|
|
|
149,830
|
|
|
|
(56,140
|
)
|
|
|
570,416
|
|
|
|
226,144
|
|
|
|
(65,074
|
)
|
|
|
731,486
|
|
|
|
(175,990
|
)
|
|
|
555,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
289,675
|
|
|
$
|
91,246
|
|
|
$
|
(34,189
|
)
|
|
$
|
346,732
|
|
|
$
|
137,721
|
|
|
$
|
(34,346
|
)
|
|
$
|
450,107
|
|
|
$
|
(107,178
|
)
|
|
$
|
342,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relevant Financial and
Performance Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
9,856,626
|
|
|
$
|
862,271
|
|
|
$
|
2,472
|
|
|
$
|
10,721,369
|
|
|
$
|
14,808,096
|
|
|
$
|
(89,838
|
)
|
|
$
|
25,439,627
|
|
|
$
|
588,649
|
|
|
$
|
26,028,276
|
|
Allocated capital
|
|
|
552,835
|
|
|
|
370,451
|
|
|
|
12,848
|
|
|
|
936,134
|
|
|
|
675,467
|
|
|
|
2,108
|
|
|
|
1,613,709
|
|
|
|
182,551
|
|
|
|
1,796,260
|
|
Loans produced
|
|
|
84,205,831
|
|
|
|
2,698,332
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
86,904,163
|
|
|
|
4,793,661
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
91,697,824
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
91,697,824
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
|
80,906,387
|
|
|
|
2,055,905
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
82,962,292
|
|
|
|
5,271,485
|
|
|
|
(9,184,815
|
)
|
|
|
79,048,962
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
79,048,962
|
|
MBR margin
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.53
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
%
|
|
|
1.26
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
ROE
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
ROA
|
|
|
2.87
|
%
|
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2.70
|
%
|
|
|
0.92
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
Net interest margin, thrift.
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
%
|
Average FTE
|
|
|
4,471
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
5,738
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
6,701
|
|
|
|
1,234
|
|
|
|
7,935
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
117,693
|
|
|
$
|
45,160
|
|
|
$
|
(1,290
|
)
|
|
$
|
161,563
|
|
|
$
|
230,394
|
|
|
$
|
43,430
|
|
|
$
|
435,387
|
|
|
$
|
(10,676
|
)
|
|
$
|
424,711
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(9,978
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(9,978
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(9,978
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
592,229
|
|
|
|
14,985
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
607,214
|
|
|
|
45,365
|
|
|
|
(60,404
|
)
|
|
|
592,175
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
592,175
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
12,650
|
|
|
|
31,594
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
44,244
|
|
|
|
6,154
|
|
|
|
(6,163
|
)
|
|
|
44,235
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
44,235
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12,810
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12,810
|
|
|
|
2,866
|
|
|
|
2,190
|
|
|
|
17,866
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
17,866
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
|
2,697
|
|
|
|
1,989
|
|
|
|
6,354
|
|
|
|
31,958
|
|
|
|
(4,040
|
)
|
|
|
34,272
|
|
|
|
2,429
|
|
|
|
36,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
724,240
|
|
|
|
107,246
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
832,185
|
|
|
|
306,759
|
|
|
|
(24,987
|
)
|
|
|
1,113,957
|
|
|
|
(8,247
|
)
|
|
|
1,105,710
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
477,154
|
|
|
|
36,624
|
|
|
|
47,080
|
|
|
|
560,858
|
|
|
|
102,861
|
|
|
|
35,319
|
|
|
|
699,038
|
|
|
|
145,954
|
|
|
|
844,992
|
|
Deferred expense under FAS 91
|
|
|
(196,233
|
)
|
|
|
(1,963
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(198,196
|
)
|
|
|
(19,143
|
)
|
|
|
(7,060
|
)
|
|
|
(224,399
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(224,399
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
443,319
|
|
|
|
72,585
|
|
|
|
(46,381
|
)
|
|
|
469,523
|
|
|
|
223,041
|
|
|
|
(53,246
|
)
|
|
|
639,318
|
|
|
|
(154,201
|
)
|
|
|
485,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
268,085
|
|
|
$
|
43,913
|
|
|
$
|
(28,061
|
)
|
|
$
|
283,937
|
|
|
$
|
134,938
|
|
|
$
|
(32,214
|
)
|
|
$
|
386,661
|
|
|
$
|
(93,533
|
)
|
|
$
|
293,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relevant Financial and
Performance Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
6,489,208
|
|
|
$
|
629,027
|
|
|
$
|
(106
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,118,129
|
|
|
$
|
11,825,555
|
|
|
$
|
(66,938
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,876,746
|
|
|
$
|
768,266
|
|
|
$
|
19,645,012
|
|
Allocated capital
|
|
|
364,125
|
|
|
|
193,959
|
|
|
|
10,291
|
|
|
|
568,375
|
|
|
|
524,791
|
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
|
|
1,094,630
|
|
|
|
286,237
|
|
|
|
1,380,867
|
|
Loans produced
|
|
|
56,493,453
|
|
|
|
1,079,142
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
57,572,595
|
|
|
|
5,141,689
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
62,714,284
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
62,714,284
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
|
54,284,169
|
|
|
|
1,315,673
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
55,599,842
|
|
|
|
3,357,700
|
|
|
|
(6,660,302
|
)
|
|
|
52,297,240
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
52,297,240
|
|
MBR margin
|
|
|
1.31
|
%
|
|
|
1.14
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.30
|
%
|
|
|
1.35
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
ROE
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
ROA
|
|
|
4.04
|
%
|
|
|
2.87
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
3.42
|
%
|
|
|
1.14
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.92
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
Net interest margin, thrift.
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.95
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
%
|
Average FTE
|
|
|
3,511
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
4,432
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
5,240
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
6,240
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in the mortgage banking overhead was $24.1 million
and $10.1 million production division overhead and
servicing overhead, respectively, for the year ended
December 31, 2006. For the year ended December 31,
2005, the production division overhead and servicing overhead
were $18.5 million and $9.6 million servicing overhead. |
|
(2) |
|
Included are eliminations, deposits, and treasury items, the
details of which are provided on page 27. |
24
The following tables provide additional detail on the results
for the production divisions of our mortgage banking segment for
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking Production Divisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freedom
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Professionals Group
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
(Reverse
|
|
|
Production
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
|
Correspondent
|
|
|
Conduit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
Mortgage)
|
|
|
Divisions
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
64,218
|
|
|
$
|
15,005
|
|
|
$
|
79,138
|
|
|
$
|
158,361
|
|
|
$
|
2,507
|
|
|
$
|
9,918
|
|
|
$
|
170,786
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
353,955
|
|
|
|
38,229
|
|
|
|
52,465
|
|
|
|
444,649
|
|
|
|
32,473
|
|
|
|
160,844
|
|
|
|
637,966
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
21,141
|
|
|
|
21,141
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
806
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
418,173
|
|
|
|
53,234
|
|
|
|
131,540
|
|
|
|
602,947
|
|
|
|
35,786
|
|
|
|
193,055
|
|
|
|
831,788
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
324,503
|
|
|
|
47,359
|
|
|
|
29,841
|
|
|
|
401,703
|
|
|
|
57,092
|
|
|
|
135,246
|
|
|
|
594,041
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
FAS 91
|
|
|
(159,346
|
)
|
|
|
(24,951
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(184,297
|
)
|
|
|
(22,426
|
)
|
|
|
(32,256
|
)
|
|
|
(238,979
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
253,016
|
|
|
|
30,826
|
|
|
|
101,699
|
|
|
|
385,541
|
|
|
|
1,120
|
|
|
|
90,065
|
|
|
|
476,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
154,087
|
|
|
$
|
18,773
|
|
|
$
|
61,935
|
|
|
$
|
234,795
|
|
|
$
|
682
|
|
|
$
|
54,198
|
|
|
$
|
289,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relevant Financial and
Performance Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
3,930,599
|
|
|
$
|
954,680
|
|
|
$
|
4,149,226
|
|
|
$
|
9,034,505
|
|
|
$
|
204,641
|
|
|
$
|
617,480
|
|
|
$
|
9,856,626
|
|
Allocated capital
|
|
|
211,459
|
|
|
|
51,870
|
|
|
|
182,133
|
|
|
|
445,462
|
|
|
|
10,943
|
|
|
|
96,430
|
|
|
|
552,835
|
|
Loans produced
|
|
|
36,859,055
|
|
|
|
10,263,616
|
|
|
|
30,102,134
|
|
|
|
77,224,805
|
|
|
|
1,957,493
|
|
|
|
5,023,533
|
|
|
|
84,205,831
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
|
36,041,893
|
|
|
|
9,940,275
|
|
|
|
28,425,553
|
|
|
|
74,407,721
|
|
|
|
2,000,314
|
|
|
|
4,498,352
|
|
|
|
80,906,387
|
|
MBR margin
|
|
|
1.16
|
%
|
|
|
0.54
|
%
|
|
|
0.46
|
%
|
|
|
0.81
|
%
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
|
|
3.80
|
%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
Pretax income/loan sold
|
|
|
0.70
|
%
|
|
|
0.31
|
%
|
|
|
0.36
|
%
|
|
|
0.52
|
%
|
|
|
0.06
|
%
|
|
|
2.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.59
|
%
|
ROE
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
ROA
|
|
|
3.91
|
%
|
|
|
1.96
|
%
|
|
|
1.48
|
%
|
|
|
2.58
|
%
|
|
|
0.32
|
%
|
|
|
6.77
|
%
|
|
|
2.87
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
|
|
1.57
|
%
|
|
|
1.91
|
%
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
|
|
1.23
|
%
|
|
|
1.61
|
%
|
|
|
1.73
|
%
|
Average FTE
|
|
|
2,418
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
|
|
4,471
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
48,763
|
|
|
$
|
10,829
|
|
|
$
|
49,762
|
|
|
$
|
109,354
|
|
|
$
|
5,459
|
|
|
$
|
2,880
|
|
|
$
|
117,693
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
394,498
|
|
|
|
48,235
|
|
|
|
9,974
|
|
|
|
452,707
|
|
|
|
59,260
|
|
|
|
80,262
|
|
|
|
592,229
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12,926
|
|
|
|
12,650
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
443,417
|
|
|
|
59,064
|
|
|
|
59,604
|
|
|
|
562,085
|
|
|
|
65,035
|
|
|
|
97,120
|
|
|
|
724,240
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
255,147
|
|
|
|
30,764
|
|
|
|
18,133
|
|
|
|
304,044
|
|
|
|
94,942
|
|
|
|
78,168
|
|
|
|
477,154
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
FAS 91
|
|
|
(128,385
|
)
|
|
|
(16,511
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(144,896
|
)
|
|
|
(29,038
|
)
|
|
|
(22,299
|
)
|
|
|
(196,233
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
316,655
|
|
|
|
44,811
|
|
|
|
41,471
|
|
|
|
402,937
|
|
|
|
(869
|
)
|
|
|
41,251
|
|
|
|
443,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
191,576
|
|
|
$
|
27,111
|
|
|
$
|
25,090
|
|
|
$
|
243,777
|
|
|
$
|
(525
|
)
|
|
$
|
24,833
|
|
|
$
|
268,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relevant Financial and
Performance Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
3,192,851
|
|
|
$
|
590,614
|
|
|
$
|
2,236,944
|
|
|
$
|
6,020,409
|
|
|
$
|
319,106
|
|
|
$
|
149,693
|
|
|
$
|
6,489,208
|
|
Allocated capital
|
|
|
153,298
|
|
|
|
27,551
|
|
|
|
103,534
|
|
|
|
284,383
|
|
|
|
15,981
|
|
|
|
63,761
|
|
|
|
364,125
|
|
Loans produced
|
|
|
29,145,082
|
|
|
|
5,718,598
|
|
|
|
15,810,873
|
|
|
|
50,674,553
|
|
|
|
2,883,559
|
|
|
|
2,935,341
|
|
|
|
56,493,453
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
|
28,358,598
|
|
|
|
5,424,613
|
|
|
|
14,819,081
|
|
|
|
48,602,292
|
|
|
|
2,852,465
|
|
|
|
2,829,412
|
|
|
|
54,284,169
|
|
MBR margin
|
|
|
1.56
|
%
|
|
|
1.09
|
%
|
|
|
0.40
|
%
|
|
|
1.16
|
%
|
|
|
2.27
|
%
|
|
|
2.94
|
%
|
|
|
1.31
|
%
|
Pretax income/loan sold
|
|
|
1.12
|
%
|
|
|
0.83
|
%
|
|
|
0.28
|
%
|
|
|
0.83
|
%
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)%
|
|
|
1.46
|
%
|
|
|
0.82
|
%
|
ROE
|
|
|
125
|
%
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
ROA
|
|
|
5.99
|
%
|
|
|
4.58
|
%
|
|
|
1.12
|
%
|
|
|
4.04
|
%
|
|
|
(0.16
|
)%
|
|
|
9.12
|
%
|
|
|
4.04
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
1.53
|
%
|
|
|
1.83
|
%
|
|
|
2.22
|
%
|
|
|
1.82
|
%
|
|
|
1.71
|
%
|
|
|
1.92
|
%
|
|
|
1.81
|
%
|
Average FTE
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
2,148
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
|
3,511
|
|
25
The following tables provide additional detail on the results
for divisions of our thrift segment for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thrift
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-
|
|
|
Prime SFR
|
|
|
Home
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backed
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Homebuilder
|
|
|
Warehouse
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Lending
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
Total Thrift
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
31,809
|
|
|
$
|
76,081
|
|
|
$
|
39,503
|
|
|
$
|
45,546
|
|
|
$
|
60,422
|
|
|
$
|
3,489
|
|
|
$
|
2,202
|
|
|
$
|
259,052
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(9,225
|
)
|
|
|
(1,800
|
)
|
|
|
(3,322
|
)
|
|
|
(3,800
|
)
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
(1,665
|
)
|
|
|
(19,993
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
3,703
|
|
|
|
23,996
|
|
|
|
39,068
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
66,634
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
(834
|
)
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
(12,934
|
)
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(12,725
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1,637
|
|
|
|
8,723
|
|
|
|
23,412
|
|
|
|
1,867
|
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
37,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
30,850
|
|
|
|
72,580
|
|
|
|
57,954
|
|
|
|
105,363
|
|
|
|
58,489
|
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
330,795
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
4,978
|
|
|
|
20,496
|
|
|
|
69,073
|
|
|
|
21,516
|
|
|
|
4,120
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
121,621
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
FAS 91
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,165
|
)
|
|
|
(8,812
|
)
|
|
|
(6,993
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(16,970
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
29,719
|
|
|
|
67,602
|
|
|
|
38,623
|
|
|
|
45,102
|
|
|
|
43,966
|
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
226,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
18,099
|
|
|
$
|
41,170
|
|
|
$
|
23,521
|
|
|
$
|
27,467
|
|
|
$
|
26,775
|
|
|
$
|
556
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
137,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relevant Financial and
Performance Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
3,258,988
|
|
|
$
|
5,876,399
|
|
|
$
|
1,934,429
|
|
|
$
|
2,502,397
|
|
|
$
|
1,076,213
|
|
|
$
|
119,043
|
|
|
$
|
40,627
|
|
|
$
|
14,808,096
|
|
Allocated capital
|
|
|
58,135
|
|
|
|
227,937
|
|
|
|
148,033
|
|
|
|
123,273
|
|
|
|
104,123
|
|
|
|
10,382
|
|
|
|
3,584
|
|
|
|
675,467
|
|
Loans produced
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
109,375
|
|
|
|
2,937,596
|
|
|
|
1,746,690
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,793,661
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
170,296
|
|
|
|
2,604,875
|
|
|
|
2,496,314
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,271,485
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
ROA
|
|
|
0.55
|
%
|
|
|
0.70
|
%
|
|
|
1.18
|
%
|
|
|
1.10
|
%
|
|
|
2.51
|
%
|
|
|
0.47
|
%
|
|
|
0.37
|
%
|
|
|
0.92
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
0.98
|
%
|
|
|
1.29
|
%
|
|
|
2.04
|
%
|
|
|
1.82
|
%
|
|
|
5.61
|
%
|
|
|
2.93
|
%
|
|
|
5.42
|
%
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
Average FTE
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
30,086
|
|
|
$
|
73,231
|
|
|
$
|
32,840
|
|
|
$
|
46,122
|
|
|
$
|
44,458
|
|
|
$
|
632
|
|
|
$
|
3,025
|
|
|
$
|
230,394
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3,750
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,596
|
)
|
|
|
(900
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(2,615
|
)
|
|
|
(9,978
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
8,806
|
|
|
|
3,098
|
|
|
|
33,169
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
45,365
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
953
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,154
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,221
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,866
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
8,268
|
|
|
|
21,905
|
|
|
|
1,409
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
31,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
30,953
|
|
|
|
79,239
|
|
|
|
50,627
|
|
|
|
99,469
|
|
|
|
44,968
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
306,759
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
15,558
|
|
|
|
61,526
|
|
|
|
18,049
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
102,861
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
FAS 91
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,046
|
)
|
|
|
(10,738
|
)
|
|
|
(6,359
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(19,143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
29,954
|
|
|
|
76,239
|
|
|
|
37,115
|
|
|
|
48,681
|
|
|
|
33,278
|
|
|
|
(1,881
|
)
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
223,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
18,122
|
|
|
$
|
46,124
|
|
|
$
|
22,454
|
|
|
$
|
29,452
|
|
|
$
|
20,133
|
|
|
$
|
(1,138
|
)
|
|
$
|
(209
|
)
|
|
$
|
134,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relevant Financial and
Performance Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
2,212,816
|
|
|
$
|
4,993,311
|
|
|
$
|
1,648,086
|
|
|
$
|
2,106,111
|
|
|
$
|
794,166
|
|
|
$
|
21,831
|
|
|
$
|
49,234
|
|
|
$
|
11,825,555
|
|
Allocated capital
|
|
|
40,342
|
|
|
|
202,883
|
|
|
|
95,907
|
|
|
|
101,060
|
|
|
|
78,051
|
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
4,376
|
|
|
|
524,791
|
|
Loans produced
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
207,968
|
|
|
|
2,993,962
|
|
|
|
1,939,759
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,141,689
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
543,542
|
|
|
|
560,881
|
|
|
|
2,253,277
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,357,700
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
(52
|
)%
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
ROA
|
|
|
0.81
|
%
|
|
|
0.92
|
%
|
|
|
1.34
|
%
|
|
|
1.40
|
%
|
|
|
2.56
|
%
|
|
|
(5.08
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.49
|
)%
|
|
|
1.14
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
|
|
1.47
|
%
|
|
|
1.99
|
%
|
|
|
2.19
|
%
|
|
|
5.60
|
%
|
|
|
2.89
|
%
|
|
|
6.14
|
%
|
|
|
1.95
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
275
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Average FTE
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
26
The following tables provide additional detail on deposits,
treasury and eliminations for the year ended December 31,
2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interdivision
|
|
|
Economic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Loan Sales
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(3,343
|
)
|
|
$
|
32,275
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
15,629
|
|
|
$
|
44,561
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(68,023
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(68,023
|
)
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(4,361
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(4,361
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,193
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,193
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,476
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(5,817
|
)
|
|
|
(1,664
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
3,476
|
|
|
|
(2,666
|
)
|
|
|
(28,916
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,812
|
|
|
|
(18,294
|
)
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
26,764
|
|
|
|
8,529
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13,716
|
|
|
|
49,009
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
FAS 91
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,229
|
)
|
|
|
(2,229
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
(23,288
|
)
|
|
|
(11,195
|
)
|
|
|
(28,916
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,675
|
)
|
|
|
(65,074
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(14,182
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,818
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,610
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4,264
|
|
|
$
|
(34,346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relevant Financial and
Performance Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(90,019
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(89,838
|
)
|
Allocated capital
|
|
|
2,108
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,108
|
|
Loans produced
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
(9,184,815
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
(9,184,815
|
)
|
ROE
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
ROA
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Average FTE
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
Year ended December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
9,405
|
|
|
$
|
19,877
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
14,148
|
|
|
$
|
43,430
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(62,204
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
(60,404
|
)
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,970
|
|
|
|
(11,133
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(6,163
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,190
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,190
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
2,486
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(7,092
|
)
|
|
|
(4,040
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
2,486
|
|
|
|
9,971
|
|
|
|
(35,167
|
)
|
|
|
(11,133
|
)
|
|
|
8,856
|
|
|
|
(24,987
|
)
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
16,045
|
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
14,271
|
|
|
|
35,319
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
FAS 91
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(7,060
|
)
|
|
|
(7,060
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
(13,559
|
)
|
|
|
4,968
|
|
|
|
(35,167
|
)
|
|
|
(11,133
|
)
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
|
|
(53,246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(8,203
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,006
|
|
|
$
|
(21,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,736
|
)
|
|
$
|
995
|
|
|
$
|
(32,214
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relevant Financial and
Performance Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(67,118
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(66,938
|
)
|
Allocated capital
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,464
|
|
Loans produced
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
(6,660,302
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
(6,660,302
|
)
|
ROE
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
ROA
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Average FTE
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
27
Accounting
Methodology for Reporting Segment Financial
Results
The profitability of each operating channel is measured on a
fully-leveraged basis after allocating capital based on
regulatory capital rules. The Company uses a fund transfer
pricing (“FTP”) system to allocate interest expense to
the operating channels. Each operating channel is allocated
funding with maturities and interest rates matched with the
expected lives and repricing frequencies of the channel’s
assets. The difference between these allocations and the
Company’s actual net interest income and capital levels
resulting from centralized management of funding costs is
reported in the Treasury unit and Corporate Overhead,
respectively. Trust preferred is allocated to the operating
channels, which results in higher interest expense at the
operating channel level but reduces the capital charge to each
operating channel. This is more reflective of our use of trust
preferred as a component of capital.
The mortgage production divisions are credited with gain on sale
of loans based on the actual amount realized for loans sold in
the period for that division. Loans are occasionally transferred
(“sold”) from the production divisions to the thrift
divisions at a premium based on the estimated fair value. The
premium paid for the loans is recorded as a gain in the
production divisions and a premium on the asset in the thrift
divisions and eliminated in consolidation. In subsequent
periods, this premium is amortized as part of the thrift
divisions’ net interest margin and the amortization is
reversed in Eliminations.
Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 91,
“Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated
with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of
Leases” (“SFAS 91”), certain fees and
related incremental direct costs associated with originating
loans are required to be deferred when incurred. SFAS 91
fees and expenses are deferred at production and subsequently
recognized at sale. This is reflected as a reclassification
reducing operating expenses and loan fees with the net deferral
reported as a component of the gain on sale. The deferral of
direct origination costs is shown separately as a contra to the
gross operating expenses in the detail segment tables on
pages 24 to 27 to enable the computation of gross cost
per funded loan.
The Company hedges the MSRs to protect their economic value. The
results in the business segment tables above reflect the
economic fair value of MSRs. Prior to the adoption of Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 156,
“Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets, an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities” (“SFAS 156”) on
January 1, 2006, the economic fair value may vary from the
generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)
value due to the lower of cost or market limitations of GAAP.
Differences between the economic value and the GAAP value were
eliminated in consolidation. Also in 2006, the Company has
revised its capital allocation on MSRs to conform to updated
regulatory capital guidelines. Prior period segment data was
revised accordingly.
The Company’s corporate overhead costs such as corporate
salaries and related expenses, and non-recurring corporate items
are not allocated to the operating channels. Also, for purposes
of calculating average interest-earning assets, the allowance
for loan losses is excluded.
28
PRODUCT
PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS
As part of our process of measuring results and holding managers
responsible for specific targets, we evaluate profitability at
the product level in addition to our segment results. We
currently have four product groups:
|
|
|
Standard Consumer Home Loans Held for Sale |
|
Includes first mortgage products originated for sale through the
various Indymac channels (excluding servicing retained and
consumer construction channels). These products include agency
conforming, Alt-A and subprime loans. |
|
|
|
Agency Conforming |
|
|
|
First mortgage loans for sale that meet the underwriting
guidelines of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. |
|
|
|
Alt-A |
|
|
|
First mortgage loans for sale that have prime credit
characteristics, but do not meet the GSE underwriting
guidelines. We sell Alt-A loans to the GSEs on a negotiated
basis even though the loans do not meet the GSE underwriting
guidelines. |
|
|
|
Subprime |
|
|
|
Includes first mortgage loans that are extended to borrowers
with impaired credit with one or more of the following
characteristics: 1) FICO score of less than 620;
2) late mortgage payment in the last 12 months; and
3) bankruptcy in the last 2 years. |
|
Specialty Consumer Home Loans Held for Sale and/or
Investment |
|
Includes specialty mortgage products originated through the
various Indymac channels and adjusted for intercompany activity.
These products include, HELOCs/seconds, reverse mortgages,
CTP/Lot and discontinued products. |
|
|
|
HELOCs/Seconds |
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages. |
|
|
|
Reverse Mortgages |
|
|
|
Reverse mortgage loans extended to borrowers age 62 and
older secured by equity in a primary residence. |
|
|
|
CTP/Lot |
|
|
|
Loans made to homeowners for the construction of new custom
homes and the subsequent permanent mortgage, and lot loans. |
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
Dealer originated manufactured housing and home improvement
loans. |
|
Home Loans and Related Investments |
|
Includes all investment related activity including home loans
held for investment, variable cash flow instruments,
mortgage-backed securities and other related investments. |
|
|
|
Retained Assets and Retention Activities |
|
|
|
Mortgage banking, trading and hedging activity associated with
the purchase, management and sale of mortgage banking assets and
variable cash flow instruments retained in connection with the
Company’s loan sales. Activity also includes loans acquired
through
clean-up
calls and originated through customer retention programs. |
29
|
|
|
|
|
MBS |
|
|
|
Trading and investment activity related to the purchase,
management and sale of investment grade mortgage-backed
securities. |
|
|
|
SFR Loans Held for Investment |
|
|
|
Company-wide loan investment activity related to the purchase,
management and sale of single family residential mortgage loans
held for investment. |
|
Specialty Commercial Loans Held for Investment |
|
Includes the consolidated loan activity associated with loans
that are made to commercial customers such as homebuilders,
commercial builders and mortgage brokers and bankers for the
purposes of either building residential homes or financing the
purchase of these homes. |
|
|
|
Single Spec |
|
|
|
Loans that are made to homebuilders to build individual custom
homes for resale to consumers. |
|
|
|
Builder Financing |
|
|
|
Subdivision lending for commercial acquisition, development and
construction loans to commercial builders. |
|
|
|
Warehouse Lending |
|
|
|
Warehouse lines of credit to mortgage brokers to finance their
inventory of loans prior to sale. |
|
Overhead |
|
Includes all fixed operating costs associated with production
divisions and servicing loans that are not allocated to the
respective products for which these services are provided. In
addition, it includes all corporate fixed costs that do not vary
in the short term with changes in business activity. These fixed
costs include corporate administration, financial management,
enterprise risk management, centralized information technology
and other unallocated fixed costs. |
30
The following tables summarize the profitability for each of the
four product groups and the loan servicing operations for the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard
|
|
|
Specialty
|
|
|
Loans &
|
|
|
Specialty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
Home Loans
|
|
|
Home Loans
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Overhead
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
126,582
|
|
|
$
|
151,281
|
|
|
$
|
168,025
|
|
|
$
|
77,184
|
|
|
$
|
(3,343
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,992
|
|
|
$
|
526,721
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(6,371
|
)
|
|
|
(9,225
|
)
|
|
|
(4,397
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(19,993
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
432,508
|
|
|
|
200,488
|
|
|
|
35,058
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
668,054
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
27,139
|
|
|
|
72,227
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,951
|
|
|
|
101,317
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(16,849
|
)
|
|
|
37,331
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
20,482
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
30,964
|
|
|
|
6,920
|
|
|
|
7,644
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
3,917
|
|
|
|
50,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue (expense)
|
|
|
559,090
|
|
|
|
386,652
|
|
|
|
310,336
|
|
|
|
80,431
|
|
|
|
(2,666
|
)
|
|
|
12,860
|
|
|
|
1,346,703
|
|
Variable expenses
|
|
|
233,344
|
|
|
|
169,448
|
|
|
|
10,988
|
|
|
|
11,376
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
425,156
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
FAS 91
|
|
|
(178,637
|
)
|
|
|
(74,536
|
)
|
|
|
(5,772
|
)
|
|
|
(7,301
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(266,246
|
)
|
Fixed expenses
|
|
|
186,182
|
|
|
|
94,937
|
|
|
|
53,824
|
|
|
|
18,875
|
|
|
|
8,529
|
|
|
|
269,950
|
|
|
|
632,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
318,201
|
|
|
|
196,803
|
|
|
|
251,296
|
|
|
|
57,481
|
|
|
|
(11,195
|
)
|
|
|
(257,090
|
)
|
|
|
555,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
193,784
|
|
|
$
|
119,201
|
|
|
$
|
153,039
|
|
|
$
|
35,006
|
|
|
$
|
(6,818
|
)
|
|
$
|
(151,283
|
)
|
|
$
|
342,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
8,536,706
|
|
|
$
|
5,574,028
|
|
|
$
|
9,915,749
|
|
|
$
|
1,439,550
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
562,243
|
|
|
$
|
26,028,276
|
|
Allocated capital
|
|
$
|
398,215
|
|
|
$
|
373,204
|
|
|
$
|
625,455
|
|
|
$
|
133,069
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
266,317
|
|
|
$
|
1,796,260
|
|
Performance
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
1.48
|
%
|
|
|
2.71
|
%
|
|
|
1.69
|
%
|
|
|
5.36
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2.02
|
%
|
MBR margin
|
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
|
|
1.88
|
%
|
|
|
1.57
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
Operating Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan production
|
|
$
|
70,043,484
|
|
|
$
|
17,484,288
|
|
|
$
|
2,232,454
|
|
|
$
|
1,937,598
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
91,697,824
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
$
|
63,635,182
|
|
|
$
|
13,187,579
|
|
|
$
|
2,226,201
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
79,048,962
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
98,061
|
|
|
$
|
107,441
|
|
|
$
|
154,099
|
|
|
$
|
56,087
|
|
|
$
|
9,153
|
|
|
$
|
(130
|
)
|
|
$
|
424,711
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(4,699
|
)
|
|
|
(3,750
|
)
|
|
|
(1,529
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(9,978
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
438,995
|
|
|
|
126,842
|
|
|
|
26,338
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
592,175
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
18,126
|
|
|
|
36,043
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(9,935
|
)
|
|
|
44,235
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,090
|
|
|
|
15,776
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
17,866
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
29,242
|
|
|
|
2,695
|
|
|
|
3,770
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
36,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue (expense)
|
|
|
537,056
|
|
|
|
279,042
|
|
|
|
231,201
|
|
|
|
58,329
|
|
|
|
9,719
|
|
|
|
(9,637
|
)
|
|
|
1,105,710
|
|
Variable expenses
|
|
|
218,381
|
|
|
|
126,077
|
|
|
|
3,734
|
|
|
|
16,874
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
365,066
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
FAS 91
|
|
|
(160,543
|
)
|
|
|
(54,845
|
)
|
|
|
(1,963
|
)
|
|
|
(7,048
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(224,399
|
)
|
Fixed expenses
|
|
|
150,815
|
|
|
|
56,092
|
|
|
|
35,251
|
|
|
|
9,418
|
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
223,347
|
|
|
|
479,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
328,403
|
|
|
|
151,718
|
|
|
|
194,179
|
|
|
|
39,085
|
|
|
|
4,716
|
|
|
|
(232,984
|
)
|
|
|
485,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
198,684
|
|
|
$
|
91,666
|
|
|
$
|
117,478
|
|
|
$
|
23,647
|
|
|
$
|
2,854
|
|
|
$
|
(141,201
|
)
|
|
$
|
293,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
6,037,836
|
|
|
$
|
4,050,747
|
|
|
$
|
7,813,287
|
|
|
$
|
996,350
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
746,792
|
|
|
$
|
19,645,012
|
|
Allocated capital
|
|
$
|
274,935
|
|
|
$
|
225,414
|
|
|
$
|
436,090
|
|
|
$
|
94,528
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
349,900
|
|
|
$
|
1,380,867
|
|
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
1.62
|
%
|
|
|
2.65
|
%
|
|
|
1.97
|
%
|
|
|
5.63
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
MBR margin
|
|
|
1.22
|
%
|
|
|
2.33
|
%
|
|
|
1.42
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
Operating Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan production
|
|
$
|
48,151,564
|
|
|
$
|
11,389,658
|
|
|
$
|
901,365
|
|
|
$
|
2,271,697
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
62,714,284
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
$
|
44,146,314
|
|
|
$
|
6,291,711
|
|
|
$
|
1,859,215
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
52,297,240
|
|
31
The following tables provide details on the profitability for
the standard consumer home loans held for sale for the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard Consumer Home Loans Held for Sale
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Agency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
Conforming
|
|
|
Alt-A
|
|
|
Subprime
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
1,757
|
|
|
$
|
94,707
|
|
|
$
|
30,118
|
|
|
$
|
126,582
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
407,635
|
|
|
|
23,005
|
|
|
|
432,508
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
3,625
|
|
|
|
502,342
|
|
|
|
53,123
|
|
|
|
559,090
|
|
Variable expenses
|
|
|
7,420
|
|
|
|
196,971
|
|
|
|
28,953
|
|
|
|
233,344
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
FAS 91
|
|
|
(6,030
|
)
|
|
|
(150,322
|
)
|
|
|
(22,285
|
)
|
|
|
(178,637
|
)
|
Fixed expenses
|
|
|
5,271
|
|
|
|
163,240
|
|
|
|
17,671
|
|
|
|
186,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
(3,036
|
)
|
|
|
292,453
|
|
|
|
28,784
|
|
|
|
318,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,849
|
)
|
|
$
|
178,104
|
|
|
$
|
17,529
|
|
|
$
|
193,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
129,275
|
|
|
$
|
7,128,473
|
|
|
$
|
1,278,958
|
|
|
$
|
8,536,706
|
|
Allocated capital
|
|
$
|
5,324
|
|
|
$
|
314,394
|
|
|
$
|
78,497
|
|
|
$
|
398,215
|
|
Performance
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
(35
|
)%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
|
|
1.33
|
%
|
|
|
2.35
|
%
|
|
|
1.48
|
%
|
MBR margin
|
|
|
0.41
|
%
|
|
|
0.84
|
%
|
|
|
2.03
|
%
|
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
184
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
Operating
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan production
|
|
$
|
877,309
|
|
|
$
|
66,580,898
|
|
|
$
|
2,585,277
|
|
|
$
|
70,043,484
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
$
|
883,719
|
|
|
$
|
60,129,551
|
|
|
$
|
2,621,912
|
|
|
$
|
63,635,182
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
2,484
|
|
|
$
|
70,612
|
|
|
$
|
24,965
|
|
|
$
|
98,061
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
5,806
|
|
|
|
404,911
|
|
|
|
28,278
|
|
|
|
438,995
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
8,290
|
|
|
|
475,523
|
|
|
|
53,243
|
|
|
|
537,056
|
|
Variable expenses
|
|
|
7,380
|
|
|
|
178,305
|
|
|
|
32,696
|
|
|
|
218,381
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
FAS 91
|
|
|
(5,424
|
)
|
|
|
(131,196
|
)
|
|
|
(23,923
|
)
|
|
|
(160,543
|
)
|
Fixed expenses
|
|
|
4,394
|
|
|
|
128,194
|
|
|
|
18,227
|
|
|
|
150,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
|
300,220
|
|
|
|
26,243
|
|
|
|
328,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,174
|
|
|
$
|
181,633
|
|
|
$
|
15,877
|
|
|
$
|
198,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
116,723
|
|
|
$
|
5,168,483
|
|
|
$
|
752,630
|
|
|
$
|
6,037,836
|
|
Allocated capital
|
|
$
|
4,978
|
|
|
$
|
229,650
|
|
|
$
|
40,307
|
|
|
$
|
274,935
|
|
Performance
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
2.13
|
%
|
|
|
1.37
|
%
|
|
|
3.32
|
%
|
|
|
1.62
|
%
|
MBR margin
|
|
|
0.84
|
%
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
|
|
1.98
|
%
|
|
|
1.22
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
77
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
Operating Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan production
|
|
$
|
905,481
|
|
|
$
|
44,899,737
|
|
|
$
|
2,346,346
|
|
|
$
|
48,151,564
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
$
|
981,249
|
|
|
$
|
40,481,759
|
|
|
$
|
2,683,306
|
|
|
$
|
44,146,314
|
|
32
The following tables provide details on the profitability for
the specialty consumer home loans held for sale
and/or
investment for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Consumer Home Loans Held for Sale
and/or
Investment
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
HELOCs/
|
|
|
Reverse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
Seconds
|
|
|
Mortgages
|
|
|
CTP/Lot
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
90,832
|
|
|
$
|
9,918
|
|
|
$
|
48,329
|
|
|
$
|
2,202
|
|
|
$
|
151,281
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(1,800
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,906
|
)
|
|
|
(1,665
|
)
|
|
|
(6,371
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
(1,106
|
)
|
|
|
160,844
|
|
|
|
40,761
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
200,488
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
5,998
|
|
|
|
21,141
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
27,139
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
(17,508
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(16,849
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
10,452
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
19,360
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
30,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
86,868
|
|
|
|
193,055
|
|
|
|
106,203
|
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
386,652
|
|
Variable expenses
|
|
|
52,746
|
|
|
|
79,858
|
|
|
|
36,844
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
169,448
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
FAS 91
|
|
|
(33,776
|
)
|
|
|
(32,256
|
)
|
|
|
(8,504
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(74,536
|
)
|
Fixed expenses
|
|
|
11,628
|
|
|
|
55,388
|
|
|
|
27,614
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
94,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
56,270
|
|
|
|
90,065
|
|
|
|
50,249
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
196,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
34,268
|
|
|
$
|
54,198
|
|
|
$
|
30,602
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
119,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
2,666,823
|
|
|
$
|
617,480
|
|
|
$
|
2,249,098
|
|
|
$
|
40,627
|
|
|
$
|
5,574,028
|
|
Allocated capital
|
|
$
|
233,930
|
|
|
$
|
31,712
|
|
|
$
|
103,978
|
|
|
$
|
3,584
|
|
|
$
|
373,204
|
|
Performance
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
171
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
3.41
|
%
|
|
|
1.61
|
%
|
|
|
2.15
|
%
|
|
|
5.42
|
%
|
|
|
2.71
|
%
|
MBR margin
|
|
|
0.58
|
%
|
|
|
3.80
|
%
|
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.88
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
Operating
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan production
|
|
$
|
7,199,309
|
|
|
$
|
5,023,533
|
|
|
$
|
5,261,446
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
17,484,288
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
$
|
6,192,913
|
|
|
$
|
4,498,352
|
|
|
$
|
2,496,314
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
13,187,579
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
54,784
|
|
|
$
|
2,880
|
|
|
$
|
46,752
|
|
|
$
|
3,025
|
|
|
$
|
107,441
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,084
|
)
|
|
|
(2,615
|
)
|
|
|
(4,699
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
8,385
|
|
|
|
80,262
|
|
|
|
37,995
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
126,842
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
12,926
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
18,126
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
1,221
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,090
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
8,268
|
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
|
19,918
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
29,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
77,858
|
|
|
|
97,120
|
|
|
|
103,450
|
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
279,042
|
|
Variable expenses
|
|
|
42,370
|
|
|
|
50,574
|
|
|
|
33,133
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
126,077
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
FAS 91
|
|
|
(22,497
|
)
|
|
|
(22,299
|
)
|
|
|
(10,049
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(54,845
|
)
|
Fixed expenses
|
|
|
4,618
|
|
|
|
27,594
|
|
|
|
22,921
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
56,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
53,367
|
|
|
|
41,251
|
|
|
|
57,445
|
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
151,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
32,287
|
|
|
$
|
24,833
|
|
|
$
|
34,755
|
|
|
$
|
(209
|
)
|
|
$
|
91,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
1,931,463
|
|
|
$
|
149,693
|
|
|
$
|
1,920,357
|
|
|
$
|
49,234
|
|
|
$
|
4,050,747
|
|
Allocated capital
|
|
$
|
119,506
|
|
|
$
|
15,317
|
|
|
$
|
86,215
|
|
|
$
|
4,376
|
|
|
$
|
225,414
|
|
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
162
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
2.84
|
%
|
|
|
1.92
|
%
|
|
|
2.43
|
%
|
|
|
6.14
|
%
|
|
|
2.65
|
%
|
MBR margin
|
|
|
2.08
|
%
|
|
|
2.94
|
%
|
|
|
1.68
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2.33
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
Operating Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan production
|
|
$
|
3,626,310
|
|
|
$
|
2,935,341
|
|
|
$
|
4,828,007
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
11,389,658
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
$
|
1,207,261
|
|
|
$
|
2,829,412
|
|
|
$
|
2,255,038
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,291,711
|
|
33
The following tables provide details on the profitability for
the home loans and related investments and the loan servicing
operations for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Loans and Related Investments
|
|
|
|
Retained Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR Loans
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
and Retention
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held for
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
Activities
|
|
|
MBS
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
53,160
|
|
|
$
|
31,809
|
|
|
$
|
83,056
|
|
|
$
|
168,025
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(9,225
|
)
|
|
|
(9,225
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
31,477
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
3,703
|
|
|
|
35,058
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
72,227
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
72,227
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
37,781
|
|
|
|
(834
|
)
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
37,331
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
5,286
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1,637
|
|
|
|
6,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
199,931
|
|
|
|
30,850
|
|
|
|
79,555
|
|
|
|
310,336
|
|
Variable expenses
|
|
|
10,988
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,988
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
FAS 91
|
|
|
(5,772
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(5,772
|
)
|
Fixed expenses
|
|
|
47,715
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
4,978
|
|
|
|
53,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
147,000
|
|
|
|
29,719
|
|
|
|
74,577
|
|
|
|
251,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
89,523
|
|
|
$
|
18,099
|
|
|
$
|
45,417
|
|
|
$
|
153,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
801,446
|
|
|
$
|
3,258,988
|
|
|
$
|
5,855,315
|
|
|
$
|
9,915,749
|
|
Allocated capital
|
|
$
|
340,239
|
|
|
$
|
58,135
|
|
|
$
|
227,081
|
|
|
$
|
625,455
|
|
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
6.63
|
%
|
|
|
0.98
|
%
|
|
|
1.42
|
%
|
|
|
1.69
|
%
|
MBR margin
|
|
|
1.53
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.57
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
Operating Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan production
|
|
$
|
2,232,454
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,232,454
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
$
|
2,055,905
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
170,296
|
|
|
$
|
2,226,201
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
45,160
|
|
|
$
|
30,086
|
|
|
$
|
78,853
|
|
|
$
|
154,099
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3,750
|
)
|
|
|
(3,750
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
17,414
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
8,832
|
|
|
|
26,338
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
35,090
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
953
|
|
|
|
36,043
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
15,776
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
2,697
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
115,361
|
|
|
|
30,953
|
|
|
|
84,887
|
|
|
|
231,201
|
|
Variable expenses
|
|
|
3,734
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,734
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
FAS 91
|
|
|
(1,963
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,963
|
)
|
Fixed expenses
|
|
|
31,252
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
35,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
82,338
|
|
|
|
29,954
|
|
|
|
81,887
|
|
|
|
194,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
49,814
|
|
|
$
|
18,122
|
|
|
$
|
49,542
|
|
|
$
|
117,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
629,027
|
|
|
$
|
2,212,816
|
|
|
$
|
4,971,444
|
|
|
$
|
7,813,287
|
|
Allocated capital
|
|
$
|
193,959
|
|
|
$
|
40,342
|
|
|
$
|
201,789
|
|
|
$
|
436,090
|
|
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
7.18
|
%
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
|
|
1.59
|
%
|
|
|
1.97
|
%
|
MBR margin
|
|
|
1.32
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.42
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Operating Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan production
|
|
$
|
901,365
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
901,365
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
$
|
1,315,673
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
543,542
|
|
|
$
|
1,859,215
|
|
34
The following table provides details on the profitability for
the specialty commercial loans held for investment for the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Commercial Loans Held for Investment
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Single
|
|
|
Builder
|
|
|
Warehouse
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
Spec
|
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
Lending
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
13,273
|
|
|
$
|
60,422
|
|
|
$
|
3,489
|
|
|
$
|
77,184
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
|
|
(3,800
|
)
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
(4,397
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
4,052
|
|
|
|
1,867
|
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
|
|
7,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
16,909
|
|
|
|
58,489
|
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
|
|
80,431
|
|
Variable expenses
|
|
|
2,694
|
|
|
|
8,682
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,376
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
FAS 91
|
|
|
(308
|
)
|
|
|
(6,993
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(7,301
|
)
|
Fixed expenses
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
|
|
12,834
|
|
|
|
4,120
|
|
|
|
18,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
12,602
|
|
|
|
43,966
|
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
57,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
7,675
|
|
|
$
|
26,775
|
|
|
$
|
556
|
|
|
$
|
35,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
244,294
|
|
|
$
|
1,076,213
|
|
|
$
|
119,043
|
|
|
$
|
1,439,550
|
|
Allocated capital
|
|
$
|
18,564
|
|
|
$
|
104,123
|
|
|
$
|
10,382
|
|
|
$
|
133,069
|
|
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
5.43
|
%
|
|
|
5.61
|
%
|
|
|
2.93
|
%
|
|
|
5.36
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
Operating Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan production
|
|
$
|
190,908
|
|
|
$
|
1,746,690
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,937,598
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
10,997
|
|
|
$
|
44,458
|
|
|
$
|
632
|
|
|
$
|
56,087
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(512
|
)
|
|
|
(900
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
(1,529
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
|
|
1,409
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
3,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
12,472
|
|
|
|
44,968
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
58,329
|
|
Variable expenses
|
|
|
3,403
|
|
|
|
13,471
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
16,874
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
FAS 91
|
|
|
(689
|
)
|
|
|
(6,359
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(7,048
|
)
|
Fixed expenses
|
|
|
2,070
|
|
|
|
4,578
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
9,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
7,688
|
|
|
|
33,278
|
|
|
|
(1,881
|
)
|
|
|
39,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
4,652
|
|
|
$
|
20,133
|
|
|
$
|
(1,138
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
180,353
|
|
|
$
|
794,166
|
|
|
$
|
21,831
|
|
|
$
|
996,350
|
|
Allocated capital
|
|
$
|
14,305
|
|
|
$
|
78,051
|
|
|
$
|
2,172
|
|
|
$
|
94,528
|
|
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
(52
|
)%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
6.10
|
%
|
|
|
5.60
|
%
|
|
|
2.89
|
%
|
|
|
5.63
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
275
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
Operating Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan production
|
|
$
|
331,938
|
|
|
$
|
1,939,759
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,271,697
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
35
The following table provides details on the overhead costs for
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
Servicing OH
|
|
|
MB OH
|
|
|
Deposit OH
|
|
|
Corporate OH
|
|
|
Total Overhead
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
(247
|
)
|
|
$
|
809
|
|
|
$
|
14,364
|
|
|
$
|
(7,934
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,992
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,951
|
|
|
|
1,951
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,003
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
3,476
|
|
|
|
(2,854
|
)
|
|
|
3,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
17,840
|
|
|
|
(8,837
|
)
|
|
|
12,860
|
|
Variable expenses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
FAS 91
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Fixed expenses
|
|
|
19,376
|
|
|
|
40,621
|
|
|
|
41,128
|
|
|
|
168,825
|
|
|
|
269,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
(16,620
|
)
|
|
|
(39,520
|
)
|
|
|
(23,288
|
)
|
|
|
(177,662
|
)
|
|
|
(257,090
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(10,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,068
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,182
|
)
|
|
$
|
(102,911
|
)
|
|
$
|
(151,283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2,470
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
559,590
|
|
|
$
|
562,243
|
|
Allocated capital
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
12,643
|
|
|
$
|
2,108
|
|
|
$
|
251,361
|
|
|
$
|
266,317
|
|
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Operating Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan production
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
(494
|
)
|
|
$
|
(796
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,749
|
|
|
$
|
(11,589
|
)
|
|
$
|
(130
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Service fee income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(9,935
|
)
|
|
|
(9,935
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
2,486
|
|
|
|
(4,047
|
)
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
(822
|
)
|
|
|
15,235
|
|
|
|
(25,571
|
)
|
|
|
(9,637
|
)
|
Variable expenses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
FAS 91
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Fixed expenses
|
|
|
17,410
|
|
|
|
29,670
|
|
|
|
28,794
|
|
|
|
147,473
|
|
|
|
223,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
(15,889
|
)
|
|
|
(30,492
|
)
|
|
|
(13,559
|
)
|
|
|
(173,044
|
)
|
|
|
(232,984
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(9,613
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,448
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,203
|
)
|
|
$
|
(104,937
|
)
|
|
$
|
(141,201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(106
|
)
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
|
$
|
746,718
|
|
|
$
|
746,792
|
|
Allocated capital
|
|
$
|
3,375
|
|
|
$
|
6,916
|
|
|
$
|
1,464
|
|
|
$
|
338,145
|
|
|
$
|
349,900
|
|
Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Operating Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan production
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Loans sold
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
36
LOAN
PRODUCTION
The Company achieved record mortgage loan production of
$90.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2006, up
48% from the $60.8 billion reported in 2005. At
December 31, 2006, our total pipeline of loans in process
was at $11.8 billion, up 13% from December 31, 2005.
The production growth in 2006 was accomplished through our
continued drive to leverage our mortgage banking platform. The
mortgage professionals group increased its volume by 52% year
over year, contributing 91% of our production growth. Strong
production from conduit and Financial Freedom, which increased
90% and 71%, respectively, also contributed to this overall
growth. The Company has also improved its retention activities
with volume from servicing retention increasing 150% during the
same period. The production growth in these channels was driven
by our strategies to offer a broad and diverse product mix, such
as Alt-A, reverse mortgages, and HELOCs. Year over year, our
sales force, regional centers and active customers increased
44%, 23%, and 18%, respectively. Total loan production,
including subdivision construction, reached $91.7 billion
for the year ended December 31, 2006, also a record for the
Company. We expect to continue our growth by expanding into new
regions, hiring new salespeople, and continued product
development.
On February 12, 2007, the MBA issued an estimate of the
industry volume for 2006 of $2.5 trillion, which represents a
17% decline from 2005. Based on this estimate, our market share
is 3.58% in 2006, up from 2.01% in 2005.
The following summarizes our loan production and pipeline by
purpose, interest rate type, product type, S&P lifetime loss
estimate, geographic distribution, and channels as of and for
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Production and Pipeline by
Purpose:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loan
production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase transactions
|
|
$
|
35,189
|
|
|
$
|
25,605
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
|
|
41,764
|
|
|
|
28,213
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
|
|
12,998
|
|
|
|
6,956
|
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage loan production
|
|
$
|
89,951
|
|
|
$
|
60,774
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% purchase and cash-out
refinance transactions
|
|
|
86
|
%
|
|
|
89
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage industry market
share
|
|
|
3.58
|
%
|
|
|
2.01
|
%
|
|
|
78
|
%
|
Mortgage pipeline:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase transactions
|
|
$
|
3,914
|
|
|
$
|
3,617
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
|
|
4,193
|
|
|
|
4,332
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
|
|
1,792
|
|
|
|
1,237
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specific rate locks
|
|
|
9,899
|
|
|
|
9,186
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Non-specific rate locks on bulk
purchases
|
|
|
1,922
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pipeline at period end(1)
|
|
$
|
11,821
|
|
|
$
|
10,488
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total pipeline of loans in process includes rate lock
commitments the Company has provided on loans that are
specifically identified or non-specific bulk packages, and loan
applications we have received for which the borrower has not yet
locked in the interest rate commitment. Non-specific bulk
packages represent pools of loans the Company has committed to
purchase, where the pool characteristics are specified but the
actual loans are not. |
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Production by Amortization Type
as a Percent of Mortgage Production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate mortgages
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
Intermediate term fixed-rate loans
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Interest-only loans
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
Pay option ARMs
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
Other ARMs
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Production by Product
Type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard First Mortgage Products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alt-A
|
|
$
|
70,146
|
|
|
$
|
47,223
|
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
Agency conforming
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Subprime
|
|
|
2,674
|
|
|
|
2,276
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total standard first mortgage
products (S&P evaluated)(1)
|
|
|
74,077
|
|
|
|
50,591
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
Specialty Consumer Home Mortgage
Products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity line of
credit(2)/Seconds
|
|
|
7,199
|
|
|
|
3,653
|
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
Reverse mortgages
|
|
|
5,024
|
|
|
|
2,935
|
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
Consumer construction(2)
|
|
|
3,651
|
|
|
|
3,595
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal mortgage production
|
|
|
89,951
|
|
|
|
60,774
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
Builder construction commitments(2)
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total production
|
|
$
|
91,698
|
|
|
$
|
62,714
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following summarizes the estimated lifetime losses for
mortgage production using the S&P Levels model for the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lifetime
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Lifetime
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
Loss Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Loss Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Production by S&P Lifetime
Loss Estimate(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency conforming equivalent
(<48 bps)
|
|
|
0.23
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
0.21
|
%
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
Prime Alt-A equivalent
(48-135 bps)
|
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
Subprime equivalent
(>135 bps)
|
|
|
4.44
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total S&P lifetime loss
estimate
|
|
|
0.79
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
0.70
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total S&P evaluated production
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
74,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
The following table shows the reconciliation from total
production to total S&P evaluated production for the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
FICO
|
|
|
CLTV(3)
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
FICO
|
|
|
CLTV(3)
|
|
|
Total production
|
|
$
|
91,698
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
62,714
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity line of
credit(2)/Seconds
|
|
|
7,199
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
|
|
3,653
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
Reverse mortgages
|
|
|
5,024
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
|
2,935
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Consumer construction(2)
|
|
|
3,651
|
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
|
3,595
|
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
Builder construction commitments
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total S&P evaluated production
|
|
$
|
74,077
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
$
|
50,591
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
While Indymac production is evaluated using the S&P Levels
model, the data are not audited or endorsed by S&P. S&P
evaluated production excludes second liens, HELOC, reverse
mortgages and construction loans. In the third quarter of 2006,
Indymac adopted version 5.7 of the S&P Levels model. The
average lifetime loss for 2005 has been restated utilizing the
new model. |
|
(2) |
|
Amount represents total commitments. |
|
(3) |
|
Combined
loan-to-value
ratio for loans in the second lien position is used to calculate
weighted average original
loan-to-value
ratio for the portfolio. |
Total average lifetime loss rate for the year ended 2006
increased nine basis points from 0.70% for the year ended 2005
to 0.79%, driven by an increase in loans with subordinate
financing and subprime loans originated during the period. The
loss estimates are shown to describe the relative level of
credit risk in our loan production at time of origination.
Because the Company routinely sells the vast majority of loans
produced, these estimates do not reflect the amount of credit
risk retained by the Company.
The following indicates the geographic distribution of our
production for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Geographic
distribution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
Florida
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
New York
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Virginia
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
The following summarizes our loan production by divisions for
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Production by
Divisions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loan
Production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Professionals Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale(1)
|
|
$
|
36,859
|
|
|
$
|
29,145
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Correspondent
|
|
|
10,264
|
|
|
|
5,719
|
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
Conduit
|
|
|
30,101
|
|
|
|
15,811
|
|
|
|
90
|
%
|
Consumer Direct
|
|
|
1,958
|
|
|
|
2,883
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)%
|
Financial Freedom
|
|
|
5,024
|
|
|
|
2,935
|
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
Servicing Retention
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
Home Equity Division
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)%
|
Consumer Construction and Lot
|
|
|
2,937
|
|
|
|
2,994
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mortgage Loan Production
|
|
|
89,951
|
|
|
|
60,774
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
Commercial Loan
Production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Builder Construction
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Production
|
|
$
|
91,698
|
|
|
$
|
62,714
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Wholesale channel includes $3.3 billion, and
$1.3 billion of production from wholesale inside sales for
2006 and 2005. The wholesale inside sales force focuses on small
and geographically remote mortgage brokers through centralized
in-house sales personnel instead of field sales personnel. |
Key production drivers for mortgage professionals group’s
wholesale and correspondent channels for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005 follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Key Production
Drivers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active customers(1)
|
|
|
7,927
|
|
|
|
6,728
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
Sales personnel
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
Number of regional offices
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Active customers are defined as customers who funded at least
one loan during the most recent
90-day
period. |
LOAN
SALES
The following summarizes loans sold and the performance ratios
on loan sales during the three years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004 (year ended December 31, 2004 is
reflected on a pro forma basis (1)):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2004(1)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Total loans sold
|
|
$
|
79,049
|
|
|
$
|
52,297
|
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
$
|
31,036
|
|
|
|
155
|
%
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross MBR margin before hedging
|
|
|
1.04
|
%
|
|
|
1.26
|
%
|
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
|
|
1.98
|
%
|
|
|
(47
|
)%
|
Net MBR margin after hedging
|
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
|
|
1.80
|
%
|
|
|
(41
|
)%
|
40
|
|
|
(1) |
|
2004 MBR margins are calculated using proforma gain on
mortgage loan sales for the year ended December 31, 2004 of
$431.2 million, which excluded the $59.5 million
pre-tax SAB 105 accounting adjustment and the
$7.9 million pre-tax purchase accounting adjustment related
to the Financial Freedom acquisition. The GAAP gain on mortgage
loan sales was $363.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 representing a net MBR margin after
hedging of 1.59%. |
The MBR margin is calculated using mortgage banking revenue
divided by total loans sold. The mortgage banking revenue
includes total consolidated gain on sale of loans company-wide
and the net interest income earned on mortgage loans held for
sale by mortgage banking production divisions. While most of the
gain on sale of loans results from the loan sale activities in
our mortgage banking segment, we do occasionally sell loans held
by our thrift segment, primarily lot loans and home equity
products. The gain on sale recognized in the thrift segment is
included in the MBR margin calculation.
Included in the gain on sale of loans in 2006 were
$9.7 million of losses related to the establishment of a
reserve for fraud losses on certain lot loans. The Company
discovered that 45 lot loans related to two developments in
Michigan and Florida were the subject of criminal fraud on the
part of the developers, brokers, appraisers and closing agents.
These loans had outstanding principal balances of approximately
$13.9 million before the reserve for fraud losses. At
December 31, 2006, these loans are non-accrual and have an
aggregate book value of $5.3 million. We have since
performed a full portfolio review and implemented a series of
product guideline changes, operational changes and fraud
prevention measures to mitigate future occurrences of this kind.
We believe there are no further incidences of fraud in its
existing book of lot loans of similar size or scope.
The following tables summarize MBR margin by channel and product
for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
MBR Margin by Channel:
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Wholesale
|
|
|
1.16
|
%
|
|
|
1.56
|
%
|
Correspondent
|
|
|
0.54
|
%
|
|
|
1.09
|
%
|
Conduit
|
|
|
0.46
|
%
|
|
|
0.40
|
%
|
Consumer Direct
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
|
|
2.27
|
%
|
Financial Freedom
|
|
|
3.80
|
%
|
|
|
2.94
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
1.26
|
%
|
|
|
1.35
|
%
|
Total MBR margin
|
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
MBR Margin by Product:
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Agency Conforming
|
|
|
0.41
|
%
|
|
|
0.84
|
%
|
Alt-A
|
|
|
0.84
|
%
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
Subprime
|
|
|
2.03
|
%
|
|
|
1.98
|
%
|
HELOC/Seconds
|
|
|
0.58
|
%
|
|
|
2.08
|
%
|
Reverse Mortgages
|
|
|
3.80
|
%
|
|
|
2.94
|
%
|
CTP/Lot
|
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
|
|
1.68
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
1.57
|
%
|
|
|
1.43
|
%
|
Total MBR margin
|
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
The Company hedges the interest rate risk inherent in its
pipeline of mortgage loans held for sale to protect its margin
on sale of loans. Indymac focuses on trying to maintain stable
profit margins with an emphasis on forecasting expected fallout
to more precisely estimate our required hedge coverage ratio and
optimize hedge costs. By closely monitoring key factors, such as
product type, origination channels, progress or
“status” of transactions, as well as changes in market
interest rates since Indymac committed a rate to the borrower
(“rate lock commitments”), the Company seeks to
quantify the optional component of each rate lock, and in turn,
the aggregate rate
41
lock pipeline. By accurately evaluating these factors, the
Company has been able to minimize the purchase of options and
also stabilize gain on sale margins over different rate
environments.
In addition to mortgage loans held for sale, the hedging
activities also include rate lock commitments. Rate lock
commitments on mortgage loans that are intended to be sold are
considered to be derivatives pursuant to SFAS No. 133,
“Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities,” (“SFAS 133”). The rate lock
commitments are initially valued at zero and continue to be
adjusted for changes in value resulting from changes in market
interest rates, pursuant to SAB 105. The Company hedges the
risk of changes in fair value of rate lock commitments by
selling forward contracts on securities of Fannie Mae or Freddie
Mac, Euro Dollar futures and other hedge instruments to manage
this risk. These forward and futures contracts are also
accounted for as derivatives and recorded at fair value.
The following shows the various channels through which loans
were distributed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Distribution of Loan Sales by
Channel:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of government-sponsored
enterprises (“GSEs”) equivalent loans
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
Private-label securitizations
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
Whole loan sales, servicing
retained
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Whole loan sales, servicing
released
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal sales
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
|
|
95
|
%
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
Investment portfolio acquisitions
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan distribution percentage
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan distribution
|
|
$
|
81,968
|
|
|
$
|
54,921
|
|
|
$
|
34,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We maintain multiple channels for loan dispositions to achieve
sustainable liquidity and to develop a deep and diverse investor
base. Also, through multiple channels, Indymac endeavors to
consistently sell investment and non-investment grade bonds,
AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities, and whole loans
for cash.
In conjunction with the sale of mortgage loans, the Company
generally retains certain assets. The primary assets retained
include MSRs and, to a lesser degree, AAA-rated and agency
interest-only securities, AAA-rated principal-only securities,
prepayment penalty securities, investment and non-investment
grade securities, and residual securities. The allocated cost of
the retained assets at the time of sale is recorded as an asset
with an offsetting increase to the gain on sale of loans (or a
reduction in the cost basis of the loans sold). The calculation
of the $668.1 million in gain on sale of loans earned
during the year ended December 31, 2006 included the
retention of $1.1 billion in MSRs, and $388.5 million
of other retained assets. During 2006, assets previously
retained generated cash flows of $677.0 million. More
information on the valuation assumptions related to the
Company’s retained assets can be found at page 49,
under the heading “Valuation of MSRs, Interest-Only,
Prepayment Penalty, and Residual Securities.”
42
MORTGAGE
SERVICING AND OTHER RETAINED ASSETS
MORTGAGE
SERVICING AND MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS
Indymac’s total loans serviced for others reached
$139.8 billion (including reverse mortgages and HELOCs) at
December 31, 2006, with a weighted average coupon of 7.05%.
In comparison, Indymac serviced $84.5 billion of mortgage
loans owned by others at December 31, 2005, with a weighted
average coupon of 6.19%. The activity in the servicing
portfolios for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing Portfolio
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance at
beginning of period
|
|
$
|
84,495
|
|
|
$
|
50,219
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
80,237
|
|
|
|
52,382
|
|
Clean-up
calls exercised
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
Loan payments and prepayments
|
|
|
(24,884
|
)
|
|
|
(17,966
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid principal balance at end of
period
|
|
$
|
139,817
|
|
|
$
|
84,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables provide additional information related to
the servicing portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
By Product Type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate mortgages
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Intermediate term fixed-rate loans
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
Pay option ARMs
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Reverse mortgages (all ARMs)
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
HELOCs
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
Information(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average FICO
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
Weighted average original LTV(2)
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
Average original loan size (in
thousands)
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
Percent of portfolio with
prepayment penalty
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
Portfolio delinquency (% of unpaid
principal balance)(3)
|
|
|
5.15
|
%
|
|
|
3.74
|
%
|
By Geographic Distribution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
Florida
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
New York
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Virginia
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Portfolio delinquency is calculated for the entire servicing
portfolio. All other information presented excludes reverse
mortgages. |
|
(2) |
|
Combined
loan-to-value
ratio for loans in the second lien position is used to calculate
weighted average original
loan-to-value
ratio for the portfolio. |
|
(3) |
|
Delinquency is defined as 30 days or more past due. |
43
Capitalized MSRs totaled $1.8 billion as of
December 31, 2006, and $1.1 billion as of
December 31, 2005, an increase of $728.0 million.
Refer to “Note 7 — Mortgage Servicing
Rights” in the accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements for details of the activities in MSRs.
The fair value of MSRs is determined using discounted cash flow
techniques benchmarked against third party opinions of value.
Estimates of fair value involve several assumptions, including
assumptions about future prepayment rates, market expectations
of future interest rates and discount rates. Prepayment rates
are projected using a prepayment model developed by a third
party vendor and calibrated for the Company’s collateral.
The model considers key factors, such as refinance incentive,
housing turnover, seasonality and aging of the pool of loans.
Prepayment speeds incorporate expectations of future rates
implied by the market forward LIBOR/swap curve, as well as
collateral specific current coupon information. Refer to
“Valuation of MSRs, Interest-Only, Prepayment Penalty, and
Residual Securities” on page 49 for further detail on
the valuation assumptions.
Effective January 1, 2006, SFAS 156 allowed us to
elect to measure MSRs using the fair value method instead of the
amortization method. Therefore, change in value due to run-off
of the portfolio is recorded as valuation adjustment instead of
the amortization for periods beginning in 2006. Prior to the
adoption of SFAS 156, we hedged our MSRs on an economic
basis and elected to designate SFAS 133 fair value hedge
accounting on certain tranches of the total MSRs. The changes in
the value of the designated MSRs attributable to the hedged
risk, and the fair value of the designated hedges, were recorded
through income if the hedging relationships were proven to be
effective under the provision of SFAS 133. All MSRs,
regardless of hedge designation, were then adjusted to the lower
of cost or market (“LOCOM”). The components of service
fee income (expense) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
BPS
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
BPS
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
BPS
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
UPB
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
UPB
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
UPB
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Service fee income
(expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross service fee income
|
|
$
|
500,904
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
282,420
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
142,266
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Change in value due to portfolio
run- off/amortization
|
|
|
(374,955
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(227,085
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(146,491
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service fee income, net of change
in value due to portfolio run-off/amortization
|
|
|
125,949
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
55,335
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(4,225
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Change in value due to application
of external benchmarking policies
|
|
|
(16,459
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Valuation adjustment due to market
changes
|
|
|
24,180
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(13,460
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(50,293
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Hedge (loss) gain on MSRs
|
|
|
(32,353
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
42,065
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total service fee income
(expense)
|
|
$
|
101,317
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
44,235
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
(12,453
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
In addition to the hedging gain (loss) on MSRs, the Company also
uses other hedging strategies to manage its economic risks
associated with MSRs. A summary of the performance on MSRs,
including AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities, and
hedges for the respective periods follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Valuation adjustment due to market
changes and external benchmarking
|
|
$
|
7,721
|
|
|
$
|
(13,459
|
)
|
|
$
|
(50,293
|
)
|
Hedge (loss) gain on MSRs
|
|
|
(32,353
|
)
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
42,065
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on
AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities
|
|
|
3,136
|
|
|
|
(13,864
|
)
|
|
|
(42,651
|
)
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on
principal-only securities
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
|
|
(704
|
)
|
|
|
4,462
|
|
Unrealized gain on prepayment
penalty securities
|
|
|
23,625
|
|
|
|
21,694
|
|
|
|
3,772
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
|
2,933
|
|
|
|
6,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on MSRs, AAA-rated
and agency interest-only securities, and hedges
|
|
$
|
3,098
|
|
|
$
|
(1,040
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36,624
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
RETAINED ASSETS
The carrying value of AAA-rated and agency interest-only,
principal-only, prepayment penalty, residual and non-investment
grade securities is evaluated by discounting estimated net
future cash flows. For these securities, estimated net future
cash flows are primarily based on assumptions related to
prepayment speeds, in addition to expected credit loss
assumptions on the residual securities. The models used for
estimation are periodically tested against historical prepayment
speeds and our valuations are benchmarked to external sources,
where available. We also may retain certain other investment
grade securities from our securitizations and to a lesser extent
purchase from third parties to serve as hedges for our AAA-rated
and agency interest-only securities. A summary of the activity
of the retained assets follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
AAA-rated and agency
interest-only securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
78,731
|
|
|
$
|
90,658
|
|
Retained investments from
securitizations
|
|
|
29,576
|
|
|
|
25,168
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(22,939
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Clean-up
calls exercised
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
Cash received, net of accretion
|
|
|
(14,827
|
)
|
|
|
(23,060
|
)
|
Valuation gains (losses) before
hedges
|
|
|
3,136
|
|
|
|
(13,864
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
73,570
|
|
|
$
|
78,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal-only
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
9,483
|
|
|
$
|
18,598
|
|
Retained investments from
securitizations
|
|
|
13,862
|
|
|
|
13,073
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
121,281
|
|
|
|
123,048
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(100,761
|
)
|
|
|
(142,132
|
)
|
Cash received, net of accretion
|
|
|
(4,576
|
)
|
|
|
(2,400
|
)
|
Valuation losses before hedges
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
|
|
(704
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
38,478
|
|
|
$
|
9,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Prepayment penalty
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
75,741
|
|
|
$
|
33,451
|
|
Retained investments from
securitizations
|
|
|
43,094
|
|
|
|
38,742
|
|
Transfer from MSRs/residual
securities
|
|
|
4,523
|
|
|
|
8,491
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(2,078
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Cash received, net of accretion
|
|
|
(47,329
|
)
|
|
|
(26,637
|
)
|
Valuation gains before hedges
|
|
|
23,625
|
|
|
|
21,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
97,576
|
|
|
$
|
75,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residual
securities(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
167,771
|
|
|
$
|
135,386
|
|
Retained investments from
securitizations(2)
|
|
|
224,014
|
|
|
|
58,396
|
|
Transfer from MSRs/prepayment
penalty securities
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
(9,209
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(107,360
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Cash received, net of accretion
|
|
|
(22,362
|
)
|
|
|
(23,941
|
)
|
Valuation losses before hedges
|
|
|
(2,481
|
)
|
|
|
(2,070
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
250,573
|
|
|
$
|
167,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
92,120
|
|
|
$
|
146,822
|
|
Retained investments from
securitizations
|
|
|
43,701
|
|
|
|
38,241
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
72,366
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
Sales
|
|
|
(9,796
|
)
|
|
|
(83,629
|
)
|
Cash received, net of accretion
|
|
|
(8,780
|
)
|
|
|
(7,376
|
)
|
Valuation losses)before hedges
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(1,577
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
189,253
|
|
|
$
|
92,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Investment-grade
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
57,712
|
|
|
$
|
83,052
|
|
Retained investments from
securitizations
|
|
|
34,205
|
|
|
|
14,224
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
3,697
|
|
|
|
1,523
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
(846
|
)
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
Sales
|
|
|
(13,542
|
)
|
|
|
(37,330
|
)
|
Cash received, net of accretion
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
(325
|
)
|
Valuation losses before hedges
|
|
|
(1,421
|
)
|
|
|
(3,185
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
80,174
|
|
|
$
|
57,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in the residual securities balance at December 31,
2006 were $31.8 million of HELOC residuals retained from
two separate guaranteed mortgage securitization transactions.
There was no gain on sale of loans recognized in connection with
these transactions. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts retained consist of 33% in prime-lot loans, 37% in
subprime loans and 30% in HELOCs. |
46
The fair value of other investment grade and non-investment
grade securities by credit rating follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
(Discount)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Face
|
|
|
to Face
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Other investment grade
mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AA+
|
|
$
|
7,445
|
|
|
$
|
(69
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,376
|
|
|
$
|
7,513
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
AA
|
|
|
87,044
|
|
|
|
(1,127
|
)
|
|
|
85,917
|
|
|
|
86,311
|
|
|
|
21,787
|
|
AA-
|
|
|
14,038
|
|
|
|
(348
|
)
|
|
|
13,690
|
|
|
|
14,138
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
A
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
2,192
|
|
|
|
2,160
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
21,747
|
|
|
|
(1,209
|
)
|
|
|
20,538
|
|
|
|
20,734
|
|
|
|
29,848
|
|
BBB-
|
|
|
64,902
|
|
|
|
(5,340
|
)
|
|
|
59,562
|
|
|
|
58,397
|
|
|
|
40,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other investment grade
mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
197,449
|
|
|
$
|
(8,174
|
)
|
|
$
|
189,275
|
|
|
$
|
189,253
|
|
|
$
|
92,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-investment grade
mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BB+
|
|
$
|
8,456
|
|
|
$
|
(1,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,299
|
|
|
$
|
7,299
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
BB
|
|
|
57,986
|
|
|
|
(8,405
|
)
|
|
|
49,581
|
|
|
|
49,856
|
|
|
|
36,873
|
|
BB-
|
|
|
22,022
|
|
|
|
(901
|
)
|
|
|
21,121
|
|
|
|
21,170
|
|
|
|
13,523
|
|
B
|
|
|
6,619
|
|
|
|
(5,569
|
)
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
6,458
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,240
|
|
|
|
(4,998
|
)
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other non-investment grade
mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
100,323
|
|
|
$
|
(21,030
|
)
|
|
$
|
79,293
|
|
|
$
|
80,174
|
|
|
$
|
57,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006, other investment grade and
non-investment grade mortgage-backed securities totaled
$269.4 million, of which 86% were collateralized by prime
loans and 14% were collateralized by subprime loans.
The components of the net gain (loss) on mortgage-backed
securities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gain on available for
sale securities
|
|
$
|
3,715
|
|
|
$
|
6,054
|
|
|
$
|
3,972
|
|
Impairment on available for sale
securities
|
|
|
(10,238
|
)
|
|
|
(607
|
)
|
|
|
(1,582
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on prepayment
penalty securities
|
|
|
23,625
|
|
|
|
21,694
|
|
|
|
3,379
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on
AAA-rated and agency interest-only and residual securities
|
|
|
1,692
|
|
|
|
(16,970
|
)
|
|
|
(36,708
|
)
|
Net gain on trading securities and
other instruments used to hedge AAA-rated and agency
interest-only and residual securities
|
|
|
1,688
|
|
|
|
7,695
|
|
|
|
7,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gain (loss) on securities,
net
|
|
$
|
20,482
|
|
|
$
|
17,866
|
|
|
$
|
(23,804
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
weighted average yields and remaining contractual maturities of
our mortgage-backed securities, excluding AAA-rated agency and
non-agency securities, as of December 31, 2006. For
securities
available-for-sale,
the weighted average yield is computed based on the amortized
costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than One
|
|
|
More than Five
|
|
|
More than Ten
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year or Less
|
|
|
Year to Five Years
|
|
|
Years to Ten Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated and agency interest-only
securities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
73,570
|
|
|
|
18.24
|
%
|
|
$
|
73,570
|
|
|
|
18.24
|
%
|
AAA-rated principal-only securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
38,478
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
%
|
|
|
38,478
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
%
|
Other investment grade
mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,295
|
|
|
|
9.02
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
185,958
|
|
|
|
7.45
|
%
|
|
|
189,253
|
|
|
|
7.48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment grade mortgage-
backed securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,295
|
|
|
|
9.02
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
298,006
|
|
|
|
9.88
|
%
|
|
|
301,301
|
|
|
|
9.87
|
%
|
Prepayment penalty securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,138
|
|
|
|
15.03
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
96,438
|
|
|
|
29.99
|
%
|
|
|
97,576
|
|
|
|
29.82
|
%
|
Other non-investment grade
securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
46,844
|
|
|
|
23.00
|
%
|
|
|
4,502
|
|
|
|
22.00
|
%
|
|
|
199,227
|
|
|
|
18.99
|
%
|
|
|
250,573
|
|
|
|
19.79
|
%
|
Residual mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
16,040
|
|
|
|
12.18
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
64,134
|
|
|
|
13.58
|
%
|
|
|
80,174
|
|
|
|
13.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-investment grade
mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
64,022
|
|
|
|
20.15
|
%
|
|
|
4,502
|
|
|
|
22.00
|
%
|
|
|
359,799
|
|
|
|
20.97
|
%
|
|
|
428,323
|
|
|
|
20.86
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
67,317
|
|
|
|
19.60
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,502
|
|
|
|
22.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
657,805
|
|
|
|
15.95
|
%
|
|
$
|
729,624
|
|
|
|
16.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Given prepayments on the underlying collateral of our MBS, we do
not expect our MBS to remain outstanding throughout their
contractual maturity periods. Therefore, contractual maturity is
not a relevant measure of the timing of our future expected cash
flows. Actual economic cash flows are expected to be received
much sooner.
48
VALUATION
OF MSRs, INTEREST-ONLY, PREPAYMENT PENALTY,
AND RESIDUAL SECURITIES
MSRs, AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities, prepayment
penalty securities, and residual securities are recorded at fair
market value. Prior to January 1, 2006, MSRs were subject
to the lower of cost or market limitations. Relevant information
and assumptions used to value these securities at
December 31, 2006 and 2005 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Valuation Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Wtd.
|
|
|
Servicing
|
|
|
3-Month
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Lifetime
|
|
|
3-Month
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Fee/Interest
|
|
|
Prepayment
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Prepayment
|
|
|
Prepayment
|
|
|
Discount
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Coupon
|
|
|
Strip
|
|
|
Speeds
|
|
|
Multiple
|
|
|
Speeds
|
|
|
Speeds
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Loss Rate(1)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSRs
|
|
$
|
1,822,455
|
|
|
$
|
139,816,763
|
|
|
|
7.05
|
%
|
|
|
0.37
|
%
|
|
|
20.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.57
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
%
|
|
|
19.8
|
%
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated interest-only securities
|
|
$
|
73,570
|
|
|
$
|
5,957,550
|
|
|
|
6.93
|
%
|
|
|
0.51
|
%
|
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
|
19.7
|
%
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment penalty securities
|
|
$
|
97,576
|
|
|
$
|
20,282,718
|
|
|
|
7.40
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
%
|
|
|
20.6
|
%
|
|
|
26.3
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lot loan residual securities
|
|
|
57,640
|
|
|
$
|
2,246,833
|
|
|
|
9.24
|
%
|
|
|
3.54
|
%
|
|
|
35.6
|
%
|
|
|
0.73
|
|
|
|
39.8
|
%
|
|
|
37.9
|
%
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.61
|
%
|
HELOC residual securities
|
|
|
98,697
|
|
|
$
|
3,039,555
|
|
|
|
9.59
|
%
|
|
|
2.71
|
%
|
|
|
43.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
50.3
|
%
|
|
|
47.6
|
%
|
|
|
20.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.11
|
%
|
Closed-end seconds residual
securities
|
|
|
14,572
|
|
|
$
|
1,737,859
|
|
|
|
10.44
|
%
|
|
|
3.69
|
%
|
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
37.1
|
%
|
|
|
24.8
|
%
|
|
|
24.1
|
%
|
|
|
8.08
|
%
|
Subprime residual securities
|
|
|
79,664
|
|
|
$
|
4,848,859
|
|
|
|
7.74
|
%
|
|
|
1.68
|
%
|
|
|
33.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
39.5
|
%
|
|
|
38.1
|
%
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
5.85
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-investment grade residual
securities
|
|
$
|
250,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSRs
|
|
$
|
1,094,490
|
|
|
$
|
84,495,133
|
|
|
|
6.19
|
%
|
|
|
0.37
|
%
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.54
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
%
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated and agency interest-only
securities
|
|
$
|
78,731
|
|
|
$
|
7,583,643
|
|
|
|
6.63
|
%
|
|
|
0.38
|
%
|
|
|
27.5
|
%
|
|
|
2.73
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment penalty securities
|
|
$
|
75,741
|
|
|
$
|
13,657,946
|
|
|
|
6.30
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
|
|
20.3
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime residual securities
|
|
$
|
2,438
|
|
|
$
|
1,183,361
|
|
|
|
5.85
|
%
|
|
|
0.61
|
%
|
|
|
60.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
46.3
|
%
|
|
|
51.4
|
%
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.34
|
%
|
Lot loan residual securities
|
|
|
41,066
|
|
|
$
|
939,005
|
|
|
|
7.55
|
%
|
|
|
2.90
|
%
|
|
|
33.2
|
%
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
43.1
|
%
|
|
|
41.4
|
%
|
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
|
|
0.48
|
%
|
HELOC residual securities
|
|
|
66,041
|
|
|
$
|
1,430,473
|
|
|
|
8.26
|
%
|
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
|
|
55.8
|
%
|
|
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
44.0
|
%
|
|
|
49.6
|
%
|
|
|
19.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.82
|
%
|
Subprime residual securities
|
|
|
58,226
|
|
|
$
|
4,831,675
|
|
|
|
7.40
|
%
|
|
|
2.17
|
%
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
37.1
|
%
|
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
|
|
24.9
|
%
|
|
|
4.76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-investment grade residual
securities
|
|
$
|
167,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a percentage of the original pool balance, the actual
cumulative loss rate to date totaled 0.34%, 0.06% and 0.50% for
HELOC, closed-end seconds and subprime loans, respectively, at
December 31, 2006. No loss has been incurred on lot loans
as of December 31, 2006. |
The lifetime prepayment speeds represent the annual constant
prepayment rate (“CPR”) estimated for the remaining
life of the collateral supporting the asset. For MSRs and
AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities, prepayment rates
are projected using a prepayment model developed by a third
party vendor and calibrated for the Company’s collateral.
The model considers key factors, such as refinance incentive,
housing turnover, seasonality and aging of the pool of loans.
Prepayment speeds incorporate expectations of future rates
implied by the market forward LIBOR/swap curve, as well as
collateral specific current coupon information.
The weighted-average multiple for MSRs, AAA-rated and agency
interest-only securities and residual securities represent the
book value divided by the product of collateral balance and
servicing fee/interest strip. While the weighted-average life of
such assets is a function of the undiscounted cash flows, the
multiple is a function of the discounted cash flows. With regard
to AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities, the
marketplace frequently uses calculated multiples to assess the
overall impact valuation assumptions have on value. Collateral
type, coupon, loan age and the size of the interest strip must
be considered when comparing these multiples. The mix of
collateral types supporting servicing-related assets is
primarily non-conforming/conventional, which may make the
Company’s MSR multiples incomparable to peer multiples
whose product mix is substantially different.
Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2006, the calculation of
remaining cumulative loss rate has changed to using the
remaining lifetime loss projection divided by current collateral
balance. All prior periods have been adjusted to reflect such
change.
The prepayment penalty securities are used as hedges of MSRs.
The value of prepayment penalty securities generally rises in a
declining rate environment due to higher prepayment activities,
which typically mitigates a
49
decline in MSR value attendant to faster prepayments. As of
December 31, 2006, as a percentage of the underlying
collateral, the value of prepayment penalty securities was 48
basis points, down from 55 basis points at
December 31, 2005, due to an increase in the market
interest rates.
HEDGING
INTEREST RATE RISK ON SERVICING-RELATED ASSETS
With respect to the investment in servicing-related assets
(AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities, non-investment
grade residual securities and MSRs), the Company is exposed to
interest rate risk. The MSRs and Other Retained Assets division
is responsible for the management of interest rate and
prepayment risks in the servicing-related assets, subject to
policies and procedures established by, and oversight from, our
management-level Interest Rate Risk Committee
(“IRRC”), Variable Cash Flow Instruments Committee
(“VCI”), Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”)
group, and our Board of Directors-level ERM Committee.
The objective of our hedging strategy is to maintain a stable
range of returns in all interest rate environments and not to
speculate on interest rates. As such, we manage the
comprehensive interest rate risk of our servicing-related assets
using financial instruments. Historically, we have hedged
servicing-related assets using a variety of derivative
instruments and on-balance sheet securities. As there are no
hedge instruments that would be perfectly correlated with these
hedged assets, we use a mix of the instruments designed to
correlate well with the hedged servicing assets.
We use a
value-at-risk
(“VAR”) measure to monitor our interest rate risk on
our assets. The measure incorporates a range of market factors
that can impact the value of these assets, and supplements other
risk measures such as Duration Gap and stress testing. VAR
estimates the exposure to loss over a specified period at a
specified confidence level. We have chosen a historical approach
that uses 500 days of market conditions along with current
portfolio data to estimate the potential
one-day loss
at a 95% confidence level. This means that actual losses are
estimated to exceed the VAR measure about five times every
100 days.
In modeling the VAR, we have made a number of assumptions and
approximations. As there is no standardized methodology for
estimating VAR, different assumptions and approximations could
result in materially different VAR estimates.
As of December 31, 2006, the portfolio of MSRs and
interest-only securities was valued at $1.8 billion. The
average VAR (after the effect of hedging transactions) for the
year was $2.3 million, or 13 bps of the recorded
value. During 2006, the VAR measure ranged from
$1.1 million to $5.1 million.
A key performance measure for the MSRs and Other Retained Assets
division is the return on equity of the deployed capital. The
segment as a whole reported an ROE of 25% and 23% for the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The table
below provides a detail by major asset class of the ROE for the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Servicing
|
|
|
AAA IO
|
|
|
Credit Risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing
|
|
|
AAA IO
|
|
|
Credit Risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
65,596
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
25,027
|
|
|
|
91,246
|
|
|
$
|
32,807
|
|
|
|
(2,766
|
)
|
|
|
13,872
|
|
|
|
43,913
|
|
Average capital deployed
|
|
$
|
243,232
|
|
|
|
10,002
|
|
|
|
117,217
|
|
|
|
370,451
|
|
|
$
|
125,477
|
|
|
|
8,252
|
|
|
|
60,230
|
|
|
|
193,959
|
|
Return on equity
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
(34
|
)%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
MORTGAGE-BACKED
SECURITIES AND LOANS HELD FOR INVESTMENT
In addition to the securities retained from our securitizations,
the Company also invests in non-agency senior and agency
securities and loans held for investment to generate core
interest income, stabilize company-wide earnings, and provide a
consistent return on equity. These securities are generally
classified as available for sale and fair value adjustments are
excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component in
shareholders’ equity.
At December 31, 2006, mortgage-backed securities totaled
$5.4 billion, of which 89% were AAA-rated securities. At
December 31, 2005, mortgage-backed securities totaled
$4.1 billion, of which 90% were AAA-rated securities. Our
AAA-rated mortgage-backed securities had an expected
weighted-average life of 2.9 years and 2.6 years at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
50
Details of loans held for investment and AAA-rated non-agency
and agency securities as of December 31, 2006 and 2005
follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Loans held for
investment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage
|
|
$
|
6,519,340
|
|
|
$
|
5,441,521
|
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
2,225,979
|
|
|
|
1,883,674
|
|
Builder construction
|
|
|
786,279
|
|
|
|
612,061
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
23,618
|
|
|
|
31,882
|
|
Land and other mortgage
|
|
|
375,215
|
|
|
|
260,615
|
|
Revolving warehouse lines of credit
|
|
|
246,778
|
|
|
|
48,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total — loans held for
investment
|
|
$
|
10,177,209
|
|
|
$
|
8,278,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated non-agency securities,
trading
|
|
$
|
43,957
|
|
|
$
|
52,633
|
|
AAA-rated non-agency securities,
available for sale
|
|
|
4,604,489
|
|
|
|
3,524,952
|
|
AAA-rated agency securities,
available for sale
|
|
|
65,175
|
|
|
|
43,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AAA-rated mortgage backed
securities
|
|
$
|
4,713,621
|
|
|
$
|
3,620,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
weighted average yields and remaining contractual maturities of
our MBS portfolio, excluding other retained assets as of
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than One Year
|
|
|
More than Five
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year or Less
|
|
|
to Five Years
|
|
|
Years to Ten Years
|
|
|
More than Ten Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wtd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wtd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wtd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wtd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wtd.
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated agency securities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,963
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
63,212
|
|
|
|
5.88
|
%
|
|
$
|
65,175
|
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
AAA-rated non-agency securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,648,446
|
|
|
|
5.51
|
%
|
|
|
4,648,446
|
|
|
|
5.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AAA-rated mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,963
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,711,658
|
|
|
|
5.51
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,713,621
|
|
|
|
5.52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The weighted average yield is computed based on the amortized
costs of the securities. |
Given prepayments on the underlying collateral of our MBS, we do
not expect our MBS to remain outstanding throughout their
contractual maturity periods. Therefore, contractual maturity is
not a relevant measure of the timing of our future expected cash
flows. Actual economic cash flows are expected to be received
much sooner.
SFR
MORTGAGE LOANS HELD FOR INVESTMENT
The Company’s portfolio of mortgage loans held for
investment is comprised primarily of SFR mortgage loans, with a
concentration in adjustable-rate and intermediate term
fixed-rate mortgage loans to mitigate interest rate risk. The
Company plans to grow the investments in its thrift portfolio
opportunistically based on the extent to which (1) their
ROEs exceed our cost of both core and risk-based capital or
(2) they are needed to support our core mortgage banking
investments in mortgage servicing rights and residual and
non-investment grade securities, if their ROEs are below our
cost of capital. During the year ended December 31, 2006,
the Company added $2.9 billion of mortgage loans to the
held for investment portfolio in accordance with this strategy.
51
A composition of the portfolio and the relevant credit quality
characteristics as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
SFR mortgage loans held for
investment (book value)
|
|
$
|
6,519,340
|
|
|
$
|
5,441,521
|
|
Average loan size
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
|
$
|
292
|
|
Non-performing loans
|
|
|
1.09
|
%
|
|
|
0.62
|
%
|
Estimated average life in years(1)
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Estimated average net duration in
months(2)
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Annualized yield
|
|
|
6.01
|
%
|
|
|
5.06
|
%
|
Percent of loans with active
prepayment penalty
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Fixed-rate mortgages
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Intermediate term fixed-rate loans
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Interest-only loans
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
Pay option ARMs
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Other ARMs
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Additional
Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average FICO score(3)
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
Original average loan to value
ratio
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
Current average loan to value
ratio(4)
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
Geographic distribution of top
five states:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern California
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
Northern California
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total California
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
Florida
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
New York
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Virginia
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Michigan
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the estimated length of time, on average, the SFR
loan portfolio will remain outstanding based on the
Company’s estimates for prepayments. |
|
(2) |
|
Average net duration measures the expected change in the value
of a financial instrument in response to changes in interest
rates, taking into consideration the impact of the related
hedges. The negative net duration implies an increase in value
as rates rise while the positive net duration implies a decrease
in value. |
|
(3) |
|
FICO scores are the result of a credit scoring system developed
by Fair Isaacs and Co. and are generally used by lenders to
evaluate a borrower’s credit history. FICO scores of 700 or
higher are generally considered in the mortgage industry to be
very high quality borrowers with low risk of default, but in
general, the secondary market will consider FICO scores of 620
or higher to be prime. |
|
(4) |
|
Current average
loan-to-value
ratio is estimated based on the Office of the Federal Housing
Enterprise Oversight House Price Index Metropolitan Statistical
Area data on a loan level basis. |
Included in our loans held for investment portfolio at
December 31, 2006 were $1.2 billion in pay option ARM
loans, or 18% of the portfolio, as compared to
$1.3 billion, or 25% of the portfolio, at December 31,
2005. As of December 31, 2006, approximately 83% (based on
loan count) of our pay option ARM loans had negatively
amortized, resulting in an increase of $26.8 million to
their original loan balance. This is an increase from 56% at
December 31, 2005. The net increase in unpaid principal
balance due to negative amortization was $21.4 million for
the year ended December 31, 2006, which approximated the
deferred interest recognized for the year. The original weighted
average combined
loan-to-value
(“CLTV”) on our pay option ARM loans was 76%, while
the estimated current LTV at December 31, 2006 is 64%,
calculated based on the Office of the Federal Housing Enterprise
Oversight House Price Index Metropolitan Statistical Areas data
on a loan level basis. The decline in the current
loan-to-value
was due to estimated appreciation of the underlying property
value. The original weighted average FICO score on our pay
option ARM loans was 708 at December 31, 2006.
52
CONSUMER
CONSTRUCTION DIVISION
Indymac’s consumer construction division provides
construction financing for individual consumers who want to
build a new primary residence or second home. The primary
product is a
construction-to-permanent
residential mortgage loan. This product typically provides
financing for a construction term from 6 to 12 months and
automatically converts to a permanent mortgage loan at the end
of construction. The end result is a product that represents a
hybrid activity between our portfolio lending activities and
mortgage banking activities. The Company earns net interest
income on these loans during the construction phase. When the
loan converts to permanent status, the interest rate may be
adjusted based on the underlying permanent note. As of
December 31, 2006, based on the underlying note agreements,
69% of the construction loans will be converted to
adjustable-rate permanent loans, 21% to intermediate term fixed
rate loans, and 10% to fixed-rate loans. The consumer
construction division also provides financing to builders who
are building single-family residences without a guaranteed sale
at inception of project, or on a speculative basis.
Total new consumer construction commitments grew 2% from 2005 to
$3.7 billion. About 68% of new commitments are generated
through mortgage broker customers of the mortgage bank and the
remaining 32% of new commitments are retail originations. Once
each loan has converted to a permanent mortgage loan, the
mortgage is classified as a mortgage loan held for sale and may
be sold in the secondary market or acquired by our SFR mortgage
loan portfolio. The amount of construction loans that were
converted to permanent status was $1.8 billion in 2006, an
increase of 15% over 2005. Overall, the Company is one of the
largest custom residential construction lenders in the nation.
Consumer construction loans outstanding at December 31,
2006 increased 18% from December 31, 2005.
Information on our consumer construction portfolio follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Construction loans (book value)
|
|
$
|
2,225,979
|
|
|
$
|
1,883,674
|
|
Lot, land and other mortgage loans
(book value)
|
|
|
50,154
|
|
|
|
107,164
|
|
Total commitments
|
|
|
3,600,454
|
|
|
|
3,334,416
|
|
Average loan commitment
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
Non-performing loans
|
|
|
1.14
|
%
|
|
|
0.47
|
%
|
Fixed-rate loans
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
Adjustable-rate loans
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Additional
Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
loan-to-value
ratio(1)
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
Average FICO score
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
Geographic distribution of top
five states:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern California
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
Northern California
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total California
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
Florida
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Washington
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Colorado
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
New York
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consumer Construction
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The average
loan-to-value
ratio is based on the estimated appraised value of the completed
project compared to the commitment amount at the date indicated. |
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Aggregate Maturities of Construction Loan Balances
Due:
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in
|
|
|
|
thousands)
|
|
|
Within one year or less
|
|
$
|
2,136,318
|
|
Between one to five years (94%
adjustable-rate and 6% fixed-rate)
|
|
|
89,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consumer Construction
|
|
$
|
2,225,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOME
EQUITY DIVISION
Indymac’s home equity division specializes in providing
HELOC and closed-end second mortgages nationwide through
Indymac’s wholesale and retail channels. We also purchase
HELOC and closed-end second mortgages through our conduit
channel. At December 31, 2006, our total HELOC servicing
portfolio amounted to $3.6 billion, an increase of
approximately $1.5 billion from the portfolio size at
December 31, 2005. We plan to sell or securitize a majority
of the loans in our HELOC portfolio and as a result, they are
classified as held for sale on our balance sheet.
We produced $3.9 billion of new HELOC commitments through
our mortgage banking segment and internal channels during the
year ended December 31, 2006, and sold $2.6 billion of
HELOC loans, realizing $25.3 million of gain on sale. In
2005, the amount of HELOC loans produced and sold were
$2.2 billion and $560.9 million, respectively, with a
total gain on sale of $7.9 million. In addition to the
sales of HELOCs, we periodically transfer HELOCs to two
guaranteed mortgage HELOC securitization trusts to maintain the
required collateral level in the trusts. These trusts were
established in 2004 by the Company in two separate financing
transactions through which approximately $1.0 billion of
HELOCs were recharacterized as asset-backed certificates to
secure $1.0 billion of non-recourse HELOC notes. These
transfers did not result in any gain on sale of loans as the
trusts were originally established in on-balance sheet
guaranteed mortgage securitization transactions. During 2006 and
2005, HELOCs transferred to the trusts were $327.1 million
and $789.8 million, respectively. We fulfilled our
requirements to both trusts in 2006.
All HELOC loans are adjustable rate loans and indexed to the
prime rate. Information on the combined HELOC portfolio,
including both held for sale and held for investment loans, as
of and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Outstanding balance (book value)
|
|
$
|
656,714
|
|
|
$
|
786,922
|
|
Total commitments(1)
|
|
$
|
2,211,298
|
|
|
$
|
1,493,415
|
|
Average spread over prime
|
|
|
1.39
|
%
|
|
|
1.47
|
%
|
Average FICO score
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
Average CLTV ratio(2)
|
|
|
77
|
%
|
|
|
78
|
%
|
54
Additional
Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30+ Days
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Commitment
|
|
|
Average Spread
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Delinquency
|
|
CLTV
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Over Prime
|
|
|
FICO
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
96% to 100%
|
|
$
|
87,718
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
%
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
4.16
|
%
|
91% to 95%
|
|
|
115,868
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
2.17
|
%
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
0.62
|
%
|
81% to 90%
|
|
|
226,440
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
%
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
2.34
|
%
|
71% to 80%
|
|
|
129,441
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
%
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
0.77
|
%
|
70% or less
|
|
|
97,247
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
%
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
656,714
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
%
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
1.76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
96% to 100%
|
|
$
|
118,995
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
|
2.63
|
%
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
91% to 95%
|
|
|
78,909
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
%
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
81% to 90%
|
|
|
278,304
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
1.86
|
%
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
%
|
71% to 80%
|
|
|
162,560
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
%
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
%
|
70% or less
|
|
|
148,154
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
%
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
786,922
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
%
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On funded loans. |
|
(2) |
|
The CLTV combines the
loan-to-value
on both the first mortgage loan and the HELOC. |
HOMEBUILDER
DIVISION
Indymac’s homebuilder division provides land acquisition,
development and construction financing to homebuilders for
residential construction. Builder construction loans are
typically adjustable-rate loans, indexed to the prime interest
rate with terms ranging from 12 to 24 months. The Company
earns net interest income on these loans. The homebuilder
division has central operations in Pasadena, California with 17
satellite sales offices in Arizona, California, Colorado,
Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Oregon,
Tennessee, Texas, and Washington, D.C. Our typical customer
is a mid-size, professional homebuilder who builds between 200
and 2,000 homes per year. We do a limited amount of business
with large private and public homebuilders, and have begun a
small homebuilder program for homebuilders building five to
25 unit projects, and who typically build five to
100 homes per year.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, we entered into
new tract construction commitments of $1.7 billion, down
10% or $193 million from 2005. The decline in volume was
mainly due to a slowing of new home projects as new home sales
declined over the past several months. The homebuilder division
is being more selective about new commitments and consequently
its pipeline has reduced. Builder loans outstanding at
December 31, 2006, including tract construction and land
and other mortgage loans, totaled $1.1 billion. This
reflects a $280 million, or 32%, increase compared to
December 31, 2005 with the increase primarily resulting
from advances under existing commitments.
At December 31, 2006, non-performing loans for the builder
construction portfolio are at 0.78%. Although this has increased
compared to prior year it is still considered low in comparison
to the portfolio’s historical performance. The current
softening of the housing market makes the prospect of increased
non-performing assets and future losses likely. Moreover, due to
the size of certain assets in this heterogeneous portfolio, the
deterioration of a single asset may significantly increase the
builder construction and the Company non-performing ratios. We
manage this credit risk by implementing strong underwriting
guidelines and risk-based pricing. Our current weighted average
loan-to-value
ratio is 73%. Additionally, 97% of our builder construction
loans are secured by corporate or personal guarantees of the
builders as well as the underlying real estate.
55
Information on our builder construction portfolio follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Construction loans (book value)
|
|
$
|
786,279
|
|
|
$
|
612,061
|
|
Land and other mortgage loans
(book value)
|
|
|
358,556
|
|
|
|
252,427
|
|
Total commitments
|
|
|
2,010,727
|
|
|
|
1,796,712
|
|
Average loan commitments
|
|
|
10,810
|
|
|
|
10,824
|
|
Percentage of homes under
construction or completed — pre-sold
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
Median sales price of homes
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
Non-performing loans
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
Additional
Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
loan-to-value
ratio(1)
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
Geographic distribution of top
five states:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern California
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
Northern California
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total California
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
Florida
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Illinois
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Oregon
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Arizona
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Builder Construction
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The average
loan-to-value
ratio is based on the estimated appraised value of the completed
project compared to the commitment amount at the date indicated. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Maturities of Construction Loan Balances Due
(All Floating Rate):
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Within one year or less
|
|
$
|
536,870
|
|
Between one to five years(1)
|
|
|
249,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Builder Construction
|
|
$
|
786,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
15% of these loans will mature in 2009 while the remaining will
mature in 2008. |
WAREHOUSE
LENDING DIVISION
Our warehouse lending division offers short-term lines of credit
to approved correspondent sellers nationwide. The group
functions as a financial intermediary for lenders, providing
them with the financial capacity to fund loans and hold them on
balance sheet until they are sold to approved investors. The
warehouse lending operation relies mainly on the sale or
liquidation of the mortgages as a source of repayment.
Receivables under warehouse facilities are presented on our
balance sheet as loan receivables. Terms of warehouse lines,
including the commitment amount, are determined based upon the
financial strength, historical performance and other
qualifications of the borrower. Information on our warehouse
lending portfolio follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Outstanding balance (book value)
|
|
$
|
246,778
|
|
|
$
|
48,616
|
|
Total commitments
|
|
|
712,000
|
|
|
|
201,000
|
|
Since the reentering of the warehouse lending business in the
first quarter of 2005, we have experienced significant growth.
Total commitments increased 254% from $201 million at
December 31, 2005 to $712 million at December 31,
2006. There were no non-performing loans in this portfolio at
December 31, 2006 and 2005.
56
For information related to the Company’s balance of
non-performing assets and related credit reserves, see
discussion in the “Credit Risk and Reserves” section
at page 60.
NET
INTEREST MARGIN
Information regarding our consolidated average balance sheets
(all segments are combined), along with the total dollar amounts
of interest income and interest expense and the weighted-average
interest rates follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
Securities
|
|
$
|
4,658,402
|
|
|
$
|
319,846
|
|
|
|
6.87
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,652,102
|
|
|
$
|
208,560
|
|
|
|
5.71
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,906,547
|
|
|
$
|
143,351
|
|
|
|
4.93
|
%
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
11,488,630
|
|
|
|
797,460
|
|
|
|
6.94
|
%
|
|
|
7,746,762
|
|
|
|
430,857
|
|
|
|
5.56
|
%
|
|
|
5,188,810
|
|
|
|
277,494
|
|
|
|
5.35
|
%
|
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
|
6,243,353
|
|
|
|
365,158
|
|
|
|
5.85
|
%
|
|
|
5,282,342
|
|
|
|
256,427
|
|
|
|
4.85
|
%
|
|
|
5,271,841
|
|
|
|
225,962
|
|
|
|
4.29
|
%
|
Builder construction and income
property
|
|
|
735,841
|
|
|
|
76,006
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
%
|
|
|
578,865
|
|
|
|
51,772
|
|
|
|
8.94
|
%
|
|
|
475,123
|
|
|
|
30,180
|
|
|
|
6.35
|
%
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
2,014,213
|
|
|
|
144,574
|
|
|
|
7.18
|
%
|
|
|
1,627,281
|
|
|
|
97,656
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
1,330,562
|
|
|
|
76,535
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
Investment in Federal Home Loan
Bank stock and other
|
|
|
887,837
|
|
|
|
47,972
|
|
|
|
5.40
|
%
|
|
|
757,659
|
|
|
|
29,083
|
|
|
|
3.84
|
%
|
|
|
347,976
|
|
|
|
14,086
|
|
|
|
4.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
26,028,276
|
|
|
|
1,751,016
|
|
|
|
6.73
|
%
|
|
|
19,645,011
|
|
|
|
1,074,355
|
|
|
|
5.47
|
%
|
|
|
15,520,859
|
|
|
|
767,608
|
|
|
|
4.95
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing assets
|
|
|
1,436,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
786,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,843,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
846,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
865,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
29,308,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,277,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,870,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and
Shareholders’ Equity
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
8,663,777
|
|
|
|
408,208
|
|
|
|
4.71
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,938,147
|
|
|
|
195,528
|
|
|
|
3.29
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,277,667
|
|
|
|
103,612
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
%
|
Advances from Federal Home
Loan Bank
|
|
|
10,560,896
|
|
|
|
491,300
|
|
|
|
4.65
|
%
|
|
|
8,439,903
|
|
|
|
281,929
|
|
|
|
3.34
|
%
|
|
|
5,809,913
|
|
|
|
145,925
|
|
|
|
2.51
|
%
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
5,985,486
|
|
|
|
324,787
|
|
|
|
5.43
|
%
|
|
|
4,235,298
|
|
|
|
172,187
|
|
|
|
4.07
|
%
|
|
|
4,560,357
|
|
|
|
113,009
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
25,210,159
|
|
|
|
1,224,295
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
%
|
|
|
18,613,348
|
|
|
|
649,644
|
|
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
|
|
14,647,937
|
|
|
|
362,546
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,302,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,283,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,055,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
27,512,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,897,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,703,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
1,796,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,380,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,166,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
29,308,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,277,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,870,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
526,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
424,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
405,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.98
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balances are calculated on a daily basis. Non-performing
loans are included in the average balances for the periods
presented. The allowance for loan losses is excluded from the
average loan balances.
57
The following table summarizes net interest margin by segment
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Earning
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Earning
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Earning
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
By Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thrift segment and other
|
|
$
|
15,307
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,527
|
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,572
|
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
|
2.05
|
%
|
Mortgage banking segment
|
|
|
10,721
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
|
|
7,118
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
2.27
|
%
|
|
|
4,949
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
3.80
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
26,028
|
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
|
|
2.02
|
%
|
|
$
|
19,645
|
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
|
$
|
15,521
|
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net interest margin during the year ended December 31,
2006 was 2.02%, a decline from 2.16% and 2.61% from the years
ended December 31, 2005, and 2004 respectively. Net
interest margin was compressed as the Company experienced the
negative impact from the inverted yield curve on loans held for
sale. In addition, higher cost of funds and hedging cost, higher
premium amortization, and increased non-performing loans
contributed further decline in net interest margin.
Interest income and interest expense fluctuations depend upon
changes in the average balances and interest rates of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The
following table details changes attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) Due to
|
|
|
|
Volume(1)
|
|
|
Rate(2)
|
|
|
Mix(3)
|
|
|
Total Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2006 vs. 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
57,467
|
|
|
$
|
42,193
|
|
|
$
|
11,626
|
|
|
$
|
111,286
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
208,114
|
|
|
|
106,869
|
|
|
|
51,620
|
|
|
|
366,603
|
|
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
|
46,651
|
|
|
|
52,524
|
|
|
|
9,556
|
|
|
|
108,731
|
|
Builder construction and income
property
|
|
|
14,039
|
|
|
|
8,020
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
24,234
|
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
23,220
|
|
|
|
19,145
|
|
|
|
4,553
|
|
|
|
46,918
|
|
Investment in Federal Home
Loan Bank stock and other
|
|
|
4,997
|
|
|
|
11,855
|
|
|
|
2,037
|
|
|
|
18,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
354,488
|
|
|
|
240,606
|
|
|
|
81,567
|
|
|
|
676,661
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
89,748
|
|
|
|
84,257
|
|
|
|
38,675
|
|
|
|
212,680
|
|
Advances from Federal Home
Loan Bank
|
|
|
70,850
|
|
|
|
110,701
|
|
|
|
27,820
|
|
|
|
209,371
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
71,154
|
|
|
|
57,631
|
|
|
|
23,815
|
|
|
|
152,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
231,752
|
|
|
|
252,589
|
|
|
|
90,310
|
|
|
|
574,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense)
|
|
$
|
122,736
|
|
|
$
|
(11,983
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,743
|
)
|
|
$
|
102,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
2005 vs. 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
36,771
|
|
|
$
|
22,633
|
|
|
$
|
5,805
|
|
|
$
|
65,209
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
136,798
|
|
|
|
11,096
|
|
|
|
5,469
|
|
|
|
153,363
|
|
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
29,955
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
30,465
|
|
Builder construction and income
property
|
|
|
6,590
|
|
|
|
12,314
|
|
|
|
2,688
|
|
|
|
21,592
|
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
17,068
|
|
|
|
3,314
|
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
|
21,121
|
|
Investment in Federal Home
Loan Bank stock and other
|
|
|
16,584
|
|
|
|
(729
|
)
|
|
|
(858
|
)
|
|
|
14,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
214,261
|
|
|
|
78,583
|
|
|
|
13,903
|
|
|
|
306,747
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
40,220
|
|
|
|
37,241
|
|
|
|
14,455
|
|
|
|
91,916
|
|
Advances from Federal Home
Loan Bank
|
|
|
66,056
|
|
|
|
48,151
|
|
|
|
21,797
|
|
|
|
136,004
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
(8,055
|
)
|
|
|
72,393
|
|
|
|
(5,160
|
)
|
|
|
59,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
98,221
|
|
|
|
157,785
|
|
|
|
31,092
|
|
|
|
287,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense)
|
|
$
|
116,040
|
|
|
$
|
(79,202
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,189
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Changes in volume are calculated by taking changes in average
outstanding balances multiplied by the prior period’s rate. |
|
(2) |
|
Changes in the rate are calculated by taking changes in the
average interest rate multiplied by the prior period’s
volume. |
|
(3) |
|
Changes in rate/volume (“mix”) are calculated by
taking changes in rates times the changes in volume. |
INTEREST
RATE SENSITIVITY
In addition to our hedging activities to mitigate the interest
rate risk in our pipeline of mortgage loans held for sale, rate
locks and our investment in servicing-related assets, we perform
extensive, company-wide interest rate risk management. A primary
measurement tool used to evaluate interest rate risk over the
comprehensive balance sheet is net portfolio value
(“NPV”) analysis. The NPV analysis and duration gap
estimate the exposure of the fair value of net assets
attributable to shareholders’ equity to changes in interest
rates.
The following sets forth the NPV and change in NPV that we
estimate might result from a 100 basis point change in
interest rates as of December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
100 bps
|
|
|
100 bps
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
100 bps
|
|
|
100 bps
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
541,545
|
|
|
$
|
541,545
|
|
|
$
|
541,545
|
|
|
$
|
442,059
|
|
|
$
|
442,059
|
|
|
$
|
442,059
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
541,175
|
|
|
|
573,028
|
|
|
|
522,503
|
|
|
|
342,545
|
|
|
|
348,982
|
|
|
|
323,577
|
|
Available for sale securities
|
|
|
4,183,629
|
|
|
|
4,272,980
|
|
|
|
4,064,097
|
|
|
|
2,680,955
|
|
|
|
2,727,144
|
|
|
|
2,613,690
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
9,566,224
|
|
|
|
9,645,767
|
|
|
|
9,440,968
|
|
|
|
6,057,556
|
|
|
|
6,111,131
|
|
|
|
5,972,194
|
|
Loans held for investment
|
|
|
10,191,350
|
|
|
|
10,266,772
|
|
|
|
10,081,430
|
|
|
|
8,213,754
|
|
|
|
8,279,424
|
|
|
|
8,119,628
|
|
MSRs
|
|
|
1,822,455
|
|
|
|
1,393,979
|
|
|
|
2,142,276
|
|
|
|
1,114,630
|
|
|
|
930,932
|
|
|
|
1,239,189
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,882,732
|
|
|
|
2,219,807
|
|
|
|
1,692,256
|
|
|
|
1,372,896
|
|
|
|
1,436,900
|
|
|
|
1,391,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
28,729,110
|
|
|
$
|
28,913,878
|
|
|
$
|
28,485,075
|
|
|
$
|
20,224,395
|
|
|
$
|
20,276,572
|
|
|
$
|
20,101,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
10,936,012
|
|
|
$
|
10,978,982
|
|
|
$
|
10,894,553
|
|
|
$
|
7,629,227
|
|
|
$
|
7,665,078
|
|
|
$
|
7,594,015
|
|
Advances from Federal Home
Loan Bank
|
|
|
10,409,767
|
|
|
|
10,565,054
|
|
|
|
10,256,128
|
|
|
|
6,966,946
|
|
|
|
6,993,439
|
|
|
|
6,940,884
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
3,464,290
|
|
|
|
3,466,577
|
|
|
|
3,462,006
|
|
|
|
2,990,570
|
|
|
|
2,992,630
|
|
|
|
2,988,513
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
775,455
|
|
|
|
775,455
|
|
|
|
775,455
|
|
|
|
433,995
|
|
|
|
434,287
|
|
|
|
433,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
25,585,524
|
|
|
|
25,786,068
|
|
|
|
25,388,142
|
|
|
|
18,020,738
|
|
|
|
18,085,434
|
|
|
|
17,957,117
|
|
Shareholders’ equity (NPV)
|
|
$
|
3,143,586
|
|
|
$
|
3,127,810
|
|
|
$
|
3,096,933
|
|
|
$
|
2,203,657
|
|
|
$
|
2,191,138
|
|
|
$
|
2,144,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change from base case
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.50
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.48
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.57
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.67
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our NPV model has been built to focus on the Bank alone as the
$0.8 billion of assets at the Parent Company and its
non-bank subsidiaries have very little interest rate risk
exposure.
The increase in the net present value of equity from
December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006 is partly due
to: (i) an increase in our balance sheet, (ii) an
increase in retained earnings of Indymac Bank in the amount of
$357.6 million, (iii) a capital contribution of
$360.0 million from the Parent Company to Indymac Bank, and
(iv) an offset by a dividend payment of $178.1 million
to the Parent Company. This analysis is based on instantaneous
change in interest rates and does not reflect the impact of
changes in hedging activities as interest rates change and
changes in volumes and profits from our mortgage banking
operations that would be expected to result from the interest
rate environment.
In conjunction with the NPV analysis, we also estimate the net
sensitivity of the fair value of our financial instruments to
movements in interest rates using duration gap. This calculation
is performed by estimating the change in dollar value due to an
instantaneous parallel change in the interest rate curve. The
resulting change in dollar value per one basis point change in
interest rates is used to estimate the sensitivity of our
portfolio. The dollar values per one basis point change are then
aggregated to estimate the portfolio’s net sensitivity. To
calculate
59
duration gap, the net sensitivity is divided by the fair value
of total interest-earning assets and expressed in months. A
duration gap of zero implies that the change in value of assets
from an instantaneous rate move will be accompanied by an equal
and offsetting move in the value of debt and derivatives thus
leaving the net fair value of equity unchanged.
The assumptions inherent in our interest rate shock models
include expected valuation changes in an instantaneous and
parallel interest rate shock, and assumptions as to the degree
of correlation between the hedges and hedged assets and
liabilities. These assumptions may not adequately reflect
factors such as the spread-widening or spread-tightening risk
among the changes in rates on Treasury, LIBOR/swap curve,
mortgages, shape of the yield curve and volatility. In addition,
the sensitivity analysis described in the prior paragraph is
limited by the fact that it is performed at a particular point
in time and does not incorporate other factors that would impact
our financial performance in these scenarios, such as increases
in income associated with the increase in production volume that
could result from a decrease in interest rates. Consequently,
the preceding estimates should not be viewed as a forecast, and
it is reasonable to expect that actual results could vary
significantly from the analyses discussed above.
At December 31, 2006, net duration gap for our mortgage
banking and thrift segments was positive 1.5 months and
negative 1.6 months, respectively, with the overall net
duration gap of 0.4 month. Although our duration risk has
been maintained at relatively low levels as indicated by our
duration gap measures, fair value gains and losses will
generally occur as market conditions change. We actively manage
duration risk through asset selection by appropriate funding and
hedging to within the duration limits approved by senior
management and the Board of Directors.
The duration gap measures are estimated on a daily basis for the
mortgage servicing rights and on a monthly basis for the assets
in our thrift portfolio and pipeline.
CREDIT
RISK AND RESERVES
The following table presents the details of our loan portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Total held for sale portfolio
|
|
$
|
9,467,843
|
|
|
|
48.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,024,184
|
|
|
|
42.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,445,572
|
|
|
|
39.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,573,248
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,227,683
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage loans and HELOCs
|
|
|
6,507,221
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
%
|
|
|
5,427,270
|
|
|
|
38.0
|
%
|
|
|
4,450,921
|
|
|
|
39.7
|
%
|
|
|
5,587,409
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
%
|
|
|
2,311,753
|
|
|
|
37.3
|
%
|
Land and other mortgage loans
|
|
|
375,215
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
260,615
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
158,468
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
126,044
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
130,455
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
Builder construction and income
property loans
|
|
|
786,279
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
612,061
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
512,191
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
475,158
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
499,302
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
Consumer construction loans
|
|
|
2,225,979
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
1,883,674
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
|
|
1,574,378
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
1,191,050
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
922,494
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
Revolving warehouse lines of credit
|
|
|
246,778
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
48,616
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core held for investment loans
|
|
|
10,141,472
|
|
|
|
51.6
|
%
|
|
|
8,232,236
|
|
|
|
57.6
|
%
|
|
|
6,695,958
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
%
|
|
|
7,379,661
|
|
|
|
73.6
|
%
|
|
|
3,864,004
|
|
|
|
62.4
|
%
|
Discontinued product lines (1)
|
|
|
35,737
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
46,133
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
53,795
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
69,524
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
97,644
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held for investment portfolio
|
|
|
10,177,209
|
|
|
|
51.8
|
%
|
|
|
8,278,369
|
|
|
|
57.9
|
%
|
|
|
6,749,753
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
%
|
|
|
7,449,185
|
|
|
|
74.3
|
%
|
|
|
3,961,648
|
|
|
|
64.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
19,645,052
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
14,302,553
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,195,325
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,022,433
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,189,331
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Discontinued product lines include manufactured home loans and
home improvement, which were discontinued during 1999. |
60
The allowance for loan losses relates to loans held for
investment and is allocated to various loan products for segment
reporting purposes, and represents our judgments and assumptions
at a specific point in time and may be reallocated in the future
based on changes in performance and other circumstances. The
entire allowance for loan losses is available to cover losses in
any of the held for investment loan portfolios. The following
summarizes the Company’s allowance for loan losses/credit
discounts and non-performing assets as of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
QTD Net
|
|
|
YTD Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
as a
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
Charge
|
|
|
Charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Loan
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Performing
|
|
|
Offs/Net
|
|
|
Offs/Net
|
|
Type of Loan
|
|
Book Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Discounts (1)
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
REO (Gains)
|
|
|
REO (Gains)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Held for sale
portfolio
|
|
$
|
9,507,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
39,464
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
%
|
|
$
|
54,347
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held for investment
portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage loans and HELOCs
|
|
|
6,507,221
|
|
|
$
|
23,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
%
|
|
|
68,699
|
|
|
|
5,632
|
|
|
|
7,324
|
|
Land and other mortgage loans
|
|
|
375,215
|
|
|
|
6,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
%
|
|
|
5,959
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Builder construction and income
property loans
|
|
|
786,279
|
|
|
|
14,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
%
|
|
|
8,981
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Consumer construction loans
|
|
|
2,225,979
|
|
|
|
11,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
%
|
|
|
19,998
|
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
3,318
|
|
Revolving warehouse lines of credit
|
|
|
246,778
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core held for investment loans
|
|
|
10,141,472
|
|
|
|
56,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.56
|
%
|
|
|
103,637
|
|
|
|
7,176
|
|
|
|
10,642
|
|
Discontinued product lines (2)
|
|
|
35,737
|
|
|
|
5,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.42
|
%
|
|
|
4,846
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
2,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held for investment portfolio
|
|
|
10,177,209
|
|
|
$
|
62,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
%
|
|
|
108,483
|
|
|
|
7,602
|
|
|
|
12,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
19,684,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
162,830
|
|
|
$
|
7,602
|
|
|
$
|
12,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core portfolios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,918
|
|
|
$
|
586
|
|
|
$
|
(2,230
|
)
|
Discontinued product lines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreclosed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,638
|
|
|
$
|
571
|
|
|
$
|
(2,235
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
184,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets as a
percentage of total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amount represents the lower of cost or market adjustments in
the held for sale portfolio. |
|
(2) |
|
Discontinued product lines include manufactured home loans and
home improvement loans, which were discontinued in 1999. |
61
The following provides additional comparative data on
non-performing assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Loans held for sale before market
valuation reserves
|
|
$
|
78,238
|
|
|
$
|
31,050
|
|
|
$
|
65,643
|
|
|
$
|
52,847
|
|
|
$
|
17,603
|
|
Market valuation reserves
|
|
|
(23,891
|
)
|
|
|
(10,245
|
)
|
|
|
(11,032
|
)
|
|
|
(13,992
|
)
|
|
|
(6,977
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans held for sale
|
|
|
54,347
|
|
|
|
20,805
|
|
|
|
54,611
|
|
|
|
38,855
|
|
|
|
10,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for investment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage loans
|
|
$
|
68,699
|
|
|
$
|
28,335
|
|
|
$
|
22,155
|
|
|
$
|
12,414
|
|
|
$
|
15,097
|
|
Land and other mortgage loans
|
|
|
5,959
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
8,376
|
|
Builder construction and income
property loans
|
|
|
8,981
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,546
|
|
|
|
9,704
|
|
|
|
9,082
|
|
Consumer construction loans
|
|
|
19,998
|
|
|
|
9,249
|
|
|
|
9,553
|
|
|
|
8,954
|
|
|
|
10,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total portfolio non-performing
loans
|
|
|
103,637
|
|
|
|
37,781
|
|
|
|
43,254
|
|
|
|
31,143
|
|
|
|
43,005
|
|
Discontinued product lines
|
|
|
4,846
|
|
|
|
5,623
|
|
|
|
5,868
|
|
|
|
6,449
|
|
|
|
10,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans held
for investment
|
|
|
108,483
|
|
|
|
43,404
|
|
|
|
49,122
|
|
|
|
37,592
|
|
|
|
53,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
|
162,830
|
|
|
|
64,209
|
|
|
|
103,733
|
|
|
|
76,447
|
|
|
|
63,636
|
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
21,638
|
|
|
|
8,817
|
|
|
|
19,161
|
|
|
|
23,677
|
|
|
|
36,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$
|
184,468
|
|
|
$
|
73,026
|
|
|
$
|
122,894
|
|
|
$
|
100,124
|
|
|
$
|
100,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past due 90 days or more as
to interest or principal and accruing interest
|
|
$
|
185
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to
non-performing loans held for investment
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
127
|
%
|
|
|
108
|
%
|
|
|
140
|
%
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets to
total assets
|
|
|
0.63
|
%
|
|
|
0.34
|
%
|
|
|
0.73
|
%
|
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
|
|
1.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following reflects the activity in the allowance for loan
losses during the indicated periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
55,168
|
|
|
$
|
52,891
|
|
|
$
|
52,645
|
|
|
$
|
50,761
|
|
|
$
|
57,700
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
19,993
|
|
|
|
9,978
|
|
|
|
8,170
|
|
|
|
19,700
|
|
|
|
16,155
|
|
Charge-offs net of recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage loans
|
|
|
(7,324
|
)
|
|
|
(1,428
|
)
|
|
|
(3,060
|
)
|
|
|
(3,888
|
)
|
|
|
(5,783
|
)
|
Land and other mortgage loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(1,658
|
)
|
Builder construction
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3,136
|
)
|
|
|
(2,575
|
)
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
(3,318
|
)
|
|
|
(2,127
|
)
|
|
|
(1,463
|
)
|
|
|
(1,510
|
)
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
Discontinued product lines
|
|
|
(2,133
|
)
|
|
|
(3,978
|
)
|
|
|
(3,401
|
)
|
|
|
(9,271
|
)
|
|
|
(12,831
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs net of recoveries
|
|
|
(12,775
|
)
|
|
|
(7,701
|
)
|
|
|
(7,924
|
)
|
|
|
(17,816
|
)
|
|
|
(23,094
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
62,386
|
|
|
$
|
55,168
|
|
|
$
|
52,891
|
|
|
$
|
52,645
|
|
|
$
|
50,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs to average loans held
for investment
|
|
|
0.14
|
%
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
0.34
|
%
|
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
The allowance for loan losses is allocated to the following
categories for segment reporting purposes. The overall adequacy
of the allowance for loan losses is based on the allowance in
its entirety. The allocation among the various loan products is
representative of our judgments and assumptions at a specific
point in time and may be
62
reallocated in the future based on changes in performance and
other circumstances. Allocation of the allowance for loan losses
to each category, and the corresponding percentage of the loan
category, at the dates indicated are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Portfolio loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage loans
|
|
$
|
23,992
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
20,291
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,969
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
20,038
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
13,053
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Land and other mortgage loans
|
|
|
6,690
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
4,224
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
4,421
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
3,167
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
2,555
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
Builder construction and income
property loans
|
|
|
14,146
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
12,838
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
11,660
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
11,999
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
14,823
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
Consumer construction loans
|
|
|
11,391
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
11,361
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
11,141
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
10,440
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
10,883
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
Revolving warehouse lines of credit
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total portfolio loans
|
|
|
56,517
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
48,831
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
45,191
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
45,644
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
41,314
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
Discontinued product lines
|
|
|
5,869
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
|
6,337
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
7,700
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
7,001
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
|
9,447
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
62,386
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
55,168
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
52,891
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
52,645
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
50,761
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit-related reserves, including the allowance for loan
losses and the market valuation reserves, totaled
$101.9 million at December 31, 2006, compared to
$65.4 million at December 31, 2005. As of
December 31, 2006, the allowance for loan losses of
$62.4 million for loans held for investment represented
0.61% of total loans held for investment, declining from 0.67%
at December 31, 2005.
At December 31, 2006, non-performing assets as a percentage
of total assets was 0.63%, an increase from 0.34% at
December 31, 2005. The non-performing loans increased
$65.1 million and $33.5 million in loans held for
investment and loans held for sale, respectively. As a result of
the increased delinquencies in these portfolios, foreclosure
activities rose during the period, leading to increased
foreclosed assets at December 31, 2006 to
$21.6 million. At December 31, 2006, the allowance for
loan losses to non-performing loans held for investment was 58%,
down from 127% at December 31, 2005. The increase in
non-performing loans held for investment is primarily due to the
seasoning and the growth of the SFR mortgage loan portfolio. The
increase in non-performing loans in the builder construction
portfolio is mainly attributable to a loan of $9.0 million
that was placed on non-accrual in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Net charge-offs increased to $12.8 million in 2006 from
$7.7 million in 2005. The increase is a direct result of
loan delinquencies and non-performing loans trending up.
Included in the charge-offs for 2006 were $2.3 million of
charge-offs related to the sale of non-performing loans that
were recorded in the fourth quarter.
The increase in non-performing loans held for sale is
attributable to our growth in mortgage production and an
increase in early payment defaults on certain products. A
substantial number of these non-performing loans are covered by
the early default provision in the purchase agreements and are
subject to repurchase by the sellers.
Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when they are
90 days past due. Non-performing assets include
non-performing loans and foreclosed assets. We record the
balance of our assets acquired in foreclosure or by deed in lieu
of foreclosure at estimated net realizable value.
Our determination of the level of the allowance for loan losses
and, correspondingly, the provision for loan losses, is based on
management’s judgments and assumptions regarding various
matters, including general economic conditions, loan portfolio
composition, loan demand, delinquency trends and prior loan loss
experience. Management continually evaluates these assumptions
to reflect its judgments regarding these economic conditions and
various relevant factors impacting credit quality and inherent
losses. In assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan
losses in its entirety, management reviews the performance in
the portfolios of loans held for investment and the non-core
portfolio of discontinued product lines, which consists of
manufactured housing and home improvement loans. A component of
the overall allowance for loan losses is not specifically
allocated to the loan portfolios
63
(“unallocated component”). The unallocated component
reflects management’s assessment of various factors that
create inherent imprecision in the methods used to determine the
specific portfolio allocations. Those factors include, but are
not limited to levels of and trends in delinquencies and
impaired loans, charge-offs and recoveries, volume and terms of
the loans, effects of any changes in risk selection and
underwriting standards, other changes in lending policies,
procedures, and practices, and national and local economic
trends and conditions. As of December 31, 2006, the
unallocated component of the total allowance for loan losses was
$17.2 million, compared to $18.7 million at
December 31, 2005.
While we consider the allowance for loan losses to be adequate
based on information currently available, future adjustments to
the allowance may be necessary due to changes in economic
conditions, delinquency levels, foreclosure rates, or loss
rates. The level of allowance for loan losses is also subject to
review by our primary federal regulator, the Office of Thrift
Supervision (“OTS”). The OTS may require the allowance
for loan losses be increased based on its evaluation of the
information available to it at the time of its examination of
the Bank.
With respect to mortgage loans held for sale, pursuant to the
applicable accounting rules, we do not provide an allowance for
loan losses. Instead, a component for credit risk related to
loans held for sale is embedded in the market valuation for
these loans. Lower of cost or market valuation adjustments
related to the credit risk on loans held for sale totaled
$39.2 million at December 31, 2006, up from
$10.2 million at December 31, 2005, primarily due to
the lower of cost or market adjustments on the loans repurchased
during 2006 and increased delinquencies in the portfolio.
SECONDARY
MARKET RESERVE
We do not generally sell loans with recourse in our loan sale
activities. However, we can be required to repurchase loans from
investors when our loan sales contain individual loans that do
not conform to the representations and warranties we made at the
time of sale. We have made significant investments in our
pre-production and post-production quality control processes to
identify potential issues that could cause repurchases. We
believe that these efforts have improved our production quality;
however, possible increases in default rates due to an economic
slowdown could cause the overall rate of repurchases to remain
constant or even increase. Since 1993, the Company has
repurchased a small number of loans from its securitization
trusts. The increase in repurchase activity in recent years has
been primarily a function of Indymac’s increased loan sale
volume to GSEs and whole loan sales. As a percentage of total
loans sold, repurchases have remained relatively flat at
21 basis points for the year ended December 31, 2006
as compared to December 31, 2005. The following reflects
the repurchase activities during the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Loans sold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs and whole loans
|
|
$
|
47,878
|
|
|
$
|
20,924
|
|
Securitization trusts
|
|
|
31,171
|
|
|
|
31,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
79,049
|
|
|
$
|
52,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total repurchases (1)
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase as a percentage of
total loans sold during the period
|
|
|
0.21
|
%
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts exclude repurchases that are administrative in nature
and generally are re-sold immediately at little or no loss. |
The Company maintains a secondary market reserve for losses that
arise in connection with loans that we may be required to
repurchase from whole loan sales, sales to the GSEs, and
securitizations. The reserve has two general components:
reserves for repurchases arising from representation and
warranty claims and reserves for repurchases arising from early
payment defaults. Also included in the reserve was a
$1.3 million charge provided in the third quarter of 2005
(reduction of gain on sale of loans) for potential investor
claims from early payment defaults on loans that we previously
sold and which were collateralized by properties in the areas
affected by the Gulf Coast Hurricanes. This reserve was reversed
to gain on sale in the second quarter of 2006. Refer to
“Note 1 — Summary of
64
Significant Accounting Policies” in the accompanying notes
to consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
The following reflects the activity in the reserve during the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
27,638
|
|
|
$
|
35,610
|
|
Additions/provisions
|
|
|
37,333
|
|
|
|
19,551
|
|
Actual
losses/mark-to-market
|
|
|
(32,817
|
)
|
|
|
(28,860
|
)
|
Recoveries on previous claims
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
33,932
|
|
|
$
|
27,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2006, we repurchased $22.8 million of closed-end second
loans from an investor due to an early payment default
provision. In connection with this repurchase, we recorded an
additional $5.2 million of provision in 2006. We
subsequently revised our credit guidelines, which are expected
to reduce the origination of these closed-end second loans that
gave rise to these repurchases. We relieved the reserve by
$9.3 million in 2006 to establish discounts on these
repurchased loans.
EXPENSES
Our operating expenses increased 28% from $618.5 million
for 2005 to $789.0 million for 2006. The increase is
attributable to the Company’s operational growth and
geographic expansion to execute on its strategy to increase
production and revenue. In 2006, we opened three new regional
operations centers and a number of sales offices for the
mortgage banking group and increased our consumer bank network
to 29 branches, resulting in higher salaries and related,
premises, data processing and office related expenses. The
Company’s average FTE employees increased 27% from 6,240
for the year ended December 31, 2005 to 7,935 for the year
ended December 31, 2006, including 561 FTE off-shore as
part of our Global Resources program. We utilize the off-shore
workforce predominantly in non-customer-facing back office
functions to enhance service levels and improve efficiencies.
Year over year, our efficiency ratio decreased from 55% during
2005 to 58% in 2006. Included in the total operating expenses
for 2005 were $9 million pretax charges for the settlement
of two previously disclosed class action lawsuits. Refer to
“Note 17 — Expenses” in the
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements for a
summary of expenses.
We have identified several strategies to help improve
performance in 2007, many of which related to cost savings
initiatives. For example, we will control our costs with our
current hiring freeze on non-revenue-generating personnel, base
salary freeze company-wide, significant variable compensation
tied to revenue and EPS growth, goals to increase outsourcing
from 9% of our workforce to 13.5% by year-end and cut 5% of our
non-labor expenses from our fourth quarter run rate; in general,
get more out of the infrastructure we have built up in the last
several years as we continue to grow our business. With respect
to the hiring freeze, given our normal employee attrition rate
of roughly 20% per year, we expect to be able to reduce our
administrative headcount and overhead while still being able to
stick to our stated goal of avoiding mass layoffs except under
the most extreme circumstances. Our estimate is that all these
measures combined could produce up to $60 million in
pre-tax cost savings annually.
As a result of the adoption and retrospective application of
SFAS 123(R), total stock option expenses of
$9.6 million, $12.1 million and $14.0 million,
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, have been recognized and included in the salaries
and related expenses.
Income tax provisions of $212.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 represented an effective tax rate of
39.1%. Income tax provisions of $192.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005 represented an effective tax rate
of 39.5%. Our effective tax rate for 2007 is expected to
approximate that of 2006.
FUTURE
OUTLOOK
The MBA is currently forecasting that mortgage industry volumes
will decline a further 5% in 2007. While we expect to continue
to capture market share, we also believe that there will be a
continuation of tough conditions for
65
loan originations, credit performance and in the secondary
market, that competition will be fierce and that the housing
market will be challenging. As a result, we believe that in 2007
our revenue margins will remain under pressure and credit
quality will likely worsen. In light of these conditions, we are
only providing broad guidance for 2007 results. We currently
anticipate that our return on equity for 2007 will range from
10.0% to 15.0%. However, the economy, interest rates and our
industry remain volatile, and, if market conditions deteriorate
significantly from what we are forecasting today, which is
always a possibility, our actual results could vary
significantly from this forecast and there could be some
downside to the above ROE range.
For additional information, refer to our
Form 8-K
filed on March 1, 2007.
This “Future Outlook” section contains certain
forward-looking statements. See the section of this
Form 10-K
entitled “Forward-Looking Statements” for a
description of factors which may cause our actual results to
differ from those anticipated.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
OVERVIEW
Our principal financing needs are to fund acquisitions of
mortgage loans and our investment in mortgage loans, MBS and
MSRs. Our primary sources of funds used to meet these financing
needs are loan sales and securitizations, deposits, advances
from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”),
borrowings, custodial balances and retained earnings. The
sources used vary depending on such factors as rates paid,
collateral requirements, maturities and the impact on our
capital. Additionally, we may occasionally securitize mortgage
loans that we intend to hold for investment to lower our costs
of borrowing against such assets and reduce the capital
requirement associated with such assets. During the year ended
December 31, 2006, we had average total liquidity of
$1.7 billion, which consists of unpledged liquid assets on
hand plus amounts that may be immediately raised through the
pledging of other available assets as collateral pursuant to
committed financing facilities. We currently believe that our
liquidity level is in excess of that necessary to satisfy our
operating requirements and meet our obligations and commitments
in a timely and cost effective manner.
PRINCIPAL
SOURCES OF CASH
Loan
Sales and Securitizations
Our business model relies heavily upon selling the majority of
our mortgage loans shortly after acquisition. The proceeds of
these sales are a critical component of the liquidity necessary
for our ongoing operations. During the year ended
December 31, 2006, we sold $79.0 billion of mortgage
loans, which represented approximately 88% of our funded
mortgage loans during the year, to third party investors through
three channels: (1) GSEs; (2) private label
securitizations; and (3) whole loan sales. Our prime SFR
mortgage loans division also acquired $2.9 billion of the
mortgage loans for our portfolio of mortgage loans held for
investment to provide future interest income for the Company.
The remainder of our funded mortgage loans during the year is
retained in our held for sale portfolio for future sale.
Our liquidity could be negatively impacted if any of our sales
channels were disrupted. Disruptions in our whole loan sales and
mortgage securitization transactions could occur as a result of
the performance of our existing securitizations, as well as
economic events or other factors beyond our control.
Advances
from Federal Home Loan Bank
The FHLB system functions as a borrowing source for regulated
financial depositories and similar institutions that are engaged
in residential housing finance. As a member of the FHLB of
San Francisco, we are required to own capital stock of the
FHLB and are authorized to apply for advances from the FHLB, on
a secured basis, in amounts determined by reference to available
collateral. SFR mortgage loans, agency and AAA-rated MBS are the
principal collateral that may be used to secure these
borrowings, although certain other types of loans and other
assets may also be accepted pursuant to FHLB policies and
statutory requirements. The FHLB offers several credit programs,
each with its own fixed or floating interest rate, and a range
of maturities.
On March 15, 2006, the Federal Housing Finance Board
published a proposed rule aimed at bolstering capital for the
Federal Home Loan Banks. Among other things, this proposal
would result in the respective FHLB reducing
66
dividends paid to its members until such time as the respective
FHLB capital reaches a specified level. In response to this
proposal, the FHLB San Francisco had planned to cut
dividends paid to be based on approximately 80% of its net
income from previous 95% of net income until the retained
earnings target was reached. The implementation of this proposal
has been deferred indefinitely to allow more time for the FHLB
to evaluate other alternatives.
Currently, Indymac Bank is approved for collateralized advances
of up to $15.6 billion. At December 31, 2006, advances
from FHLB totaled $10.4 billion, of which $7.0 billion
were collateralized by mortgage loans and $3.4 billion were
collateralized by mortgage-backed securities.
Deposits/Retail
Bank
We solicit deposits from the general public and institutions by
offering a variety of accounts and rates through our network of
29 branches in Southern California, our telebanking, and
Internet channels. Through our web site at
www.indymacbank.com, consumers can access their
accounts 24-hours
a day, seven days a week. Online banking allows customers to
access their accounts, view balances, transfer funds between
accounts, view transactions, download account information, and
pay their bills conveniently from any computer terminal.
The following table shows our deposits by channel as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Deposit Channel
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Branch
|
|
$
|
5,211,365
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,322,752
|
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
Internet
|
|
|
1,185,423
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
798,518
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Telebanking
|
|
|
1,290,595
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
934,572
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
Money desk
|
|
|
2,593,719
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
2,122,146
|
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
Custodial
|
|
|
616,904
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
493,936
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
10,898,006
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,671,924
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our deposit products include regular savings accounts, demand
deposit accounts, money market accounts, certificates of
deposit, and individual retirement accounts. Refer to
“Note 10 — Deposits” in the
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements for
details of deposit category.
Included in deposits at December 31, 2006 and 2005 were
non-interest-bearing custodial accounts, primarily related to
our GSE servicing portfolio, totaling $616.9 million and
$493.9 million, respectively.
The following sets forth the average balance of, and the average
interest rate paid on deposits, by deposit category for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest-bearing checking
|
|
$
|
52,875
|
|
|
|
1.26
|
%
|
|
$
|
51,487
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
|
$
|
41,818
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
%
|
Savings
|
|
|
1,539,701
|
|
|
|
4.64
|
%
|
|
|
1,302,158
|
|
|
|
2.88
|
%
|
|
|
1,650,381
|
|
|
|
1.96
|
%
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
7,071,201
|
|
|
|
4.77
|
%
|
|
|
4,584,502
|
|
|
|
3.44
|
%
|
|
|
2,585,468
|
|
|
|
2.74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
8,663,777
|
|
|
|
4.71
|
%
|
|
|
5,938,147
|
|
|
|
3.29
|
%
|
|
|
4,277,667
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
%
|
Non-interest-bearing checking
|
|
|
67,681
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
60,778
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
50,360
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Custodial accounts
|
|
|
643,124
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
657,596
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
660,877
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
9,374,582
|
|
|
|
4.35
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,656,521
|
|
|
|
2.93
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,988,904
|
|
|
|
2.07
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued but unpaid interest on deposits included in other
liabilities totaled $3.8 million, $10.7 million and
$1.0 million at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
67
Trust Preferred
Securities and Warrants
On November 14, 2001, we completed an offering of Warrants
and Income Redeemable Equity Securities (“WIRES”) to
investors. Gross proceeds of the transaction were
$175 million. The securities were offered as units
consisting of trust preferred securities, issued by a trust
formed by us, and warrants to purchase Indymac Bancorp’s
common stock.
In 2006, we issued an additional $188 million in pooled
trust preferred securities without warrants attached. To date,
we have issued $368 million of such trust preferred
securities. Refer to “Note 12 — Other
Borrowings” in the accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements for further discussion of trust preferred
securities and warrants.
Other
Borrowings, Excluding Subordinated Debentures Underlying
Trust Preferred Securities
Other borrowings, excluding the subordinated debentures
underlying the trust preferred securities, consist of
asset-backed commercial paper, loans and securities sold under
committed financing facilities and uncommitted agreements to
repurchase, and notes payable. Total other borrowings increased
to $4.2 billion at December 31, 2006, from
$4.1 billion at December 31, 2005.
At December 31, 2006, we had $8.4 billion in committed
financing facilities ($8.0 billion whole loan facilities,
$300 million bond facilities and $100 million in
unsecured revolving line of credit). Of these committed
financing facilities, $2.2 billion was available for use,
based on eligible collateral. Decisions by our lenders and
investors to make additional funds available to us in the future
will depend upon a number of factors. These include our
compliance with the terms of existing credit arrangements, our
financial performance, eligible collateral, changes in our
credit rating, industry and market trends in our various
businesses, the general availability and interest rates
applicable to financing and investments, the lenders’
and/or
investors’ own resources and policies concerning loans and
investments and the relative attractiveness of alternative
investment or lending opportunities. As of December 31,
2006, we believe we were in compliance with all representations,
warranties, and financial covenants under our borrowing
facilities. Refer to “Note 12 — Other
Borrowings” in the accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements for further discussion of the
Company’s borrowing facilities.
Additional information related to our repurchase agreements
follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Average balance during the year
|
|
$
|
3,726,067
|
|
|
$
|
2,947,552
|
|
|
$
|
3,734,377
|
|
Maximum balance
outstanding (1)
|
|
|
6,026,510
|
|
|
|
5,254,136
|
|
|
|
4,694,704
|
|
Balance at December 31,
|
|
|
2,455,505
|
|
|
|
3,057,262
|
|
|
|
1,930,686
|
|
Interest rate, end of year
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
Weighted average coupon rate
during the year
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The maximum amount of borrowings outstanding occurred in
February 2006, August 2005 and May 2004. |
68
The following summarizes our sources of financing as of
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committed
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Financial Institution or Instrument
|
|
Financing
|
|
|
Balances
|
|
|
Type of Financing
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Merrill Lynch
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
Whole Loan Repurchase Agreement
|
|
|
Jan-07
|
|
UBS Warburg
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
Whole Loan/Bond Repurchase
|
|
|
Apr-07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
Whole Loan Repurchase Agreement
|
|
|
Mar-07
|
|
Greenwich Capital Financial
Products
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
Whole Loan Repurchase Agreement
|
|
|
Aug-07
|
|
Greenwich Capital
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
Bond Repurchase Agreement
|
|
|
Aug-07
|
|
UBS LTD.
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
Uncommitted Financing
|
|
|
|
|
Lehman Brothers
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Uncommitted Financing
|
|
|
|
|
North Lake Capital Funding
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
Asset-Backed Commercial Paper
|
|
|
|
|
Citicorp North America
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
Asset-Backed Commercial Paper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Borrowings
|
|
|
8,300
|
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from Federal Home
Loan Bank
|
|
|
15,618
|
|
|
|
10,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Financing
|
|
$
|
23,918
|
|
|
|
13,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELOC Note Trust
(2004-1)
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
Note Trust
|
|
|
Apr-26
|
|
HELOC Note Trust
(2004-2)
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
Note Trust
|
|
|
Oct-36
|
|
Wells Fargo Bank
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Unsecured Line of Credit
|
|
|
Jun-08
|
|
Trust Preferred Debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
Trust Preferred Debentures
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Trust preferred debentures of $78.3 million,
$30.5 million, $30.4 million, $30.9 million,
$92.8 million, $46.4 million, $46.4 million,
$39.2 million, $41.2 million, and $20.6 million
will mature in November 2031, July 2033, January 2034, March
2035, December 2035, September 2036, September 2036, December
2036, March 2037, and January 2037, respectively. |
Our credit facilities do not have default triggers tied to our
credit rating. While a change in rating would therefore not
directly affect our current borrowing capacity in a material
manner, it might affect our lenders’ decisions to renew
credit facilities with us or it may change market perceptions
and impact our trading and loan sales activities. During 2006,
our outlook by Fitch was upgraded from Stable to Positive. As of
December 31, 2006, the corporate ratings assigned to both
Indymac Bancorp and Indymac Bank were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dominion Bond
|
|
|
Moody’s
|
|
Standard & Poor’s
|
|
Fitch, IBCA, Duff & Phelps
|
|
Rating Service
|
|
Indymac Bancorp:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outlook
|
|
Stable
|
|
Stable
|
|
Positive
|
|
Positive
|
Long term issuer credit
|
|
Ba1
|
|
BBB—
|
|
BBB—
|
|
BBBL
|
Short term issuer credit
|
|
NA
|
|
A3
|
|
F2
|
|
R2L
|
Indymac Bank:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outlook
|
|
Stable
|
|
Stable
|
|
Positive
|
|
Positive
|
Long term issuer credit
|
|
Baa3
|
|
BBB
|
|
BBB—
|
|
BBB
|
Short term issuer credit
|
|
P2
|
|
A2
|
|
F2
|
|
R2M
|
69
Direct
Stock Purchase Plan
Our direct stock purchase plan offers investors the ability to
purchase shares of our common stock directly over the Internet.
For those interested in investing over $10,000, investors can
also participate in the waiver program administered by Mellon
Investor Services LLC. During 2006, we raised
$148.5 million of capital by issuing 3,532,360 shares
of common stock through this plan.
Capital
Raising and Deployment Strategies
To optimize its capital structure and shareholders’
returns, the Company has obtained an authorization from the
Indymac Bancorp Board of Directors to purchase an additional
$236.4 million of Indymac Bancorp common stock for a total
current authorization of up to $300 million (see
“Share Repurchase Activities” on page 15).
Additionally, the Indymac Bank Board of Directors has approved
the following capital raising initiatives: 1) issuing up to
$500 million in non-cumulative perpetual preferred
securities; and 2) issuing up to $200 million in
senior subordinated debt.
PRINCIPAL
USES OF CASH
In addition to the financing sources discussed above, our cash
needs are funded by net cash flows from operations before net
purchases and originations of loans held for sale, sales of
mortgage-backed securities and principal and interest payments
on loans and securities. The amounts of net acquisitions of
loans held for sale, and trading securities included as
components of net cash used in operating activities, totaled
$7.9 billion during the year ended December 31, 2006
and $4.8 billion during the year ended December 31,
2005. Excluding the purchase and sale activity for loans held
for sale and trading securities, the net cash provided by the
Company’s operating activities totaled $490.5 million
and $222.9 million for the years ended December 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
REGULATORY
CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
Indymac Bank is subject to regulatory capital regulations
administered by the federal banking agencies. As of
December 31, 2006, Indymac Bank met all of the requirements
of a “well-capitalized” institution under the general
regulatory capital regulations. We believe that, under current
regulations, Indymac Bank will continue to meet its
“well-capitalized” minimum capital requirements in the
foreseeable future. Indymac Bank’s regulatory capital
compliance could be impacted, however, by a number of factors,
such as changes to applicable regulations, adverse action by our
regulators, changes in our mix of assets, interest rate
fluctuations, loan loss provisions and credit losses, or
significant changes in the economy in areas where we have most
of our loans. Any of these factors could cause our actual future
results to vary from anticipated future results and consequently
could have an adverse impact on the ability of Indymac Bank to
meet its future minimum capital requirements. Refer to
“Note 23 — Regulatory Requirements” in
the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements for
further discussion.
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
In the ordinary course of our business, we engage in financial
transactions that are not recorded on our balance sheet. These
transactions are structured to manage our interest rate, credit
or liquidity risks, to diversify funding sources or to optimize
our capital usage.
Substantially all of our off-balance sheet arrangements relate
to the securitization of mortgage loans. Our mortgage loan
securitizations are normally structured as sales in accordance
with SFAS 140, which involves the transfer of the mortgage
loans to “qualifying special-purpose entities” that
are not subject to consolidation. In a securitization, an entity
transferring the assets is able to convert those assets into
cash. Special-purpose entities used in such securitizations
obtain cash to acquire the assets by issuing securities to
investors. We also, generally, have the right to repurchase
mortgage loans from the special-purpose entities if the
remaining outstanding balance of the mortgage loans falls to a
level where the cost of servicing the loans exceeds the revenues
we earn.
In connection with our loan sales that are securitization
transactions, there are $68.7 billion in loans owned by
off-balance sheet trusts as of December 31, 2006. The
trusts have issued bonds secured by these loans. We have no
obligation to provide funding support to either the third party
investors or the off-balance sheet trusts. Generally, neither
the third party investors nor the trusts have recourse to our
assets or us, and they have no ability to require us to
repurchase their loans other than for non-credit-related
recourse that can arise under standard representations and
70
warranties. We maintain secondary market reserves mostly for
losses that could arise in connection with loans that we are
required to repurchase from GSEs and whole loan sales. For
information on the sales proceeds and cash flows from our
securitizations for 2006 see “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations — Liquidity and Capital
Resources — Principal Sources of Cash — Loan
Sales and Securitizations.”
We often retain certain interests, which may include
subordinated classes of securities, MSRs, AAA-rated and agency
interest-only securities, prepayment penalty and residual
securities in the securitization trust. The performance of the
loans in the trusts will impact our ability to realize the
current estimated fair value of these assets that are included
on our balance sheet. MSRs, AAA-rated and agency interest-only
securities, principal-only securities, prepayment penalty
securities, non-investment grade securities and residual
securities were $1.8 billion, $73.6 million,
$38.5 million, $97.6 million, $80.2 million and
$250.6 million, respectively, at December 31, 2006.
See “Note 14 — Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets” in the accompanying notes to the
consolidated financial statements for further disclosure of
credit exposure associated with our securitizations.
Management does not believe that any of its off-balance sheet
arrangements have or are reasonably likely to have a current or
future material effect on our financial condition, changes in
financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of
operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
AGGREGATE
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table summarizes our material contractual
obligations as of December 31, 2006. The payment amounts
represent those amounts contractually due to the recipient and
do not include any unamortized premiums or discounts, hedge
basis adjustments, or other similar carrying value adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment Due
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2007
|
|
|
January 1, 2008
|
|
|
January 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Deposits Without a Stated Maturity
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
2,042,258
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,042,258
|
|
Custodial Accounts and Certificates
of Deposits
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8,587,667
|
|
|
|
203,528
|
|
|
|
64,354
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
8,855,748
|
|
FHLB Advances
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
5,053,000
|
|
|
|
2,642,000
|
|
|
|
2,548,800
|
|
|
|
169,000
|
|
|
|
10,412,800
|
|
Asset-backed commercial papers
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
2,114,508
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,114,508
|
|
Repurchase Agreements
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
1,405,505
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,405,505
|
|
HELOC Notes (1)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
659,283
|
|
|
|
659,283
|
|
Trust Preferred Debentures
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
456,695
|
|
|
|
456,695
|
|
Other Notes
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
Accrued Interest Payable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
161,682
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
161,682
|
|
Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
9,785
|
|
|
|
13,531
|
|
|
|
21,553
|
|
|
|
47,222
|
|
Operating Leases (2)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
36,119
|
|
|
|
62,574
|
|
|
|
40,347
|
|
|
|
43,287
|
|
|
|
182,327
|
|
Employment Agreements (3)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12,792
|
|
|
|
18,323
|
|
|
|
4,516
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
35,631
|
|
Purchase Obligations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,245
|
|
|
|
7,381
|
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,421,138
|
|
|
$
|
2,943,591
|
|
|
$
|
2,672,307
|
|
|
$
|
1,350,017
|
|
|
$
|
26,387,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
HELOC notes are non-recourse and secured by AAA-rated HELOC
certificates. |
|
(2) |
|
Total lease commitments are net of sublease rental income. |
|
(3) |
|
With the exception of the Chief Executive Officer, the amounts
represent compensation for ten senior executives and includes
both base salary and estimated bonuses, calculated based on the
terms in their respective written employment agreements.
According to the Chief Executive Officer’s employment
agreement, his bonus is contingent upon future financial
performance of the Company and cannot be reasonably estimated
for future periods. As a result, only his base salary and his
actual 2006 bonus to be paid in 2007 are included above. |
71
A schedule of significant commitments at December 31, 2006
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment Due
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Undisbursed loan
commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
Reverse mortgages
|
|
$
|
426,977
|
|
Builder construction
|
|
|
858,525
|
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
1,317,346
|
|
HELOCs
|
|
|
1,582,748
|
|
Revolving warehouse lending
|
|
|
465,222
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
$
|
14,042
|
|
At December 31, 2006, there were no loan purchase
commitments under our
clean-up
call rights. See “Note 21 — Commitments and
Contingencies” in the accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements for further details of our
clean-up
call rights.
Additionally, in connection with standard representations and
warranties on loan sales and securitizations, we are
occasionally required to repurchase loans or make certain
payments to settle claims based on breaches of these
representations and warranties. In 2006, our active mortgage
banking operations have sold $79.0 billion in loans and
repurchased $167 million loans, or 0.21% of total loans
sold. To provide for probable future losses related to loans
sold, we have established a reserve based on estimated losses on
actual pending and expected claims and repurchase requests,
historical experience, loan sales volume and loan sale
distribution channels and the assessment of the probability of
vendor or investor claims, which is included in other
liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The balance in
this reserve totaled $33.9 million at December 31,
2006. See the “Secondary Market Reserve” section on
page 64 for further information.
RISK
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
RISKS
RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS GENERALLY
The
level of demand for our mortgage loans may decrease as a result
of rising interest rates, which could adversely impact our
earnings.
The mortgage industry is a cyclical business that generally
performs better in a low interest rate environment. The
environment of historically low interest rates over the past
three years has been favorable for mortgage bankers, such as us.
As the industry transitions to a higher interest rate
environment, rising interest rates generally reduce the demand
for mortgage loans and construction loans. If demand for these
loans decreases, our earnings may decrease because our
alternative investments may earn less income for us than the
origination and sale of mortgage loans. Demand for these loans
could also be reduced by a weaker economy, an increase in
unemployment or a decrease in real estate values. There are
numerous economic factors, including inflation, that could also
impact interest rates, housing prices or housing demand. Gain on
sale of loans is a large component of our revenue and would be
adversely impacted by a significant decrease in our mortgage
loan volume.
Actions
undertaken by current and potential competitors could adversely
impact our earnings and financial position.
We face significant competition in acquiring and selling loans.
In our mortgage banking operations, we compete with other
mortgage bankers, GSEs, established third party lending
programs, investment banking firms, banks, savings and loan
associations, and other lenders and entities purchasing mortgage
assets. With regard to MBS issued through our mortgage banking
operations, we face competition from other investment
opportunities available to prospective investors. We estimate
our market share of the U.S. mortgage market to be
approximately 3.58% for 2006. A number of our competitors have
significantly larger market share and financial resources. We
seek to compete with financial institutions and mortgage
companies through an emphasis on quality of service, diversified
products, strong risk management and maximum use of technology.
The GSEs have made and we believe will continue to make
significant technological and economic advances to broaden their
customer bases. When the GSEs expand, there are both positive
and negative impacts on our mortgage banking lending operations.
As GSEs expand, additional liquidity is brought to the market,
and loan
72
products can be resold more quickly. Conversely, expanding GSEs
increase competition for loans, which may reduce profit margins
on loan sales. We seek to address these competitive pressures by
making a strong effort to maximize our use of technology, by
diversifying into other residential mortgage products that are
less affected by GSEs, and by operating in a more cost-effective
manner than our competitors.
We are
subject to changing government regulations, which could
adversely affect our operations.
The banking industry, in general, is heavily regulated. As a
savings and loan holding company, we are subject to regulation
by the OTS, and Indymac Bank is subject to regulation by the OTS
and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or the FDIC. The
economic and political environment influence regulatory
policies, and as such, any or all of our business activities are
subject to change if and when our primary regulators change the
policies and regulations. Our business is subject to the laws,
rules and regulations of various federal and state government
agencies. These laws, rules and regulations, among other things,
limit the interest rates, finance charges and other fees we may
charge, require us to make extensive disclosure and prohibit
discrimination. We also are subject to inspection by the OTS and
the FDIC. Our business is also subject to laws, rules and
regulations regarding the disclosure of non-public information
about our customers to non-affiliated third parties. Our
operations on the Internet are not currently subject to direct
regulation by any government agency in the United States beyond
OTS regulations and regulations applicable to businesses
generally. A number of legislative and regulatory proposals
currently under consideration by federal, state and local
governmental organizations may lead to laws or regulations
concerning various aspects of business on the Internet,
including: user privacy, taxation, content, access charges,
liability for third-party activities, and jurisdiction. The
adoption of new laws or a change in the application of existing
laws may decrease the use of the Internet, increase our costs or
otherwise adversely affect our business.
Regulatory and legal requirements are subject to change. If such
requirements change and become more restrictive, it would be
more difficult and expensive for us to comply and could affect
the way we conduct our business, which could adversely impact
our operations and earnings.
Our financial condition and results of operations are reported
in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting
principles, or GAAP. While not impacting economic results,
future changes in accounting principles issued by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board could impact our earnings as reported
under GAAP. As a public company, we are also subject to the
corporate governance standards set forth in the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, as well as applicable rules and regulations
promulgated by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange.
Complying with these standards, rules and regulations may impose
administrative costs and burdens on us.
Additionally, political conditions could impact our earnings.
Acts or threats of war or terrorism, as well as actions taken by
the U.S. or other governments in response to such acts or
threats, could impact business and economic conditions in which
we operate.
Economic
downturns or disasters in our principal lending markets,
including California, Florida, Michigan, New Jersey and New
York, could adversely impact our earnings.
A majority of our loans are geographically concentrated in
certain states, including California, Florida, Michigan, New
York and New Jersey, with 52% of our loan receivable balance at
December 31, 2006 being in California. Any adverse economic
conditions in these markets could cause the number of loans
acquired to decrease, likely resulting in a corresponding
decline in revenues and an increase in credit risk. Also, we
could be adversely affected by business disruptions triggered by
natural disasters or acts of war or terrorism in these
geographic areas.
Our
business is highly dependent upon technology for execution of
our business model.
Our business performance is highly dependent on solidly
executing our mortgage banking business model. We must properly
price and continue to expand our products, customer base and
market share. In addition, the execution of our hedging
activities is critical as we have significant exposure to
changes in interest rates.
We are highly dependent on the use of technology in all areas of
our business and we must take advantage of advances in
technology to stay competitive. There are no guarantees as to
our degree of success in anticipating and taking advantage of
technological advances or that we will be more successful in the
use of technology than our competitors.
73
Our
business process outsourcing and information technology
outsourcing activities in India may be adversely impacted by
instability in the Indian business environment caused by
political factors or data security breaches involving
outsourcing firms.
Through the Global Resources program, we utilize an off-shore
workforce in India predominantly in non-customer-facing back
office functions to enhance service levels and improve
efficiencies. Political instability, increasing labor disputes
and public uprisings may cause disruptions to the general
business environment in India. We do not believe these issues
should materially impact our outsourcing activities. However, if
political and social unrest in India dramatically worsens, our
outsourcing activities may be adversely impacted.
Additionally, there have been reported incidences of alleged
security breaches and loss of customer data involving the
outsourcing industry in India. While we have not been affected
by any such security breaches and we believe our overall
information security framework is very solid, we cannot
guarantee that all potential security risks abroad have been
eliminated.
We may
be adversely affected by unusual employee
turnover.
Our strategic goals anticipate the need to continue to attract
and retain talented employees. There is significant competition
among employers in the financial service industry and we
experience turnover of employees. For 2006, our turnover rate
was 21.7%. We do not believe that this rate of turnover is
unusual in our industry and we have not experienced significant
shortfalls in our strategic goals to date as a result of
turnover. However, should we be subjected to unusual turnover of
employees, it may have a negative effect on our business and
operating results. In January 2007, we have announced a
company-wide base salary freeze in response to the current
market environment. Consequently, this may increase our turnover
rate and thus negatively impact our business and operating
results.
RISKS
RELATED TO OUR INTEREST RATE HEDGING STRATEGIES
Certain
hedging strategies that we use to manage our assets and
liabilities may be ineffective to mitigate the impact of
interest rate changes.
We utilize various hedging strategies to mitigate the interest
rate risk and prepayment risk inherent in many of our assets,
including our mortgage pipeline, our portfolio of interest-only
securities, our mortgage servicing rights portfolio, and other
financial instruments in which we invest.
Due to the characteristics of our financial assets and
liabilities and the nature of our business activities, our
liquidity, financial position, and results of operations may be
materially affected by changes in interest rates in various
ways. The objective of our hedging strategies is to mitigate the
impact of interest rate changes, on an economic and accounting
basis, on net interest income and the fair value of our balance
sheet. The overall effectiveness of these hedging strategies is
subject to market conditions, the quality of our execution, the
accuracy of our asset valuation assumptions and other sources of
interest rate risk discussed further below.
Certain
hedging strategies that we use to manage our mortgage pipeline
may be ineffective to mitigate the risk of overall changes in
fair value of loans held for sale and interest rate lock
commitments.
The mortgage pipeline consists of our commitments to purchase
mortgage loans, or interest rate locks, and funded mortgage
loans that will be sold in the secondary market. The risk
associated with the mortgage pipeline is that interest rates
will fluctuate between the time we commit to purchase a loan at
a pre-determined price, or the customer locks in the interest
rate on a loan, and the time we sell or commit to sell the
mortgage loan. These commitments are managed net of the
anticipated loan funding probability, or fallout factor.
Generally speaking, if interest rates increase, the value of an
unhedged mortgage pipeline decreases, and gain on sale margins
are adversely impacted. Typically, we hedge the risk of overall
changes in fair value of loans held for sale by either entering
into forward loan sale agreements, selling forward Fannie Mae or
Freddie Mac MBS or using other derivative instruments to hedge
loan commitments and to create fair value hedges against the
funded loan portfolios. If the hedging strategies we use to
mitigate interest rate risk in our mortgage pipeline are
ineffective, our gain on sale margins may be compressed and our
earnings may be adversely impacted.
74
Certain
hedging strategies that we use to manage our investment in
Mortgage Servicing Rights and other retained assets may be
ineffective to mitigate the risk of changes in the fair value of
these assets due to changes in interest rates.
We invest in MSRs and other retained assets to support our
mortgage banking strategies and to deploy capital at acceptable
returns. The value of these assets and the income they provide
tend to be counter-cyclical to the changes in production volumes
and gain on sale of loans that result from changes in interest
rates. We also enter into derivatives and other mortgage-related
securities to hedge our MSRs and other retained assets to offset
losses in fair value resulting from increased prepayments in
declining interest rate environments. The primary risk
associated with MSRs and other retained assets is that they will
lose a substantial portion of their value as a result of higher
than anticipated prepayments occasioned by declining interest
rates. Conversely, these assets generally increase in value in a
rising rate environment. Our hedging strategies are highly
susceptible to prepayment risk, basis risk, market volatility
and changes in the shape of the yield curve among other factors.
In addition, our hedging strategies rely on assumptions and
projections regarding our assets and general market factors. If
these assumptions and projections prove to be incorrect or our
hedging strategies do not adequately mitigate the impact of
changes in interest rates or prepayment speeds, we may incur
losses that could adversely impact our earnings.
Certain
hedging and asset/liability management strategies that we use to
manage our other financial instruments may be ineffective to
mitigate the risk of interest rate fluctuations.
Certain other financial instruments that we invest in tend to
decrease in value as interest rates increase and tend to
increase in value as interest rates decline. These include fixed
rate mortgage loans held for investment, fixed rate investment
grade and non-investment grade mortgage-backed and asset-backed
securities. To a lesser extent, adjustable mortgage loans held
for investment and mortgage securities supported by adjustable
rate mortgage loans may change in value as interest rates
change, if the timing or absolute level of interest rate
adjustments on the underlying loans do not correspond to
applicable changes in market interest rates. We invest in these
assets to earn stable spread income. While such assets are
generally low risk from a credit standpoint, these assets are
subject to interest rate risk because actual future cash flows
may vary from expected cash flows primarily due to borrower
prepayment behavior.
We use hedging and asset/liability management strategies to
mitigate the impact that changes in interest rates will have on
these financial instruments. These strategies require us to make
certain assumptions and use estimates that may prove to be
incorrect and make these strategies ineffective to mitigate the
interest rate risk embedded in these financial instruments. If
these strategies are ineffective our net interest income and
earnings may be adversely impacted.
There
can be no assurance that our interest rate risk strategies or
their implementation will be successful in any particular
interest rate environment.
We seek to mitigate our interest rate risks through the various
strategies described above. However, there can be no assurance
that these strategies (including assumptions concerning the
correlation thought to exist between different types of
instruments) or their implementation will be successful in any
particular interest rate environment, as market volatility
cannot be predicted.
The following are the primary sources of risk that we must
manage in our hedging strategies:
Basis Risk. In connection with our interest
rate risk management, basis risk is most prevalent in our
hedging activities, in that the change in value of hedges may
not equal or completely offset the change in value of the
financial asset or liability being hedged. While we choose
hedges we believe will correlate effectively with the hedged
asset or liability under a variety of market conditions, there
are no assurances that the hedges we choose will be perfectly
correlated with the assets or liabilities we attempt to hedge.
Further, we make assumptions in our financial models as to how
LIBOR/swap, treasury, agency and private-label mortgage rates,
and other hedges that we might use will change in relation to
one another. From time to time, in certain interest rate
environments, the relative movement of these different interest
rates and the corresponding change in value of the applicable
hedge instruments do not change in accordance with our
assumptions, which may result in an imperfect correlation
between the values of the hedges and the hedged assets making
our hedges ineffective in mitigating basis risk which may result
in our earnings being adversely impacted.
75
Options Risk. An option provides the holder
the right, but not the obligation, to buy, sell, or in some
manner alter the cash flows of an instrument or financial
contract. Options may be stand-alone instruments such as
exchange-traded options and
over-the-counter
contracts, or they may be embedded within standard instruments.
Instruments with embedded options include bonds and notes with
call or put provisions, loans that give borrowers the right to
prepay balances, and adjustable rate loans with interest rate
caps or floors that limit the amount by which the rate may
adjust. Loans that give borrowers the right to prepay balances
present the most significant option risk that we must manage,
and there are no assurances that the hedges that we select for
any type of option will effectively offset the interest rate
risks.
Repricing Risk. Repricing risks arise from the
timing difference in the maturity
and/or
repricing of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet
positions. While such repricing mismatches are fundamental to
our business, they can expose us to fluctuations in income and
economic value as interest rates vary. We monitor and manage
repricing risk by calculating and monitoring the duration gap on
our individual positions and in the aggregate, and maintaining
certain risk tolerances. In certain circumstances, however, this
internal risk management process may not eliminate repricing
risk. If we inadequately manage our repricing risk through our
hedging strategies, our operations and earnings may be adversely
impacted.
Yield Curve Risk. The value of certain loans,
securities and hedges we hold is based on a number of factors,
including the shape or slope of the appropriate yield curve, as
the market values of financial assets and hedge instruments are
based on expectations for interest rates in the future. Yield
curves typically reflect the market’s expectations for
future interest rates. In valuing our assets and related hedge
instruments, in formulating our hedging strategies and in
evaluating the interest rate sensitivity for risk management
purposes, our models use market yield curves, which are
constantly changing. If the shape or slope of the market yield
curves changes unexpectedly, the market values of our assets and
related hedges may be negatively impacted
and/or
changes in the value of the hedges may not be effectively
correlated with the changes in the value of the hedged assets or
liabilities.
RISKS
RELATED TO OUR VALUATION OF ASSETS
We use
estimates in determining the fair value of certain assets, such
as Mortgage Servicing Rights, AAA-rated and agency interest-only
securities, non-investment grade securities, and residual
securities. If our estimates prove to be incorrect, we may be
required to write down the value of these assets which could
adversely impact our earnings.
We hold assets that we retain in connection with the sale or
securitization of mortgage loans, including MSRs, AAA-rated and
agency interest-only securities, prepayment penalty securities,
non-investment grade securities and residuals. We use third
party vendor financial models to value each of the asset types
referred to above. These models are complex and use asset
specific collateral data and market inputs for interest rates.
In addition, the modeling requirements of MSRs and residual
securities are significantly more complex than those of
AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities because of the
high number of variables that drive cash flows associated with
MSRs and the complex cash flow structures, which may differ on
each securitization, that determine the value of residual
securities. There are no assurances that we can properly manage
the increased complexity of our models and valuations to ensure,
among other things, that the models are properly calibrated, the
assumptions are reasonable, the mathematical relationships used
in the model are predictive and remain so over time, and the
data and structure of the assets and hedges being modeled are
properly input.
Even if the general accuracy of the valuation model is
validated, valuations are highly dependent upon the
reasonableness of our assumptions and the predictability of the
relationships which drive the results of the model. Such
assumptions are complex as we must make judgments about the
effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. As the number
of variables and assumptions affecting the possible future
resolution of the uncertainties increases, those judgments
become even more complex. If loans in our investment portfolio,
or loans underlying certain assets in our investment portfolio
prepay faster than estimated or loan loss levels are higher than
anticipated, we may be required to write down the value of
certain assets which could adversely impact our earnings.
76
Our
valuation assumptions regarding securities acquired from third
party issuers may be incorrect, which could adversely impact our
earnings.
From time to time, we may acquire securities from third party
issuers. We value these securities with complex financial models
that incorporate significant assumptions and judgments, which
could vary significantly as market conditions change. If our
assumptions with respect to these types of assets are incorrect,
we may be required to write down the value of some or all of
these assets which could adversely impact our earnings.
RISKS
RELATED TO OUR ASSUMPTION OF CREDIT RISK
Our
risk management policies and practices may not adequately manage
our exposure to credit risk in our business
operations.
We have assumed a degree of credit risk in connection with our
investments in certain mortgage securities and loans held for
investment and sale, as well as in connection with our
construction lending operations and our mortgage banking
activities. We have established risk management and credit
polices to manage our exposure to credit losses in each of these
business operations. We have also established a central credit
risk management group to monitor the credit quality of our
balance sheet and production. We cannot be sure, however, that
the risk management polices and practices in place will provide
adequate oversight of our credit risk.
Our
earnings could be adversely impacted if the assumptions
underlying our risk-based pricing models prove to be
incorrect.
Our mortgage loan underwriting process, including our
e-MITS
underwriting and pricing system, depends heavily on risk-based
pricing models. Because our risk-based pricing models, including
the risk-based pricing models utilized in
e-MITS, are
based primarily on standard industry loan loss data supplemented
by our historical loan loss data and proprietary logic developed
by us, and because the models cannot predict the effect of
financial market and other economic performance factors, there
are no assurances that our risk-based pricing models are a
complete and accurate reflection of the risks associated with
our loan products which may reduce the quality of our loan
portfolio and could adversely impact our earnings.
Our
earnings could be adversely impacted by incidences of fraud and
compliance failures that are not within our direct
control.
We are subject to fraud and compliance risk in connection with
the purchase or origination of mortgage loans. Fraud risk
includes the risk of intentional misstatement of information in
property appraisals or other underwriting documentation provided
to us by third parties. This risk is typically higher in the
acquisition of a loan from a third-party seller. Compliance risk
is the risk that loans are not originated in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations, and to our standards. There can
be no assurance that we can prevent or detect acts of fraud or
violations of law or our compliance standards by third parties
that we deal with. Frequent incidences of fraud or violations of
law or our compliance standards may require us to repurchase
loans that we have originated and sold at a more frequent rate
than we have anticipated and could have an adverse impact on our
earnings.
We are
exposed to credit risk from the sale of mortgage
loans.
We retain limited credit exposure from the sale of mortgage
loans. We make standard representations and warranties to the
transferee in connection with all such dispositions. These
representations and warranties do not assure against credit risk
associated with the transferred loans, but if individual
mortgage loans are found not to have fully complied with the
associated representations and warranties we have made to a
transferee, we may be required to repurchase the loans from the
transferee or we may make payments in lieu of curing such
breaches of these representations and warranties.
Our
management of the credit risk associated with non-investment
grade MBS and residual securities depends upon estimates and
assumptions that may not be accurate.
We assume a certain degree of credit risk in connection with
investments in non-investment grade MBS and residual securities
that we occasionally acquire from third-party issuers or retain
from our own securitizations. Non-investment grade securities
(rated below BBB) may or may not represent the second loss
position, depending on the rating, but are typically subject to
a disproportionate amount of the credit risk. Residuals
represent the first loss
77
position and are not typically rated by a nationally recognized
rating agency. In general, non-investment grade securities bear
losses prior to the more senior investment grade securities, and
therefore bear a disproportionate amount of the credit risk with
respect to the underlying collateral.
Non-investment grade securities represent leveraged credit risk
as they absorb a disproportionate share of credit risk as
compared to investment grade securities. These securities are
recorded on our books net of discount that is based upon, among
other things, the estimated credit losses, expected prepayments,
as estimated by internal loss models
and/or
perceived by the market, and the coupons, associated with these
securities. The adequacy of this discount is dependent upon how
accurate our estimate is of both the amount and timing of the
cash flows paid to the non-investment grade securities, which is
primarily based upon our estimate of the amount and timing of
credit losses and prepayments on the underlying loan collateral.
Residual securities possess a greater degree of risk because
they are relatively illiquid, represent the first loss position
and require a higher reliance on financial models in determining
their fair value. Realization of this fair value is dependent
upon the accuracy of our estimate of both the amount and timing
of the cash flows paid to the residual securities, which are
based primarily on our estimate of the amount and timing of
credit losses on the underlying loan collateral and to a lesser
extent prepayment rates on the underlying loan collateral.
If we do not adequately estimate the credit losses, prepayments
and the amount and timing of cash flows associated with
non-investment grade and residual securities that we hold, our
earnings and cash flows may be adversely impacted.
The
rate of loan losses we incur may exceed the level of our loss
reserves, which could adversely impact our
earnings.
We establish reserves for various credit risk exposures. These
reserves are often based on estimates of future borrower
behavior and the value of underlying collateral. Both our
business units and corporate oversight groups review the
adequacy of these reserves and the underlying estimates on a
periodic basis and we make adjustments to the reserves when
required. There is no assurance that our actual losses will not
exceed our estimates and adversely impact our earnings.
We
make and hold in our portfolio a significant number of
construction loans, which may pose more credit risk than other
types of mortgage loans typically made by savings
institutions.
We offer residential construction programs for builders and
developers. Builder construction loans are considered more risky
than other types of residential mortgage loans. The primary
credit risks associated with builder construction lending are
underwriting, project risks and market risks. Project risks
include cost overruns, borrower credit risk, project completion
risk, general contractor credit risk, and environmental and
other hazard risks. Market risks are risks associated with the
sale of the completed residential units. They include
affordability risk, which is the risk of affordability of
financing by borrowers in a rising interest rate environment,
product design risk, and risks posed by competing projects.
While we have established adequate reserves on our financial
statements to cover the credit risk of our construction loan
portfolio, there can be no assurance that losses will not exceed
our reserves, which could adversely impact our earnings. Our
failure to adequately address the related risks could have an
adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
The U.S. housing market has experienced a significant amount of
appreciation in recent years and this boom has provided a very
favorable operating environment for new home builders. Recently,
house price appreciation has slowed, and in some markets, house
prices have begun to decline. This slowdown has negatively
impacted the amount of new home sales and the prices of such
sales. Our builder construction portfolio has seen virtually no
charge-offs or non-performing loans in the past three years.
Given the current environment we expect that our non-performing
loans in this portfolio will increase substantially and these
non-performing loans could result in a material level of
charge-offs.
Recent
developments in the subprime mortgage market may affect the
profitability of our subprime loans in the
pipeline.
Rising default rates by subprime borrowers have caused
purchasers of subprime mortgage loans in the secondary market to
demand better terms. While the Bank has raised the rates on its
subprime loans in order to respond in the near term to this
development, the Bank is unable to change the terms of loans to
which it already is
78
committed and are in the pipeline. As a result, the
profitability of subprime loans currently in the pipeline may be
affected.
We are
exposed to credit risk related to counterparties in many of our
businesses. If these counterparties are unable to perform
according to the terms of our contract, our earnings may be
adversely impacted.
In connection with our trading and hedging activities, we do
business only with counterparties that we believe are
established and sufficiently capitalized. In addition, with
respect to hedging activities on the pipeline of mortgage loans
held for sale, we enter into “master netting”
agreements with an independent clearinghouse known as the Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation. This entity collects and pays daily
margin deposits to reduce the risk associated with counterparty
credit quality. We do not engage in any foreign currency
trading. All interest rate hedge contracts are with entities
(including their subsidiaries) that are approved by a committee
of our Board of Directors and that generally must have a long
term credit rating of “A” or better (by one or more
nationally recognized statistical rating organization) at the
time the relevant contract is consummated. We also retain
limited credit exposure from the sale of our mortgage loans. We
make standard representations and warranties to the purchasers
in connection with all such dispositions. These representations
and warranties do not protect purchasers from credit risk
associated with the transferred loans, but if individual
mortgage loans are found not to have fully complied with the
representations and warranties we make to purchasers, we may be
required to repurchase the loans from the purchasers or we may
make payments to settle such breaches of these representations
and warranties. While we have made what we believe to be
appropriate loss allowances and reserves for representation and
warranty claims, there can be no guarantee that the amount
reserved is sufficient to cover all potential losses and
repurchases which could adversely impact our earnings.
RISKS
RELATED TO OUR LIQUIDITY
Our
ability to borrow funds and raise capital could be limited,
which could adversely affect our earnings.
Our ability to make mortgage loans depends largely on our
ability to secure financing on acceptable terms. Our primary
sources of funds to meet our financing needs include loan sales
and securitizations, consumer deposits, borrowings from the
Federal Home Loan Bank, or FHLB, asset-backed commercial
paper, borrowings from investment and commercial banks and
capital. Our ability to maintain borrowing facilities is subject
to renewal of these facilities. If we are unable to renew any of
these financing arrangements or arrange for new financing on
terms acceptable to us, or if we default on any of the
restrictions imposed upon us by our lenders, then we may have to
reduce the number of loans we are able to fund or to hold on our
balance sheet. A reduction in assets could adversely impact our
earnings. Additionally, we are required to maintain adequate
capital to be regarded as “well capitalized” by the
OTS. There is no guarantee that we will be able to adequately
access capital markets when or if a need for additional capital
arises which could limit our ability to increase the assets on
our balance sheet and adversely impact our earnings.
On March 15, 2006, the Federal Housing Finance Board
published a proposed rule aimed at bolstering capital for the
Federal Home Loan Banks. Among other things, this proposal
would result in the respective FHLB reducing dividends paid to
its members until such time as the respective FHLB capital
reaches a specified level. The implementation of this proposal
has been deferred indefinitely to allow more time for the
Finance Board to evaluate other alternatives.
The
level of demand for, and the value of, our mortgage loans may
decrease as a result of rising interest rates, which could
adversely impact our earnings.
Our business model relies heavily upon the ability to sell the
majority of mortgage loans shortly after we acquire them. The
key channels through which we sell mortgage loans are bulk sales
of loan pools to GSEs, sales on a whole loan basis and the
private securitization of loan pools, whereby the loans are sold
to securitization trusts. During 2006, sales to GSEs were 19% of
our total loan sales, whole loan sales were 39%, private
securitizations were 38%, and the remaining was transfers to our
thrift portfolio. We have ready access to all three of these
external distribution channels at this time; however, a
disruption in this access could negatively impact our liquidity
position and our ability to execute on our business plan. The
secondary mortgage market is generally a very liquid market with
continuing demand for mortgage-backed security issuances. A
lengthy disruption to this market may require us
79
to radically restructure our business to slow volume and we
would have difficulty sustaining our earnings performance as a
significant portion of our earnings depends on our ability to
sell our mortgage production.
Decreased
secondary market demand for subprime loans may limit our ability
to make such loans, which could adversely affect our
earnings.
Rising default rates by subprime mortgage loan borrowers may
cause the demand for such loans in the secondary market to
decline. In such an event, the Bank is likely to reduce its
originations or purchases of such loans, which could adversely
affect our earnings.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND JUDGMENTS
Several of the critical accounting policies that are very
important to the portrayal of our financial condition and
results of operations require management to make difficult and
complex judgments that rely on estimates about the effect of
matters that are inherently uncertain due to the impact of
changing market conditions
and/or
consumer behavior. We believe our most critical accounting
policies relate to: (1) assets that are highly dependent on
internal valuation models and assumptions rather than market
quotations, including, AAA-rated and agency interest-only
securities, prepayment penalty securities, MSRs and
non-investment grade and residual securities;
(2) derivatives hedging instruments and hedge accounting;
(3) our allowance for loan losses (“ALL”); and
(4) our secondary market reserve.
Management discusses these critical accounting policies and
related judgments with Indymac’s Audit Committee and
external auditors on a quarterly basis. We believe the
judgments, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of
our consolidated financial statements are appropriate given the
factual circumstances at the time; however, given the
sensitivity of our consolidated financial statements to these
critical accounting policies, the use of other judgments,
estimates and assumptions could result in material differences
in our results of operations or financial condition. Our
accounting policies are described in
“Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies.”
With the exception of the ALL, these items are generally created
in connection with our loan sale and securitization process. The
allocated cost of the retained assets at the time of the sale is
recorded as a component of the net gain on sale of loans. We
recognized a total of $1.5 billion in retained assets in
connection with loan sales during the year ended
December 31, 2006. Such retained assets were comprised
primarily of MSRs (73%) and, to a much lesser degree, AAA-rated
and agency interest-only securities, prepayment penalty
securities, investment grade and non-investment grade
securities, residual securities, and AAA-rated principal-only
securities.
There is a risk that at times we might not satisfy the
requirements for fair value hedge accounting under
SFAS 133, as amended, for a portion of our loans held for
sale because we do not meet the required complex hedge
correlation tests. This could cause temporary fluctuations in
our reported income but not in the ultimate economic results.
The fluctuation in our reported income if hedge accounting is
not achieved would be over a very short period as we sold our
mortgage loans on average in 50 days during 2006 and the
economic effect of both the hedges and loans would be recorded
once the sale was completed. In addition, any imprecision in
valuation of these items would be adjusted and recorded in a
short period through our gain on sale margin once the sale of
the loans was completed.
Fair values for these assets are determined by using available
market information, historical performance of the assets
underlying collateral and internal valuation models as
appropriate. The reasonableness of fair values will vary
depending upon the availability of third party market
information, which is a function of the market liquidity of the
asset being valued. In connection with our mortgage banking and
investment portfolio operations, we invest in assets created
from the loan sale and securitization process, for which markets
are relatively limited and illiquid. As a result, the valuation
of these assets is subject to our assumptions about future
events rather than market quotations. These assets include
AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities, MSRs,
non-investment grade securities and residuals. As the number of
variables and assumptions used to estimate fair value increases
and as the time period increases over which the estimates are
made, such estimates will likely change in a greater number of
periods, potentially adding volatility to our valuations and
financial results. For further information regarding the
sensitivity of the fair value of these assets to changes in the
underlying assumptions, refer to “Note 14 —
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets” in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company.
80
AAA-RATED
INTEREST-ONLY SECURITIES
AAA-rated interest-only securities are created upon the sale of
loans through private-label securitizations or, to a much lesser
degree, purchased from third-party issuers. The values of
AAA-rated interest-only securities represent the present value
of the estimated future cash flows to be received from the
excess spread. Future cash flows are estimated by taking the
coupon rate of the loans collateralizing the transaction less
the interest rate (coupon) paid to the investors less
contractually specified servicing and trustee fees, after giving
effect to estimated prepayments of the underlying loans. The AAA
rating of the interest-only securities reflects the fact that
they are exposed to very low credit risk, but does not reflect
the fact that their interest rate risk can be significant.
We classify our AAA-rated interest-only securities as trading
and they are therefore carried at fair value, with changes in
fair value being recorded through earnings. Valuation changes,
net of related hedge gains and losses, are included in
“Gain (loss) on mortgage-backed securities, net” in
the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. We use third party
models and an option adjusted spread (“OAS”) valuation
methodology to value these securities. The key assumptions
include projected lifetime prepayment rates based on collateral
type, option adjusted spreads, and future delinquency and
default rates. Based on these assumptions, our model calculates
implied discount rates, which we compare to market discount
rates and risk premiums to determine if our valuations are
reasonable.
In addition to considering actual prepayment trends, future
prepayment rates are estimated based on the following four
factors:
1) Relative Coupon Rate. The interest
rate the borrower is currently paying relative to current market
rates for that type of loan is the primary predictor of the
borrower’s likelihood to prepay. We assume that a
borrower’s propensity to prepay increases when the
borrower’s loan rate exceeds the current market rates.
2) Seasoning. Based on prepayment curves
and other studies performed by industry analysts of prepayment
activity over the life of a pool of loans, a pattern has been
identified whereby prepayments typically peak in years one to
three, consistent with borrower moving habits.
3) Seasonality. Seasonality refers to the
time of the year that prepayments occur. All else being
constant, prepayments tend to be higher in summer months due to
borrowers’ tendency to move outside of the school year and
lower in winter months due to the holiday season.
4) Burn Out. Burn out is associated with
a pool of mortgage loans which has endured a variety of high
prepayment environments such that it may be assumed that the
remaining borrowers are insensitive to any subsequent decline in
interest rates. Consequently, all else being equal, projected
prepayment speeds for such a pool of loans would be lower than a
newly originated loan pool with comparable characteristics.
As cash flows must be estimated over the life of the pool of
mortgage loans underlying the AAA-rated interest-only
securities, assumptions must be made about the level of interest
rates over that same time horizon, which is primarily three to
five years, as these securities have a weighted average life of
approximately that period. We utilize a credit spread over the
market LIBOR/swap forward curve to estimate the level of
mortgage interest rates over the life of the pool of loans. We
believe a forward curve, as opposed to static or spot interest
rates, incorporates the market perception about expected changes
in interest rates and provides a more realistic estimate of
lifetime interest rates and therefore prepayment rates.
The discount rate represents the implicit yield a knowledgeable
investor would require to purchase or own the projected cash
flows. Using an OAS model, embedded options and other cash flow
uncertainties are quantified across a large number of
hypothetical interest rate environments. The OAS is essentially
the credit spread over the risk free rate after the option costs
(e.g., hedge costs) are considered. Overall, we evaluate the
reasonableness of the discount rate based on the spread over the
risk free rate (duration adjusted LIBOR securities) relative to
other cash flow sensitive investments with higher and lower risk
profiles.
MORTGAGE
SERVICING RIGHTS
MSRs are created upon the sale of loans to GSEs, in
private-label securitizations, and sometimes, from the sale of
whole loans. We also purchase MSRs from time to time from third
parties. The carrying value of MSRs in our financial statements
represents our estimate of the present value of future cash
flows to be received by us as servicer of the loans. In general,
future cash flows are estimated by projecting the service fee,
plus late fees and reinvestment income associated with interest
earned on “float,” after subtracting guarantee fees on
agency portfolios, the cost of
81
reimbursing investors for compensating interest associated with
the early pay-off of loans, the market cost to service the
loans, the cost of mortgage insurance premiums (if applicable),
and after giving effect to estimated prepayments.
Subsequent to the adoption of SFAS 156, MSRs are recorded
at fair value with valuation changes, net of hedges, being
reported in service fee income in the consolidated statements of
earnings. We use a third party valuation model and OAS. The key
assumptions include prepayment rates and, to a lesser degree,
reinvestment income and discount rates. Prepayment speeds and
OAS derived discount rates are determined using the methodology
described above for AAA-rated and agency interest-only
securities.
Reinvestment income represents the interest earned on custodial
balances, often referred to as float. Custodial balances are
generated from the collection of borrower principal and interest
and escrow balances which we generally hold on deposit for a
short period until the required monthly remittance of such funds
to a trustee. Reinvestment income is reduced by compensating
interest, or “interest shortfall,” which we must pay
to investors to compensate for interest lost on the early payoff
of loans pursuant to our servicing obligations. Our estimate of
reinvestment income is a function of float, which is derived
from our estimate of prepayment speeds, and an estimate of the
interest rate we will earn by temporarily investing these
balances. The reinvestment rate is typically based on the
Federal Funds rate, and we factor in the market forward curve to
derive a long-term estimate.
The valuation of MSRs includes numerous assumptions of varying
lower sensitivities in addition to the assumptions discussed
above. For example, other assumptions include, but are not
limited to, market cost to service loans, prepayment penalties,
delinquencies and the related late fees and escrow balances. We
believe our valuation of MSRs as of December 31, 2006 was
reasonable given market conditions at December 31, 2006 and
quarterly valuations obtained from third parties.
NON-INVESTMENT
GRADE SECURITIES AND RESIDUALS
General
Non-investment grade securities and residuals are created upon
the issuance of private-label securitizations and to a lesser
extent purchased from third parties. Non-investment grade
securities (rated below BBB) represent leveraged credit risk as
they typically absorb a disproportionate amount of credit losses
before such losses affect senior or other investment grade
securities. Residuals represent the first loss position and are
not typically rated by the nationally recognized agencies. The
value of residuals represents the present value of future cash
flows expected to be received by us from the excess cash flows
created in the securitization transaction. In general, future
cash flows are estimated by taking the coupon rate of the loans
underlying the transaction less the interest rate paid to the
investors, less contractually specified servicing and trustee
fees, and after giving effect to estimated prepayments and
credit losses.
Cash flows are also dependent upon various restrictions and
conditions specified in each transaction. For example, residual
securities are not typically entitled to any cash flows unless
over-collateralization has reached a certain level. The
over-collateralization represents the difference between the
bond balance and the collateral underlying the security. A
sample over-collateralization structure may require 2% of the
original collateral balance for 36 months. At month 37, it
may require 4%, but on a declining balance basis. Due to
prepayments, that 4% requirement is generally less than the 2%
required on the original balance. In addition, the transaction
may include an over-collateralization “trigger event,”
the occurrence of which may require the over-collateralization
to be increased. An example of such a trigger event is
delinquency rates or cumulative losses on the underlying
collateral that exceed stated levels. If over-collateralization
targets were not met, the trustee would apply cash flows that
would otherwise flow to the residual security until such targets
are met. A delay or reduction in the cash flows received will
result in a lower valuation of the residual.
We consider certain of our investment grade securities to be
hedges of our AAA-rated interest-only securities and residual
securities. We therefore classify them as trading securities in
order to reflect changes in their fair values in our current
income. Residual securities are generally classified as trading
securities so that the accounting for these securities will
mirror the economic hedging activities. All other MBS, including
the majority of our non-investment grade securities, are
classified as available for sale. At least quarterly, we
evaluate the carrying value of non-investment grade and residual
securities in light of the actual performance of the underlying
loans. If fair value is less than amortized cost and the
estimated undiscounted cash flows have decreased compared to the
prior period, the impairment is recorded through earnings. We
classify our non-investment grade residuals as trading and
82
therefore record them at our estimate of their fair value, with
changes in fair value being recorded through earnings. We use a
third-party model, using the “cash-out” method to
value these securities. This method reflects when we receive the
cash, which may be later than when the trust receives the cash.
The model takes into consideration the cash flow structure
specific to each transaction (such as over-collateralization
requirements and trigger events). The key valuation assumptions
include credit losses, prepayment rates and, to a lesser degree,
discount rates.
Loss
Estimates
We use a proprietary loss estimation model to project credit
losses. This model was developed utilizing our actual loss
experience for prime and subprime loans. The modeling logic has
been reviewed by a third-party specialist in this area and
validated. The expected loan loss is a function of loan amount,
conditional default probability and projected loss severity.
Characteristics that impact default probability vary depending
on loan type and current delinquency status, but generally
include the borrower’s credit score,
loan-to-value
ratio, loan amount,
debt-to-income
ratio, and loan purpose, among other variables. Characteristics
that impact loss severity includes unpaid principal balance,
loan-to-value,
days to liquidation, mortgage insurance status, cash-out versus
no cash-out financing and primary residence status. The loss
estimation model also includes conditional default curves, which
relate to the expected timing of the estimated loss. In our
experience, default probabilities generally reach a peak within
two to three years of loan origination and become less likely
after four to five years. While there can be no assurance as to
the accuracy of the model in predicting losses, we and a
third-party specialist have “back tested” our model
and have validated the model’s default probability logic.
The model is updated and recalibrated periodically based on our
on-going actual loss experience.
Prepayment
Speeds
We estimate prepayments on a collateral-specific basis and
consider actual prepayment activity for the collateral pool. We
also consider the current interest rate environment, the market
forward curve projections and prepayments estimated on similar
collateral pools where we own MSRs. Increasing prepayments tend
to benefit the valuation of non-investment grade securities as
the projected loss gets reduced due to the shorter loan life.
However, increasing prepayments may reduce the value of residual
securities since these securities represent excess spread on the
underlying collateral. Higher prepayments reduce the life of the
residual and total cash flows resulting in a reduction in the
fair value of the residual.
Discount
Rates
We determine static discount rates based on a number of factors,
including but not limited to the collateral type and quality,
structure of the transaction, market interest rates and our
ability to generate an appropriate after tax return on equity
given the other valuation assumptions and resulting projected
cash flows. We also review the discount rates used by other
investors for similar securities to evaluate the appropriateness
of our assumptions. As non-investment grade securities and
residuals are our highest risk profile assets, and liquidity is
generally the lowest for these assets on a duration adjusted
basis, the spread over the risk free rate is also the highest of
all of our cash flow sensitive assets.
DERIVATIVES
AND OTHER HEDGING INSTRUMENTS
The accounting and reporting standards for derivative financial
instruments are established in SFAS 133. SFAS 133
requires that we recognize all derivative instruments on the
balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in fair
value of these instruments depends on the intended use of the
derivative and the associated designation. If certain conditions
are met, hedge accounting may be applied and the derivative
instrument may be specifically designated as a fair value hedge
or a cash flow hedge. In designating hedges of certain funded
mortgage loans in our pipeline and our borrowings and advances
as fair value hedges and cash flow hedges, respectively, we are
required by SFAS 133 to establish at the inception of the
hedge the method we will use in assessing the effectiveness of
the hedging relationship, for hedge accounting qualification,
and in measuring and recognizing hedge ineffectiveness, for
financial reporting purposes. In accordance with the
requirements of SFAS 133, these methods are consistent with
our approach to managing risk.
83
In complying with the requirements of SFAS 133, our
management team has made certain judgments in identifying
derivative instruments, designating hedged risks, calculating
hedge effectiveness, and measuring, recognizing, and classifying
changes in value. Critical judgments made with respect to our
hedge designations include:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Hedge Effectiveness Testing
Methodology. SFAS 133 requires that we
identify and consistently follow a methodology justifying our
expectation that our hedges will continue to be highly effective
at achieving offsetting changes in value. In devising such a
methodology, which is consistent with our risk management
policy, we have exercised judgment in identifying (1) the
scope and the types of historical data and observations,
(2) the mathematical formulas and quantitative steps to
calculate hedge effectiveness, and (3) the frequency and
necessity of updates to our calculations and assumptions. As
discussed in the footnotes to our financial statements, we have
designated certain forwards, futures, and swaps to hedge the
benchmark interest rate risk in our funded mortgage loan
pipeline and borrowings exposures, respectively, as
SFAS 133 hedges. If the results of our hedge effectiveness
tests determine that our hedges are not effective, we do not
adjust the basis of our pipeline mortgage loans, in the case of
disqualified fair value hedges, or defer derivative gains and
losses in Other Comprehensive Income (“OCI”), in the
case of disqualified cash flow hedges, from the date our hedges
were last effective to the date they are again compliant with
SFAS 133. Therefore, the ability to recognize hedge
accounting basis adjustments and OCI deferrals may cause us to
report materially different results under different conditions
or using different assumptions.
|
|
|
•
|
Hedge Ineffectiveness Measurement. Regardless
of our method of proving hedge effectiveness, we are required to
recognize hedge ineffectiveness to the extent that exact offset
is not achieved, as defined by SFAS 133. As discussed in
the footnotes to the financial statements, the estimated fair
value amounts of our financial instruments have been determined
using available market information and valuation methods that we
believe are appropriate under the circumstances. These estimates
are inherently subjective in nature and involve matters of
significant uncertainty and judgment to interpret relevant
market and other data. The use of different market assumptions
and/or
estimation methods may have a material effect on the estimated
fair value amounts, and therefore on the recognition of basis
adjustments and OCI deferrals for hedged mortgage loans and
forecasted borrowing/advance cash flows, respectively, as well
as the hedge ineffectiveness recognized in the income statement
for both hedge types.
|
Some of our hedges, including certain elements of our pipeline
which are required to be carried at fair value as derivative
instruments in accordance with SFAS 133, and other
derivative instruments for which we do not designate hedging
relationships for accounting purposes, involve estimates of fair
value where no direct exchange-traded or indirect
“proxy” market prices are immediately available. As
noted above and in the footnotes to our financial statements, we
employ available market information and valuation methods that
we believe are appropriate under the circumstances and, as
applicable, within the range of industry practice.
Changes in either the mix of market information or the valuation
methods used would change the fair values carried on the balance
sheet, the associated impact on the income statement, and the
application and impacts of SFAS 133 hedge accounting.
SAB 105 provides guidance regarding loan commitments that
are accounted for as derivative instruments. As noted in the
footnotes to the financial statements, interest rate lock
commitments are valued at zero at inception. The rate locks are
adjusted for changes in value resulting from changes in market
interest rates.
Non-derivative contracts sometimes contain embedded terms
meeting the definition of a derivative instrument under
SFAS 133. In certain circumstances, management has
concluded that such terms are appropriately excluded from fair
value accounting as they are clearly and closely related to the
economic characteristics of the non-derivative “host”
contract, in accordance with SFAS 133. Under different
facts and circumstances, should such embedded terms not be
considered clearly and closely related, recognition of such
embedded derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value would be
required by SFAS 133.
ALLOWANCE
FOR LOAN LOSSES
We utilize several methodologies to estimate the adequacy of our
ALL and to ensure that the allocation of the ALL to the various
portfolios is reasonable given current trends and the economic
outlook. In this regard, we segregate assets into homogeneous
pools of loans and heterogeneous loans.
84
Homogeneous pools of loans exhibit similar characteristics and,
as such, can be evaluated as pools of assets through the
assessment of default probabilities and corresponding loss
severities. Our homogeneous pools include residential mortgage
loans, manufactured home loans and home improvement loans. The
estimate of the allowance for loan losses for homogeneous pools
is based on expected inherent losses resulting from two
methodologies:
|
|
|
|
1)
|
Internal Loan Loss Estimation Model — This
model estimates losses based on several key loan
characteristics. For further discussion regarding this model,
see the previous section entitled “Non- Investment Grade
Securities and Residuals — Loss Estimates.”
|
|
|
2)
|
Historical Loss Analysis — This analysis
compares the level of allowance to the historical losses
actually incurred in prior years.
|
Our builder construction loans generally carry higher balances
and involve unique loan characteristics that cannot be evaluated
solely through the use of default rates, loss severities and
trend analysis. To estimate an appropriate level of ALL for our
heterogeneous loans, we constantly screen the portfolios on an
individual asset basis to classify problem credits and to
estimate potential loss exposure. In this estimation, we
determine the level of adversely classified assets (using the
classification criteria described below) in a portfolio and the
related loss potential and extrapolate the weighting of those
two factors across all assets in the portfolio.
Our asset classification methodology was designed in accordance
with guidelines established by our supervisory regulatory
agencies as follows:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Pass — Assets classified Pass are assets that
are well protected by the net worth and paying capacity of the
borrower or by the value of the asset or underlying collateral.
|
|
|
•
|
Special Mention — Special Mention assets have
potential weaknesses that require close attention, but have not
yet jeopardized the timely repayment of the asset in full.
|
|
|
•
|
Substandard — This is the first level of
adverse classification. Assets in this category are inadequately
protected by the net worth and paying capacity of the borrower
or by the value of the collateral. Substandard assets are
characterized by the distinct possibility that some loss will
occur if the deficiencies are not corrected.
|
|
|
•
|
Doubtful — Assets in this category have the
same weaknesses as a substandard asset, with the added
characteristic that based on current facts, conditions and
values, liquidation of the asset in full is highly improbable.
|
|
|
•
|
Loss — Assets in the Loss category are
considered uncollectible and of such little value that the
continuance as an asset, without establishment of a specific
valuation allowance, is not warranted.
|
SECONDARY
MARKET RESERVE
As part of the normal course of business involving loans sold to
the secondary market, we are occasionally required to repurchase
loans or make payments to settle breaches of the standard
representations and warranties made as part of our loan sales or
securitizations. The secondary market reserve includes probable
losses on repurchases arising from representation and warranty
claims, and probable obligations related to disputes with
investors and vendors with respect to contractual obligations
pertaining to mortgage origination activity. The reserve level
is a function of expected losses based on actual pending claims
and repurchase requests, historical experience, loan volume and
loan sales distribution channels and the assessment of probable
vendor or investor claims. An increase to this reserve is
recorded as a reduction of the gain on sale of loans in our
consolidated statements of earnings and the corresponding
reserve is recorded in other liabilities in our consolidated
balance sheets. At the time we repurchase a loan, the estimated
loss on the loan is charged against this reserve and recorded as
a reduction of the basis of the loan.
SENSITIVITY
ANALYSIS
Changing the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of
AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities, MSRs,
principal-only securities, prepayment penalty securities and
non-investment grade securities and residuals (“the
retained assets”) could materially impact the amount
recorded in gain on sale of loans. Initially, the estimation of
the fair value of the retained assets from loan securitizations
and sales impacts the financial statements of our
mortgage-banking segment. Thereafter, adjustments to fair value
impact the retained assets and servicing division’s
85
financial statements. Provisions to the secondary market
reserves and adjustments to the ALL may impact any of our
segments. Refer to “Note 14 — Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets” in the consolidated
financial statements of Indymac for further information on the
hypothetical effect on the fair value of our retained assets
using various unfavorable variations of the expected levels of
certain key assumptions used in valuing these assets at
December 31, 2006.
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in
interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity
prices and equity prices. The primary market risk to which we
are exposed is interest rate risk, including fluctuations in
short and long term interest rates. An additional risk is the
early prepayment of loans held for investment, MBS and mortgage
loans underlying our MSRs, AAA-rated and agency interest-only
securities and residuals. Our retained assets and servicing
division is responsible for the management of interest rate and
prepayment risks subject to policies and procedures established
by, and oversight from, our management-level Interest Rate
Risk Committee, Variable Cash Flow Instruments Committee,
management level Enterprise Risk Management
(“ERM”) group and Board of Directors-level ERM
Committee. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations — Risk Factors That May Affect Future
Results” above for further discussion of risks.
We utilize a variety of means in order to manage interest rate
risk. We invest in MSRs and AAA-rated and agency interest-only
securities to generate core interest and fee income. The value
of these instruments and the income they provide tends to be
counter-cyclical to the changes in production volumes and gain
on sale of loans that result from changes in interest rates.
With regard to the pipeline of mortgage loans held for sale, in
general, we hedge this asset with forward commitments to sell
Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac securities of comparable maturities
and weighted average interest rates. To hedge our investments in
MSRs, AAA-rated and agency interest-only and residual
securities, we use several strategies, including buying
and/or
selling mortgage-backed or U.S. Treasury securities,
forward rate agreements, futures, floors, swaps, or options,
depending on several factors. Lastly, we enter into swap
agreements and utilize FHLB advances to mitigate interest rate
risk on mortgage loans held for investment. In connection with
all of the above strategies, we use hedging instruments to
reduce our exposure to interest rate risk, not to speculate on
the direction of market interest rates.
A primary measurement tool used to evaluate risk is an NPV
analysis. An NPV analysis simulates the effects of an
instantaneous change in interest rates (in a variety of basis
point increments) on our assets and liabilities, commitments and
hedges. The result is an estimate of the increase or decrease to
net portfolio value. See “Item 7. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis — Interest Rate
Sensitivity” for a further discussion of our NPV analysis.
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
The information called for by this Item 8 is set forth
beginning at
page F-1
of this
Form 10-K.
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
The management of Indymac is responsible for establishing and
maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures, as
defined under
Rules 13a-15
and 15d-15
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As of December 31,
2006, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with
the participation of the Company’s management, including
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of Indymac’s
disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation,
management concluded that Indymac’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of December 31, 2006 were effective in
ensuring that information required to be disclosed in this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
(“Annual Report”) was recorded, processed, summarized,
and reported within the time period required by the SEC’s
rules and forms.
Management’s responsibilities related to establishing and
maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures include
maintaining effective internal controls over financial reporting
that are designed to produce reliable financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. As
86
disclosed in the Report of Management on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting (“Report of Management”) included
in this Annual Report, management assessed the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, in relation to criteria for effective
internal control over financial reporting as described in
“Internal Control — Integrated Framework,”
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management
believes that, as of December 31, 2006, the Company’s
system of internal control over financial reporting met those
criteria. The independent registered public accounting firm that
audited the financial statements included in this Annual Report
has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment
of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006. The Report of Management and the
attestation report are included in this Annual Report
Exhibit 99.1.
There have been no significant changes in the Company’s
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
affect the Company’s disclosure of controls and procedures
subsequent to December 31, 2006.
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
|
The information required by this Item 10 is hereby
incorporated by reference to Indymac Bancorp’s definitive
proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A
within 120 days after the end of our 2006 fiscal year.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
The information required by this Item 11 is hereby
incorporated by reference to Indymac Bancorp’s definitive
proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A
within 120 days after the end of our 2006 fiscal year.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
The information required by this Item 12 is hereby
incorporated by reference to Indymac Bancorp’s definitive
proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A
within 120 days after the end of our 2006 fiscal year.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
|
The information required by this Item 13 is hereby
incorporated by reference to Indymac Bancorp’s definitive
proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A
within 120 days after the end of our 2006 fiscal year.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
The information required by this Item 14 is hereby
incorporated by reference to Indymac Bancorp’s definitive
proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A
within 120 days after the end of our 2006 fiscal year.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS,
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) (1) and (2) — Financial Statements and
Schedules
The information required by this section of Item 15 is set
forth in the Index to Financial Statements and Schedules at
page F-2
of this
Form 10-K.
(3) — Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1*
|
|
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of IndyMac Bancorp (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2000).
|
|
3
|
.2*
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on January 25, 2007).
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
4
|
.1*
|
|
Indenture dated as of
November 14, 2001 between IndyMac Bancorp and The Bank of
New York (“BoNY”), as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.8 to IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001).
|
|
4
|
.2*
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated
as of November 14, 2001 between IndyMac Bancorp and BoNY,
as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to
IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001).
|
|
4
|
.3*
|
|
Rights Agreement dated as of
October 17, 2001 between IndyMac Bancorp and BoNY, as
Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on October 18, 2001).
|
|
4
|
.4*
|
|
2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006).
|
|
4
|
.5*
|
|
2002 Incentive Plan, as Amended
and Restated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.1*
|
|
Amended and Restated
Trust Agreement dated as of November 14, 2001 between
IndyMac Bancorp, as Sponsor, Roger H. Molvar and Richard L.
Sommers, as Administrative Trustees, Wilmington Trust Company,
as Property Trustee and as Delaware Trustee, BoNY, as Paying
Agent, Registrar, Transfer Agent and Authenticating Agent and
several Holders of the Securities (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.11 to IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001).
|
|
10
|
.2*
|
|
Unit Agreement dated as of
November 14, 2001 between IndyMac Bancorp, IndyMac Capital
Trust I, Wilmington Trust Company, as Property Trustee, and
BoNY, as Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12
to IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001).
|
|
10
|
.3*
|
|
Warrant Agreement dated as of
November 14, 2001 between IndyMac Bancorp and BoNY, as
Warrant Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13
to IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001).
|
|
10
|
.4*
|
|
Guarantee Agreement dated as of
November 14, 2001 between IndyMac Bancorp, as Guarantor,
and BoNY, as Guarantee Trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.14 to IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001).
|
|
10
|
.5*
|
|
Director Emeritus Plan Agreement
and Consulting Agreement dated January 22, 2002 between
IndyMac Bancorp and Thomas J. Kearns (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.20 to IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2002).
|
|
10
|
.6*
|
|
Director Emeritus Agreement dated
August 1, 2002 between IndyMac Bancorp and Frederick J.
Napolitano (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to
IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2002).
|
|
10
|
.7*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated
November 1, 2002 between IndyMac Bank and Richard Wohl
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to IndyMac
Bancorp’s
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2002).
|
|
10
|
.8*
|
|
IndyMac Bank Deferred Compensation
Plan, Amended and Restated Effective as of September 15,
2003, as amended December 31, 2003 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.18 to IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003).
|
|
10
|
.9*
|
|
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. Cash
Incentive Award Program Under the 2002 Incentive Plan, As
Amended and Restated (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.10*
|
|
Employment Agreement entered into
July 26, 2005 between IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. and
Terrence O. Hughes (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.11*
|
|
Director Emeritus Participant
Agreement, dated January 24, 2006, by and between IndyMac
Bancorp, Inc. and James R. Ukropina (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on January 26, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.12*
|
|
Form of Director Indemnification
Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2006).
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.13*
|
|
Employment Agreement entered into
May 23, 2006 between IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. and Scott Keys
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to IndyMac
Bancorp’s
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on May 30, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.14*
|
|
Employment Agreement entered into
May 23, 2006 between IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. and
S. Blair Abernathy (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on May 30, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.15*
|
|
Employment Agreement entered into
May 23, 2006 between IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. and
Charles A. Williams (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on May 30, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.16*
|
|
Employment Agreement entered into
May 23, 2006 between IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. and Ashwin
Adarkar (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on May 30, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.17*
|
|
Employment Agreement entered into
May 23, 2006 between IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. and Frank M.
Sillman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to
IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on May 30, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.18*
|
|
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. Amended
Director Emeritus Plan effective as of May 24, 2006
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to IndyMac
Bancorp’s
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.19*
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement entered into July 1, 2006 between IndyMac Bank,
F.S.B. and James R. Mahoney (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on July 5, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.20*
|
|
Letter Agreement entered into
July 1, 2006 between IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. and James R.
Mahoney (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on July 5, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.21*
|
|
Form of Director’s Agreement,
effective August 1, 2006 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on August 2, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.22*
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement entered into September 18, 2006 between IndyMac
Bancorp and Michael W. Perry (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to IndyMac Bancorp’s
Form 8-K
filed with SEC on September 22, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.23*
|
|
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. Senior
Manager Deferred Compensation Plan effective December 5,
2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to IndyMac
Bancorp’s
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on December 8, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.24*
|
|
Board Compensation Policy and
Stock Ownership Requirements, revised January 23, 2007
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to IndyMac
Bancorp’s
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on January 25, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Terms of Stock Awards Granted to
Executive Officers.
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Chief Executive Officer’s
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Chief Financial Officer’s
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Chief Executive Officer’s
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Chief Financial Officer’s
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Reports on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference. |
89
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Pasadena, State of
California, on March 1, 2007.
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC.
Michael W. Perry
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on
behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ Michael
W. Perry
Michael
W. Perry
|
|
Chairman of the Board of
Directors
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
March 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Scott
Keys
Scott
Keys
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
March 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Louis
E. Caldera
Louis
E. Caldera
|
|
Director
|
|
March 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lyle
E. Gramley
Lyle
E. Gramley
|
|
Director
|
|
March 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Hugh
M. Grant
Hugh
M. Grant
|
|
Director
|
|
March 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patrick
C. Haden
Patrick
C. Haden
|
|
Director
|
|
March 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Terrance
G. Hodel
Terrance
G. Hodel
|
|
Director
|
|
March 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
L.
Hunt II
Robert
L. Hunt II
|
|
Director
|
|
March 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lydia
H. Kennard
Lydia
H. Kennard
|
|
Director
|
|
March 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Senator
John Seymour
(ret.)
Senator
John Seymour (ret.)
|
|
Director
|
|
March 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bruce
G. Willison
Bruce
G. Willison
|
|
Director
|
|
March 1, 2007
|
90
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
INDYMAC
BANCORP, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004
F-1
INDYMAC
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
F-8
|
|
F-2
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Shareholders
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, shareholders’ equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2006. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of the Company at December 31, 2006 and
2005, and the consolidated results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, on January 1, 2006, the Company changed its
method of accounting for share-based payments in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, under the
modified-retrospective transition method, and its method of
accounting for mortgage servicing rights in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 156,
Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets, an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 140.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on
criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26,
2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Los Angeles, California
February 26, 2007
F-3
INDYMAC
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
541,725
|
|
|
$
|
442,525
|
|
Securities classified as trading
($152.9 million and $96.8 million pledged as collateral for
borrowings at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively)
|
|
|
542,731
|
|
|
|
348,962
|
|
Securities classified as available
for sale, amortized cost of $4.9 billion and $3.8 billion
at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively ($4.1 billion
and $2.7 billion pledged as collateral for borrowings at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively)
|
|
|
4,900,514
|
|
|
|
3,753,195
|
|
Loans receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage
|
|
|
8,801,252
|
|
|
|
5,170,168
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
633,096
|
|
|
|
755,040
|
|
Consumer lot loans
|
|
|
33,495
|
|
|
|
98,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held for sale
|
|
|
9,467,843
|
|
|
|
6,024,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage
|
|
|
6,519,340
|
|
|
|
5,441,521
|
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
2,225,979
|
|
|
|
1,883,674
|
|
Builder construction
|
|
|
786,279
|
|
|
|
612,061
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
23,618
|
|
|
|
31,882
|
|
Land and other mortgage
|
|
|
375,215
|
|
|
|
260,615
|
|
Revolving warehouse lines of credit
|
|
|
246,778
|
|
|
|
48,616
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(62,386
|
)
|
|
|
(55,168
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held for investment
|
|
|
10,114,823
|
|
|
|
8,223,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans receivable
($14.9 billion and $10.2 billion pledged as collateral
for borrowings at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively)
|
|
|
19,582,666
|
|
|
|
14,247,385
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
1,822,455
|
|
|
|
1,094,490
|
|
Investment in Federal Home
Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
762,054
|
|
|
|
556,262
|
|
Interest receivable
|
|
|
217,667
|
|
|
|
131,644
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets
|
|
|
112,608
|
|
|
|
80,847
|
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
21,638
|
|
|
|
8,817
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
991,258
|
|
|
|
788,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
29,495,316
|
|
|
$
|
21,452,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and
Shareholders’ Equity
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
10,898,006
|
|
|
$
|
7,671,924
|
|
Advances from Federal Home
Loan Bank
|
|
|
10,412,800
|
|
|
|
6,953,000
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
4,637,000
|
|
|
|
4,367,270
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,519,242
|
|
|
|
916,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
27,467,048
|
|
|
|
19,908,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock —
authorized, 10,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value; none
issued
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Common stock —
authorized, 200,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value; issued
102,258,939 shares (73,017,356 outstanding) at
December 31, 2006, and issued 93,436,622 shares (64,246,767
outstanding) at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
|
934
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
1,597,814
|
|
|
|
1,318,751
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(31,439
|
)
|
|
|
(15,157
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
983,348
|
|
|
|
759,330
|
|
Treasury stock,
29,241,583 shares and 29,189,855 shares at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively
|
|
|
(522,478
|
)
|
|
|
(520,417
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
2,028,268
|
|
|
|
1,543,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
29,495,316
|
|
|
$
|
21,452,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-4
INDYMAC
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands,
|
|
|
|
except per share data)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed and other securities
|
|
$
|
319,846
|
|
|
$
|
208,560
|
|
|
$
|
143,351
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage
|
|
|
708,932
|
|
|
|
387,993
|
|
|
|
253,552
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
80,202
|
|
|
|
33,898
|
|
|
|
14,298
|
|
Consumer lot loans
|
|
|
8,326
|
|
|
|
8,966
|
|
|
|
9,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held for sale
|
|
|
797,460
|
|
|
|
430,857
|
|
|
|
277,494
|
|
Loans held for investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage
|
|
|
321,349
|
|
|
|
235,302
|
|
|
|
201,722
|
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
144,574
|
|
|
|
97,656
|
|
|
|
76,535
|
|
Builder construction
|
|
|
76,006
|
|
|
|
51,772
|
|
|
|
30,180
|
|
Land and other mortgage
|
|
|
32,650
|
|
|
|
17,631
|
|
|
|
12,289
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
2,436
|
|
|
|
2,197
|
|
|
|
11,951
|
|
Revolving warehouse lines of credit
|
|
|
8,723
|
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held for investment
|
|
|
585,738
|
|
|
|
405,855
|
|
|
|
332,677
|
|
Other
|
|
|
47,972
|
|
|
|
29,083
|
|
|
|
14,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
1,751,016
|
|
|
|
1,074,355
|
|
|
|
767,608
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
408,208
|
|
|
|
195,528
|
|
|
|
103,612
|
|
Advances from Federal Home
Loan Bank
|
|
|
491,300
|
|
|
|
281,929
|
|
|
|
145,925
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
324,787
|
|
|
|
172,187
|
|
|
|
113,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
1,224,295
|
|
|
|
649,644
|
|
|
|
362,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
526,721
|
|
|
|
424,711
|
|
|
|
405,062
|
|
Provision for loan
losses
|
|
|
19,993
|
|
|
|
9,978
|
|
|
|
8,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
506,728
|
|
|
|
414,733
|
|
|
|
396,892
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
668,054
|
|
|
|
592,175
|
|
|
|
363,813
|
|
Service fee income (loss)
|
|
|
101,317
|
|
|
|
44,235
|
|
|
|
(12,453
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on mortgage-backed
securities, net
|
|
|
20,482
|
|
|
|
17,866
|
|
|
|
(23,804
|
)
|
Fee and other income
|
|
|
50,122
|
|
|
|
36,701
|
|
|
|
27,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
839,975
|
|
|
|
690,977
|
|
|
|
354,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
1,346,703
|
|
|
|
1,105,710
|
|
|
|
751,518
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
788,960
|
|
|
|
618,497
|
|
|
|
482,506
|
|
Amortization of other intangible
assets
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
790,083
|
|
|
|
619,088
|
|
|
|
483,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before provision for
income taxes and minority interests
|
|
|
556,620
|
|
|
|
486,622
|
|
|
|
268,311
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
212,567
|
|
|
|
191,989
|
|
|
|
105,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings before minority
interest
|
|
|
344,053
|
|
|
|
294,633
|
|
|
|
162,332
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(1,124
|
)
|
|
|
(1,505
|
)
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
342,929
|
|
|
$
|
293,128
|
|
|
$
|
162,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (net earnings divided by
weighted average basic shares outstanding)
|
|
$
|
5.07
|
|
|
$
|
4.67
|
|
|
$
|
2.72
|
|
Diluted (net earnings divided by
weighted average diluted shares outstanding)
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
$
|
4.43
|
|
|
$
|
2.61
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
67,701
|
|
|
|
62,760
|
|
|
|
59,513
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
71,118
|
|
|
|
66,115
|
|
|
|
62,010
|
|
Dividends declared per
share
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-5
INDYMAC
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-In-
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Shareholders’
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2003
|
|
|
56,760,375
|
|
|
$
|
859
|
|
|
$
|
1,043,856
|
|
|
$
|
(26,454
|
)
|
|
$
|
518,408
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(519,238
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,017,431
|
|
Cumulative-effect adjustment due to
change in accounting for common stock options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
57,501
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(43,354
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
14,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2003, retrospectively adjusted
|
|
|
56,760,375
|
|
|
|
859
|
|
|
|
1,101,357
|
|
|
|
(26,454
|
)
|
|
|
475,054
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(519,238
|
)
|
|
|
1,031,578
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
3,330,000
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
100,138
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
100,171
|
|
Exercises of common stock options
|
|
|
1,798,215
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
36,423
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
36,443
|
|
Compensation expenses for common
stock options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13,983
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13,983
|
|
Net officers’ notes receivable
payments
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Deferred compensation, restricted
stock, and amortization net of forfeitures
|
|
|
126,148
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,827
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,827
|
|
Net unrealized loss on
mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,243
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,243
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,243
|
)
|
Net unrealized gain on derivatives
used in cash flow hedges
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
8,393
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
8,393
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
8,393
|
|
Purchases of common stock
|
|
|
(19,258
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(597
|
)
|
|
|
(597
|
)
|
Cash dividends
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(72,414
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(72,414
|
)
|
Net earnings, retrospectively
adjusted
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
162,065
|
|
|
|
162,065
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
162,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
168,215
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2004, retrospectively adjusted
|
|
|
61,995,480
|
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
|
1,254,793
|
|
|
|
(20,304
|
)
|
|
|
564,705
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(519,835
|
)
|
|
|
1,280,271
|
|
Exercises of common stock options
|
|
|
1,833,369
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
43,435
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
43,453
|
|
Exercises of warrants
|
|
|
138,794
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3,035
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,036
|
|
Compensation expenses for common
stock options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12,109
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12,109
|
|
Net officers’ notes receivable
payments
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Deferred compensation, restricted
stock, and amortization net of forfeitures
|
|
|
295,544
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5,278
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,281
|
|
Net unrealized loss on
mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(16,733
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(16,733
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(16,733
|
)
|
Net unrealized gain on derivatives
used in cash flow hedges
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
21,880
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
21,880
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
21,880
|
|
Purchases of common stock
|
|
|
(16,420
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
Cash dividends
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(98,503
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(98,503
|
)
|
Net earnings, retrospectively
adjusted
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
293,128
|
|
|
|
293,128
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
293,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
298,275
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2005, retrospectively adjusted
|
|
|
64,246,767
|
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
1,318,751
|
|
|
|
(15,157
|
)
|
|
|
759,330
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(520,417
|
)
|
|
|
1,543,441
|
|
Cumulative-effect adjustment due to
change in accounting for MSRs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,624
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,624
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
3,532,360
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
148,435
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
148,470
|
|
Exercises of common stock options
|
|
|
857,489
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
23,486
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
23,495
|
|
Exercises of warrants
|
|
|
3,957,000
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
86,883
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
86,923
|
|
Compensation expenses for common
stock options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,630
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,630
|
|
Net officers’ notes receivable
payments
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Deferred compensation, restricted
stock, and amortization net of forfeitures
|
|
|
475,468
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
10,520
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,525
|
|
Net unrealized gain on
mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,921
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,921
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,921
|
|
Net unrealized loss on derivatives
used in cash flow hedges
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(16,035
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(16,035
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(16,035
|
)
|
Purchases of common stock
|
|
|
(51,728
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,061
|
)
|
|
|
(2,061
|
)
|
Cash dividends
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(129,535
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(129,535
|
)
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
342,929
|
|
|
|
342,929
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
342,929
|
|
Adjustment on initial application
of SFAS 158, net of tax
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(6,168
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(6,168
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(6,168
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
326,647
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31,
2006
|
|
|
73,017,356
|
|
|
$
|
1,023
|
|
|
$
|
1,597,814
|
|
|
$
|
(31,439
|
)
|
|
$
|
983,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(522,478
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,028,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-6
INDYMAC
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
342,929
|
|
|
$
|
293,128
|
|
|
$
|
162,065
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
earnings to net cash used in operating activities: Gain on sale
of loans
|
|
|
(668,054
|
)
|
|
|
(592,175
|
)
|
|
|
(363,813
|
)
|
Compensation expenses related to
stock options and restricted stocks
|
|
|
20,155
|
|
|
|
17,389
|
|
|
|
16,811
|
|
Other amortization and depreciation
|
|
|
93,515
|
|
|
|
59,393
|
|
|
|
75,954
|
|
Change in valuation of mortgage
servicing rights, including amortization
|
|
|
367,234
|
|
|
|
269,586
|
|
|
|
187,157
|
|
(Gain) loss on mortgage-backed
securities, net
|
|
|
(20,482
|
)
|
|
|
(17,866
|
)
|
|
|
23,804
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
19,993
|
|
|
|
9,978
|
|
|
|
8,170
|
|
Net increase in deferred tax
liability
|
|
|
245,115
|
|
|
|
166,369
|
|
|
|
57,333
|
|
Net decrease in other assets and
liabilities
|
|
|
90,012
|
|
|
|
17,110
|
|
|
|
282,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities before activity for trading securities and loans held
for sale
|
|
|
490,417
|
|
|
|
222,912
|
|
|
|
449,529
|
|
Net sales of trading securities
|
|
|
360,547
|
|
|
|
109,721
|
|
|
|
100,687
|
|
Net purchases and originations of
loans held for sale
|
|
|
(8,253,670
|
)
|
|
|
(4,909,424
|
)
|
|
|
(5,677,096
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
(7,402,706
|
)
|
|
|
(4,576,791
|
)
|
|
|
(5,126,880
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales of and payments from
loans held for investment
|
|
|
989,919
|
|
|
|
1,109,017
|
|
|
|
2,655,524
|
|
Purchases of mortgage-backed
securities available for sale
|
|
|
(1,170,559
|
)
|
|
|
(819,997
|
)
|
|
|
(1,713,431
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of and
principal payments from mortgage-backed securities available for
sale
|
|
|
997,623
|
|
|
|
822,748
|
|
|
|
1,502,294
|
|
Net increase in investment in
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
|
|
(205,792
|
)
|
|
|
(165,546
|
)
|
|
|
(77,432
|
)
|
Net decrease (increase) in real
estate investment
|
|
|
10,780
|
|
|
|
(32,260
|
)
|
|
|
(1,600
|
)
|
Net purchases of property, plant
and equipment
|
|
|
(99,947
|
)
|
|
|
(109,076
|
)
|
|
|
(59,140
|
)
|
Purchase of Financial Freedom, net
of cash received
|
|
|
(40,000
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(82,152
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing
activities
|
|
|
482,024
|
|
|
|
804,886
|
|
|
|
2,224,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits
|
|
|
3,222,155
|
|
|
|
1,925,557
|
|
|
|
1,392,706
|
|
Net increase in advances from
Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
3,459,800
|
|
|
|
791,000
|
|
|
|
1,227,000
|
|
Net increase in borrowings
|
|
|
69,797
|
|
|
|
1,104,208
|
|
|
|
430,114
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of
common stock
|
|
|
148,470
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
100,171
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of trust
preferred securities
|
|
|
188,000
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
Redemption of trust preferred
securities
|
|
|
(47,271
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net proceeds from stock options,
warrants, and notes receivable
|
|
|
110,527
|
|
|
|
46,591
|
|
|
|
36,509
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(129,535
|
)
|
|
|
(98,501
|
)
|
|
|
(72,414
|
)
|
Purchases of common stock
|
|
|
(2,061
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
(597
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
7,019,882
|
|
|
|
3,858,273
|
|
|
|
3,143,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
99,200
|
|
|
|
86,368
|
|
|
|
240,672
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of year
|
|
|
442,525
|
|
|
|
356,157
|
|
|
|
115,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
year
|
|
$
|
541,725
|
|
|
$
|
442,525
|
|
|
$
|
356,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow
information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
1,168,615
|
|
|
$
|
600,683
|
|
|
$
|
329,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (received) paid for income
taxes
|
|
$
|
(56,258
|
)
|
|
$
|
70,312
|
|
|
$
|
35,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of
non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transfer of loans held for sale
to loans held for investment
|
|
$
|
2,951,131
|
|
|
$
|
2,691,949
|
|
|
$
|
2,897,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recharacterization of loans to
mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,419,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transfer of mortgage servicing
rights to trading securities
|
|
$
|
4,723
|
|
|
$
|
8,491
|
|
|
$
|
5,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
F-7
INDYMAC
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 —
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Financial
Statement Presentation
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. is a savings and loan holding company.
References to “Indymac Bancorp” or the “Parent
Company” refer to the parent company alone while references
to “Indymac,” the “Company,” “we”
or “us” refer to Indymac Bancorp and its consolidated
subsidiaries.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Indymac Bancorp and all of its wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries, including IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. (“Indymac
Bank” or “Bank”) and variable interest entities.
All significant intercompany balances and transactions with
Indymac’s consolidating subsidiaries have been eliminated
in consolidation. Minority interests in Indymac’s
majority-owned subsidiaries or variable interest entities are
included in “other liabilities” on the consolidated
balance sheets and the minority interests on Indymac’s
earnings are reported separately.
The consolidated financial statements of Indymac are prepared in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (“U.S. GAAP”). Certain prior year
amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation. In accordance with banking regulatory reporting
guidance issued in the first quarter of 2006, the Company
reclassified prepayment penalty fees and late fees from fee and
other income to interest income. Such fees were not significant
in 2004. As such only 2005 results have been revised to conform
to the current presentation.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses reported and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. Significant estimates include the allowance for
loan losses, secondary market reserves and the valuation of our
hedging instruments, mortgage servicing rights
(“MSRs”), AAA-rated interest-only securities,
non-investment grade securities and residuals for which active
markets do not exist. Actual results may differ significantly
from those estimates and assumptions.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) issued Statement No. 123 (revised 2004),
“Share-Based Payment”
(“SFAS 123(R)”), which requires the cost
resulting from stock options be measured at fair value and
recognized in earnings. This Statement replaces Statement
No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation” (“SFAS 123”) and
supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,”
(“APB 25”) which permitted the recognition of
compensation expense using the intrinsic value method. The
Company adopted SFAS 123(R) on January 1, 2006 using
the modified-retrospective method. See Note 24 —
Benefit Plans for further details on stock incentive plans.
The following table summarizes net earnings as well as dilutive
earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2005
and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Reported net earnings
|
|
$
|
300,226
|
|
|
$
|
170,522
|
|
Retrospective application of
SFAS 123(R)
|
|
|
7,098
|
|
|
|
8,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net earnings
|
|
$
|
293,128
|
|
|
$
|
162,065
|
|
Adjusted average dilutive shares
|
|
|
66,115
|
|
|
|
62,010
|
|
Reported dilutive earnings per share
|
|
$
|
4.54
|
|
|
$
|
2.74
|
|
Adjusted dilutive earnings per share
|
|
$
|
4.43
|
|
|
$
|
2.61
|
|
In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 155,
“Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments” (“SFAS 155”), which amends
FASB Statements No. 133 and 140. This Statement permits
fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument
containing an embedded derivative that would otherwise require
F-8
bifurcation and broadens a Qualified Special Purpose
Entity’s (“QSPE”) permitted holdings to include
passive derivative financial instruments that pertain to other
derivative financial instruments. This Statement is effective
for all financial instruments acquired, issued or subject to a
remeasurement event occurring after the beginning of an
entity’s first fiscal year beginning after
September 15, 2006. The Company will adopt this Statement
on January 1, 2007 and it is not anticipated the adoption
of this Statement will have a material impact on the
Company’s financial condition and results.
In March 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 156,
“Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets, an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities” (“SFAS 156”), which
requires that all separately recognized servicing assets and
servicing liabilities be initially measured at fair value, if
practicable and permits the entities to elect either fair value
measurement with changes in fair value reflected in earnings or
the amortization and impairment requirements of SFAS 140
for subsequent measurement. The subsequent measurement of
separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities
at fair value eliminates the necessity for entities that manage
the risks inherent in servicing assets and servicing liabilities
with derivatives to qualify for hedge accounting treatment and
eliminates the characterization of declines in fair value as
impairments or direct write-downs. The Statement is effective as
of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning
after September 15, 2006, with earlier adoption permitted.
The Company adopted SFAS 156 prospectively on
January 1, 2006 and elected to apply fair value method for
all classes of its separately recognized mortgage servicing
rights with changes in fair value reflected in the service fee
income on the statement of earnings. The difference between the
fair value and the carrying amount, net of any related valuation
allowance, of $17.6 million ($10.6 million after-tax)
on MSRs, on January 1, 2006 was recorded as a
cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of
January 1, 2006.
In April 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
FIN 46(R)-6, “Determining the Variability to Be
Considered in Applying FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”
(“FIN 46(R)-6”). FIN 46(R)-6 addresses
how variability should be considered when applying
FIN 46(R). Variability affects the determination of whether
an entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”), which
interests are variable interests, and which party, if any, is
the primary beneficiary of the VIE required to consolidate.
FIN 46(R)-6 clarifies that the design of the entity also
should be considered when identifying which interests are
variable interests. The Company adopted the guidance in
FIN 46(R)-6 prospectively on July 1, 2006, and this
adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s
financial condition and results.
In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”)
reached final conclusions on Issue
06-2,
“Accounting for Sabbatical Leave and Other Similar
Benefits,” pursuant to FASB Statement No. 43,
“Accounting for Compensated Absences”
(“EITF
06-2”).
EITF 06-2
requires that an employee’s right to a compensated absence
under a sabbatical or similar benefit arrangement does
accumulate pursuant to Statement No. 43 and, therefore, a
liability for the benefit should be accrued over the period
required for the employee to earn the right to the time off
under the arrangement. This Statement is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2006. Consistent with
Statement No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections,” the effect of adoption should be
recognized as either (a) a change in accounting principle
through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings or
(b) a change in accounting principle through retrospective
application to all prior periods. The Company will adopt this
Statement on January 1, 2007, and the adoption of this
Statement will not have a material impact on the Company’s
financial condition and results.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation 48,
“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”
(“FIN 48”), an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income
Taxes.” FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and
reporting for income taxes where interpretation of the law is
uncertain. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for the
financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and
disclosure of income tax uncertainties with respect to positions
taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. FIN 48
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006. The Company will adopt this Statement on January 1,
2007. The cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48 will be
recorded in retained earnings if the uncertain tax position
meets the recognition threshold. It is not anticipated the
adoption of FIN 48 will have a material impact on the
Company’s financial condition and results.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157,
“Fair Value Measurements”
(“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 addresses how
companies should measure fair value when they are required to
use a fair value measure for
F-9
recognition or disclosure purposes under GAAP. SFAS 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The Company is assessing the impact of
the adoption of this Statement.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 158,
“Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension
and Other Postretirement Plans”, an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)
(“SFAS 158”). SFAS 158 requires
(a) recognition of the funded status (measured as the
difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the
benefit obligation) of a benefit plan as an asset or liability
in the employer’s statement of financial position,
(b) measurement of the funded status as of the
employer’s fiscal year-end with limited exceptions, and
(c) recognition of changes in the funded status in the year
in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. The
requirement to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan and
the disclosure requirements are effective as of the end of the
fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. The requirement
to measure the plan assets and benefit obligations as of the
date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of
financial position is effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2008. The Company adopted this Statement on
December 31, 2006, and as a result, recorded in its
consolidated balance sheet an increase in pension and other
postretirement liability of $10.1 million, deferred taxes
of $3.9 million and accumulated other comprehensive income
(“AOCI”) of $6.2 million. See
Note 24 — Benefit Plans for further details.
In September 2006, the Securities Exchange Commission issued
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108
(“SAB 108”). SAB 108 addresses how the
effects of prior year uncorrected misstatements should be
considered when quantifying misstatements in current year
financial statements. SAB 108 requires companies to
quantify misstatements using a balance sheet and income
statement approach and to evaluate whether either approach
results in quantifying an error that is material in light of
relevant quantitative and qualitative factors. When the effect
of initial adoption is material, companies will record the
effect as a cumulative effect adjustment to beginning of year
retained earnings and disclose the nature and amount of each
individual error being corrected in the cumulative adjustment.
SAB 108 is effective for the year ended December 31,
2006. The adoption of SAB 108 did not have a material
effect on the Company’s previously reported financial
statements of the financial statements for the period of
adoption.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159,
“The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”).
SFAS 159 would allow the Company a one-time irrevocable
election to measure certain financial assets and liabilities on
the balance sheet at fair value and report the unrealized gains
and losses on the elected items in earnings at each subsequent
reporting date. The fair value option may be applied instrument
by instrument, with a few exceptions, and is applied only to
entire instruments and not to portions of instruments.
SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating this
Statement and has not yet determined the financial assets and
liabilities for which the fair value option would be elected or
the potential impact on the consolidated financial statements,
if such election were made.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include non-restricted cash on deposit
and overnight investments.
Mortgage-Backed
and Agency Notes
MBS and agency notes consist of AAA-rated senior securities,
investment and non-investment grade securities, AAA-rated
interest-only and principal-only securities, prepayment penalty
securities, residual securities, and agency notes. AAA-rated
interest-only securities, prepayment penalty securities, and
residual securities, as well as the securities that the Company
considers as hedges of its AAA-rated interest-only securities,
residual securities and MSRs, are carried as trading securities.
All other MBS are classified as available for sale, including
HELOC residual securities created in two separate securitization
transactions through which HELOC loans were recharacterized as
securities available for sale. All securities are carried at
fair value, which is estimated based on market quotes, when
available, or on discounted cash flow techniques using
assumptions for prepayment rates, market yield requirements and
credit losses when market quotes are not available. We estimate
future prepayment rates based upon current and expected future
interest rate levels, collateral seasoning and market forecasts,
as well as relevant characteristics of the collateral underlying
the assets, such as loan types, prepayment penalties, interest
rates and recent prepayment experience. These assumptions are
estimates as of a specific point in time and will
F-10
change as interest rates or economic conditions change. Premiums
or discounts on securities available for sale are amortized or
accreted into income using the effective interest method.
Securities classified as trading are carried at fair value with
changes in fair value being recorded through current earnings.
Accordingly, the hedge accounting provisions of SFAS 133
are not required. Unrealized gains and losses resulting from
fair value adjustments on investment and MBS available for sale
are excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component
of OCI, net of taxes, in shareholders’ equity. If we
determine a decline in fair value of an available for sale
security is other than temporary, an impairment write down is
recognized in current earnings. Realized gains and losses are
calculated using the specific identification method.
Loans
Held for Sale
Loans held for sale consist primarily of residential mortgage
loans, which are secured by
one-to-four
family residential real estate located throughout the United
States. We originate and purchase mortgage loans generally with
the intent to sell them in the secondary market. Loans held for
sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost, net of purchase
discounts or premiums, deferred fees, deferred origination costs
and effects of hedge accounting, or fair value. We determine the
fair value of loans held for sale using current secondary market
prices for loans with similar coupons, maturities and credit
quality. The Company adopted SAB 105 on April 1, 2004.
The Company no longer recognizes any revenue at the inception of
a rate lock commitment, and thus excludes the day one value on
rate lock commitments from the fair value of loans held for
sale. Initial value inherent in the rate lock commitments at
origination is recognized at the time of the sale of the
underlying loans.
The fair value of mortgage loans is subject to change primarily
due to changes in market interest rates. Under our risk
management policy, we hedge the changes in fair value of our
loans held for sale primarily by selling forward contracts on
agency securities. We formally designate and document certain of
these hedging relationships as fair value hedges and record the
changes in the fair value of hedged loans held for sale as an
adjustment to the carrying basis of the loan through gain on
sale of loans in current earnings. We record the related hedging
instruments at fair value with changes in fair value being
recorded also in gain on sale of loans in current earnings. The
non-designated pipeline hedges are recorded at fair value in
gain on sale of loans in current earnings.
As part of our mortgage banking operations, we enter into
commitments to purchase or originate loans whereby the interest
rate on the loans is determined prior to funding (“rate
lock commitments”). We report rate lock commitments on
loans we intend to sell as derivatives as defined in
SFAS 133 and determine the fair value of rate lock
commitments using current secondary market prices for underlying
loans with similar coupons, maturity and credit quality, subject
to the anticipated loan funding probability, or fallout factor.
Similar to loans held for sale, the fair value of rate lock
commitments is subject to change primarily due to changes in
interest rates. In addition, the value of rate lock commitments
is affected by changes in the anticipated loan funding
probability or fallout factor. Under our risk management policy,
we hedge these changes in fair value primarily by selling
forward contracts on agency securities. Both the rate lock
commitments and the related hedging instruments are recorded at
fair value with changes in fair value being recorded in current
earnings in gain on sale of loans.
Our recognition of gain or loss on the sale of loans is
accounted for in accordance with SFAS 140,
“Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,”
(“SFAS 140”). SFAS 140 requires that a
transfer of financial assets in which we surrender control over
the assets be accounted for as a sale to the extent that
consideration other than beneficial interests in the transferred
assets is received in exchange. The carrying value of the assets
sold is allocated between the assets sold and the retained
interests based on their relative fair values.
SFAS 140 requires, for certain transactions completed after
the initial adoption date, a “true sale” analysis of
the treatment of the transfer under state law as if the Company
was a debtor under the bankruptcy code. A “true sale”
legal analysis includes several legally relevant factors, such
as the nature and level of recourse to the transferor and the
nature of retained servicing rights. The analytical conclusion
as to a “true sale” is never absolute and
unconditional, but contains qualifications based on the inherent
equitable powers of a bankruptcy court, as well as the unsettled
state of the common law. Once the legal isolation test has been
met under SFAS 140, other factors concerning the nature and
extent of the transferor’s control over the transferred
assets are taken into account in order to determine whether
derecognition of assets is warranted, including whether the
special-purpose entity (“SPE”) has complied with rules
concerning qualifying special-purpose entities.
F-11
The Company is not eligible to become a debtor under the
bankruptcy code. Instead, the insolvency of the Company is
generally governed by the relevant provisions of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Act and the FDIC’s regulations. However,
the “true sale” legal analysis with respect to the
Company is similar to the “true sale” analysis that
would be done if the Company were subject to the bankruptcy code.
A legal opinion regarding legal isolation for each
securitization has been obtained by the Company. The “true
sale” opinion provides reasonable assurance the purchased
assets would not be characterized as the property of the
transferring Company’s receivership or conservatorship
estate in the event of insolvency and also states the transferor
would not be required to substantively consolidate the assets
and liabilities of the purchaser SPE with those of the
transferor upon such event.
The securitization process involves the sale of the loans to one
of our wholly-owned bankruptcy remote special-purpose entities
which then sells the loans to a separate, transaction-specific
securitization trust in exchange for the considerations
generated by the sale of the MBS issued by the securitization
trust. The securitization trust issues and sells undivided
interests to third-party investors that entitle the investors to
specified cash flows generated from the securitized loans. These
undivided interests are usually represented by certificates with
varying interest rates, and are secured by the payments on the
loans acquired by the trust, and commonly include senior and
subordinated classes. The senior class securities are usually
rated “AAA” by at least two of the major independent
rating agencies and have priority over the subordinated classes
in the receipt of payments. We have no obligation to provide
credit support to either the third-party investors or the
securitization trusts. Generally, neither third-party investors
nor securitization trusts have recourse to our assets or us; and
neither have the ability to require us to repurchase their
securities other than through enforcement of the standard
representations and warranties. We do make certain
representations and warranties concerning the loans, such as
lien status or mortgage insurance coverage, and if we are found
to have breached a representation or warranty, we may be
required to repurchase the loan from the securitization trust.
We do not guarantee any securities issued by the securitization
trusts. The securitization trusts represent “qualified
special-purpose entities,” which meet the certain criteria
of SFAS 140, and are therefore not consolidated for
financial reporting purposes.
In addition to the cash we receive from the sale of MBS, we
often retain certain interests in the securitization trust.
These retained interests may include subordinated classes of
securities, MSRs, AAA-rated interest-only securities, residual
securities, cash reserve funds, securities associated with
prepayment charges on the underlying mortgage loans, or an over
collateralization account. Other than MSRs, AAA-rated
interest-only securities, and securities associated with
prepayment charges on the underlying mortgage loans, these
retained interests are subordinated and serve as credit
enhancement for the more senior securities issued by the
securitization trust.
AAA-rated
interest-only securities, securities associated with prepayment
charges on the underlying mortgage loans, and non-HELOC residual
interests retained are included in securities classified as
trading and other subordinated securities retained and HELOC
residuals are included in MBS available for sale on the
consolidated balance sheets.
We usually retain the servicing function for the securitized
mortgage loans. As a servicer, we are entitled to receive a
servicing fee equal to a specified percentage of the outstanding
principal balance of the loans or a fixed dollar amount for our
reverse mortgage servicing. We may also be entitled to receive
additional servicing compensation, such as late payment fees or
prepayment charges.
Transaction costs associated with the securitizations are
recognized as a component of the gain or loss at the time of
sale.
Loans
Held for Investment
Loans are classified as held for investment based on
management’s intent and ability to hold the loans for the
foreseeable future. Loans held for investment are recorded at
their unpaid principal balance, net of discounts and premiums,
unamortized net deferred loan origination costs and fees and
allowance for loan losses. Discounts, premiums, and net deferred
loan origination costs and fees are amortized to income over the
contractual life of the loan using the effective interest method.
Interest is recognized as revenue when earned according to the
terms of the loans and when, in the opinion of management, it is
collectible. Loans are evaluated for collectability and, if
appropriate, interest accrual is discontinued and previously
accrued interest is reversed.
F-12
Allowance
for Loan Losses
We maintain an allowance for loan losses on loans held for
investment. Additions to the allowance are based on assessments
of certain factors, including but not limited to, estimated
probable losses on the loans, borrower credit quality,
delinquency, prior loan loss experience and general economic
conditions. Additions to the allowance are provided through a
charge to earnings. Specific valuation allowances may be
established for loans that are deemed impaired, if default by
the borrower is deemed probable, and if the fair value of the
loan or the collateral is estimated to be less than the gross
carrying value of the loan. Actual losses on loans are recorded
as a reduction to the allowance through charge-offs. Subsequent
recoveries of amounts previously charged off are credited to the
allowance.
We classify loans as impaired when, based upon current
information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to
collect all amounts due, both principal and interest, according
to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Loans are
generally placed on non-accrual status when they are
90 days past due and charged off upon foreclosure. Large
groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans are collectively
evaluated for impairment. Impairment is measured based on the
present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the
loan’s effective interest rate, based on a loan’s
observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if
the loan is collateral dependent. Specific factors used in the
impaired loan identification process include, but are not
limited to, delinquency status,
loan-to-value
ratio, the condition of the underlying collateral, credit
history, and debt coverage. For impaired loans on non-accrual
status, cash receipts are applied, and interest income is
recognized, on a cash basis. For all other impaired loans, cash
receipts are applied to principal and interest in accordance
with the contractual terms of the loan and interest income is
recognized on the accrual basis. Generally, a loan may be
returned to accrual status when all delinquent principal and
interest are brought current in accordance with the terms of the
loan agreement and certain performance criteria have been met.
The estimated loss upon liquidation on all other loans held for
investment are charged off prior to or upon foreclosure.
Secondary
Market Reserve
The Company maintains a secondary market reserve for losses that
arise in connection with loans that we are required to
repurchase from GSEs and whole loan sales. This reserve has two
general components: reserves for repurchases arising from
representation and warranty claims, and reserves for disputes
with investors and vendors with respect to contractual
obligations pertaining to mortgage operations. Reserve levels
are a function of expected losses based on expected and actual
pending claims and repurchase requests, historical experience,
loan volume and loan sales distribution channels and the
assessment of probability related to such claims. While the
ultimate amount of repurchases and claims is uncertain,
management believes that the reserve is adequate. We will
continue to evaluate the adequacy of our reserve and may
continue to allocate a portion of our gain on sale proceeds to
the reserve going forward. Changes in the level of provision to
this reserve impacts the overall gain on sale margin from
quarter to quarter. The entire balance of our secondary market
reserve is included on the consolidated balance sheets as a
component of other liabilities.
Mortgage
Servicing Rights
We retain MSRs in connection with our mortgage banking
operations. Under primary servicing agreements, we collect
monthly principal, interest and escrow payments from individual
mortgagors and perform certain accounting and reporting
functions on behalf of the mortgage investors. Under master
servicing agreements, we collect monthly payments from various
sub-servicers
and perform certain accounting and reporting functions on behalf
of the mortgage investors.
We recognize MSRs as separate assets only when servicing is
contractually separated from the underlying mortgage loans by
sale or securitization of the loans with servicing retained or
by separate purchase or assumption of the servicing. Prior to
the adoption of SFAS 156 on January 1, 2006, the
carrying value of mortgage loans sold or securitized was
allocated between loans and mortgage servicing rights based upon
the relative fair values of each and purchased MSRs are
initially recorded at cost. All MSRs were subsequently carried
at the lower of the initial carrying value, adjusted for
amortization, or fair value. We designate fair value hedges on
certain tranches of MSRs. The changes in the fair value of the
designated MSRs, and the fair value of the designated hedges,
were recorded through income, if the hedging relationships are
proven to be effective under the provisions of SFAS 133.
MSRs are
F-13
amortized over the period of, and in proportion to, the
estimated future net servicing income. Subsequent to the
adoption of SFAS 156, all classes of MSRs are recorded at
fair value.
Because a limited and illiquid market exists for MSRs, we
determine the fair value of our MSRs using discounted cash flow
techniques. Using models primarily purchased from third parties,
we determine the fair value of recognized MSRs by estimating the
present value of anticipated future net cash flows. Estimates of
fair value involve several assumptions, including the key
valuation assumptions about market expectations of future
prepayment rates, interest rates and discount rates, which are
subject to change over time. Changes in these underlying
assumptions could cause the fair value of MSRs to change
significantly in the future. For purposes of impairment
evaluation and measurement, we stratify our MSRs based on
predominant risk characteristics, underlying loan type, interest
rate type, and interest rate level. Prior to the adoption of
SFAS 156, to the extent that the carrying value of MSRs
exceeds fair value by individual strata, a valuation reserve was
recorded as a charge to service fee income in current earnings.
Valuation reserves for each stratum are then adjusted in
subsequent periods to reflect changes in the measurement of
impairment. Subsequent to the adoption of SFAS 156, changes in
fair values are reflected in the service fee income on the
statement of earnings. Quarterly, we obtain third party opinions
of value to test the reasonableness of our valuation models.
Derivative
Instruments
In seeking to protect our financial assets and liabilities from
the effects of changes in market interest rates, we have devised
and implemented a comprehensive asset/liability management
strategy that seeks, on an economic basis, to mitigate
significant fluctuations in our financial position and results
of operations. We invest in MSRs, AAA-rated and agency
interest-only and residual securities to generate core fee and
interest income. The value of these instruments and the income
they provide tends to be somewhat counter-cyclical to the
changes in production volumes and gain on sale of loans that
result from changes in interest rates. With regard to the
pipeline of mortgage loans held for sale, in general, we hedge
these assets with forward commitments to sell Fannie Mae
(“FNMA”) or Freddie Mac (“FHLMC”) securities
with comparable maturities and weighted average interest rates.
Also, we use futures or options in our pipeline hedging. To
hedge our investments in MSRs, AAA-rated and agency
interest-only and residual securities, we use several
strategies, including buying
and/or
selling mortgage-backed or U.S. Treasury securities,
forward rate agreements, futures, floors, swaps, or options,
depending on several factors. Lastly, we enter into swap and
swaption agreements to hedge the cash flows on advances or
borrowings that are collateralized by our mortgage loans held
for investment and mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”).
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
“Accounting For Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities,” as amended and interpreted
(“SFAS 133”) requires that we recognize all
derivative instruments on the balance sheet at fair value. If
certain conditions are met, hedge accounting may be applied and
the derivative instrument may be specifically designated as:
(a) a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of
a recognized asset or liability or unrecognized firm commitment,
referred to as a fair value hedge, or (b) a hedge of
the exposure to the variability of cash flows of a recognized
asset, liability or forecasted transaction, referred to as a
cash flow hedge.
In the case of a qualifying fair value hedge, changes in the
value of the derivative instruments that are highly effective
(as defined in SFAS 133) are recognized in current
earnings along with the change in value of the designated hedged
item. In the case of a qualifying cash flow hedge, changes in
the value of the derivative instruments that are highly
effective are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
(loss) income (“OCI”), until the hedged item is
recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a
derivative’s change in fair value is recognized through
earnings. Upon the occasional termination of a cash flow hedge,
the remaining cost of that hedge is amortized over the remaining
life of the hedged item in proportion to the change in the
hedged forecasted transaction. We have derivatives in place to
hedge the exposure to the variability in future cash flows for
forecasted transactions through 2036. Derivatives that are
non-designated hedges, as defined in SFAS 133, are adjusted
to fair value through earnings. We formally document all
qualifying hedge relationships, as well as our risk management
objective and strategy for undertaking each hedge transaction.
We are not a party to any foreign currency hedge relationships.
F-14
Foreclosed
Assets
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans is initially
recorded at fair value of the underlying property less estimated
costs to sell through a charge to the allowance for loan losses
or to the related valuation reserves for loans held for sale.
Subsequent operating activity and declines in value are charged
to earnings.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill, representing the excess of purchase price over the
fair value of net assets acquired, resulted from acquisitions we
have made. Core deposit intangible asset is amortized using an
accelerated method of amortization over a period of ten years,
which is the estimated life of the deposits acquired. Intangible
assets from the acquisition of the remaining shares of Financial
Freedom is amortized on a straight-line basis over a three-year
period. Goodwill is not amortized, and we review our goodwill
and other intangible assets for
other-than-temporary
impairment at least annually. If circumstances indicate that
other-than-temporary
impairment might exist, recoverability of the asset is assessed
based on expected undiscounted net cash flows.
Fixed
Assets
Fixed assets are included in other assets and are stated at
cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization.
Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method in
amounts sufficient to relate the cost of depreciable assets to
current earnings over their estimated service lives. Estimated
service lives of furniture and equipment generally range from
three to seven years and 20 to 40 years for buildings.
Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line
method over the lesser of the life of the lease or the service
lives of the improvements.
Software
Development
We capitalize external direct costs of materials and services
consumed in developing or obtaining internal-use computer
software and direct salary and benefit costs relating to the
respective employees’ time spent on the software project
during the application development stage. The estimated service
lives for capitalized software generally range from three to
seven years.
Income
Taxes
Deferred income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements are computed using the liability method. Under this
method, deferred income taxes are provided for differences
between the financial accounting and income tax basis of our
assets and liabilities.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Our stock-based compensation is provided to employees in
accordance with the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, and
the 2002 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, which allow
for the grant of various types of awards (the
“Awards”) including, but not limited to, non-qualified
stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock awards,
performance stock awards, and stock bonuses to our employees,
including officers and directors. Awards are granted at the
average market price of our stock on the grant date.
The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) on January 1, 2006,
which requires the recognition of compensation expenses related
to stock options, and revised all prior periods in accordance
with SFAS 123(R) at the time of adoption. When revising
prior periods under the modified-retrospective transition
method, the compensation cost recognized in prior periods
approximated the amount previously reported in the pro forma
disclosures. See New Accounting Pronouncements in Note 1
and Note 24 — Benefit Plans for further details.
NOTE 2 —
BUSINESS COMBINATION
On July 16, 2004, the Company acquired 93.75% of the
outstanding common stock of Financial Freedom Holdings Inc.
(“FFHI”) and related assets from Lehman Brothers Bank,
F.S.B. and its affiliates for an aggregate cash purchase price
of $84.6 million. In November 2004, FFHI merged into its
wholly owned subsidiary, Financial Freedom Senior Funding
Corporation (“FFSFC”) in November 2004, with FFSFC as
the surviving entity. The Company owned 93.75% of the
outstanding common stock of FFSFC, with the remaining 6.25%
ownership held by its chief executive officer (FFHI and FFSFC
are referred to collectively as Financial Freedom herein). The
F-15
transaction was accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting and resulted in $48.4 million recorded as
goodwill. On July 3, 2006, the Company acquired the
remaining 6.25% of the outstanding common stock of Financial
Freedom from James Mahoney, CEO of Financial Freedom, for an
aggregate cash purchase price of $40.0 million. Goodwill
and other intangibles recorded from the purchase were
$29.1 million and $3.8 million, respectively. As a
result of this transaction, Financial Freedom is now a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Indymac Bank.
Pro forma results of operations reflecting the acquisition of
Financial Freedom has not been presented because the results of
operations of Financial Freedom are not material to the
Company’s consolidated results of operations.
NOTE 3 —
SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company operates through two primary segments: mortgage
banking and thrift. The profitability of each operating channel
is measured on a fully-leveraged basis after allocating capital
based on regulatory capital rules. The Company uses a fund
transfer pricing (“FTP”) system to allocate interest
expense to the operating channels. Each operating channel is
allocated funding with maturities and interest rates matched
with the expected lives and repricing frequencies of the
channel’s assets. The difference between these allocations
and the Company’s actual net interest income and capital
levels resulting from centralized management of funding costs is
reported in the Treasury unit and Corporate Overhead,
respectively, which are included in the “Other” column
in the tables below.
Effective January 1, 2005, the gain on sale allocation was
modified from funding-based to settlement-based. Previously, the
mortgage banking production divisions were credited with gain on
sale at production based on the actual amount realized for those
loans sold and settled in the period plus an estimate of gain on
loans produced but not yet sold. Differences between the gain on
sale credited to the production divisions and the consolidated
gain on sale due to timing of loan sales were eliminated in
consolidation and reported in the “Other” column in
the tables below. The mortgage production divisions are now
credited with gain on sale of loans based on the actual amount
realized for loans sold in the period for that division.
Elimination of a funding allocation at the consolidated level is
no longer necessary. We have revised all prior period data to
conform to the current allocation methodology.
Loans are occasionally transferred (“sold”) from the
production divisions to the thrift divisions at a premium based
on the estimated fair value. The premium paid for the loans is
recorded as a gain in the production divisions and a premium on
the asset in the thrift divisions and eliminated in
consolidation. In subsequent periods, this premium is amortized
as part of the thrift divisions’ net interest margin and
the amortization is reversed in the “Other” column in
the tables below.
The Company hedges the MSRs to protect their economic value. The
results in the business segment reflect the economic fair value
of the MSRs. The economic fair value may vary from the GAAP
value due to the lower of cost or market limitations of GAAP for
years 2005 and 2004. Differences between the economic value and
the GAAP value are eliminated in consolidation and included in
the “Other” column in the tables below.
Mortgage banking overhead, elimination and other, and corporate
overhead costs such as corporate salaries and related expenses,
excess capital, and non-recurring corporate items are not
allocated to the operating channels and are included in the
“Other” column in the tables below.
F-16
Segment information for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
MSRs and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Divisions
|
|
|
Retained Assets
|
|
|
Thrift
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
170,786
|
|
|
$
|
60,497
|
|
|
$
|
259,052
|
|
|
$
|
36,386
|
|
|
$
|
526,721
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
831,788
|
|
|
|
205,074
|
|
|
|
330,795
|
|
|
|
(20,954
|
)
|
|
|
1,346,703
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
|
289,675
|
|
|
|
91,246
|
|
|
|
137,721
|
|
|
|
(175,713
|
)
|
|
|
342,929
|
|
Allocated average capital
|
|
|
552,835
|
|
|
|
370,451
|
|
|
|
675,467
|
|
|
|
197,507
|
|
|
|
1,796,260
|
|
Assets as of December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
8,573,306
|
|
|
$
|
3,322,947
|
|
|
$
|
16,593,628
|
|
|
$
|
1,005,435
|
|
|
$
|
29,495,316
|
|
Return on equity
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
117,693
|
|
|
$
|
45,160
|
|
|
$
|
230,394
|
|
|
$
|
31,464
|
|
|
$
|
424,711
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
724,240
|
|
|
|
107,246
|
|
|
|
306,759
|
|
|
|
(32,535
|
)
|
|
|
1,105,710
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
|
268,085
|
|
|
|
43,913
|
|
|
|
134,938
|
|
|
|
(153,808
|
)
|
|
|
293,128
|
|
Allocated average capital
|
|
|
364,125
|
|
|
|
193,959
|
|
|
|
524,791
|
|
|
|
297,992
|
|
|
|
1,380,867
|
|
Assets as of December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
5,104,754
|
|
|
$
|
1,740,639
|
|
|
$
|
13,217,215
|
|
|
$
|
1,389,691
|
|
|
$
|
21,452,299
|
|
Return on equity
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
128,942
|
|
|
$
|
59,129
|
|
|
$
|
213,795
|
|
|
$
|
3,196
|
|
|
$
|
405,062
|
|
Net revenues (expense)
|
|
|
527,190
|
|
|
|
25,391
|
|
|
|
286,767
|
|
|
|
(87,830
|
)
|
|
|
751,518
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
|
185,651
|
|
|
|
2,286
|
|
|
|
135,228
|
|
|
|
(161,100
|
)
|
|
|
162,065
|
|
Allocated average capital
|
|
|
243,515
|
|
|
|
173,218
|
|
|
|
439,295
|
|
|
|
310,799
|
|
|
|
1,166,827
|
|
Assets as of December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
4,416,606
|
|
|
$
|
1,572,184
|
|
|
$
|
9,751,579
|
|
|
$
|
1,085,275
|
|
|
$
|
16,825,644
|
|
Return on equity
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
F-17
NOTE 4 —
MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES AND AGENCY NOTES
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, our MBS and agency notes
were comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities — trading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated non-agency securities
|
|
$
|
43,957
|
|
|
$
|
52,633
|
|
AAA-rated and agency interest-only
securities
|
|
|
73,570
|
|
|
|
78,731
|
|
AAA-rated principal-only securities
|
|
|
38,478
|
|
|
|
9,483
|
|
Prepayment penalty securities
|
|
|
97,576
|
|
|
|
75,741
|
|
Other investment grade securities
|
|
|
29,015
|
|
|
|
8,830
|
|
Other non-investment grade
securities
|
|
|
41,390
|
|
|
|
4,480
|
|
Non-investment grade residual
securities
|
|
|
218,745
|
|
|
|
119,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed
securities — trading
|
|
$
|
542,731
|
|
|
$
|
348,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities — available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated non-agency securities
|
|
$
|
4,604,489
|
|
|
$
|
3,524,952
|
|
AAA-rated agency securities
|
|
|
65,175
|
|
|
|
43,014
|
|
Other investment grade securities
|
|
|
160,238
|
|
|
|
83,290
|
|
Other non-investment grade
securities
|
|
|
38,784
|
|
|
|
53,232
|
|
Non-investment grade residual
securities
|
|
|
31,828
|
|
|
|
48,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed
securities — available for sale
|
|
$
|
4,900,514
|
|
|
$
|
3,753,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual maturities of the MBS and agency notes generally
range from 10 to 30 years. Expected weighted average lives
of these securities generally range from several months to five
years due to borrower prepayments occurring prior to the
contractual maturity.
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and estimated
fair value of mortgage-backed securities classified as available
for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
$
|
4,930,825
|
|
|
$
|
3,793,494
|
|
Gross unrealized holding gains
|
|
|
13,675
|
|
|
|
5,382
|
|
Gross unrealized holding losses
|
|
|
(43,986
|
)
|
|
|
(45,681
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value
|
|
$
|
4,900,514
|
|
|
$
|
3,753,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
The unrealized losses and fair value of securities that have
been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than
12 months and 12 months or greater were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or Greater
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
As of December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities — available
for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated agency securities
|
|
$
|
(585
|
)
|
|
$
|
31,865
|
|
|
$
|
(172
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,498
|
|
|
$
|
(757
|
)
|
|
$
|
48,363
|
|
AAA-rated non-agency securities
|
|
|
(1,482
|
)
|
|
|
460,767
|
|
|
|
(39,315
|
)
|
|
|
1,649,480
|
|
|
|
(40,797
|
)
|
|
|
2,110,247
|
|
Other investment grade securities
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
|
|
13,369
|
|
|
|
(1,891
|
)
|
|
|
25,998
|
|
|
|
(2,368
|
)
|
|
|
39,367
|
|
Other non-investment grade
securities
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
4,563
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
4,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities —
available for sale
|
|
$
|
(2,608
|
)
|
|
$
|
510,564
|
|
|
$
|
(41,378
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,691,976
|
|
|
$
|
(43,986
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,202,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities — available
for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated agency securities
|
|
$
|
(300
|
)
|
|
$
|
37,742
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(300
|
)
|
|
$
|
37,742
|
|
AAA-rated non-agency securities
|
|
|
(10,933
|
)
|
|
|
1,150,440
|
|
|
|
(33,235
|
)
|
|
|
1,098,490
|
|
|
|
(44,168
|
)
|
|
|
2,248,930
|
|
Other investment grade securities
|
|
|
(994
|
)
|
|
|
28,619
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(994
|
)
|
|
|
28,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities —
available for sale
|
|
$
|
(12,227
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,216,801
|
|
|
$
|
(33,235
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,098,490
|
|
|
$
|
(45,462
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,315,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, the securities that have been in
unrealized loss position for 12 months or more are
primarily related to AAA-rated securities issued by private
institutions. These unrealized losses are primarily attributable
to changes in interest rates and individually were 7% or less of
their respective amortized cost basis. Because the Company has
the ability and the intent to hold these investments until a
recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, the Company does
not consider these investments to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired at December 31, 2006.
As a result of our periodic reviews for impairment in accordance
with
EITF 99-20,
“Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on
Certain Investments”
(“EITF 99-20”),
during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, we
recorded $10.2 million, $0.6 million and
$1.6 million, respectively, in impairment charges on
investment grade, non-investment grade and residual securities.
We value AAA-rated interest-only securities using an
option-adjusted spread (“OAS”) methodology, in which
discount rates and future cash flows vary over time with the
level of rates implied by each of 200 randomly-generated forward
interest rate paths. When available, market information is used
to validate these assumptions. The prepayment rates used to
value our AAA-rated interest-only securities portfolio are based
primarily on four-factor prepayment models which incorporate
relative weighted average coupon (“WAC”), seasoning,
burnout, and seasonality, as well as expectations of future
rates implied by the forward LIBOR/swap curve. At
December 31, 2006 and 2005, the weighted average constant
lifetime prepayment rate assumption was 16.4% and 20.3%,
respectively, and the implied yield was 15.4% and 8.0%,
respectively.
The fair value of our residual securities is determined by
discounting estimated net future cash flows, using discount
rates that approximate current market rates and expected
prepayment rates. Estimated net future cash flows include
assumptions related to expected credit losses on these
securities. We maintain a model that evaluates the default rate
and severity of loss on the residual securities’
collateral, considering such factors as loss experience,
delinquencies,
loan-to-value
ratio, borrower credit scores and property type. The following
table details the assumptions used in valuing the residual
securities as of December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Closed-End Seconds
|
|
|
Subprime
|
|
|
Lot
|
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
Prime
|
|
|
Subprime
|
|
|
Lot
|
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
Weighted average discount rate
|
|
|
24.1
|
%
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
20.7
|
%
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
24.9
|
%
|
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
|
|
19.0
|
%
|
Projected prepayment rate
|
|
|
37.1
|
%
|
|
|
39.5
|
%
|
|
|
39.8
|
%
|
|
|
50.3
|
%
|
|
|
46.3
|
%
|
|
|
37.1
|
%
|
|
|
43.1
|
%
|
|
|
44.0
|
%
|
Remaining cumulative losses
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
F-19
There were no prime residual securities as of December 31,
2006 and no closed-end seconds residual securities as of
December 31, 2005.
The fair value of all of our other investment and non-investment
grade mortgage-backed securities is estimated based on
discounted cash flow techniques using assumptions for prepayment
rates, market yield requirements and credit losses, and market
information when available.
As of December 31, 2006, the aggregate amount of the
securities from each of the following five issuers was greater
than 10% of the shareholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
Name of Issuer
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Residential Asset Securitization
Trust Series 2006-A4IP
|
|
$
|
358,794
|
|
|
$
|
359,982
|
|
Residential Asset Securitization
Trust Series 2006-A16
|
|
|
264,723
|
|
|
|
264,731
|
|
Residential Asset Securitization
Trust Series 2005-A15
|
|
|
216,146
|
|
|
|
217,245
|
|
IndyMac Certificate
Trust 2004-1
|
|
|
258,594
|
|
|
|
258,594
|
|
IndyMac Certificate
Trust 2004-2
|
|
|
441,729
|
|
|
|
441,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,539,986
|
|
|
$
|
1,542,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These issuers are qualifying special-purpose entities created by
the Company in conjunction with the securitization transactions
with the objective to recharacterize loans as securities for the
purposes of: (1) lower our cost of funds; (2) improve
our liquidity profile; and (3) improve our risk profile
through the use of bond insurance. Of the total securities from
these issuers, 97% of the securities are AAA-rated asset-backed
certificates with approximately $0.7 billion insured by a
third party.
NOTE 5 —
LOANS RECEIVABLE
A summary of loans receivable follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans held
for sale
|
|
$
|
9,331,112
|
|
|
$
|
5,933,524
|
|
Unamortized premiums and fees
|
|
|
176,094
|
|
|
|
95,428
|
|
Hedge effects and other valuation
adjustments
|
|
|
(39,363
|
)
|
|
|
(4,768
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held for sale
|
|
|
9,467,843
|
|
|
|
6,024,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of mortgage
loans held for investment
|
|
|
6,828,862
|
|
|
|
5,645,741
|
|
Unamortized premium and fees on
mortgage loans held for investment
|
|
|
89,306
|
|
|
|
88,273
|
|
Outstanding balances on other
loans held for investment(1)
|
|
|
3,259,532
|
|
|
|
2,546,167
|
|
Unamortized net deferred loan fees
on other loans held for investment
|
|
|
(491
|
)
|
|
|
(1,812
|
)
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(62,386
|
)
|
|
|
(55,168
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held for investment
|
|
|
10,114,823
|
|
|
|
8,223,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans receivable
|
|
$
|
19,582,666
|
|
|
$
|
14,247,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes construction and income property loans and revolving
warehouse lines of credit. |
Substantially all of the mortgage loans that we acquired are
non-conforming loans secured by first liens on single-family
residential properties. Approximately 52% of the principal
amount of single family mortgage loans held for investment at
December 31, 2006 was collateralized by properties located
in California.
F-20
Our impaired loans by collateral type, non-performing and past
due loans are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Builder construction loans
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
11,546
|
|
Consumer construction loans
|
|
|
19,998
|
|
|
|
9,249
|
|
|
|
9,553
|
|
Specific reserves
|
|
|
(343
|
)
|
|
|
(802
|
)
|
|
|
(3,622
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
19,655
|
|
|
$
|
8,447
|
|
|
$
|
17,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance during the year
|
|
$
|
13,632
|
|
|
$
|
14,636
|
|
|
$
|
21,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans
|
|
$
|
162,830
|
|
|
$
|
64,209
|
|
|
$
|
103,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans past due 90 days
as to interest or principal and accruing interest
|
|
$
|
185
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, the
amount of interest foregone on impaired construction loans was
$0.8 million, $1.4 million and $1.5 million,
respectively. No interest income was recognized on a cash basis
on impaired construction loans for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The amount of interest income recognized
on a cash basis on impaired construction loans was
$0.6 million and $0.2 million for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
NOTE 6 —
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Our determination of the level of the allowance for loan losses
and, correspondingly, the provision for loan losses, is based
upon management’s judgments and assumptions regarding
various matters, including general economic conditions, loan
portfolio composition, loan demand, delinquency trends, and
prior loan loss experience. The allowance for loan losses of
$62.4 million is considered adequate to cover probable
losses inherent in the loan portfolio at December 31, 2006.
However, no assurance can be given that we will not, in any
particular period, sustain loan losses that exceed the
allowance, or that subsequent evaluation of the loan portfolio,
in light of then-prevailing factors, including economic
conditions, credit quality of the assets comprising the
portfolio and the ongoing examination process, will not require
significant changes in the allowance for loan losses.
The table below summarizes the changes to the allowance for loan
losses for the years ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
55,168
|
|
|
$
|
52,891
|
|
|
$
|
52,645
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
19,993
|
|
|
|
9,978
|
|
|
|
8,170
|
|
Charge-offs, net of recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFR mortgage loans
|
|
|
(7,324
|
)
|
|
|
(1,428
|
)
|
|
|
(3,060
|
)
|
Land and other mortgage loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Builder construction
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
(3,318
|
)
|
|
|
(2,127
|
)
|
|
|
(1,463
|
)
|
Discontinued product lines(1)
|
|
|
(2,133
|
)
|
|
|
(3,978
|
)
|
|
|
(3,401
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(12,775
|
)
|
|
|
(7,701
|
)
|
|
|
(7,924
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
62,386
|
|
|
$
|
55,168
|
|
|
$
|
52,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes manufactured home loans and home improvement loans. |
F-21
NOTE 7 —
MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS
The assumptions used to value MSRs at December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Assumptions
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-Month
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Lifetime
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Servicing
|
|
|
Prepayment
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Prepayment
|
|
|
Discount
|
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
WAC
|
|
|
Fee
|
|
|
Speed
|
|
|
Multiple
|
|
|
Speeds (CPR)
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
1,822,455
|
|
|
$
|
139,816,763
|
|
|
|
7.05
|
%
|
|
|
0.37
|
%
|
|
|
20.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.57
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
%
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
1,094,490
|
|
|
$
|
84,495,133
|
|
|
|
6.19
|
%
|
|
|
0.37
|
%
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.54
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
%
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
$
|
640,794
|
|
|
$
|
50,218,965
|
|
|
|
5.73
|
%
|
|
|
0.36
|
%
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.54
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
%
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
The changes in MSRs are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
1,094,490
|
|
|
$
|
640,794
|
|
|
$
|
443,688
|
|
Cumulative-effect adjustment due to
change in accounting for MSRs
|
|
|
17,561
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Additions from Financial Freedom
acquisition
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
41,003
|
|
Additions from loan sale or
securitization
|
|
|
1,075,740
|
|
|
|
701,178
|
|
|
|
377,003
|
|
Purchase or assumption
|
|
|
8,658
|
|
|
|
5,463
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Transfers to other retained assets
|
|
|
(4,723
|
)
|
|
|
(8,491
|
)
|
|
|
(5,362
|
)
|
Clean-up
calls exercised
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
(3,911
|
)
|
|
|
(18,754
|
)
|
Change in fair value due to run-off
|
|
|
(376,718
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Change in fair value due to market
changes
|
|
|
24,180
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Change in fair value due to
application of external benchmarking policies
|
|
|
(16,459
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(227,084
|
)
|
|
|
(146,491
|
)
|
Valuation/impairment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(13,459
|
)
|
|
|
(50,293
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
1,822,455
|
|
|
$
|
1,094,490
|
|
|
$
|
640,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSRs fair value as a percentage of
unpaid principal balance (in bps)
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
Changes in the valuation allowance for impairment of MSRs are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
(127,818
|
)
|
|
$
|
(87,997
|
)
|
|
$
|
(59,529
|
)
|
Remeasurement to fair value upon
adoption of SFAS 156
|
|
|
127,818
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Provision for valuation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(42,502
|
)
|
|
|
(40,666
|
)
|
Clean-up
calls exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,681
|
|
|
|
8,353
|
|
Permanent impairment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(127,818
|
)
|
|
$
|
(87,997
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 8 —
INVESTMENT IN FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK STOCK
The investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock consisted of
capital stock, at cost, totaling $762.1 million and
$556.3 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Total dividend income recognized was
$32.1 million, $21.2 million and $13.9 million,
respectively, in 2006, 2005 and 2004. We earned a yield of
5.37%, 4.44% and 4.04% in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The
investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock is required to
permit Indymac Bank to borrow from the Federal Home
Loan Bank of San Francisco.
F-22
NOTE 9 —
OTHER ASSETS
The major components of other assets follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed assets and software
development, net
|
|
$
|
275,813
|
|
|
$
|
239,590
|
|
Hedging related deposits
|
|
|
33,466
|
|
|
|
43,375
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
102,597
|
|
|
|
65,775
|
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
45,829
|
|
|
|
66,223
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
at fair value
|
|
|
316,197
|
|
|
|
211,066
|
|
Servicing related advances
|
|
|
108,835
|
|
|
|
54,944
|
|
Investment in non-consolidated
trusts
|
|
|
16,960
|
|
|
|
12,484
|
|
Investment in real estate
|
|
|
24,088
|
|
|
|
36,750
|
|
Other
|
|
|
67,473
|
|
|
|
57,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
$
|
991,258
|
|
|
$
|
788,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software development and fixed assets included in other assets
are detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Software development
|
|
$
|
176,493
|
|
|
$
|
130,422
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(81,984
|
)
|
|
|
(52,360
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net software development
|
|
|
94,509
|
|
|
|
78,062
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
170,380
|
|
|
|
137,119
|
|
Buildings and leasehold
improvements
|
|
|
121,493
|
|
|
|
99,326
|
|
Land
|
|
|
11,544
|
|
|
|
12,787
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(122,113
|
)
|
|
|
(87,704
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed assets and software
development, net
|
|
$
|
275,813
|
|
|
$
|
239,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The opening of mortgage banking regional offices as well as
additional retail branches has contributed to the increase in
data processing, furniture and equipment, and leasehold
improvements.
Additionally, included in our other assets were
$24.0 million investment in real estate projects. The
amount represents our funding in the real estate projects as
well as the mezzanine debt financing provided to the borrowers.
The special purpose entities formed related to these real estate
projects have been evaluated and determined to be variable
interest entities (“VIEs”) under the definition of
FIN 46 and we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary of
the VIEs, and thus, required to consolidate the VIEs. The
minority interests in the VIEs are reported on our consolidated
balance sheet as other liabilities.
Hedging related deposits represent margin deposits with our
clearing agent or counterparties associated with our hedge
positions. For further information on our derivative financial
instruments, see “Note 15 — Derivative
Instruments.”
Depreciation and amortization expense was $63.7 million,
$44.1 million and $36.0 million for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
F-23
NOTE 10 —
DEPOSITS
A summary of the carrying value of deposits, rates, and
maturities of certificates of deposit follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Non interest-bearing checking
|
|
$
|
72,081
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
63,308
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Non interest-bearing
checking — Loan servicing accounts
|
|
|
616,904
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
493,936
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Interest-bearing checking
|
|
|
54,844
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
55,479
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
Savings
|
|
|
1,915,333
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,194,963
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits
|
|
|
2,659,162
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
1,807,686
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
Certificates of deposit, due:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
|
7,970,763
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
5,503,280
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
One to two years
|
|
|
147,519
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
276,311
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
Two to three years
|
|
|
56,009
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
39,794
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
Three to four years
|
|
|
25,879
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
35,591
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
Four to five years
|
|
|
38,475
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
8,982
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
Over five years
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certificates of deposit
|
|
|
8,238,844
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
5,864,238
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
10,898,006
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,671,924
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The interest expense by deposit type for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest-bearing checking
|
|
$
|
665
|
|
|
$
|
603
|
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
71,385
|
|
|
|
37,561
|
|
|
|
32,488
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
336,158
|
|
|
|
157,364
|
|
|
|
70,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense on deposits
|
|
$
|
408,208
|
|
|
$
|
195,528
|
|
|
$
|
103,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006, accrued interest payable was $23,000,
$202,000, and $3.6 million for interest-bearing checking,
savings, and certificates of deposit, respectively. Accrued
interest payable is included in other liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheets.
The following summarizes certificates of deposit in amounts of
$100,000 or more by remaining contractual maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Three months or less
|
|
$
|
2,407,796
|
|
|
$
|
1,126,906
|
|
Three to six months
|
|
|
1,604,348
|
|
|
|
1,033,109
|
|
Six to twelve months
|
|
|
848,732
|
|
|
|
1,314,711
|
|
Over twelve months
|
|
|
127,884
|
|
|
|
169,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certificates of deposit
($100,000 or more)
|
|
$
|
4,988,760
|
|
|
$
|
3,643,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 11 —
ADVANCES FROM THE FHLB
As a member of the FHLB, we maintain a credit line based largely
on a percentage of total regulatory assets. Advances totaled
$10.4 billion at December 31, 2006 and
$7.0 billion at December 31, 2005, and are
collateralized
F-24
in the aggregate by loans, securities, all FHLB stock owned and
by deposits with the FHLB. The maximum amount of credit that the
FHLB will extend for purposes other than meeting withdrawals
varies from time to time in accordance with its policies. The
interest rates charged by the FHLB for advances typically vary
depending upon maturity, the cost of funds of the FHLB, and the
collateral for the borrowing.
Scheduled maturities of advances from the FHLB were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
$
|
5,053,000
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,127,000
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
One to two years
|
|
|
1,151,000
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
731,000
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
Two to three years
|
|
|
1,491,000
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
574,000
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
Three to four years
|
|
|
759,000
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
145,000
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
Four to five years
|
|
|
1,789,800
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
376,000
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
Over five years
|
|
|
169,000
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
10,412,800
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,953,000
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial data pertaining to advances from the FHLB were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate/Amount
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Weighted average coupon rate, end
of year
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
Weighted average rate during the
year, including hedge effect
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
Average balance of advances from
FHLB
|
|
$
|
10,560,896
|
|
|
$
|
8,439,903
|
|
Maximum amount of advances from
FHLB at any month end
|
|
$
|
12,688,800
|
|
|
$
|
9,186,000
|
|
Interest expense for the year
|
|
$
|
491,300
|
|
|
$
|
281,929
|
|
Amount of advances subject to
call/put options
|
|
$
|
309,000
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
We had $5.2 billion and $4.5 billion of unused
committed financing from the FHLB at December 31, 2006 and
2005, respectively.
NOTE 12 —
OTHER BORROWINGS
Other borrowings of the Company consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Asset-backed commercial papers
|
|
$
|
2,114,508
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Loans and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
1,405,505
|
|
|
$
|
3,057,262
|
|
HELOC notes payable
|
|
|
659,283
|
|
|
|
998,289
|
|
Trust preferred debentures
|
|
|
456,695
|
|
|
|
308,661
|
|
Other notes payable
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
2,890
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,637,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,367,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006, we had $8.4 billion in committed
financing facilities ($8.0 billion whole loan facilities,
$300 million bond facilities and $100 million in
unsecured revolving line of credit). Of these committed
financing facilities, $2.2 billion was available for use,
based on eligible collateral. Decisions by our lenders and
investors to make additional funds available to us in the future
will depend upon a number of factors. These include our
compliance with the terms of existing credit arrangements, our
financial performance, eligible collateral, changes in our
credit rating, industry and market trends in our various
businesses, the general availability and interest rates
F-25
applicable to financing and investments, the lenders’
and/or
investors’ own resources and policies concerning loans and
investments and the relative attractiveness of alternative
investment or lending opportunities.
Asset-Backed
Commercial Paper
In April 2006, we established the North Lake Capital Funding
Program, a single seller asset-backed commercial paper facility,
which allows us to directly issue, secured liquidity notes
backed by mortgage loans. Both the collateral pledged and
secured liquidity notes are recorded on our balance sheet as
assets and liabilities, respectively. The secured liquidity
notes have been rated F-1+ by Fitch Ratings,
P-1 by
Moody’s Investors Service and
A-1+ by
Standard & Poor’s, and are supported by credit
enhancements, such as over collateralization, excess spread, and
market value swaps provided by highly rated counterparties. We
are authorized to issue up to $2.5 billion in short-term
notes, with expected maturities not to exceed 180 days
after issuance and final maturities of 60 days following
the expected maturities. As of December 31, 2006, we had
$1.1 billion in secured liquidity notes outstanding. The
weighted average borrowing rate on the North Lake Capital
funding facility was 5.6%.
In November 2006, we established a multi-seller Asset-Backed
Commercial Paper facility, structured as a repurchase facility
to provide up to $1.5 billion dedicated financing for our
Construction to Permanent, Lot, and Reverse Mortgage loans. This
is an annually renewable
364-day
committed facility administered by Citicorp North America,
Inc. As of December 31, 2006, we had outstandings of
$1.1 billion under this facility.
Loans
and Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
We sold, under agreements to repurchase, securities of the
U.S. government and its agencies, specific loans and other
approved investments to various broker-dealers pursuant to
committed credit facilities totaling $4.3 billion
($4.0 billion whole loan facilities and $300 million
bond facilities) at December 31, 2006. The amounts
outstanding under these repurchase agreements were
$1.4 billion at December 31, 2006, of which
$947 million were draws on the committed credit facilities
and approximately $460 million represented the uncommitted
financing. The amount outstanding under loans and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase was $3.1 billion at
December 31, 2005. Our outstanding repurchase agreements
have an average maturity of less than 30 days. These
repurchase agreements generally reprice on an
overnight-to-one-month
basis for loans, and a
one-to-three-month
basis for securities, bearing interest at rates indexed to LIBOR
or the federal funds rate, plus an applicable margin. We were in
compliance with all material financial covenants under these
repurchase agreements at December 31, 2006 and 2005. For
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the weighted
average borrowing rate on repurchase agreements, including the
multi-seller asset-backed commercial paper facility with
Citicorp, was 5.2% and 3.9%, respectively.
HELOC
Notes Payable
During 2004, the Company financed $1.0 billion in HELOC
loans through two separate securitization transactions. The
securitization trusts issued AAA-rated asset-backed
certificates, and the Company pledged the certificates to secure
these nonrecourse notes payable. Interest rates on the notes are
based on LIBOR plus a margin. For the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005, the cost of funds on these
notes was 5.42% and 3.65%, respectively.
Trust Preferred
Securities and Warrants
On November 14, 2001, we completed an offering of Warrants
and Income Redeemable Equity Securities (“WIRES”) to
investors. Gross proceeds of the transaction were
$175 million. The securities were offered as units
consisting of trust preferred securities, issued by a trust
formed by us, and warrants to purchase Indymac Bancorp’s
common stock. As part of this transaction, Indymac Bancorp
issued subordinated debentures to the trust and purchased common
securities from the trust. The yield on the subordinated
debentures and the common securities is the same as the yield on
the trust preferred securities. Also, we issued 3,500,000
warrants, each convertible into 1.5972 shares of Indymac
Bancorp’s common stock as part of the WIRES offering.
Beginning on November 14, 2006, Indymac has the option to
redeem the warrants for cash equal to the warrant value (the
difference between $50 and the exercise price of the warrant),
subject to the conditions in the prospectus. During 2006, a
total of 2.5 million warrants were exercised at an average
exercise price of $35.09 per share to purchase
4.0 million shares of Indymac
F-26
Bancorp’s common stock. To date, total warrants of
2.6 million have been exercised and converted into a total
of 4.1 million shares of Indymac Bancorp’s common
stock. Subordinated debentures redeemed in conjunction with the
warrant exercises totaled $64.5 million as of
December 31, 2006.
In 2006, we issued an additional $188 million in pooled
trust preferred securities. To date, we have issued
$368 million trust preferred securities (without warrants
attached) as summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Face Amount
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
December 2006
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
%
|
December 2006
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
6.90
|
%
|
September 2006
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
|
6.96
|
%
|
June 2006
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
7.35
|
%
|
December 2005
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
6.31
|
%
|
December 2004
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
5.83
|
%
|
December 2003
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
6.30
|
%
|
July 2003
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
6.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
368,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rates on these securities are fixed for terms ranging
from 5 to 10 years, after which the rates reset quarterly
indexed to
3-month
LIBOR. The securities can be called at the option of Indymac
Bancorp five or ten years after issuance. In each of these
transactions, Indymac Bancorp issued subordinated debentures to,
and purchased common securities from, each of the trusts. The
rates on the subordinated debentures and the common securities
in each of these transactions matches the rates on the related
trust preferred securities. The proceeds of these securities
have been used in ongoing operations.
Upon the adoption of FIN 46, the trusts have been
deconsolidated from the financial statements of the Company.
Book values of the subordinated debentures underlying the trust
preferred securities, which represent the liabilities due from
Indymac Bancorp to the trusts, totaled $456.7 million and
$308.7 million at December 31, 2006, and
December 31, 2005, respectively. These subordinated
debentures are included in Other Borrowings on the consolidated
balance sheets.
Revolving
Syndicated Bank Credit Facilities
In June 2005, a revolving unsecured syndicated bank facility in
the aggregate amount of $75 million was executed between
Indymac Bancorp and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which was later
increased to $100 million in June 2006. The interest rate
is based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin. We did not draw on
the line during 2006 and 2005 and thus, carried no outstanding
balances at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Other
Notes Payable
The Company participates in certain real estate construction
projects through the builder construction division. The special
purpose entities formed related to these real estate projects
have been evaluated and determined to be VIEs under the
definition of FIN 46 and we are deemed as the primary
beneficiary of the VIEs, and thus, required to consolidate the
VIEs. At December 31, 2006, the $1.0 million
represents the notes payable in the VIEs.
Collateralized
Mortgage Obligations
Collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) are
secured by a pledge of mortgage loans, MBS and residual cash
flows from such securities. As required by the indentures
relating to the CMOs, the pledged collateral is held in the
custody of trustees. The trustees collect principal and interest
payments on the underlying collateral, reinvest such amounts in
the guaranteed investment contracts, and make corresponding
principal and interest payments on the CMOs to the bondholders.
All outstanding CMOs had been redeemed in February 2006. Our net
equity investments in CMOs amounted to approximately $150,000 at
December 31, 2005. The weighted average coupon on CMOs was
11.6% at December 31, 2005.
F-27
Commitment
Fees
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had deferred commitment
fees totaling $3.0 million and $1.9 million,
respectively. The amortization of $4.4 million and
$3.2 million was recognized as interest expense in 2006 and
2005, respectively. We amortize these fees over the contractual
life of the borrowings.
Pledged
Borrowings
We pledged certain of our loans and securities for our
borrowings, which mainly consist of advances from FHLB and loans
and securities sold under agreements to repurchase. The
following provides information related to such pledged assets as
of December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Loans pledged for FHLB
|
|
$
|
8,747
|
|
|
$
|
6,926
|
|
Securities pledged for FHLB
|
|
|
3,598
|
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
Loans pledged for repurchase
agreements
|
|
|
4,058
|
|
|
|
3,280
|
|
Securities pledged for repurchase
agreements
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
1,327
|
|
Loans pledged for other
|
|
|
2,074
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pledged
|
|
$
|
19,181
|
|
|
$
|
12,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, pledged assets exceeded our
borrowings by approximately $5.2 billion. The excess
collateral was held by a trustee and pledged to our lenders. The
following table details the amounts allocated among the various
lenders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
FHLB
|
|
$
|
1,932
|
|
|
$
|
1,398
|
|
Merrill Lynch
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
924
|
|
Morgan Stanley
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
UBS Warburg
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
Greenwich
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Citicorp
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Federal Reserve
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
North Lake Funding
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total excess
|
|
$
|
5,249
|
|
|
$
|
2,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
Covenants
The Company is subject to various debt covenants as a condition
of its borrowing facilities. As of December 31, 2006, in
addition to the standard covenants of timely repayments of
interest and principal, the key debt covenants include
maintaining minimum well-capitalized capital ratios (5%, 6%, and
10% for core capital, Tier 1 risk-based and total
risk-based capital, respectively) and minimum net worth of
$1 billion for the Company. As of December 31, 2006,
we believe we were in compliance with all material financial
covenants under our borrowing facilities.
F-28
NOTE 13 —
PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Indymac Bancorp parent only financial information follows:
Condensed
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
153,839
|
|
|
$
|
67,697
|
|
Securities classified as trading
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
6,418
|
|
Securities classified as available
for sale
|
|
|
57,037
|
|
|
|
72,083
|
|
Loans held for investment, net
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
Investment in and advances to
subsidiaries
|
|
|
2,304,573
|
|
|
|
1,753,143
|
|
Intercompany receivables
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,676
|
|
Investment in non-consolidated
subsidiaries
|
|
|
16,960
|
|
|
|
12,484
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
22,580
|
|
|
|
23,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,557,467
|
|
|
$
|
1,938,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and
Shareholders’ Equity
|
Trust preferred debentures
|
|
$
|
458,218
|
|
|
$
|
308,661
|
|
Loans and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
55,106
|
|
|
|
69,128
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
14,749
|
|
|
|
16,068
|
|
Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
2,029,394
|
|
|
|
1,545,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
2,557,467
|
|
|
$
|
1,938,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
Condensed
Statements of Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale and
trading
|
|
$
|
5,357
|
|
|
$
|
7,836
|
|
|
$
|
6,033
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,074
|
|
|
|
2,611
|
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
10,627
|
|
|
|
10,775
|
|
|
|
8,850
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred debentures
|
|
|
26,652
|
|
|
|
17,182
|
|
|
|
15,319
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,483
|
|
|
|
4,032
|
|
|
|
2,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
30,135
|
|
|
|
21,214
|
|
|
|
17,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest loss
|
|
|
(19,508
|
)
|
|
|
(10,439
|
)
|
|
|
(8,878
|
)
|
Provision for loan
losses
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
(1,476
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest loss after provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
(19,533
|
)
|
|
|
(9,939
|
)
|
|
|
(7,402
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
|
360,393
|
|
|
|
304,601
|
|
|
|
177,551
|
|
Net gain on securities
|
|
|
3,591
|
|
|
|
4,299
|
|
|
|
3,972
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
364,069
|
|
|
|
308,953
|
|
|
|
181,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
344,536
|
|
|
|
299,014
|
|
|
|
174,141
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
13,461
|
|
|
|
17,376
|
|
|
|
13,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before provision for
income tax
|
|
|
331,075
|
|
|
|
281,638
|
|
|
|
160,370
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(11,100
|
)
|
|
|
(8,867
|
)
|
|
|
(6,604
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
342,175
|
|
|
$
|
290,505
|
|
|
$
|
166,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
Condensed
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
342,175
|
|
|
$
|
290,505
|
|
|
$
|
166,974
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
earnings to net cash (used in) provided
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and net amortization
(accretion)
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
(1,869
|
)
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
Compensation expenses related to
stock options and restricted stock
|
|
|
3,275
|
|
|
|
10,067
|
|
|
|
7,616
|
|
Gain on mortgage-backed
securities, net
|
|
|
(3,591
|
)
|
|
|
(4,299
|
)
|
|
|
(3,972
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
(1,476
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(360,393
|
)
|
|
|
(304,601
|
)
|
|
|
(177,552
|
)
|
Net purchases of trading securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(18,961
|
)
|
Payments from trading securities
|
|
|
7,703
|
|
|
|
19,332
|
|
|
|
17,860
|
|
Net decrease in other assets and
liabilities
|
|
|
(9,440
|
)
|
|
|
7,646
|
|
|
|
3,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
(19,638
|
)
|
|
|
16,281
|
|
|
|
(6,596
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in loans held for
investment
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
|
1,809
|
|
|
|
3,908
|
|
Net purchases of securities
available for sale
|
|
|
(22,207
|
)
|
|
|
(21,196
|
)
|
|
|
(161,144
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of and net
payments from available for sale securities
|
|
|
39,474
|
|
|
|
41,304
|
|
|
|
73,962
|
|
Cash dividends received from
Indymac Bank
|
|
|
178,132
|
|
|
|
146,212
|
|
|
|
38,518
|
|
Decrease (increase) in investment
in and advances to subsidiaries, net of cash payments
|
|
|
7,228
|
|
|
|
5,102
|
|
|
|
(8,496
|
)
|
Capital contributions to Indymac
Bank and other Bancorp subsidiaries
|
|
|
(354,127
|
)
|
|
|
(247,265
|
)
|
|
|
(120,000
|
)
|
Net sale (purchases) of property,
plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(2,661
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(147,889
|
)
|
|
|
(74,059
|
)
|
|
|
(175,913
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of trust
preferred debentures
|
|
|
188,000
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
Redemption of trust preferred
securities
|
|
|
(47,271
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in
borrowings
|
|
|
(14,461
|
)
|
|
|
(17,118
|
)
|
|
|
84,216
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of
common stock
|
|
|
148,470
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
100,171
|
|
Net proceeds from stock options,
warrants, and notes receivable
|
|
|
110,527
|
|
|
|
46,590
|
|
|
|
36,509
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(129,535
|
)
|
|
|
(98,501
|
)
|
|
|
(72,414
|
)
|
Purchases of common stock
|
|
|
(2,061
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
(597
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
253,669
|
|
|
|
20,389
|
|
|
|
177,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
86,142
|
|
|
|
(37,389
|
)
|
|
|
(4,624
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
67,697
|
|
|
|
105,086
|
|
|
|
109,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end
of period
|
|
$
|
153,839
|
|
|
$
|
67,697
|
|
|
$
|
105,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
NOTE 14 —
TRANSFERS AND SERVICING OF FINANCIAL ASSETS
Retained
Assets
In conjunction with the sale of mortgage loans in private-label
securitizations and GSE transactions, the Company generally
retains certain assets. The primary assets retained include
MSRs, and to a lesser degree,
AAA-rated
interest-only securities, AAA-rated principal-only securities,
prepayment penalty securities, investment grade securities,
non-investment grade securities, and residual securities. The
allocated cost of the retained assets at the time of sale is
recorded as an asset with an offsetting increase to the gain on
sale of loans (or a reduction in the cost basis of the loans
sold). The calculation of the $668.1 million in gain on
sale of loans earned during the year ended December 31,
2006 included the retention of $1.1 billion in MSRs and
$388.5 million of other retained assets. For the years
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, we recognized a total of
$592.2 million and $363.8 million in gain on sale of
loans, respectively. The fair value of retained assets totaling
$889.0 million and $775.2 million in 2005 and 2004,
respectively, was included as a component of these gains.
The portfolio of AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities
at December 31, 2006 was comprised of
AAA-rated
interest-only securities retained in our loan securitization
activities as well as the agency interest-only securities.
Agency interest-only securities were created by securitizing a
portion of the contractual servicing fee related to loans sold
to the GSEs prior to 2005. These securities represented the
unconditional right to receive cash flows based on the cash flow
from the underlying loans. These securities were legally
separate from contractual servicing fees and can be sold or
pledged by the Company without restriction. Starting in 2005, we
decided not to retain agency interest-only securities.
The key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of retained
assets at the time of sale during the year ended
December 31, 2006 on a weighted average basis were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Lifetime
|
|
|
Discount
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
CPR
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
$
|
1,075,741
|
|
|
|
22.81
|
%
|
|
|
10.17
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
AAA-rated interest-only securities
|
|
|
29,576
|
|
|
|
24.56
|
%
|
|
|
25.71
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
AAA-rated principal-only securities
|
|
|
13,862
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.62
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Prepayment penalty securities
|
|
|
43,094
|
|
|
|
21.50
|
%
|
|
|
12.53
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Investment grade mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
|
43,701
|
|
|
|
33.61
|
%
|
|
|
8.48
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Non-investment grade
mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
34,205
|
|
|
|
42.43
|
%
|
|
|
13.39
|
%
|
|
|
3.11
|
%
|
Non-investment grade residual
securities
|
|
|
224,014
|
|
|
|
40.51
|
%
|
|
|
23.11
|
%
|
|
|
3.07
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,464,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
The following table shows the hypothetical effect on the fair
value of our retained assets using various unfavorable
variations of the expected levels of certain key assumptions
used in valuing these assets at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Non-Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-Rated
|
|
|
AAA-Rated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
Grade
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Agency
|
|
|
Principal-
|
|
|
Prepayment
|
|
|
Mortgage-
|
|
|
Mortgage-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
Interest-Only
|
|
|
Only
|
|
|
Penalty
|
|
|
Backed
|
|
|
Backed
|
|
|
Residual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance sheet carrying value of
retained interests
|
|
$
|
1,822,455
|
|
|
$
|
73,570
|
|
|
$
|
38,478
|
|
|
$
|
97,576
|
|
|
$
|
189,253
|
|
|
$
|
80,174
|
|
|
$
|
250,573
|
|
|
$
|
2,552,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment speed assumption
|
|
|
25.78
|
%
|
|
|
16.40
|
%
|
|
|
13.19
|
%
|
|
|
28.20
|
%
|
|
|
28.60
|
%
|
|
|
31.90
|
%
|
|
|
39.60
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse
change of prepayment speed
|
|
$
|
111,660
|
|
|
$
|
5,497
|
|
|
$
|
(923
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,211
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,418
|
|
|
$
|
(456
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,644
|
|
|
$
|
129,629
|
|
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse
change of prepayment speed
|
|
$
|
212,598
|
|
|
$
|
10,445
|
|
|
$
|
(1,724
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,338
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,377
|
|
|
$
|
(860
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,566
|
|
|
$
|
243,064
|
|
Discount rate assumption
|
|
|
8.83
|
%
|
|
|
15.40
|
%
|
|
|
5.68
|
%
|
|
|
26.30
|
%
|
|
|
7.90
|
%
|
|
|
13.70
|
%
|
|
|
22.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Impact on fair value of
100 basis point adverse change
|
|
$
|
51,050
|
|
|
$
|
4,631
|
|
|
$
|
1,938
|
|
|
$
|
646
|
|
|
$
|
6,592
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
15,378
|
|
|
$
|
80,376
|
|
Impact on fair value of
200 basis point adverse change
|
|
$
|
102,630
|
|
|
$
|
8,717
|
|
|
$
|
3,707
|
|
|
$
|
1,310
|
|
|
$
|
13,473
|
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
|
$
|
31,587
|
|
|
$
|
162,153
|
|
Net credit loss assumption
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse
change in credit losses
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
1,254
|
|
|
$
|
20,028
|
|
|
$
|
21,282
|
|
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse
change in credit losses
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
2,595
|
|
|
$
|
37,868
|
|
|
$
|
40,463
|
|
The adverse change of prepayment speed is assumed as an increase
in prepayment speed as MSRs represent our largest retained
assets at December 31, 2006. The negative amounts in the
table indicate increases in value resulting from changes in
prepayment speed, which partially offset the declines in value
of other retained assets.
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with
caution. Changes in fair value based on a ten percent variation
in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the
relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair
value may not be linear. The effect of a variation in a
particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest
is calculated without changing any other assumption, or
considering the offsetting hedging impacts. In reality, changes
in one factor may result in changes in another, such as hedging
strategies and associated gains or losses, which might magnify
or counteract the sensitivities.
Credit
Risk on Securitizations
With regard to the issuance of private-label securitizations, we
retain certain limited credit exposure in that we may choose to
retain non-investment grade securities and residuals. These
securities are subordinate to investors’ investment-grade
interests. We do not have credit exposure associated with
non-performing loans in securitizations beyond our investment in
retained interests in non-investment grade securities and
residuals. The value of our retained interests include credit
loss assumptions on the underlying collateral pool to estimate
this risk. The
F-33
following table summarizes the collateral balance associated
with our servicing portfolio of sold loans, and the balance of
non-investment grade securities and residual securities retained
at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of Retained Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With Credit Exposure
|
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
Non-Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serviced
|
|
|
Grade Securities
|
|
|
Residuals
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Prime
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indymac securitizations
|
|
$
|
64,894,281
|
|
|
$
|
67,237
|
|
|
$
|
156,337
|
|
GSEs
|
|
|
40,606,548
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Whole loan sales
|
|
|
28,294,404
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Subprime
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indymac securitizations
|
|
|
5,920,286
|
|
|
|
12,937
|
|
|
|
94,236
|
|
Manufactured housing
securitization
|
|
|
101,244
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
139,816,763
|
|
|
$
|
80,174
|
|
|
$
|
250,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As part of the normal course of business involving loans sold to
the secondary market, we are occasionally required to repurchase
loans or make certain payments to settle breaches of our
standard representations and warranties made as part of the loan
sales or securitizations. In anticipation of future expected
losses related to these loans, we have established secondary
market reserves and have recorded provisions of
$37.3 million, $19.6 million, and $22.9 million
to this reserve as reductions to our gain on sale of loans
during 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The balance in this
reserve was $33.9 million and $27.6 million at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, which is included
on the consolidated balance sheets as a component of Other
Liabilities. The calculation of the reserve is a function of
estimated losses based on expected and actual pending claims and
repurchase requests, historical experience, loan volume and loan
sale distribution channels.
Qualifying
Special-Purpose Entities
All loans sold in our private-label securitizations are issued
through securitization trusts, which are “qualifying
special-purpose entities” under SFAS 140. Cash flows
received from and paid to securitization trusts during the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Proceeds from new securitizations
|
|
$
|
29,557,068
|
|
|
$
|
31,018,699
|
|
|
$
|
12,205,539
|
|
Servicing fees received
|
|
|
89,993
|
|
|
|
63,720
|
|
|
|
27,024
|
|
Other cash flows received on
retained interests
|
|
|
184,597
|
|
|
|
132,330
|
|
|
|
99,542
|
|
Clean-up
calls
|
|
|
(31,483
|
)
|
|
|
(141,487
|
)
|
|
|
(677,318
|
)
|
Loan repurchases for
representations and warranties
|
|
|
(19,632
|
)
|
|
|
(8,400
|
)
|
|
|
(1,100
|
)
|
As part of our normal servicing operations, the Company advanced
cash to investors totaling $195.3 million and
$61.1 million during the years ended December 31, 2006
and 2005, respectively, and received cash reimbursements from
investors totaling $171.1 million and $61.4 million,
respectively.
From time to time, Indymac creates Net Interest Margin
(“NIM”) trusts for the securitization of residual
securities and securities associated with prepayment charges on
the underlying mortgage loans from prior or recently completed
securitization transactions. NIM trusts issue notes to outside
investors secured by the residual securities and securities
associated with prepayment charges on the underlying mortgage
loans we contribute to the trusts. The cash proceeds from the
sale of the NIM notes to investors are paid to us as payment for
the securities. The NIM notes are obligations of the NIM trusts
and are collateralized only by the residual securities and
securities associated with prepayment charges on the underlying
mortgage loans. We are not obligated to make any payments on the
notes. These entities represent qualified special-purpose
entities and meet the legal isolation criteria of SFAS 140.
Therefore, these entities are not consolidated for financial
reporting purposes, in accordance with SFAS 140. At
inception, the outside investors have the majority interest in
the fair value of the residual securities
F-34
and securities associated with prepayment charges on the
underlying mortgage loans. We receive cash flows from our
retained interests in the NIM trusts once the notes issued to
the investors are fully paid off. We created three NIM trusts
during 2006 and four NIM trusts during 2005. At inception of the
trusts, we retained a 74.3% and 18.7% interest in these trusts
during 2006 and 2005, respectively. At December 31, 2006
and 2005, these NIM trusts held assets valued at
$176.4 million and $187.9 million, respectively, and
our retained interests in these NIM trusts were valued at
$89.1 million and $52.4 million, respectively. Our
retained interests in the NIM trusts are included as a component
of securities classified as trading securities on the
consolidated balance sheets.
NOTE 15 —
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
We follow the provisions of SFAS 133, as amended, for our
derivative instruments and hedging activities, which require us
to recognize all derivative instruments on the consolidated
balance sheets at fair value. FNMA and FHLMC forward contracts,
forward rate agreements, interest rate swap agreements, interest
rate swaption agreements, interest rate floor agreements,
interest rate cap agreements, Eurodollar futures, and rate lock
commitments were identified as derivative financial instruments
and recorded at fair value as of December 31, 2006 and 2005.
Generally speaking, if interest rates increase, the value of our
rate lock commitments and funded loans decrease and loan sale
margins are adversely impacted. We hedge the risk of overall
changes in fair value of loans held for sale and rate lock
commitments generally by selling forward contracts on securities
of GSEs and by using futures and options to economically hedge
the fair value of loan commitments and the funded loan
portfolio. Under SFAS 133, certain of these positions
qualify as a fair value hedge of a portion of the funded loan
portfolio and result in adjustments to the carrying value of
designated loans through gain on sale based on value changes
attributable to the hedged risk. The forward contracts used to
economically hedge the loan commitments are accounted for as
non-designated hedges and naturally offset loan commitment
mark-to-market
gains and losses recognized as a component of gain on sale.
Effective April 1, 2004, upon the adoption of SAB 105,
the loan commitments are initially valued at zero, and the
Company only records the change in the fair value of the loan
commitments. The initial value inherent in the loan commitments
at origination is recorded as a component of gain on sale of
loans when the underlying loan is sold. At December 31,
2006 and 2005, the fair value of these commitments amounted to
$(9.8) million and $6.1 million, respectively.
We use interest rate swaps, swaption agreements and interest
rate caps to reduce our exposure to interest rate risk inherent
in a portion of the current and anticipated borrowings and
advances. A swap agreement is a contract between two parties to
exchange cash flows based on specified underlying notional
amounts and indices. A swaption agreement is an option to enter
into a swap agreement in the future. An interest rate cap is a
derivative that protects the holder from rates rising above the
agreed strike price. The holder receives money at the end of
each period in which the interest rate exceeds the agreed strike
price. Under SFAS 133, the swaps, swaption agreements and
caps used to hedge our anticipated borrowings and advances
qualify as cash flow hedges. As of December 31, 2006, our
interest rate swaps and caps carried deferred gains of
$23.1 million, while our swaption agreements carried
deferred losses of $34.2 million. The net deferred loss of
$6.8 million (net of taxes) was recorded as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income. Future effective changes
in fair value on these interest rate swap, swaption agreements
and interest rate caps will be adjusted through AOCI as long as
the cash flow hedge requirements continue to be met. AOCI
contains approximately $10.5 million (net of tax) in
deferred cash flow hedge gains and $11.0 million (net of
tax) in deferred cash flow hedge losses that the Company expects
to be realized into income over the next 12 months, based
on the respective December 31, 2006 valuations. At
December 31, 2005, our interest rate swaps, swaptions and
caps carried a net deferred valuation gain of $9.2 million
(net of tax), which was recorded as a component of AOCI.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 156, the Company applied the
fair value hedge provisions of SFAS 133 on certain tranches
of our MSR asset in 2005 and 2004. Economically, the positions
we used to hedge the MSR asset included Euro dollar futures,
forward rate agreements, interest rate caps, swaps and
swaptions, which are intended to mitigate valuation declines
that result from changes and volatility in the interest rate
environment. Gains and losses on both designated and
undesignated derivative financial instruments are classified as
a component of service fee income for mortgage servicing assets,
and as a component of gain or (loss) on mortgage-backed
securities, net, for our AAA-rated and agency interest-only,
residual and principal-only securities. Upon the adoption of
SFAS 156, we no longer have to designate SFAS 133
hedges for our MSRs.
F-35
Indymac recognizes ineffective changes in hedge values resulting
from designated SFAS 133 hedges discussed above in the same
income statement captions as effective changes when such
ineffectiveness occurs. Indymac recognized (losses) gains
totaling $(3.0) million, $(1.2) million, and
$0.9 million of ineffectiveness in earnings, respectively,
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
We had the following derivative financial instruments as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
|
Amounts
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Dates
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments
|
|
$
|
8,181,111
|
|
|
$
|
(9,751
|
)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Forward agency and loan sales
|
|
|
5,076,325
|
|
|
|
4,562
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Eurodollar futures contracts
|
|
|
25,524,000
|
|
|
|
7,813
|
|
|
|
2007-2011
|
|
Mortgage servicing and other
servicing-related assets hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps (LIBOR/ Swaps)
|
|
|
454,218
|
|
|
|
2,918
|
|
|
|
2007-2011
|
|
Forward agency and loan sales
|
|
|
1,115,000
|
|
|
|
(4,938
|
)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Forward rate agreements
|
|
|
26,000,000
|
|
|
|
8,355
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Eurodollar futures contracts
|
|
|
16,455,000
|
|
|
|
2,460
|
|
|
|
2007-2010
|
|
Interest rate swaps (LIBOR)
|
|
|
16,105,316
|
|
|
|
17,453
|
|
|
|
2007-2036
|
|
Interest rate swaptions (LIBOR)
|
|
|
4,780,000
|
|
|
|
165,212
|
|
|
|
2007-2011
|
|
Borrowings and advances hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps (LIBOR/Swaps)
|
|
|
40,822
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Interest rate swaps (LIBOR)
|
|
|
1,943,476
|
|
|
|
21,054
|
|
|
|
2007-2016
|
|
Interest rate swaptions (LIBOR)
|
|
|
745,000
|
|
|
|
3,623
|
|
|
|
2007-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
106,420,268
|
|
|
$
|
218,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate lock commitments
|
|
$
|
6,226,279
|
|
|
$
|
6,110
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Forward agency and loan sales
|
|
|
3,123,172
|
|
|
|
(10,502
|
)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Eurodollar futures contracts
|
|
|
18,608,000
|
|
|
|
(2,352
|
)
|
|
|
2006-2010
|
|
Mortgage servicing and other
servicing-related assets hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps (LIBOR/ Swaps)
|
|
|
1,096,279
|
|
|
|
30,753
|
|
|
|
2006-2007
|
|
Eurodollar futures contracts
|
|
|
11,435,000
|
|
|
|
3,879
|
|
|
|
2006-2010
|
|
Interest rate swaps (LIBOR)
|
|
|
5,453,703
|
|
|
|
(30,622
|
)
|
|
|
2006-2025
|
|
Interest rate swaptions (LIBOR)
|
|
|
2,445,000
|
|
|
|
80,598
|
|
|
|
2006-2010
|
|
Borrowings and advances hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps (LIBOR)
|
|
|
39,022
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Interest rate swaps (LIBOR)
|
|
|
3,693,274
|
|
|
|
58,549
|
|
|
|
2006-2010
|
|
Interest rate swaptions (LIBOR)
|
|
|
1,945,000
|
|
|
|
11,921
|
|
|
|
2006-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
54,064,729
|
|
|
$
|
148,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While we do not anticipate nonperformance by the counterparties,
we manage credit risk with respect to such financial instruments
by entering into agreements with entities (including their
subsidiaries) approved by a committee of the Board of Directors
and with a long term credit rating of “A” or better.
For certain counterparties, we do receive margin deposits (cash
collateral) to support the financial instruments with these
approved entities.
F-36
NOTE 16 —
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair value estimates were determined for existing balance sheet
and off-balance sheet financial instruments, including
derivative instruments, without attempting to estimate the value
of certain assets and liabilities that are not considered
financial instruments. Significant assets that are not
considered financial instruments under SFAS No. 107,
“Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments,” include MSRs, foreclosed assets, fixed
assets, goodwill and intangible assets.
The estimated fair value amounts of our financial instruments
have been determined using available market information and
valuation methods that we believe are appropriate under the
circumstances. These estimates are inherently subjective in
nature and involve matters of significant uncertainty and
judgment to interpret relevant market and other data. The use of
different market assumptions
and/or
estimation methods may have a material effect on the estimated
fair value amounts.
The following table presents the estimated fair values of the
various classes of financial instruments we held as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
541,725
|
|
|
$
|
541,725
|
|
|
$
|
442,525
|
|
|
$
|
442,525
|
|
Securities classified as trading
|
|
|
542,731
|
|
|
|
542,731
|
|
|
|
348,962
|
|
|
|
348,962
|
|
Securities classified as available
for sale
|
|
|
4,900,514
|
|
|
|
4,900,514
|
|
|
|
3,753,195
|
|
|
|
3,753,195
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
9,467,843
|
|
|
|
9,565,821
|
|
|
|
6,024,184
|
|
|
|
6,056,904
|
|
Loans held for investment
|
|
|
10,114,823
|
|
|
|
10,184,055
|
|
|
|
8,223,201
|
|
|
|
8,201,674
|
|
Investment in FHLB stock
|
|
|
762,054
|
|
|
|
762,054
|
|
|
|
556,262
|
|
|
|
556,262
|
|
Financial
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
10,898,006
|
|
|
|
10,673,718
|
|
|
|
7,671,924
|
|
|
|
7,563,494
|
|
Advances from the FHLB
|
|
|
10,412,800
|
|
|
|
10,409,767
|
|
|
|
6,953,000
|
|
|
|
6,966,946
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
4,637,000
|
|
|
|
4,679,943
|
|
|
|
4,367,270
|
|
|
|
4,458,872
|
|
Derivative Financial
Instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to purchase and
originate loans
|
|
|
(9,751
|
)
|
|
|
(9,751
|
)
|
|
|
6,110
|
|
|
|
6,110
|
|
Commitments to sell loans and
securities
|
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
|
(10,502
|
)
|
|
|
(10,502
|
)
|
Forward rate agreements
|
|
|
8,355
|
|
|
|
8,355
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
38,507
|
|
|
|
38,507
|
|
|
|
27,927
|
|
|
|
27,927
|
|
Interest rate swaptions
|
|
|
168,835
|
|
|
|
168,835
|
|
|
|
92,519
|
|
|
|
92,519
|
|
Interest rate caps, floors,
flooridors and futures
|
|
|
13,409
|
|
|
|
13,409
|
|
|
|
32,698
|
|
|
|
32,698
|
|
The following describes the methods and assumptions we use in
estimating fair values:
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Carrying amount
represents fair value.
Mortgage-Backed Securities Classified as Trading or Available
for Sale. Carrying amount represents fair value.
Fair value is estimated using quoted market prices or by
discounting future cash flows using assumptions for prepayment
rates, market yield requirements and credit losses.
Loans Held for Sale. The fair value of loans
held for sale is estimated primarily based on quoted market
prices for securities backed by loans with similar coupons,
maturities and credit quality.
Loans Held for Investment. Fair value is
estimated using quoted market prices or by discounting future
cash flows using assumptions for prepayment rates, market yield
requirements and credit losses.
F-37
Investment in FHLB Stock. The carrying amount
represents the fair value. FHLB stock does not have a readily
determinable fair value, but can be sold back to the FHLB at its
par value with stated notice.
Deposits. The fair value of time deposits and
transaction accounts is determined using a cash flow analysis.
The discount rate for time deposits is derived from the rate
currently offered on alternate funding sources with similar
maturities. The discount rate for transaction accounts is
derived from a forward LIBOR curve plus a spread. Core deposit
intangibles are included in the valuation.
Advances from FHLB. The fair value of advances
from FHLB is valued using a cash flow analysis. The discount
rate is derived from the rate currently offered on similar
borrowings.
Other Borrowings. Fair values are determined
by estimating future cash flows and discounting them using
interest rates currently available to us on similar borrowings.
Commitments to Purchase and Originate
Loans. Fair value is estimated based upon the
difference between the current value of similar loans and the
price at which we have committed to purchase or originate the
loans, subject to the anticipated loan funding probability, or
fallout factor. With the adoption of SAB 105, the fair
value as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 does not include the
fair value of the rate lock commitments represents the amount of
change in value since the inception of the commitments and does
not include initial value inherent at origination.
Commitments to Sell Loans and Securities. We
utilize forward commitments to hedge interest rate risk
associated with loans held for sale and commitments to purchase
loans. Fair value of these commitments is determined based upon
the difference between the settlement values of the commitments
and the quoted market values of the securities.
Forward Rate Agreements, Interest Rate Swaps, Swaptions,
Caps, Floors, Flooridors, Futures, and Put
Options. Valuing forward rate agreements involves
forecasting forward mortgage and swap yields using current
interest rates and comparing the value of each instrument versus
market pricing indications. Fair value for the caps, floors,
flooridors, and put options is estimated based upon specific
characteristics of the option being valued, such as the
underlying index, strike rate, and time to expiration, along
with quoted market levels of implied volatility for similar
instruments. Interest rate and Eurodollar futures are traded on
the Chicago Board of Trade and market pricing is readily
available and continuously quoted on systems such as Bloomberg.
Fair value for swap and swaption agreements is estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses based on expectations of rates
over the life of the swap or swaption as implied by the forward
swap curve.
Further, we have identified: 1) intermediate term fixed
rate or ARM loans that are subject to future payment increases,
2) pay option ARM loans that permit negative amortization,
and 3) loans with combined
loan-to-value
ratios above 80%, underlying our assets whose contractual terms
may give rise to a concentration of credit risk and increase our
exposures to risk of nonpayment or realization.
F-38
The following table details the unpaid principal balance of
these loans at December 31, 2006 and the related asset
carrying value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HFI SFR Mortgage Loans
|
|
|
Mortgage Servicing Rights
|
|
|
Non-Investment Grade Securities
|
|
|
Non-Investment Grade Residuals
|
|
|
|
UPB of
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
UPB of
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
UPB of
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
UPB of
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid, Option ARM, and All
Other ARM Loans:
|
Hybrid 3/1
|
|
$
|
528,922
|
|
|
|
8.22
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,907,089
|
|
|
|
3.85
|
%
|
|
$
|
317,571
|
|
|
|
4.93
|
%
|
|
$
|
359,665
|
|
|
|
3.03
|
%
|
Hybrid 5/1
|
|
|
2,707,109
|
|
|
|
42.09
|
%
|
|
|
20,776,827
|
|
|
|
16.29
|
%
|
|
|
746,191
|
|
|
|
11.58
|
%
|
|
|
154,176
|
|
|
|
1.30
|
%
|
Hybrid 7/1
|
|
|
603,107
|
|
|
|
9.38
|
%
|
|
|
4,551,653
|
|
|
|
3.57
|
%
|
|
|
29,622
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
%
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
Hybrid
10/1
|
|
|
527,935
|
|
|
|
8.21
|
%
|
|
|
7,451,006
|
|
|
|
5.84
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Option ARMs
|
|
|
1,162,351
|
|
|
|
18.07
|
%
|
|
|
32,543,641
|
|
|
|
25.52
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
All Other ARMs
|
|
|
581,589
|
|
|
|
9.04
|
%
|
|
|
5,744,309
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
|
|
1,569,767
|
|
|
|
24.37
|
%
|
|
|
4,176,175
|
|
|
|
35.18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,111,013
|
|
|
|
95.01
|
%
|
|
$
|
75,974,525
|
|
|
|
59.58
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,663,151
|
|
|
|
41.34
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,691,793
|
|
|
|
39.52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans with Original Combined
Loan-to-Value
(“CLTV”) Ratios Above 80%:
|
>80% − =90%
|
|
$
|
314,584
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
%
|
|
$
|
20,714,751
|
|
|
|
16.25
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,631,902
|
|
|
|
25.33
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,046,204
|
|
|
|
25.66
|
%
|
>90% − =100%
|
|
|
233,960
|
|
|
|
3.64
|
%
|
|
|
28,242,859
|
|
|
|
22.14
|
%
|
|
|
1,080,113
|
|
|
|
16.77
|
%
|
|
|
2,574,217
|
|
|
|
21.68
|
%
|
>100%
|
|
|
2,409
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
%
|
|
|
23,609
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
3,656
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
%
|
|
|
4,871
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
550,953
|
|
|
|
8.57
|
%
|
|
$
|
48,981,219
|
|
|
|
38.41
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,715,671
|
|
|
|
42.16
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,625,292
|
|
|
|
47.38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Underlying Single Family
Residential Mortgage Loans and HELOCs:
|
Collateral
|
|
$
|
6,431,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
127,513,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,441,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,872,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
6,519,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,712,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
80,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
250,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our mortgage servicing rights, related to reverse mortgages of
$110.2 million with underlying collateral of
$12.3 billion at December 31, 2006, were not included
in the table above as these loans do not represent significant
risk of nonpayment.
NOTE 17 —
EXPENSES
A summary of expenses follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Salaries and related
|
|
$
|
689,742
|
|
|
$
|
552,550
|
|
|
$
|
398,755
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
79,102
|
|
|
|
55,424
|
|
|
|
43,594
|
|
Loan purchase and servicing costs
|
|
|
55,055
|
|
|
|
42,739
|
|
|
|
38,137
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
35,838
|
|
|
|
29,237
|
|
|
|
25,838
|
|
Data processing
|
|
|
64,826
|
|
|
|
45,341
|
|
|
|
36,208
|
|
Office and related
|
|
|
68,730
|
|
|
|
50,891
|
|
|
|
34,234
|
|
Advertising and promotion
|
|
|
44,369
|
|
|
|
44,959
|
|
|
|
43,488
|
|
Operations and sale of foreclosed
assets
|
|
|
3,958
|
|
|
|
2,364
|
|
|
|
6,691
|
|
Litigation settlement
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13,586
|
|
|
|
10,391
|
|
|
|
10,413
|
|
Deferral of expenses under
SFAS 91
|
|
|
(266,246
|
)
|
|
|
(224,399
|
)
|
|
|
(154,852
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
788,960
|
|
|
|
618,497
|
|
|
|
482,506
|
|
Amortization of other intangible
assets
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
$
|
790,083
|
|
|
$
|
619,088
|
|
|
$
|
483,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-39
NOTE 18 —
INCOME TAXES
The income tax provision for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2005 and 2004 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Current tax (benefit)
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(35,016
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,654
|
|
|
$
|
38,485
|
|
State
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
6,966
|
|
|
|
10,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(32,548
|
)
|
|
|
25,620
|
|
|
|
48,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
219,174
|
|
|
|
139,312
|
|
|
|
48,713
|
|
State
|
|
|
25,941
|
|
|
|
27,057
|
|
|
|
8,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax expense
|
|
|
245,115
|
|
|
|
166,369
|
|
|
|
57,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
$
|
212,567
|
|
|
$
|
191,989
|
|
|
$
|
105,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax effect of temporary differences that gave rise to
significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
24,990
|
|
|
$
|
22,510
|
|
State taxes
|
|
|
33,403
|
|
|
|
21,777
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
22,469
|
|
|
|
21,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
80,862
|
|
|
|
65,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSRs and mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
(678,264
|
)
|
|
|
(410,294
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(10,870
|
)
|
|
|
(22,202
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(689,134
|
)
|
|
|
(432,496
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability, net
|
|
$
|
(608,272
|
)
|
|
$
|
(366,509
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, the Company had a net operating
loss (“NOL”) carryforward of $110 million for
state income tax purposes. The NOL carryforward has various
expirations ranging five to 20 years through the year 2027.
The effective income tax rate differed from the federal
statutory rate for 2006 and 2005 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Federal statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of federal
tax effect
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
Other items, net
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
38.3
|
%
|
|
|
39.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rate on earnings for the year ended
December 31, 2006 decreased to 39.1% from the 39.5% for the
year ended December 31, 2005. The decline was due to a
lower blended state tax rate as the Company further expanded
geographically into states with lower tax rates. The effect of
the decline on the net deferred tax liability further reduced
the effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2006
to 38.3 %.
F-40
NOTE 19 —
EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and
denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per share
calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Average Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings
|
|
$
|
342,929
|
|
|
|
67,701
|
|
|
$
|
5.07
|
|
Effect of options, restricted
stocks and warrants
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,417
|
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings
|
|
$
|
342,929
|
|
|
|
71,118
|
|
|
$
|
4.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings
|
|
$
|
293,128
|
|
|
|
62,760
|
|
|
$
|
4.67
|
|
Effect of options and restricted
stocks
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,355
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings
|
|
$
|
293,128
|
|
|
|
66,115
|
|
|
$
|
4.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings
|
|
$
|
162,065
|
|
|
|
59,513
|
|
|
$
|
2.72
|
|
Effect of options and restricted
stocks
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings
|
|
$
|
162,065
|
|
|
|
62,010
|
|
|
$
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2001, we issued 3,500,000 warrants, each
convertible into 1.5972 shares of Indymac Bancorp’s
common stock, as part of the WIRES offering (described more in
detail in Note 12 — Other Borrowings). At
December 31, 2006, 935,636 warrants remained outstanding at
an average exercise price of $31.68 per share. These
outstanding warrants were included in our 2006, 2005 and 2004
dilutive earnings per share calculation.
Options to purchase 56,100 shares of common stock at
weighted average exercise price of $44.86 were outstanding at
December 31, 2006. These options were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share because the
options’ exercise prices were greater than the average
market price of the common stock and, therefore, the effect
would be antidilutive.
NOTE 20 —
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
The following table presents the ending balance in accumulated
other comprehensive loss for each component:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss on
mortgage-backed securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA-rated agency securities
|
|
$
|
(387
|
)
|
|
$
|
(141
|
)
|
|
$
|
(84
|
)
|
AAA-rated non-agency securities
|
|
|
(18,595
|
)
|
|
|
(26,219
|
)
|
|
|
(11,754
|
)
|
Other investment and
non-investment grade securities
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
|
|
4,191
|
|
Residual securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss on
mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
|
|
(18,459
|
)
|
|
|
(24,380
|
)
|
|
|
(7,647
|
)
|
Net unrealized (loss) gain on
derivatives used in cash flow hedges
|
|
|
(6,812
|
)
|
|
|
9,223
|
|
|
|
(12,657
|
)
|
Adjustment to initially apply
SFAS 158, net of tax
|
|
|
(6,168
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(31,439
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,304
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-41
The following table presents the changes to other comprehensive
loss and the related tax effect for each component:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on
mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
9,987
|
|
|
$
|
(27,658
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,708
|
)
|
Related tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(4,066
|
)
|
|
|
10,925
|
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
Net (loss) gain on derivatives
used in cash flow hedges
|
|
|
(26,430
|
)
|
|
|
36,165
|
|
|
|
13,873
|
|
Related tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
10,395
|
|
|
|
(14,285
|
)
|
|
|
(5,480
|
)
|
Adjustment to initially apply
SFAS 158
|
|
|
(10,128
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Related tax benefit
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change to accumulated other
comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(16,282
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,147
|
|
|
$
|
6,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 21 —
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal
Matters
In the ordinary course of business, the Company and its
subsidiaries are defendants in or parties to a number of legal
actions. Certain of such actions involve alleged violations of
employment laws, unfair trade practices, consumer protection
laws, including claims relating to the Company’s sales,
loan origination and collection efforts, and other federal and
state banking laws. Certain of such actions include claims for
breach of contract, restitution, compensatory damages, punitive
damages and other forms of relief. The Company reviews these
actions on an on-going basis and follows the provisions of
SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for
Contingencies” when making accrual and disclosure
decisions. When assessing reasonably possible and probable
outcomes, the Company bases its decisions on the evidence
discovered and in its possession, the strength of probable
witness testimony, the viability of its defenses and the
likelihood of prevailing at trial or resolving the matter
through alternative dispute resolution. Due to the difficulty of
predicting the outcome of such actions, the Company can give no
assurance that it will prevail on all claims made against it;
however, management believes, based on current knowledge and
after consultation with counsel, that these legal actions,
individually and in the aggregate, and the losses, if any,
resulting from the likely final outcome thereof, will not have a
material adverse effect on the Company and its
subsidiaries’ financial position, but may have a material
impact on the results of operations of particular periods.
Commitments
We enter into a number of commitments in the normal course of
business. These commitments expose us to varying degrees of
credit and market risk and are subject to the same credit and
risk limitation reviews as those recorded on the consolidated
balance sheets. The following types of non-derivative
commitments were outstanding at years ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Undisbursed loan
commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reverse Mortgages
|
|
$
|
426,977
|
|
|
$
|
109,896
|
|
Builder construction
|
|
|
858,525
|
|
|
|
923,993
|
|
Consumer construction
|
|
|
1,317,346
|
|
|
|
1,346,415
|
|
HELOC
|
|
|
1,582,748
|
|
|
|
731,395
|
|
Revolving warehouse lending
|
|
|
465,222
|
|
|
|
152,384
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
$
|
14,042
|
|
|
$
|
16,078
|
|
Indymac Bank notifies trustees of certain securitization trusts
when we intend to exercise our
clean-up
call rights. A
clean-up
call right is an option we retain when we securitize our loans
and retain the related servicing rights. This option allows us
to purchase the remaining loans from the securitization trusts
if the amount of
F-42
outstanding loans falls to a specified level, generally 10% of
the original securitized loan pool balance. At this level, the
costs of servicing these loans exceeds the economic benefit of
servicing the loans. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, there
were no loan purchase commitments under our
clean-up
call rights. Indymac Bank exercises its
clean-up
call rights based on management’s assessment of the
economic benefits and costs associated with such transactions.
In 2002, the Company entered into agreements with two mortgage
insurance companies to reimburse those companies for any losses
incurred on certain portfolios of single-family mortgage loans.
The total single-family mortgage loans covered by these
agreements was $13.0 million and $20.0 million as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
Company’s obligations under these agreements are accounted
for in the secondary marketing reserve, which is included in
other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The
Company paid total reimbursements, net of premiums received from
borrowers, of $0.1 million and $0.9 million in 2006
and 2005, respectively, related to these agreements.
Our Homebuilder Division issues standby letters of credit to
municipalities to guarantee the performance of improvements
related to tract construction projects. The risk of loss on the
standby letters of credit is mitigated by the fact that the
funds to complete the improvements are included in the
construction loan balance and supported by the underlying
collateral value. We have not incurred any loss on these standby
letters of credit since the inception of this practice.
Leases
We lease office facilities and equipment under lease agreements
extending through 2016. Future minimum annual rental commitments
under these non-cancelable operating leases, with initial or
remaining terms of one year or more, are as follows for the
years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in
|
|
|
|
thousands)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
36,119
|
|
2008
|
|
|
33,107
|
|
2009
|
|
|
29,467
|
|
2010
|
|
|
22,505
|
|
2011
|
|
|
17,842
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
43,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
182,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sublease rental income totaling $3.3 million reduced the
above rental commitments. Rental expense, net of sublease
income, for all operating leases was $33.5 million,
$22.0 million, and $15.3 million, in 2006, 2005, and
2004, respectively.
NOTE 22 —
RELATED PARTY LOANS
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had $1.7 million and
$2.0 million, respectively, in notes receivable from our
employees. There were no such loans outstanding with directors.
These loans have varying interest rates and terms and were
mostly secured by Indymac stock or real estate.
NOTE 23 —
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
Federal Reserve Board regulations require depository
institutions to maintain certain deposit reserve balances. One
of our subsidiaries, Indymac Bank, is a depository institution
required to maintain deposit reserves under the Federal Reserve
Board regulations. At December 31, 2006, Indymac
Bank’s deposit reserve balance of $16.8 million,
included in cash and cash equivalents on the consolidated
balance sheets, met the required level.
Indymac Bank’s primary federal regulatory agency, the
Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”), requires savings
associations to satisfy three minimum capital ratio
requirements: tangible capital, Tier 1 core (leverage)
capital and risk-based capital. To meet general minimum
adequately capitalized requirements, a savings association must
maintain a tangible capital ratio of 1.5%, a Tier 1 core
capital ratio of 3% for strong rated associations that are not
anticipating or experiencing significant growth and have
well-diversified risks, including no undue interest rate
F-43
exposure, excellent asset quality, high liquidity, and good
earnings, and 4% for others, and a risk-based capital ratio of
8%. Most associations are expected to maintain capital levels in
excess of the above-mentioned capital levels. The OTS
regulations also specify minimum requirements to be considered a
“well-capitalized institution.” A
“well-capitalized” savings association must have a
total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater and a leverage
ratio of 5% or greater. Additionally, to qualify as a
“well-capitalized institution,” a savings
association’s Tier 1 risk-based capital must be equal
to at least 6% of risk-weighted assets. In order not to be
deemed “critically undercapitalized” and therefore
subject to immediate remedial action, a savings association must
maintain a tangible equity to tangible assets ratio of 2%. As of
December 31, 2006, Indymac Bank met all of the requirements
of a “well-capitalized” institution under the general
regulatory capital regulations. However, the characterization of
Indymac Bank as “well-capitalized” by the OTS is for
“prompt corrective action” purposes only and does not
necessarily characterize Indymac Bank’s financial condition.
The Company’s business is primarily focused on
single-family lending and the related production and sale of
loans. As such, the accumulation of MSRs is a large component of
our strategy. As of December 31, 2006, the capitalized
value of MSRs was $1.8 billion. OTS regulations generally
impose higher capital requirements on MSRs that exceed total
Tier 1 capital. These higher capital requirements could
result in lowered returns on our retained assets and could limit
our ability to retain servicing assets. We have flexibility to
sell or retain MSRs and the ability to increase our capital base
through retention of earnings and other capital raising
activities. While management believes that compliance with the
capital limits on MSRs will not materially impact future
results, no assurance can be given that our plans and strategies
will be successful.
The OTS issued guidance for subprime lending programs which
requires a lender to quantify the additional risks in its
subprime lending activities and determine the appropriate
amounts of allowances for loan losses and capital it needs to
offset those risks. The Company generally classifies all non-GSE
loans in a first lien position with a FICO score less than 620
and all non-GSE loans in a second lien position with a FICO
score less than 660 as subprime. We report our subprime loan
calculation in an addendum to the Thrift Financial Report that
we file with the OTS. Subprime loans held for investment and
subprime loans held for sale which are either delinquent or more
than 90 days old since origination are supported by capital
two times that of similar prime loans. These subprime loans
totaled $101.6 million at December 31, 2006. The
impact of the additional risk- weighting criteria related to
subprime loans had the effect of reducing Indymac’s total
risk-based capital by 5 basis points.
In December 2006, the federal bank and thrift regulatory
agencies issued an interim decision that any amounts reported in
AOCI resulting from the adoption of SFAS 158 should be
excluded from regulatory capital until the regulatory agencies
determine otherwise. As a result, $4.9 million in AOCI was
excluded from our regulatory capital.
F-44
The following presents Indymac Bank’s actual and required
capital ratios and the minimum required capital ratios to be
categorized as “well-capitalized” at December 31,
2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Ratios
|
|
|
|
Tangible
|
|
|
Tier 1 Core
|
|
|
Tier 1 Risk-based
|
|
|
Total Risk-Based
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported pre-subprime
risk-weighting
|
|
|
7.39
|
%
|
|
|
7.39
|
%
|
|
|
11.40
|
%
|
|
|
11.77
|
%
|
Adjusted for additional subprime
risk weighting
|
|
|
7.39
|
%
|
|
|
7.39
|
%
|
|
|
11.35
|
%
|
|
|
11.72
|
%
|
Well-capitalized minimum
|
|
|
2.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Excess over well-capitalized
minimum requirement
|
|
$
|
1,533,111
|
|
|
$
|
679,311
|
|
|
$
|
872,953
|
|
|
$
|
280,645
|
|
December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported pre-subprime
risk-weighting
|
|
|
8.21
|
%
|
|
|
8.21
|
%
|
|
|
12.08
|
%
|
|
|
12.50
|
%
|
Adjusted for additional subprime
risk weighting
|
|
|
8.21
|
%
|
|
|
8.21
|
%
|
|
|
11.78
|
%
|
|
|
12.20
|
%
|
Well-capitalized minimum
|
|
|
2.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Excess over well-capitalized
minimum requirement
|
|
$
|
1,256,885
|
|
|
$
|
649,211
|
|
|
$
|
736,281
|
|
|
$
|
279,460
|
|
Under the capital distribution regulations, a savings
association that is a subsidiary of a savings and loan holding
company must notify the OTS of an association capital
distribution at least 30 days prior to the declaration of a
dividend or the approval by the Board of Directors of the
proposed capital distribution. The
30-day
period provides the OTS an opportunity to object to the proposed
distribution if it believes that the distribution would not be
advisable.
An application to the OTS for specific approval to pay a
dividend, rather than the notice procedure described above, is
required if: (a) the total of all capital distributions
made during a calendar year (including the proposed
distribution) exceeds the sum of the institution’s
year-to-date
net income and its retained income for the preceding two years;
(b) the institution is not entitled under OTS regulations
to “expedited treatment” (which is generally available
to institutions the OTS regards as well run and adequately
capitalized); (c) the institution would not be at least
“adequately capitalized” following the proposed
capital distribution; or, (d) the distribution would
violate an applicable statute, regulation, agreement, or
condition imposed on the institution by the OTS.
In addition to applicable OTS regulatory requirements, Indymac
Bank is required to maintain compliance with various servicing
covenants such as a minimum net worth requirement. Management
believes Indymac Bank was in compliance with all material
financial covenants as of December 31, 2006 and 2005.
NOTE 24 —
BENEFIT PLANS
Stock
Incentive Plans
The Company has two stock incentive plans, the 2002 Incentive
Plan, as amended and restated, and the 2000 Stock Incentive
Plan, as amended (collectively, the “Plans”), which
provide for the granting of non-qualified and incentive stock
options, restricted and performance stock awards, and other
awards to employees (including officers) and directors. On
April 25, 2006, the 2002 Incentive Plan, as amended and
restated, was approved by shareholders to increase the total
number of shares of common stock reserved and available for
issuance from 6,000,000 to 11,200,000. Each share issued
pursuant to a full value award (such as restricted stock) will
reduce the number of shares of common stock available for future
grant by 3.5 shares. The term of options granted under the
2002 Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was reduced from ten
years to seven years, and the Company is no longer able to grant
stock appreciation rights, bonus stock, stock units, performance
shares or performance units under the Plan.
Options granted under the Plans have an exercise price equal to
the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date
of grant, and generally vest based on one, three or five years
of continuous service. Grants issued after April 25, 2006
will expire in seven years from the grant date, while grants
issued prior to April 25, 2006
F-45
continue to have a ten-year term. Certain option and share
awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in
control (as defined in the Plans).
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for the
Plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB
No. 25 and related Interpretations, as permitted by
SFAS 123. No stock option compensation cost was recognized
in the Statement of Earnings as all options granted had an
exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying
common stock on the grant date.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair
value recognition provisions of SFAS 123(R) using the
modified-retrospective-transition method. Under this method,
compensation cost recognized for 2006 includes compensation cost
for all options granted prior to, but not yet vested as of
January 1, 2006, and all options granted subsequent to
January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the provisions of
Statements 123 and 123(R), respectively.
The Company’s income before income taxes and net income for
the year ended December 31, 2006 included stock option
compensation cost of $9.6 million and $6.0 million,
respectively, which represented $0.09 and $0.08 impact on both
basic and dilutive earnings per share, respectively. The
Company’s net income for the years ended December 31,
2005 and 2004 have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect
pre-tax stock option compensation cost of $12.1 million and
$14.0 million, respectively. The retrospectively adjusted
dilutive earnings per share for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 were $4.43 and $2.61,
respectively.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of
grant. For grants issued on and after January 1, 2006, the
fair value is determined using an enhanced binomial lattice
model. For options granted prior to January 1, 2006, the
fair value of these awards was based on the fair value
calculated for purposes of the SFAS 123 pro-forma
disclosures which used the Black Scholes option pricing model.
The assumptions used in the valuations for options granted
during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
28.11-28.44
|
%
|
|
|
25.96%-29.42
|
%
|
|
|
28.80-31.31
|
%
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
4.00-4.60
|
%
|
|
|
3.52-4.65
|
%
|
|
|
2.83-4.17
|
%
|
Weighted average expected term (in
years)
|
|
|
6.89-7.34
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Risk-free rate
|
|
|
4.54-4.73
|
%
|
|
|
4.16-4.64
|
%
|
|
|
3.75-4.51
|
%
|
Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of
the Company’s common stock and other factors. For the Black
Scholes valuation model, the expected term of the options is
estimated based on historical option exercise activity. For the
enhanced binomial valuation model, the Company uses historical
data to estimate assumptions for expected option exercise and
expected employee termination rates. The expected term of
options granted is derived from the output of the binomial model
and represents the period of time that options granted are
expected to be outstanding. The range given above results from
certain groups of employees exhibiting different behavior. The
risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the
option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect
at the time of grant.
Option activity under the Plans as of December 31, 2006 and
activity for the year then ended follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
Options:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Options outstanding at
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
7,851,820
|
|
|
$
|
24.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
788,140
|
|
|
|
39.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(854,905
|
)
|
|
|
23.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options canceled, forfeited and
expired
|
|
|
(81,850
|
)
|
|
|
36.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
7,703,205
|
|
|
$
|
26.31
|
|
|
|
5.73
|
|
|
$
|
58,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
6,034,693
|
|
|
$
|
23.70
|
|
|
|
5.01
|
|
|
$
|
44,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-46
The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted
during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
were $9.13, $7.68 and $8.35, respectively. For the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the total fair value of
options exercised was $5.7 million, $10.9 million and
$9.0 million, respectively.
The status of the Company’s nonvested shares as of
December 31, 2006 and changes during the year then ended
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Nonvested Options:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
2,660,324
|
|
|
$
|
7.54
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
788,140
|
|
|
|
9.13
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(1,701,246
|
)
|
|
|
7.53
|
|
Canceled, forfeited and expired
|
|
|
(78,706
|
)
|
|
|
8.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,668,512
|
|
|
$
|
8.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, there was $8.5 million of
total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated
forfeitures, related to nonvested options under the Plans. That
cost is expected to be recognized in less than three years. The
total fair value of shares vested during the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, were $12.8 million,
$14.3 million and $13.3 million, respectively.
Cash received from options exercised under the Plans for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was
$20.1 million, $31.5 million and $28.1 million,
respectively. The actual tax benefit for the tax deductions from
option exercises totaled $6.6 million, $15.7 million
and $11.9 million, respectively, for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. To the extent the tax
deductions exceed the amount previously expensed for financial
accounting purposes, the related tax benefit on the excess is
credited to equity, but only if that benefit can be realized
currently.
The Company recorded compensation cost of $10.1 million,
$5.6 million and $2.9 million related to the
restricted stock granted under the Plans for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Restricted stock activity under the Plans as of
December 31, 2006 and changes during the year then ended
follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Restricted Stock:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
582,401
|
|
|
$
|
32.59
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
554,189
|
|
|
|
41.09
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(170,175
|
)
|
|
|
24.20
|
|
Canceled and forfeited
|
|
|
(77,298
|
)
|
|
|
38.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
889,117
|
|
|
$
|
39.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
Plan and Other Postretirement Benefit Plan
Through December 31, 2002, we provided a defined benefit
pension plan (the “DBP Plan”) to substantially all of
our employees. Employees hired prior to January 1, 2003,
with one or more years of service, are entitled to annual
pension benefits beginning at normal retirement age
(65 years of age) equal to a formula approximating 0.9% of
final average compensation multiplied by credited service (not
in excess of 35 years), subject to a vesting requirement of
five years of service. Our policy is to contribute the amount
actuarially determined to be necessary to pay the benefits under
the DBP Plan, and in no event to pay less than the amount
necessary to meet the minimum funding standards of Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”).
Employees hired after December 31, 2002 are not eligible
for the DBP Plan.
Historically, Indymac has maintained a Director Emeritus Plan
(“DEP”), which provides certain retiring non-employee
directors with a benefit based upon length of service as a
director and the level of cash compensation for
F-47
the three prior years. Participating directors are prohibited
from competing with Bancorp or the Bank during the benefit
period. The projected benefit obligation and unfunded status for
the DEP was $2.1 million at December 31, 2006.
Included in AOCI at December 31, 2006 is unrecognized prior
service cost of $1.3 million. The estimated prior service
cost that will be amortized from other comprehensive income into
net periodic benefit cost during the year ending
December 31, 2007 will be $1.0 million.
The Company adopted SFAS 158 on December 31, 2006 and
the following table shows the incremental effect of applying the
provisions of SFAS 158 on individual line items in the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before application
|
|
|
|
|
|
After Application
|
|
|
|
of SFAS 158
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
of SFAS 158
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Accrued pension cost
|
|
$
|
3,802
|
|
|
$
|
8,061
|
|
|
$
|
11,863
|
|
Accrued postretirement cost
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,067
|
|
|
|
2,067
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
612,232
|
|
|
|
(3,960
|
)
|
|
|
608,272
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
27,460,880
|
|
|
|
6,168
|
|
|
|
27,467,048
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(25,271
|
)
|
|
|
(6,168
|
)
|
|
|
(31,439
|
)
|
Total Shareholders’ Equity
|
|
|
2,034,436
|
|
|
|
(6,168
|
)
|
|
|
2,028,268
|
|
The following table sets forth the change in the pension benefit
obligation, pension plan assets and accrued pension costs
recognized in the accompanying balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in benefit
obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation,
beginning of year
|
|
$
|
37,895
|
|
|
$
|
33,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
6,052
|
|
|
|
5,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid including expense
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
(3,614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation, end
of year
|
|
$
|
46,680
|
|
|
$
|
37,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation,
end of year
|
|
$
|
28,228
|
|
|
$
|
22,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets,
beginning of year
|
|
$
|
27,579
|
|
|
$
|
20,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
3,427
|
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
3,841
|
|
|
|
6,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid including expense
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, end of
year
|
|
$
|
34,817
|
|
|
$
|
27,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued pension costs
recognized in balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status, end of year
|
|
$
|
(11,863
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,316
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized prior service cost
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
8,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued pension cost
|
|
$
|
(11,863
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,069
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued pension cost is included in Other Liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheets.
F-48
The components of net periodic expense for the DBP Plan are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
6,052
|
|
|
$
|
5,946
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(2,212
|
)
|
|
|
(1,758
|
)
|
Recognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic expense
|
|
$
|
6,573
|
|
|
$
|
6,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in accumulated other comprehensive income at
December 31, 2006 are the following amounts that have not
been recognized in net periodic pension cost: unrecognized prior
service costs of $0.5 million and unrecognized actuarial
losses of $7.5 million. The estimated net actuarial loss
and prior service cost for the DBP Plan that will be
amortized from accumulated comprehensive income into net
periodic pension expense during the year ended December 31,
2007 are $203,000 and $56,000, respectively.
The weighted average assumptions used in computing the preceding
information as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Benefit obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
Net periodic costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
The DBP Plan’s weighted average asset allocation as of the
measurement date, by asset category, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Money market
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Bond and mortgage
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Large cap stock index
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The investment goals and the allocation of the plan assets are
determined jointly by the Employee Benefits Fiduciary Committee
and Principal Life Insurance Company, the investment manager of
the Plan. The assets of the DBP Plan are invested to provide
safety through diversification in a portfolio of equity
investments, common stocks, bonds and other investments which
may reflect varying rates of return. Only classes or categories
of investments allowed by the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) as acceptable
investment choices are considered. The overall return objective
for the portfolio is a reasonable rate on a long-term basis that
would balance the benefit obligations with the appropriate asset
allocation mix consistent with the risk levels established by
our Employee Benefits Fiduciary Committee.
During 2006 the Company contributed $3.8 million to the DBP
Plan for the 2005 plan year. We expect to make contributions of
$5.3 million in 2007 for the 2006 plan year. However, the
Company is evaluating strategic options to phase out the plan
which will reduce the amount of contributions.
F-49
The Company’s 2006 and 2005 pension expense was calculated
based upon a number of actuarial assumptions, including an
expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 7.5% for
both years. In developing the long-term rate of return
assumption, historical asset class returns as well as expected
returns were evaluated based upon broad equity and bond indices.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumes an
asset allocation of approximately 68% in equity and 32% in fixed
income financial instruments. The Employee Benefits Fiduciary
Committee regularly reviews the asset allocation with its plan
investment manager and periodically rebalances the investment
mix to achieve certain investment goals when considered
appropriate. Actuarial assumptions, including the expected rate
of return, are reviewed at least annually, and are adjusted as
necessary.
The discount rate that was utilized for determining our pension
obligation and net periodic cost was based on a review of
long-term bonds that received one of the two highest ratings
given by a recognized rating agency. The discount rate for our
pension obligation remained the same at 6.00% in 2006.
The following table indicates the benefits expected to be paid
in each of the next five fiscal years, and in the aggregate for
the five fiscal years thereafter:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
2008
|
|
|
224
|
|
2009
|
|
|
247
|
|
2010
|
|
|
340
|
|
2011
|
|
|
493
|
|
2012-2016
|
|
|
5,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined
Contribution Plan
We also offer a defined contribution plan (the “401(k)
Plan”) covering substantially all of our employees.
Employees with one full month of continuous service may
contribute up to 40% of annual compensation to a maximum of
$15,000 of pre-tax annual compensation in 2006. We may
determine, at our discretion, the amount of employer matching
contributions to be made. During 2006, 2005 and 2004, the
Company matched, for eligible participants following the
completion of one year of service, 75% of the first 3% of the
annual compensation contributed by the employee and 25% of the
second 3% of the annual compensation contributed by the employee
to the 401(k) Plan. We contributed a total of $8.4 million,
$6.3 million, and $4.6 million during the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The
employer matching contribution was made in cash.
NOTE 25 —
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN
Our Board of Directors adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan (the
“Rights Plan”) on October 17, 2001. The
Board’s purpose in adopting the Rights Plan is to protect
shareholder value in the event of an unsolicited offer to
acquire us, particularly one that does not provide equitable
treatment to all shareholders. In connection with the adoption
of the Rights Plan, we declared a distribution of one right to
purchase one one-hundredth of a share of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Shares (“Preferred Shares”)
for each outstanding share of common stock, payable to the
shareholders of record on November 1, 2001. These rights
automatically become associated with outstanding shares of
common stock on our books, and individual shareholders need take
no action with respect thereto. The rights will not become
exercisable unless an investor acquires 15 percent or more
of our common shares, or announces a tender offer that would
result in the investor owning 15 percent or more of our
common shares or makes certain regulatory filings seeking
authority to acquire 15 percent or more of our common
shares. If someone does acquire 15 percent or more of our
common shares, or acquires us in a merger or other transaction,
each right would entitle the holder, other than the investor
triggering the rights and related persons, to purchase common
shares, or shares of an entity that acquires us, at half of the
then current market price. The Board of Directors authorized and
directed the issuance of one right with respect to each common
share issued thereafter until the redemption date (as defined in
the Rights Agreement). The terms of the rights are set forth in
the Rights Agreement between us and the Bank of New York, as
Rights Agent, dated as of October 17, 2001. The rights will
expire at the close of business on October 17, 2011, unless
we redeem them earlier. The Preferred Shares have a par
F-50
value of $0.01 per share, are junior to all other series of
our preferred shares, and are entitled to quarterly dividends at
a rate equal to the dividends paid, if any, on 100 common
shares. Each one one-hundredth of a Preferred Share entitles the
holder to one vote on matters submitted to a vote of our
shareholders. The Rights Plan can be terminated or amended by
the Board at any time.
NOTE 26 —
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA — UNAUDITED
Selected quarterly financial data follows for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
377,846
|
|
|
$
|
412,211
|
|
|
$
|
446,751
|
|
|
$
|
514,208
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
250,636
|
|
|
|
282,057
|
|
|
|
310,040
|
|
|
|
381,562
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
127,210
|
|
|
|
130,154
|
|
|
|
136,711
|
|
|
|
132,646
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
3,822
|
|
|
|
2,230
|
|
|
|
4,988
|
|
|
|
8,953
|
|
Gain on sale of loans and
securities, net
|
|
|
138,584
|
|
|
|
209,917
|
|
|
|
179,193
|
|
|
|
160,842
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
79,849
|
|
|
|
104,659
|
|
|
|
86,180
|
|
|
|
72,241
|
|
Earnings per share(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
1.57
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.18
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
224,352
|
|
|
$
|
239,660
|
|
|
$
|
291,783
|
|
|
$
|
318,560
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
119,178
|
|
|
|
142,341
|
|
|
|
178,964
|
|
|
|
209,161
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
105,174
|
|
|
|
97,319
|
|
|
|
112,819
|
|
|
|
109,399
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
2,490
|
|
|
|
2,407
|
|
|
|
3,528
|
|
|
|
1,553
|
|
Gain on sale of loans and
securities, net
|
|
|
139,676
|
|
|
|
175,228
|
|
|
|
151,814
|
|
|
|
143,323
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
63,450
|
|
|
|
81,714
|
|
|
|
77,526
|
|
|
|
70,438
|
|
Earnings per share(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
1.16
|
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Earnings per share are computed independently for each of the
quarters presented. Therefore, the sum of the quarterly earnings
per share may not equal the total for the year. |
NOTE 27 —
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS — UNAUDITED
In January 2007, the Company has obtained an authorization from
the Indymac Bancorp Board of Directors to purchase an additional
$236.4 million of Indymac Bancorp common stock for a total
current authorization of up to $300 million (see
“Share Repurchase Activities” on page 15).
Additionally, the Indymac Bank Board of Directors has approved
the following capital raising initiatives: 1) issuing up to
$500 million in non-cumulative perpetual preferred
securities; and 2) issuing up to $200 million in
senior subordinated debt.
On February 7, 2007, the Company entered into a definitive
agreement with New York Mortgage Trust, Inc. (“NYMT”)
to purchase certain assets of the retail mortgage banking
platform of its wholly owned taxable REIT subsidiary, The New
York Mortgage Company, LLC (“NYMC”), for an estimated
purchase price of approximately $13.4 million, which
includes an $8 million premium to the net book value of
assets being acquired. NYMC is a $2 billion retail mortgage
origination business with 32 office locations primarily in New
York, New England and the Mid-Atlantic. The Company will
purchase substantially all of the operating assets related to
NYMC’s retail mortgage banking platform, including the use
The New York Mortgage Company name, and assume certain
liabilities of NYMC retail platform, including certain lease
liabilities and obligations under the pipeline of loan
applications. The Company will hire a majority of NYMC employees
and assume a portion of the retention and severance expenses
associated with the transaction. The transaction is subject to
customary closing requirements and is expected to close by
March 31, 2007, or earlier, subject to the clearance of any
required regulatory approvals.
F-51
DIRECTORS
Indymac Bancorp & Indymac Bank
|
|
|
|
|
*Michael W. Perry
Chairman &
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Patrick C. Haden
General Partner
Riordan, Lewis & Haden
Equity Investments
|
|
Lydia H. Kennard
Former Executive Director
Los Angeles World Airports
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louis E. Caldera
Professor of Law
University of New Mexico
|
|
Terrance G. Hodel
Former President &
Chief Operating Officer
North American Mortgage
Company
|
|
Senator John F. Seymour (ret.)
Former Chief Executive Officer
Southern California Housing
Development Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Lyle E. Gramley
Senior Economic Adviser
Stanford Washington Research
Group
|
|
Robert L. Hunt II
Former President &
Chief Operating Officer
Coast Savings Financial, Inc.
|
|
Bruce G. Willison
Former Dean &
Professor of Management
University of California
at Los Angeles,
Anderson School of Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hugh M. Grant
Retired Vice Chairman
Ernst & Young, LLP
|
|
|
|
|
Indymac Bank
|
|
|
|
|
Stuart A. Gabriel
Director & Lusk Chair in
Real Estate
University of Southern California
Lusk Center for Real Estate
|
|
Gabrielle E. Greene
General Partner
Rustic Canyon/Fontis Capital
|
|
*Richard H. Wohl
President
Indymac Bank
|
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
|
|
|
|
|
*Michael W. Perry
Chairman &
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
James A. Fraser
Executive Vice President
Chief Executive Officer
Consumer Construction Lending
|
|
*Raymond D. Matsumoto
Executive Vice President
Chief Technology Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Richard H. Wohl
President
Indymac Bank
|
|
*Gulshan Garg
Executive Vice President
Emerging Bank
|
|
Ruthann K. Melbourne
Executive Vice President
Chief Risk Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Keys
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Kenneth R. Horner
Executive Vice President
Chief Administrative Officer
|
|
*Michelle Minier
Executive Vice President
Chief Executive Officer
Financial Freedom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*S. Blair Abernathy
Executive Vice President
Chief Investment Officer
|
|
Terrence O. Hughes
Executive Vice President
General Counsel
|
|
Francisco Nebot
Executive Vice President
Director, Corporate Finance/
Treasurer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashwin Adarkar
Executive Vice President
Incubator and Mergers
& Acquisitions
|
|
*Patrick A. Hymel
Executive Vice President
Retained Assets
|
|
Grosvenor G. Nichols
Executive Vice President
Corporate Communications &
Culture
|
|
|
|
|
|
*James M. Banks
Executive Vice President
Conduit Division
|
|
R. Patterson Jackson III
Executive Vice President
Chief Executive Officer
Commercial Real Estate
|
|
John D. Olinski
Executive Vice President
Secondary Marketing &
Retained Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian N. Carter
Executive Vice President
Financial Planning and Management
Accounting
|
|
*James R. Mahoney
Chairman and Special Advisor
Financial Freedom
|
|
Frank M. Sillman
Executive Vice President
Chief Executive Officer
Indymac Mortgage Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Gary D. Clark
Executive Vice President
Chief Executive Officer
Home Equity Division
|
|
*Pamela K. Marsh
Executive Vice President
Office of the Chairman and CEO
|
|
Scott W. Van Dellen
Executive Vice President
Chief Executive Officer
Homebuilder Division
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anthony L. Ebers
Executive Vice President
Chief Executive Officer
Indymac Consumer Bank
|
|
Rayman K. Mathoda
Executive Vice President
Chief People Officer
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENTS
|
|
|
|
|
*Drew R. Buccino
Richard C. Lieber
*Mark A. Mozilo
|
|
Mark C. Nelson
*Joel M. Packer
|
|
Christopher Sherman
Jules Vogel
|
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Anwar Akram
Canise A. Arredondo
James L. Barbour
*Alpino Benedetti
*Jeffrey M. Birdsell
Gavin T. Brady
Yun-ni Chen
*Christina Ching
*Marianne Churney
Hugo J. Correa
Larry Crisp
Todd A. Elling
Boulton A. Fernando
Eric Friedman
Brent H. Frost
Gregory Garrabrants
Molly J. Graham
Samir Grover
David R. Hayes
*Etta M. Helm
Simon Heyrick
*David Hickey
|
|
Linda F. Hitchcock
Dan Hoppes
George Huffman
Janice Kay Huey
Christina M. Hunt-Fuhr
Timothy J. Hurley
Greg Ingino
Leonard Israel II
Barton Johnson
Kurt G. Johnson
Stenwyn A. Joseph
Darin P. Judis
Tim W. Koger
Timothy J. Landwehr
Rick Lieber
Steven M. Majerus
*Karen M. Mastro
*Susan E. McGovney
Robert A. Morse
Ludwig Munevar
Christopher T. Newkirk
*Sharad Nishith
|
|
Jim Novack
Christopher A. Pappalardo
*Barbara Perez
Mahesh Pratapneni
John A. Quan
John J. Reed
William Rothman
Jim Scanlan
Joel A. Schiffman
Steven Schwimmer
Andrew J. Sciandra
*Ramanupam Sen
Kenneth Shellem
Robert M. Spellman
Gregory S. Sosnovich
Ondar R. Tarlow
*Walter Tharp
Brian K. Vieaux
Aaron D. Wade
Thomas Wagner
Rick Warren
Marie-Therese Wynne
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Asterisk denotes managers and directors that have more than
10 years of service with Indymac. |